Back to Authors

Pitarc, Carla

Mayo Clinic

Indiana University School of Medicine

Citations 1

IMG-121. BraTS-Pathology 2024: Insights and Future Directions Informed by the AI-RANO & RANO-RGP Effort to Assess Glioblastoma Heterogeneity
Thakur, Siddhesh , Malec, Sylwia , Pitarc, Carla, Linardos, Akis , Innani, Shubham , Adap, Sanyukta, Moassefi, Mana, Nasrallah, MacLean P. , Gubbiotti, Maria A. , López, Giselle Y. , Karargyris, Alexandros , Kassem, Hasan, Miller, Michael L. , Baheti, Bhakti , Zhang, Juexin , Weng, Ying , Kumar, Rithik, Vinit, Vinit, Dhingra, Twinkle, Zahra, Syed Rameem , Sandino, Alvaro, Cooper, Lee , Bell, Robert , Faghani, Shahriar , Moassefi, Mana , Ahrendsen, Jared T. , Barresi, Valeria , Lucas, Calixto‐Hope G. , Chung, Verena , Miller, Michael, Pati, Sarthak , Wodziński, Marek , Müller, Henning , Chen, Ke , Kumar, Rithik, Arora, Madhav, Gupta, Ankur , Tiwari, Pallavi , Huse, Jason T. , Bakas, Spyridon

Neuro-Oncology | November 11, 2025 | Volume: 27 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v303-v304

10.1093/neuonc/noaf201.1200 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Glioblastoma is the most common malignant adult brain tumor with poor prognosis, largely due to its heterogeneous landscape. The AI-RANO and RANO-RGP groups organized the BraTS-Pathology 2024 challenge, providing a publicly-available dataset and a benchmarking environment for AI models to automatically identify six clinically-relevant histopathologic sub-regions in H&E-stained whole slide images (WSIs). METHODS We reclassified the TCGA-GBM and TCGA-LGG data according to the WHO 2021 criteria and identified diagnostic WSIs of 188 glioblastoma (IDH-wt, CNS WHO Gr.4) patients. A well-defined annotation protocol was communicated to eight neuropathologists, across eight institutions, who created “ground truth” annotations for Cellular Tumor (CT), Geographic Necrosis, Cortical Infiltration, Pseudopalisading Necrosis (PN), Microvascular Proliferation, and Penetration into White Matter (PWM). Comprehensive WSI curation for elimination of artifactual content and follow up partitioning resulted in approximately 300,000 data samples/patches. FINDINGS Inter-observer variability assessment highlighted difficulties in establishing a “gold standard”. The least annotated sub-regions (PWM and PN) were the most challenging to the participating methods, whereas all methods achieved their highest accuracy in the most annotated sub-region (CT). The highest average performance across sub-regions was obtained by a foundation model-based method. However, this top-ranked solution achieved an F1 score of 0.51 (Accuracy=0.65, Sensitivity=0.56, Specificity=0.93). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that achieving state-of-the-art performance, in automatically identifying clinically-relevant glioblastoma sub-regions, remains an unsolved research problem. Analysis of the ground-truth annotations underscores the critical need for more precisely defined and neuropathologically standardized annotation protocol. Current AI algorithms are facing difficulties in addressing glioblastoma’s heterogeneous histologic landscape in the absence of large, comprehensively, and consistently annotated data. Building upon these findings, and towards developing more accurate AI algorithms, the 2025 iteration of the BraTS-Path challenge is currently on-going by leveraging two million data samples, aiming to enhance our disease understanding and improve diagnostic accuracy, ultimately contributing to improved patient outcomes.