Back to Authors

Ikuta, Ichiro

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7145-833X

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic Hospital

Citations 9

Is Your Daily Workflow Inviting a Cyberattack?
Negrete, Lindsey, Maduram, Amy, Negrete, Lindsey , Maduram, Amy , Ikuta, Ichiro

American Journal of Roentgenology | September 9, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.2214/ajr.26.35847 Get It

Proton Density Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluation of Neurovascular Compression in Trigeminal Neuralgia
Koontz, Nicholas A. , Zhou, Yuxiang, Chen, Alicia M. , Ikuta, Ichiro , Zhou, Yuxiang , Cramer, Justin

Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B: Skull Base | February 27, 2026 | Volume: 87 | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1055/s-0046-1818872 Get It

Multisystemic Imaging Features of Coccidioidomycosis
Haug, Logan P. , Lang, Harrison, Naeem, Muhammad, Kawashima, Akira , Jokerst, Clinton, Ikuta, Ichiro , Long, Jeremiah R. , Sugi, Mark, Yano, Motoyo , Tan, Nelly , Zulfiqar, Maria, Kawashima, Akira , Sugi, Mark , Jokerst, Clinton E , Sugi, Mark D , Zulfiqar, Maria , Long, Jeremiah , Ikuta, Ichiro , Lang, Harrison

RadioGraphics | January 29, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.250064 Get It

An understanding of regions of endemicity and the spectrum of organ system involvement can improve recognition of the imaging features of coccidioidomycosis, which can overlap with those of other diseases.
The Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS-METS) Challenge 2023: Brain Metastasis Segmentation on Pre-treatment MRI
Janas, Anastasia , Baid, Ujjwal , Ramakrishnan, Divya , Saluja, Rachit , Ashraf, Nader, Maleki, Nazanin , Yordanov, Nikolay , Fehringer, Pascal, Gkampenis, Athanasios , Amiruddin, Raisa, Adewole, Maruf , Albrecht, Jake, Anazodo, Udunna, Anwar, Syed Muhammad, Bergquist, Timothy , Chiang, Veronica , Eddy, J. Mark , Ezhov, Ivan , Khalili, Nastaran, Jiang, Zhifan , Johanson, Elaine, Kazerooni, Anahita Fathi , Krantchev, Kiril, Linguraru, Marius George , Liu, Xinyang , Meier, Zeke, Moy, Harrison, Osenberg, Klara , Reitman, Zachary, Shinohara, Russell Takeshi, Wang, Chunhao , Shafique, Umber, Willms, Klara, Avesta, Arman , Bousabarah, Khaled , Chakrabarty, Satrajit , Gennaro, Nicolò , Holler, Wolfgang, Lost, Jan , Marcus, Daniel S. , Maresca, R, Merkaj, Sarah, Pedersen, Gabriel Cassinelli, Reppert, Marc von , Teytelboym, Oleg M., Tillmans, Niklas, Westerhoff, Malte , Youssef, Ayda , Pflüger, Irada, Perez-Carillo, Gloria J. Guzman, Memon, Fatima, Krycia, Mark, Patro, Satya Narayana , Petrović, Bojan , Schrickel, E. Brooke, Besada, Cristina , Chu, Sammy, Dusoi, Alexandru, Farage, Luciano , Fong, Amy, Gray, R. Ian, Krumpelman, Chase, Lincoln, Christie M. , Maros, Máté E. , Morón, Fanny , Nimchinsky, Esther A. , Patel, Uresh, Rohatgi, Saurabh , Sayah, Anousheh , Schwartz, Eric D. , Shiroishi, Mark S. , Valerie, Jewels, White, Matthew L. , Zohrabian, Vahe M. , Brüßeler, Melanie, Ghonim, Mohamed, Okar, Abdullah , Pasquini, L. , Soumala, Theodora, Taherzadeh, Mahsa , Vollmuth, Philipp, Foltyn, Martha , Abayazeed, Aly, Dellepiane, Francesco , Verdier, Maria Correia de , Al-Rubaiey, Sanaria, Ashraf, Kholod, Asla, Moamen M., Badawy, Mohamed , Lomer, Nima Broomand , Bukatz, Jan, Chen, Jim, Cimflová, Petra , Corr, Felix, Crawley, Alexis, Deptula, Lisa, Elakhdar, Tasneem, Shawali, Islam H., Frick, Alexandra, Haider, Muhammad Ammar , Hierro, Fátima , Jacobs, Sarah Maria, Hsieh, Kuang-chun Jim, Kersting, Katharina , Kida, Laura, Kollia, Sofia , Koukoulithras, Ioannis, Li, Xiao , Abouelatta, Ahmed, Mansour, Aya, Maria-Zamfirescu, Ruxandra-Catrinel, Marsiglia, Marcela , Mateo-Camacho, Yohana Sarahi , McArthur, Mark J., McDonnell, Olivia, McHugh, M, Moassefi, Mana , Morsi, Samah Mostafa, Munteanu, Alexander , Naqvi, Syed Raza, Nikanpour, Yalda , Alnoury, Mostafa , Nouh, Abdullah Mohamed Aly, Pappafava, Francesca, Patel, Markand D., Petrucci, S. , Rawie, Eric, Raymond, Scott B. , Roohani, Borna, Sabouhi, Sadeq, Sánchez‐García, Laura , Shaked, Zoe , Altes, Talissa A. , Isufi, Edvin , Dhemesh, Yaseen , Gass, Jaime, Thacker, Jonathan, Tarabishy, Abdul , Turner, Benjamin , Worede, Fikadu , Yousry, Sara, Lerebo, Wondwossen , Aristizábal, Alejandro , Karargyris, Alexandros , Kassem, Hasan , Sheller, Micah , Link, Katherine E. , Moawad, Ahmed W. , Ashraf, Nader, Jekel, Leon , Manteghinejad, Amirreza , Aneja, Sanjay , Anwar, Syed Muhammad, Chung, Verena , Conte, Gian Marco , Dako, Farouk , Eddy, James, Khalili, Nastaran, Farahani, Keyvan , Iglesias, Juan Eugenio , Kofler, Florian , LaBella, Dominic , Leemput, Koen Van , Li, Hongwei , Meier, Zeke, Menze, Bjoern H. , Piraud, Marie , Shinohara, Russell Taki , Wiestler, Benedikt , Wiggins, Walter F. , Kaur, Manpreet , LaMontagne, Pamela , Lin, MingDe , Maresca, Ryan, Petersen, Gabriel Cassinelli , Sotiras, Aristeidis , Godfrey, Devon , Floyd, Scott , Rauschecker, Andreas M. , Villanueva-Meyer, Javier E. , Cho, Jaeyoung , Bendszus, Martin , Brugnara, Gianluca , Cramer, Justin , Johnson, Derek R. , Kam, Anthony , Kwan, Benjamin Y. M. , Lai, Lillian M. , Lall, Neil , So, Tiffany Y. , Thompson, Gerard , Wu, Lei , Bansal, Anu , Barkhof, Frederik , Druzgal, T. Jason , Feltrin, Fabrício Stewan , Fung, Steve H. , Ikuta, Ichiro , Iv, Michael , Postma, Alida A. , Mahajan, Amit Kumar , Joyner, David , Létourneau‐Guillon, Laurent , Miller, Elka , Özsarlak, Ö. , Saha, Atin , Shih, Robert , Small, Juan E. , Tanwar, Manoj , Weinberg, Brent D. , Young, Robert J. , Azizova, Aynur , Ghonim, Mohanad , Ghonim, Mohamed, Sharifi, Yasaman , Singh, Gagandeep, Sollmann, Nico , Vollmuth, Philipp, Foltyn‐Dumitru, Martha , Malhotra, Ajay , Lohmann, Philipp , Pérez‐García, Víctor M. , Elhalawani, Hesham M. , Duarte Armindo, Rui , Asla, Moamen M., Bisschop, Jeroen , Faghani, Shahriar , Gulati, Vaibhav , Dahl, Rasmus Holmboe , McArthur, Mark, McHugh, Maire, Moassefi, Mana , Nandolia, Khanak , Petrucci, Samantha, Sanchez-Garcia, Laura M., Suthar, Pokhraj Prakashchandra , Vacca, Sebastiano , Vilanilam, George K. , Warren, Daniel, Weiss, David, Pati, Sarthak , Calabrese, Evan , Tahon, Nourel Hoda , Nada, Ayman , Velichko, Yury , Bakas, Spyridon , Rudie, Jeffrey D. , Aboian, Mariam

Machine Learning for Biomedical Imaging | June 26, 2025 | Volume: 3 | Issue: December 2025 | Pages: 204-247

10.59275/j.melba.2025-9bd3 Get It

The translation of AI-generated brain metastases (BM) segmentation into clinical practice relies heavily on diverse, high-quality annotated medical imaging datasets. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge has gained momentum for testing and benchmarking algorithms using rigorously annotated internationally compiled real-world datasets. This study presents the results of the segmentation challenge and characterizes the challenging cases that impacted the performance of the winning algorithms. Untreated brain metastases on standard anatomic MRI sequences (T1, T2, FLAIR, T1PG) from eight contributed international datasets were annotated in stepwise method: published UNET algorithms, student, neuroradiologist, final approver neuroradiologist. Segmentations were ranked based on lesion-wise Dice and Hausdorff distance (HD95) scores. False positives (FP) and false negatives (FN) were rigorously penalized, receiving a score of 0 for Dice and a fixed penalty of 374 for HD95. The mean scores for the teams were calculated. Eight datasets comprising 1303 studies were annotated, with 402 studies (3076 lesions) released on Synapse as publicly available datasets to challenge competitors. Additionally, 31 studies (139 lesions) were held out for validation, and 59 studies (218 lesions) were used for testing. Segmentation accuracy was measured as rank across subjects, with the winning team achieving a LesionWise mean score of 7.9. The Dice score for the winning team was 0.65 ± 0.25. Common errors among the leading teams included false negatives for small lesions and misregistration of masks in space. The Dice scores and lesion detection rates of all algorithms diminished with decreasing tumor size, particularly for tumors smaller than 100 mm3. In conclusion, algorithms for BM segmentation require further refinement to balance high sensitivity in lesion detection with the minimization of false positives and negatives. The BraTS-METS 2023 challenge successfully curated well- annotated, diverse datasets and identified common errors, facilitating the translation of BM segmentation across varied environments and providing the tools for future development of personalized volumetric reports to patients undergoing BM treatment.
Artificial Intelligence Image Artifacts: A Call to Label AI Images
Matthees, Nicholas , Zhou, Yuxiang , Ikuta, Ichiro , Matthees, Nicholas , Zhou, Yuxiang , Ikuta, Ichiro

Radiology: Artificial Intelligence | June 4, 2025 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/ryai.250235 Get It

Intensity-Based Assessment of Hippocampal Segmentation Algorithms Using Paired Precontrast and Postcontrast MRI
Cramer, Justin , Baxter, Leslie C. , Lang, Harrison, Parker, Jonathon J. , Matthees, Nicholas , Ikuta, Ichiro , Wang, Yalin , Parker, Jonathon, Chen, Alicia , Matthees, Nicholas , Ikuta, Ichiro , Wang, Yalin , Baxter, Leslie C. , Lang, Harrison, Chen, Alicia M. , Zhou, Yuxiang

Bioengineering | March 4, 2025 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 258

10.3390/bioengineering12030258 Get It

Hippocampal segmentation is essential in neuroimaging for evaluating conditions like Alzheimer’s dementia and mesial temporal sclerosis, where small volume changes can significantly impact normative percentiles. However, inaccurate segmentation is common due to the inclusion of non-hippocampal structures such as choroid plexus and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), leading to volumetric overestimation and confounding of functional analyses. Current methods of assessment largely rely on virtual or manual ground truth labels, which can fail to capture these inaccuracies. To address this shortcoming, this study introduces a more direct voxel intensity-based method of segmentation assessment. Using paired precontrast and postcontrast T1-weighted MRIs, hippocampal segmentations were refined by adding marginal gray matter and removing marginal CSF and enhancement to determine a total required correction volume. Six segmentation algorithms—e2dhipseg, HippMapp3r, hippodeep, AssemblyNet, FastSurfer, and QuickNat—were implemented and compared. HippMapp3r and e2dhipseg, followed closely by hippodeep, exhibited the least total correction volumes, indicating superior accuracy. Dedicated hippocampal segmentation algorithms outperformed whole-brain methods.
How to Implement Clinical 7T MRI—Practical Considerations and Experience with Ultra-High-Field MRI
Cramer, Justin , Ikuta, Ichiro , Ikuta, Ichiro , Zhou, Yuxiang

Bioengineering | December 5, 2024 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 12 | Pages: 1228

10.3390/bioengineering11121228 Get It

The implementation of clinical 7T MRI presents both opportunities and challenges for advanced medical imaging. This tutorial provides practical considerations and experiences with 7T MRI in clinical settings. We first explore the history and evolution of MRI technology, highlighting the benefits of increased signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and susceptibility at 7T. Technical challenges such as increased susceptibility artifacts and RF inhomogeneity are also discussed, along with innovative adaptations. This review also discusses hardware and software considerations, including new parallel transmission head coils and advanced image processing techniques to optimize image quality. Safety considerations, such as managing tissue heating and susceptibility to artifacts, are also discussed. Additionally, clinical applications of 7T MRI are examined, focusing on neurological conditions such as epilepsy, multiple sclerosis, and vascular imaging. Emerging trends in the use of 7T MRI for spectroscopy, perfusion imaging, and multinuclear imaging are explored, with insights into the future of ultra-high-field MRI in clinical practice. This review aims to provide clinicians, technologists, and researchers with a roadmap for successfully implementing 7T MRI in both research and clinical environments.
Evolution and implementation of radiographic response criteria in neuro-oncology
Ramakrishnan, Divya , Reppert, Marc von , Krycia, Mark, Sala, Matthew, Mueller, Sabine , Nabavizadeh, Ali , Lohmann, Philipp , Raji, Cyrus A. , Ikuta, Ichiro , Memon, Fatima, Aboian, Mariam , Nabavizadeh, Ali , Galldiks, Norbert , Lohmann, Philipp , Aboian, Mariam S , Ikuta, Ichiro , Aneja, Sanjay , Weinberg, Brent D.

Neuro-Oncology Advances | September 13, 2023 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/noajnl/vdad118 Get It

Abstract Radiographic response assessment in neuro-oncology is critical in clinical practice and trials. Conventional criteria, such as the MacDonald and response assessment in neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria, rely on bidimensional (2D) measurements of a single tumor cross-section. Although RANO criteria are established for response assessment in clinical trials, there is a critical need to address the complexity of brain tumor treatment response with multiple new approaches being proposed. These include volumetric analysis of tumor compartments, structured MRI reporting systems like the Brain Tumor Reporting and Data System, and standardized approaches to advanced imaging techniques to distinguish tumor response from treatment effects. In this review, we discuss the strengths and limitations of different neuro-oncology response criteria and summarize current research findings on the role of novel response methods in neuro-oncology clinical trials and practice.
P13.02.A APPLICATION OF NOVEL PACS-BASED INFORMATICS PLATFORM TO IDENTIFY IMAGING BASED PREDICTORS OF CDKN2A ALLELIC STATUS IN GLIOBLASTOMAS
Tillmanns, Niklas , Lost, Jan , Vasandani, Sagar, Vetsa, Shaurey , Marianayagam, Neelan J. , Yalçın, Kendal , Erson-Omay, Zeynep, Reppert, Marc von , Merkaj, Sara , Ramakrishnan, Divya , Avesta, Arman , Santo, Irene Dixe de Oliveira , Bousabarah, Khaled , Turowski, Bernd , Aboian, Mariam , Moliterno, Jennifer , Aboian, Mariam S , Dixe de Oliveira Santo, Irene , Tabor, Jacek , Yalcin, K, Erson-Omay, Zeynep , Jekel, Leon , Jin, Lei , Hüttner, Anita , Ikuta, Ichiro , Lin, MingDe , Aneja, Sanjay

Neuro-Oncology | September 8, 2023 | Volume: 25 | Issue: Supplement_2 | Pages: ii100-ii101

10.1093/neuonc/noad137.336 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND Gliomas with CDKN2A mutations are known to have worse prognosis but imaging features of these gliomas are unknown. Our goal is to identify CDKN2A specific qualitative imaging biomarkers in glioblastomas using a new informatics workflow that enables rapid analysis of qualitative imaging features with Visually AcceSAble Rembrandtr Images (VASARI) for large datasets in PACS. Gliomas with CDKN2A mutations are known to have worse prognosis but imaging features of these gliomas are unknown. Our goal is to identify CDKN2A specific qualitative imaging biomarkers in glioblastomas using a new informatics workflow that enables rapid analysis of qualitative imaging features withVisually AcceSAble Rembrandtr Images (VASARI) for large datasets in PACS. MATERIAL AND METHODS Sixty nine patients undergoing GBM resection with CDKN2A status determined by whole-exome sequencing were included. GBMs on magnetic resonance images were automatically 3D segmented using deep learning algorithmsincorporated within PACS. VASARI features were assessed using FHIR forms integrated within PACS. RESULTS GBMs without CDKN2A alterations were significantly larger (64% vs. 30%, p=0.007) compared to tumors with homozygous deletion (HOMDEL) and heterozygous loss (HETLOSS). Lesions larger than 8 cm were four times more likely to have no CDKN2A alteration (OR: 4.3; 95% CI:1.5-12.1; p<0.001). The pial invasion was predictive of HOMDEL (OR: 8.1, 95% CI: 1.8-53.2; p<0.012) as tumors with pial invasion were eight times more likely to be HOMDEL, even after adjusting for deep white matter and subependymal invasion. CONCLUSION We developed a novel integrated PACS informatics platform for the assessment of GBM molecular subtypes and show that tumors with HOMDEL are more likely to have radiographic evidence of pial invasion and less likely to have deep white matter invasion or subependymal invasion. These imaging features may allow noninvasive identification of CDKN2A allele status.