Phillips, Joanna J.

Abstract Oligodendrogliomas are initially slow-growing brain tumors that are prone to malignant transformation despite surgery and cytotoxic therapy. Understanding of oligodendroglioma evolution and new treatments for patients have been encumbered by a paucity of patient-matched newly diagnosed and recurrent tumor samples for multiplatform analyses, and by a lack of preclinical models for interrogation of therapeutic vulnerabilities that drive oligodendroglioma growth. Here we integrate spatial and functional analyses of tumor samples and patient-derived organoid co-cultures to show that synaptic connectivity is a hallmark of oligodendroglioma evolution and recurrence. We find that patient-matched recurrent oligodendrogliomas are enriched in synaptic gene expression programs irrespective of previous therapy or histologic grade. Analyses of spatial, single-cell, and clinical data reveal epigenetic misactivation of synaptic genes that are concentrated in regions of cortical infiltration and can be used to predict eventual oligodendroglioma recurrence. To translate these findings to patients, we show that local field potentials from tumor-infiltrated cortex at the time of resection and neuronal hyperexcitability and synchrony in patient-derived organoid co-cultures are associated with oligodendroglioma proliferation and recurrence. In preclinical models, we find that neurophysiologic drugs block oligodendroglioma growth and pathologic electrophysiology. These results elucidate mechanisms underlying oligodendroglioma evolution from an indolent tumor to a fatal disease and shed light on new biomarkers and new treatments for patients.

Importance Molecular techniques, including next-generation sequencing, genomic copy number profiling, fusion transcript detection, and genomic DNA methylation arrays, are now indispensable tools for the workup of central nervous system (CNS) tumors. Yet there remains a great deal of heterogeneity in using such biomarker testing across institutions and hospital systems. This is in large part because there is a persistent reluctance among third-party payers to cover molecular testing. The objective of this Review is to describe why comprehensive molecular biomarker testing is now required for the accurate diagnosis and grading and prognostication of CNS tumors and, in so doing, to justify more widespread use by clinicians and coverage by third-party payers. Observations The 5th edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification system for CNS tumors incorporates specific molecular signatures into the essential diagnostic criteria for most tumor entities. Many CNS tumor types cannot be reliably diagnosed according to current WHO guidelines without molecular testing. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network also incorporates molecular testing into their guidelines for CNS tumors. Both sets of guidelines are maximally effective if they are implemented routinely for all patients with CNS tumors. Moreover, the cost of these tests is less than 5% of the overall average cost of caring for patients with CNS tumors and consistently improves management. This includes more accurate diagnosis and prognostication, clinical trial eligibility, and prediction of response to specific treatments. Each major group of CNS tumors in the WHO classification is evaluated and how molecular diagnostics enhances patient care is described. Conclusions and Relevance Routine advanced multidimensional molecular profiling is now required to provide optimal standard of care for patients with CNS tumors.

Abstract Current standard of care for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) includes maximal safe resection, adjuvant radiation, and chemotherapy with the alkylating agent temozolomide. A subset of gliomas treated with temozolomide develop somatic hypermutation with a predominance of C>T transitions due to the alkylation effects on DNA. However, the frequency of occurrence, clinical ramifications, and predictive biomarkers for developing temozolomide-induced hypermutation (TMZ-HM) in GBM are unknown. Here we performed comprehensive histopathologic, genomic, and epigenomic evaluation of paired initial and recurrent GBM from 106 patients. Seven patients (7%) developed hypermutation at time of first recurrence, while an additional five patients (5%) developed hypermutation at a subsequent recurrence. Patients who developed TMZ-HM had a significantly longer interval between initial surgery and first recurrence (27.8 vs. 9.9 months, p<0.001). In contrast to IDH-mutant gliomas where TMZ-HM is associated with poor prognosis, those patients with IDH-wildtype GBM who developed TMZ-HM had significantly longer overall survival from both initial surgery (67.9 vs. 20.3 months, p<0.001) and from time of recurrence after development of hypermutation (30.9 vs. 9.5 months, p=0.001). There was no difference in oncogenic alteration frequency in initial GBM that subsequently developed TMZ-HM. However, 4 specific CpG sites out of 12 total interrogated sites in the promoter region of MGMT (a DNA repair enzyme) and 5 specific CpG sites in the promoter region of KCNQ1DN (a negative regulator of c-Myc) were significantly more hypermethylated in those GBM that developed TMZ-HM. We then generated a weighted risk score across these CpG sites that can be used to prospectively identify GBM likely to develop TMZ-HM associated with favorable survival. In summary, patients with GBM that develop TMZ-HM follow a more favorable clinical course, and specific MGMT and KCNQ1DN promoter hypermethylation patterns could serve as a biomarker to identify these patients who may potentially benefit from extended alkylating chemotherapy treatment.

Abstract Background Tumor heterogeneity underlies resistance and disease progression in glioblastoma (GBM), and tumors most commonly recur adjacent to the surgical resection margins in contrast non-enhancing (NE) regions. To date, no targeted therapies have meaningfully altered overall patient survival in the up-front setting. The aim of this study was to characterize intratumoral heterogeneity in recurrent GBM using bulk samples from primary resection and recurrent samples taken from contrast-enhancing (EN) and contrast NE regions. Methods Whole exome and RNA sequencing were performed on matched bulk primary and multiple recurrent EN and NE tumor samples from 16 GBM patients who received standard of care treatment alone or in combination with investigational clinical trial regimens. Results Private mutations emerge across multi-region sampling in recurrent tumors. Genomic clonal analysis revealed increased enrichment in gene alterations regulating the G2M checkpoint, Kras signaling, Wnt signaling, and DNA repair in recurrent disease. Subsequent functional studies identified augmented PI3K/AKT transcriptional and protein activity throughout progression, validated by phospho-protein levels. Moreover, a mesenchymal transcriptional signature was observed in recurrent EN regions, which differed from the proneural signature in recurrent NE regions. Conclusions Subclonal populations observed within bulk resected primary GBMs transcriptionally evolve across tumor recurrence (EN and NE regions) and exhibit aberrant gene expression of common signaling pathways that persist despite standard or targeted therapy. Our findings provide evidence that there are both adaptive and clonally mediated dependencies of GBM on key pathways, such as the PI3K/AKT axis, for survival across recurrences.

Abstract While genomic profiling and therapeutic selection support individualized GBM treatment, such therapeutic decision-making is usually made with reference to tumor obtained from the enhancing core region. GBM is known to be heterogeneous and exhibits a high resistance to standard therapies. To address whether non-enhancing tumor (representing the majority of tumor left behind after surgery) shows distinct genomic characteristics and therapeutic targets compared to the enhancing tumor core, we performed genome-wide exome-sequencing and RNA-sequencing for 12 patients with matched enhancing region and at least one non-enhancing region. Non-enhancing biopsies show a surprisingly high level of tumor content, with a median of 28% tumor cells and 6 of the 22 samples having greater than 50% tumor cells. Cognate non-enhancing and enhancing specimens demonstrated overall concordance in therapeutically actionable alterations (single nucleotide variants) and copy number alterations. However, non-enhancing regions were not genetically identical and did reveal additional and distinct variants compared to enhancing cores. For example, the non-enhancing region of patient 1 showed two nonsense NF1 mutations (R1534X; R2517X) while the enhancing region showed an NF1 frameshift mutation (F1247fs). Clonality analysis by LumosVar also indicated that 7 out of 12 patients harbored dissimilar cellular prevalence patterns between enhancing and non-enhancing regions. In addition, comparison of alternative polyadenylation between enhancing and non-enhancing regions uncovered distinct 3' UTR usage: e.g. SGMS2 and TOB1 tended to have longer 3' UTR in enhancing regions whereas longer 3' UTR of SYNPO and NOS1AP were prevalent in non-enhancing regions. We posit that the enhancing component of glioblastoma probably underrepresents the genomic alterations in patients' tumors. Given non-enhancing tumor is left behind after surgical debulking, genomic profiling of this region would potentially reveal more accurate tumor vulnerabilities and lead to more effective therapy. Supported by a grant from the Ben & Catherine Ivy Foundation. Citation Format: Sen Peng, Rebecca Halperin, Harshil Dhruv, Sara Byron, Christophe Legendre, Joanna Phillips, Michael Prados, Michael Berens, Nhan Tran. Probing the non-enhancing component of glioblastoma: Targeting what is left behind [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 289.

Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma is an aggressive and molecularly heterogeneous cancer with few effective treatment options. We hypothesized that next-generation sequencing can be used to guide treatment recommendations within a clinically acceptable time frame following surgery for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Experimental Design: We conducted a prospective genomics-informed feasibility trial in adults with recurrent and progressive glioblastoma. Following surgical resection, genome-wide tumor/normal exome sequencing and tumor RNA sequencing were performed to identify molecular targets for potential matched therapy. A multidisciplinary molecular tumor board issued treatment recommendations based on the genomic results, blood–brain barrier penetration of the indicated therapies, drug–drug interactions, and drug safety profiles. Feasibility of generating genomics-informed treatment recommendations within 35 days of surgery was assessed. Results: Of the 20 patients enrolled in the study, 16 patients had sufficient tumor tissue for analysis. Exome sequencing was completed for all patients, and RNA sequencing was completed for 14 patients. Treatment recommendations were provided within the study's feasibility time frame for 15 of 16 (94%) patients. Seven patients received treatment based on the tumor board recommendations. Two patients reached 12-month progression-free survival, both adhering to treatments based on the molecular profiling results. One patient remained on treatment and progression free 21 months after surgery, 3 times longer than the patient's previous time to progression. Analysis of matched nonenhancing tissue from 12 patients revealed overlapping as well as novel putatively actionable genomic alterations. Conclusions: Use of genome-wide molecular profiling is feasible and can be informative for guiding real-time, central nervous system–penetrant, genomics-informed treatment recommendations for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res; 24(2); 295–305. ©2017 AACR. See related commentary by Wick and Kessler, p. 256