Peng, Kah-Whye

Abstract Purpose: VV1 is designed to induce selective oncolysis of tumor cells and amplify cellular antitumor immune responses. This open-label, phase I, multicenter clinical trial assessed the safety and tolerability of VV1 monotherapy administered intratumorally or intravenously or administered intravenously in combination with avelumab. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received intratumoral (n = 27) or intravenous VV1 monotherapy (n = 33) or intravenous VV1 plus avelumab (n = 16). Infusion durations (15–180 minutes) and viral dose (1.7 × 1010 or 1 × 1011 TCID50) were also evaluated. Study objectives included VV1 safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, preliminary efficacy, and immune responses. Results: Intratumoral and intravenous VV1 were well tolerated, and injection reactions were infrequent. The most common adverse events of any grade related to VV1 were cytokine release syndrome (58%), fatigue (33%), and decreased lymphocyte count (32%). Virus infection of tumors was confirmed by NIS imaging and increases in serum levels of virally encoded interferon-β (IFNβ). Histologic tumor analysis at 28 days after intratumoral VV1 administration indicated increases in tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Two durable partial responses were recorded: a patient with pheochromocytoma after one intravenous dose of VV1 and a patient with thymic cancer in the combination arm. Stable disease was observed in 17 of 49 patients (34.7%) who received intravenous VV1. Conclusions: This first-in-human study demonstrates that intratumoral or intravenous VV1 administration had an acceptable safety profile as monotherapy and intravenously in combination with avelumab. There is preliminary antitumor activity. Intratumoral VV1 plus cemiplimab is now showing promise in the neoadjuvant setting. Significance: VV1 is a tumor-selective oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express IFNβ and the thyroidal NIS reporter gene. In this phase I study, we have demonstrated that a single administration of VV1, as a monotherapy or with an immune checkpoint inhibitor is safe, infects tumor lesions resulting in intratumoral infiltration of immune cells, and exhibits early signs of antitumor activity in patients with advanced unresectable and metastatic solid tumors.

Abstract Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is a transformative treatment for hematologic malignancies. However, ex vivo autologous CAR T cell manufacturing presents substantial logistical and clinical challenges. Direct in vivo CAR-T cell engineering offers a new paradigm for CAR T delivery. We recently developed the CD3-targeted lentiviral vector LV-169 which can deliver a CAR transgene to resting niche-resident T cells in lymphoid tissues. LV169 is pseudotyped with a mix of chimeric and nonchimeric VSV-G proteins detargeted (blinded) from the natural LDL receptor and re-targeted to T cells through the display of a CD3-specific scFv. Here we demonstrate that LV169 can specifically deliver a functional aBCMA-CAR transgene to resting human T cells in PBMC cultures from the healthy volunteers and from multiple myeloma patients. For clinical translation, we selected an αBCMA-CAR construct comprising a fully human single heavy chain nanobody linked to 41BB and CD3z cytoplasmic signaling domains. Human T cells expressing this CAR construct have low tonic signaling and efficiently kill BCMA-positive myeloma target cells with similar or lower associated cytokine release compared to a clinically relevant benchmark BCMA-CAR. To further improve LV169 and to minimize CAR protein incorporation in the LV envelope which may lead undesirably to myeloma cell transduction, we placed the CAR transgene under a T-cell specific Lck promoter in reverse orientation relative to the 5' LTR. The transcriptional activity of the Lck promoter was comparable to that of a constitutive EF1a promoter in primary T cells and, in contrast to EF1a had minimal activity in a variety of other tested cell types including the HEK293T producer cell line and the THP-1 monocytic cell line. Western blotting confirmed the absence of CAR protein in LV particles (LVP) generated using the Lck promoter-driven reverse orientation construct. In contrast, high levels of CAR protein were detected in LVP generated using the parental EF1a promoter-driven construct. The LV-incorporated CAR protein mediated off-target gene delivery to BCMA-positive myeloma cells. The therapeutic efficacy of intravenously administered LV169 LV particles carrying BCMA-CAR constructs was tested in the OPM-2 human multiple myeloma xenograft model. NSG mice with knockout of MHC-I and MHC-II, and with advanced disseminated OPM-2-Luc tumors were engrafted with human PBMC one week prior to intravenous LV169-BCMA-CAR administration. Mice were treated with single intravenous injection of LV169 at different doses 3 weeks after tumor engraftment. OPM-2-Luc tumor burden was monitored by regular luciferase imaging. All treated mice cleared their tumors within 28-days following LV administration and the rate of clearance was correlated to the LV particle dose. Even at the 4e8 dose level (by p24) tumors were completely cleared. Eighty four days post-treatment the treated mice remained tumor-free and resisted re-challenge with OPM-2 tumor cells. Circulating CAR-T cells, monitored by flow cytometry, became detectable by 14 dpi and peaked between 21-35 dpi. Following tumor clearance, the number of circulating CAR-T cells declined dramatically. The treatment was well tolerated and analysis of cytokines associated with CAR-T cell cytotoxicity confirmed the absence of a severe cytokine storm. IFNγ was the only cytokine which was elevated during the expansion period of CAR-T cells, while IL-2, IL-6, TNFα and GM-CSF were barely detectable. In summary the characteristics of our new developed LV169-based platform make it suitable for further clinical translation which is underway.

Abstract Direct in vivo T cell engineering offers a new paradigm for CAR T delivery. We have evaluated several approaches to engineer lentiviral (LV) vectors capable of delivering CAR transgenes directly and selectively to T cells in vivo, within the lymphoid niche. Our goal was to develop an LV delivery platform that following intravenous administration can selectively bind and activate T cells, deliver and integrate the (CAR) transgene into genomic DNA, and drive CAR expression on the T cell surface. Further requirements were that the retargeted LV should be associated with minimal off-target transduction of tumor cells and normal host tissues and should be manufacturable at titers sufficient for human application. Our strategy for retargeting has been to modify the trimeric VSV-G protein, which is well established for efficient LV pseudotyping. Of the approaches evaluated, three retargeting platforms have proven to be effective: direct covalent display, indirect covalent display, and G-capping. Direct covalent display. This (LV-169) approach uses chimeric VSV-G protein that contains a CD3-targeting ligand displayed as a N-terminal extension of VSV-G protein that has been mutated to ablate (blind) its interaction with the LDL receptor. Chimeric and nonchimeric blinded G proteins are co- incorporated into LV particles within mixed envelopes which bind to CD3. Upon binding to cell surface CD3, the engineered particles activate T-cells and enter acidifying endosomes, whereupon they trigger membrane fusion and deliver their payloads. LV-169 displaying an anti-human CD3 scFv selectively transduced resting human T cells in PBMC cultures, in fresh human whole blood and following intravenous administration to humanized mice. In immunocompetent Cre reporter mice, surrogate vectors displaying anti-murine CD3 scFv selectively transduced lymph node resident T cells, with off-target transduction being limited to tissue-resident macrophages. To eliminate the incorporation of CAR protein into the LV-169 envelope, which can lead to highly undesirable transduction of tumor cells expressing the CAR target, we placed the CAR transgene in reverse to 5'LTR orientation, downstream of a T-cell specific promoter/enhancer. In vivo efficacy of LV-169-BCMA-CAR was demonstrated in humanized mice bearing disseminated OPM-2 myeloma tumors. Clinical translation of this construct is now underway. Indirect covalent display. In this G-protein engineering approach, a short peptide (SPY-tag) is displayed as an N-terminal extension of the LDLR-blinded VSV-G protein. The SPY-tagged LV vectors are then covalently modified to display a CD3-targeting ligand by simply mixing them at room temperature with a bifunctional fusion protein consisting of the SPY-catcher and the CD3 ligand. Under these conditions, the SPY-catcher and the SPY-tag spontaneously form a covalent isopeptide bond. The CD3 ligand-modified LV particles were shown to specifically activate and transduce T cells ex vivo within human PBMC cultures. G-capping. In the final approach, the VSV-G protein is not genetically modified. Instead, a “capping” protein crosslinker that binds directly to the unmodified G protein on preformed LV particles is used to mask their LDLR binding sites and redirect them to interact with CD3. Mixing of the CD3-targeted capping protein with traditional G-pseudotyped LV particles leads to efficient binding of the cap to the trimeric G proteins. The cap-modified LV are unable to interact with LDLR but interact efficiently with CD3. CD3-capped LV particles were highly specific and efficient in human T cell activation and transduction in PBMC cultures. The association between the G protein and the bound cap is highly stable during freeze-thaw cycles and at room temperature, a critical attribute of this platform to facilitate the manufacture of a clinically and commercially viable LV product. In summary, we have developed three translationally relevant platform technologies for the generation of LV particles capable of delivering CAR transgenes specifically and efficiently to resting niche-resident T cells after intravenous administration. Manufacturing studies are underway and, in the case of the LV-169 platform, clinical translation is already in progress.

Although the live-attenuated measles virus (MeV) is one of the safest and most efficacious human vaccines, a measles-vectored COVID-19 vaccine candidate expressing the SARS-CoV-2 spike failed to elicit neutralizing antibody (nAb) responses in a phase-1 clinical trial, especially in measles-immune individuals. Here, we constructed a comprehensive panel of MeV-based COVID-19 vaccine candidates using a MeV with extensive modifications on the envelope glycoproteins (MeV-MR). We show that artificial trimerization of the spike is critical for the induction of nAbs and that their magnitude can be significantly augmented when the spike protein is synchronously fused to a dodecahedral scaffold. Furthermore, preexisting measles immunity did not abolish heterologous immunity elicited by our vector. Our results highlight the importance of antigen optimization in the development of spike-based COVID-19 vaccines and therapies.

Background: Oncolytic virotherapy, an innovative immunomodulatory therapeutic approach, is currently being investigated for its potential in treating relapsed refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. This study focuses on the use of an engineered Vesicular Stomatitis Virus called VSV-IFNβ-NIS, a bullet-shaped rhabdovirus which encodes both interferon beta (IFNβ) and sodium iodine symporter (NIS) with particular tumor cell tropism. Viral IFNβ serves as an indicator of viral proliferation and boosts the host's anti-tumor immune response. This is a phase 1 clinical trial with the identifier NCT03017820, wherein patients (pts) with R/R multiple myeloma (MM), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) are treated with a single systemic administration of VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Study Design and Methods: Patient Eligibility Criteria: The Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board approved the protocol. The study includes adult patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MM), or T-cell lymphoma (TCL). For MM or plasmacytoma, patients should have <15% plasma cells and a largest diameter of <5 cm. TCL patients should have a mass <5 cm. Study Design: This is a single-center phase 1 trial aiming to determine the maximum tolerated dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS in patients with R/R MM, and TCL. Secondary objectives included assessing the safety profile and estimating the clinical response rate of VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Correlative objectives involved monitoring viral replication through plasma IFN-β transgene levels and using SPECT/CT imaging with the NIS gene. Viral genomes were measured through quantitative reverse transcription (qRT) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of VSV RNA, and any virus shedding was examined in body fluids. The tested doses were 5 × 109 TCID50, 1.7 × 1010, 5 × 1010, and 1.7 × 1011 TCID50. The virus was administered via IV infusion over 30 minutes, and patients received 650 mg acetaminophen and 50 mg diphenhydramine hydrochloride before infusion and every 6 hours for 24 hours to manage fever and hypotension. Two expansion cohorts at DL4 have been added (20 additional PTCL, 10 B-cell lymphoma and histiocytic neoplasms) to obtain additional data on tolerability and efficacy and biomarkers of response in these histologies. Safety and Response Assessments: All patients undergo toxicity evaluation, and adverse events (AEs) assessment using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4 criteria, except for cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading, which follows the 2014 Lee criteria. Dose escalation and tolerability are based on the standard 3+3 phase 1 trial design. Ruxolitinib is added from days 2-5 or day -1 to day 9 depending on the arm to mitigate IFNβ toxicity. Response assessment followed the International Myeloma Working Group criteria for MM and the Lugano Classification for NHL and histiocytic neoplasms. Pharmacodynamic and Pharmacokinetic Analyses: For viremia and viral shedding assessment, RNA is isolated from whole blood, mouth rinse, buccal swabs, and urine samples. Quantitative RT-PCR determined VSV-nucleocapsid (N) RNA copy number, and virus shedding is assessed through coculturing samples on Vero cells. Anti-VSV antibodies are evaluated using the standard plaque reduction neutralization assay. Plasma cytokine levels are measured with a 30-plex human cytokine kit, and human IFN-β levels is quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit. Statistical Analysis: Incidence of dose-limiting toxicities and AEs are tabulated by dose level (DL). AEs are summarized by type, maximum grade, and duration across patients in each DL. Spearman rank correlation tests are used evaluated correlations between laboratory-based measures, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests compared continuous measures between response groups. Response rates will be summarized by DL and disease group, with estimated response rates and corresponding 95% binomial confidence intervals calculated.

The high cost and complexity of CAR-T therapy has spurred efforts to generate CAR-T cells directly within patients via systemic infusion of serum-stable lentiviral vector particles that target T cells in situ for CAR transgene delivery. To ensure effective in vivo delivery, these vectors need to show resistance to neutralization by human serum, demonstrate transduction specificity for T cells, and support subsequent expansion of CAR-T cells. Lentiviral vectors (LV) pseudotyped with VSV G-glycoprotein (G-WT) transduce target cells via the LDL receptor (LDLR), which is ubiquitously expressed at variable levels and is upregulated on activated T cells. G-WT LVs are widely used to generate therapeutic CAR-T cells ex vivo, following purification and ex vivo activation of the T cells. To generate LVs capable of targeting circulating T cells in vivo, we utilized rational engineering of the VSV-G glycoprotein to design a G-CD3. This modified G protein avoids LDLR recognition, incorporates a CD3-specific single-chain antibody for targeted recognition of T cells, and minimizes LV particle inactivation upon exposure to human serum. G-CD3 LVs were shown to target and transduce resting T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) cultures with very high efficiency. The G-CD3 LVs powerfully activated T cells, evident from their increased CD25 expression, and the infection was not hindered in the presence of fresh, complement-active human serum (25%). Additionally, G-CD3 LVs efficiently transduced T cells in fresh human whole blood without apparent off-target transduction of non-T cell lineages. In vivo evaluation of G-CD3 LV efficiency was performed in humanized NSG mice by intravenous (IV) or intraperitoneal (IP) delivery of G-CD3 LVs encoding anti-CD19 CAR and GFP transgenes. Both IV and IP delivery of G-CD3 LV led to in vivo CAR T cell generation with peak levels of 17% of total circulating human CD45+ cells on day 21 post vector administration. The in vivo generated CD19-CAR-T cells were fully functional as evidenced by the disappearance of endogenous human CD19+ B cells from peripheral blood. Tissue analysis of spleen, bone marrow, and liver at the time of sacrifice (day 39 post LV injection), showed anti-CD19 CAR-T in all three tissues accompanied by an absence or dramatic reduction in tissue-resident human CD19+ B cells. In contrast, CAR-T cells were not detected at any time point in humanized NSG mice injected with G-WT LV, regardless of whether the virus was administered IV or IP. In summary, these data highlight the potential applicability of fully retargeted, serum stable LVs for in vivo gene delivery or genome editing, offering promising prospects for future human gene therapy applications.

7530 Background: Oncolytic virotherapy is a novel immunomodulatory therapeutic approach currently under study for relapsed refractory (R/R) hematologic malignancies. The engineered Vesicular Stomatitis Virus VSV-IFNβ-NIS used in this study encodes interferon beta (IFNβ) and sodium iodine symporter (NIS). Virally-encoded IFNβ serves as an index of viral proliferation and enhances host anti-tumor immunity. Herein, we report the updated results of the phase 1 clinical trial NCT03017820 of a one-time administration of systemic VSV-IFNβ-NIS among patients (pts) with R/R multiple myeloma (MM), T cell Lymphoma (TCL) and Acute myeloid Leukemia (AML) with particular focus on the TCL cohort treated at the highest dose level (DL4) without Ruxolitinib. Methods: VSV-IFNβ-NIS was administered as a single IV dose following a classical 3+3 phase I trial, starting at 5e9 TCID50 DL1 through 1.7e11 TCID50 DL4. A dose expansion cohort of 8 additional R/R TCL pts was added at DL4 in view of an initial signal of activity. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of VSV-IFNβ-NIS as a single agent. Secondary objectives were determination of safety profile and preliminary efficacy of VSV-IFNβ-NIS. Adverse events (AEs) are reported based on CTCAE V4; cytokine release syndrome (CRS) grading was based on Lee (Blood 2014) criteria. Results: To date, a total of 43 pts received VSV-IFNβ-NIS: MM (N=21), TCL (N=21) and AML (N=1). In the TCL cohort: at DL4 Group A (no Ruxolitinib), 12 pts were registered, but only 11 pts were treated (mycosis fungoides (MF) N=3; ALK- ALCL N=1; PTCL-NOS N=2; AITL N=4; Nodal PTCL, TFH N=2; ages 33-79). These pts received a median of 3 lines of therapy (range: 1-5). No dose limiting toxicities were observed. Grades 3 and higher AEs were hematologic with transient lymphopenia (63.6%), neutropenia (36.4%) being the most common. The non-hematologic AEs observed included unique toxicities such as CRS grades 1-2 (81.8%); the transient transaminitis grade 1-2 (36.4%) and grade 3 (27.3%) along with thrombocytopenia grade 1-2 (63.6%) and grade 3 (18.2%) were a reflection IFNβ toxicity. All the AEs observed were short lived. Responses were seen in pts with PTCL. At DL4, in pts with systemic PTCL (N=9), there were 5 responses including 3 complete responses (CR) with two long-lasting at 24 months, an ongoing 15 month CR, and a 5 month CR, and 2 partial responses (PR) lasting 5 months in one pts and 6 months in the other. Conclusions: These updated results of single agent VSV-IFNβ-NIS which include pts with PTCL treated at the highest dose level and a dose expansion cohort demonstrates not only the safety of VSV-IFNβ-NIS but also a strong efficacy signal in pts with PTCL with impressive durable responses. Two expansion cohorts at DL4 have been added (20 additional PTCL, 10 B-cell lymphoma pts) to obtain additional data on tolerability and efficacy and biomarkers of response in these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT03017820 .

Abstract Introduction: Factors contributing to the antitumor activity of systemic oncolytic virotherapy (OV) include (i) generalized innate immune activation due to virus infusion; (ii) direct oncolytic and/or immune-mediated destruction of OV infected tumor cells due to intratumoral spread of the virus infection; (iii) collateral boosting of tumor antigen-specific T cell responses that target uninfected tumor cells. We investigated the relative contributions of these 3 factors T cell lymphoma (TCL) patients (pts) responding to a single intravenous infusion of Voyager-V1, an oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) encoding IFNβ and sodium iodide symporter (NIS) on NCT03017820. Of relevance, the virally encoded IFNβ enhances tumor specificity, boosts proinflammatory activity & serves as a convenient serum biomarker of infection. Methods: In a first in human trial, a single infusion of Voyager-V1 was administered to 15 pts with relapsed refractory hematologic cancers; 4 dose levels (DL) were tested (5x10 9, 1.7x10 10, 5x10 10, 1.7x10 11 TCID50); 7 pts had TCL. Cytokine levels and CRS symptoms were determined as a measure of generalized immune activation; serum IFNβ levels were monitored as a pharmacodynamic biomarker of virus infection; antitumor T cell responses were measured using ELISPOT assays. Results: Of 8 TCL pts, 3 had RECIST responses: PR at DL 2, a CR & PR at DL 4. Most pts experience short lived CRS typically resolving within 24 hours of virus infusion. Serum IFNβ levels increased post-therapy in all pts, typically peaking by 24 hours post virus infusion and returning to baseline by median day 10. T cell responses could not be accurately determined in most cases due to suboptimal T cell viability and/or function after thawing of frozen PBMC. Factors contributing to tumor regression in each of the responding pts appeared to differ significantly, as exemplified by the case reports below. Pt (I) with CTCL experienced grade 1 CRS followed by brisk regression of multiple cutaneous lesions. The PR lasted 3 mo, after relapse of an eye lesion, but responses at other sites deepened after the relapsed lesion was irradiated; pt remained off active therapy for the next 2 yrs. Peak serum IFNβ 4 hours post infusion was only 182 pg/ml suggesting that disease response may have been driven by nonspecific innate immune activation associated with the virus infusion. Pt (IV) (CD30+ PTCL/ cutaneous relapse) had short lived grade 2 CRS, then developed signs of IFNβ toxicity with AST elevation and thrombocytopenia. Oral ruxolitinib was administered for 5 days as IFNβ toxicity mitigation leading to normalization of AST and platelets. All PET-avid tumors regressed completely. This CR continues 16 months post virus infusion. Peak serum IFNβ was 18,213 pg/ml strongly suggesting that response was driven by extensive intratumoral amplification of the virus and oncolytic tumor destruction. Robust CTL responses to tumor neoantigens were detected in this pt at baseline indicating that collateral boosting of tumor-specific T cells may have been responsible for the long term maintenance of this CR Pt (V) (CD30+ PTCL) had short lived grade 2 CRS followed by response at all disease sites (including complete normalization of an enlarged FDG-avid spleen). Her PR ended after 6 months due to relapse in cervical lymph nodes. Peak serum IFNβ level was modest, 600 pg/ml & sustained over 48 hours suggesting slower intratumoral spread of the virus infection. The deepening of the response long after resolution of the oncolytic phase points strongly to a contribution from antitumor CTL but the assay was technically unsatisfactory in this pt. Conclusion: Analysis of the correlative data supports that intravenous Voyager-V1 therapy can recruit diverse antitumor effector mechanisms to impact tumor response in pts with heavily pretreated TCL. Importantly, intratumoral virus amplification, which results in high circulating concentrations of IFNβ, does not necessarily lead to tumor regression perhaps because of defective immune cell recruitment and/or activation in some tumors but not in others. This will be further evaluated in future study participants by performing CTL assays on fresh, rather than frozen PBMC. In conclusion, a single IV infusion of Voyager-V1 shows highly promising activity against treatment refractory TCL and should be further advanced as a new single-shot or combination therapy for this therapeutically challenging indication. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Witzig: Karyopharm Therapeutics, Celgene/BMS, Incyte, Epizyme: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene/BMS, Acerta Pharma, Kura Oncology, Acrotech Biopharma, Karyopharm Therapeutics: Research Funding. Paludo: Karyopharm: Research Funding. Patnaik: StemLine: Research Funding; Kura Oncology: Research Funding. Dispenzieri: Takeda: Research Funding; Alnylam: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Sorrento Therapeutics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Bennani: Kymera: Other: Advisory Board; Vividion: Other: Advisory Board; Kyowa Kirin: Other: Advisory Board; Daichii Sankyo Inc: Other: Advisory Board; Purdue Pharma: Other: Advisory Board; Verastem: Other: Advisory Board. Ansell: Bristol Myers Squibb, ADC Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Regeneron, Affimed, AI Therapeutics, Pfizer, Trillium and Takeda: Research Funding. Gertz: Aurora Biopharma: Other: Stock option; Akcea Therapeutics, Ambry Genetics, Amgen Inc, Celgene Corporation, Janssen Biotech Inc, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Pfizer Inc (to Institution), Sanofi Genzyme: Honoraria; Akcea Therapeutics, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc, Prothena: Consultancy; AbbVie Inc, Celgene Corporation: Other: Data Safetly & Monitoring; Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Other: Advisory Board. Dingli: Janssen: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; GSK: Consultancy; Apellis: Consultancy; Novartis: Research Funding; Alexion: Consultancy. Kumar: Astra-Zeneca: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Beigene: Consultancy; Carsgen: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Oncopeptides: Consultancy; Roche-Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; KITE: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Antengene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Tenebio: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Adaptive: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding. Bergsagel: Oncopeptides: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria; Genetech: Consultancy, Honoraria; GSK: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Patents & Royalties: human CRBN mouse; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria. Kapoor: Karyopharm: Consultancy; Cellectar: Consultancy; BeiGene: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Sanofi: Consultancy; Amgen: Research Funding; Ichnos Sciences: Research Funding; Regeneron Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Glaxo SmithKline: Research Funding; Karyopharm: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding; AbbVie: Research Funding. Lin: Sorrento: Consultancy; Vineti: Consultancy; Legend: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Bluebird Bio: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Juno: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: VSV-IFNβ-NIS is an oncolytic virus in clinical trial for systemic administration in hematologic malignancies

Abstract Although chimeric antigen receptor T (CART)–cell therapy has been successful in treating certain hematologic malignancies, wider adoption of CART-cell therapy is limited because of minimal activity in solid tumors and development of life-threatening toxicities, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS). There is a lack of a robust, clinically relevant imaging platform to monitor in vivo expansion and trafficking to tumor sites. To address this, we utilized the sodium iodide symporter (NIS) as a platform to image and track CART cells. We engineered CD19-directed and B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)–directed CART cells to express NIS (NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA-CART, respectively) and tested the sensitivity of 18F-TFB-PET to detect trafficking and expansion in systemic and localized tumor models and in a CART-cell toxicity model. NIS+CART19 and NIS+BCMA-CART cells were generated through dual transduction with two vectors and demonstrated exclusive 125I uptake in vitro. 18F-TFB-PET detected NIS+CART cells in vivo to a sensitivity level of 40,000 cells. 18F-TFB-PET confirmed NIS+BCMA-CART-cell trafficking to the tumor sites in localized and systemic tumor models. In a xenograft model for CART-cell toxicity, 18F-TFB-PET revealed significant systemic uptake, correlating with CART-cell in vivo expansion, cytokine production, and development of CRS-associated clinical symptoms. NIS provides a sensitive, clinically applicable platform for CART-cell imaging with PET scan. 18F-TFB-PET detected CART-cell trafficking to tumor sites and in vivo expansion, correlating with the development of clinical and laboratory markers of CRS. These studies demonstrate a noninvasive, clinically relevant method to assess CART-cell functions in vivo.