Old, Matthew

Abstract Purpose: VV1 is designed to induce selective oncolysis of tumor cells and amplify cellular antitumor immune responses. This open-label, phase I, multicenter clinical trial assessed the safety and tolerability of VV1 monotherapy administered intratumorally or intravenously or administered intravenously in combination with avelumab. Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received intratumoral (n = 27) or intravenous VV1 monotherapy (n = 33) or intravenous VV1 plus avelumab (n = 16). Infusion durations (15–180 minutes) and viral dose (1.7 × 1010 or 1 × 1011 TCID50) were also evaluated. Study objectives included VV1 safety and tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, preliminary efficacy, and immune responses. Results: Intratumoral and intravenous VV1 were well tolerated, and injection reactions were infrequent. The most common adverse events of any grade related to VV1 were cytokine release syndrome (58%), fatigue (33%), and decreased lymphocyte count (32%). Virus infection of tumors was confirmed by NIS imaging and increases in serum levels of virally encoded interferon-β (IFNβ). Histologic tumor analysis at 28 days after intratumoral VV1 administration indicated increases in tumor-infiltrating immune cells. Two durable partial responses were recorded: a patient with pheochromocytoma after one intravenous dose of VV1 and a patient with thymic cancer in the combination arm. Stable disease was observed in 17 of 49 patients (34.7%) who received intravenous VV1. Conclusions: This first-in-human study demonstrates that intratumoral or intravenous VV1 administration had an acceptable safety profile as monotherapy and intravenously in combination with avelumab. There is preliminary antitumor activity. Intratumoral VV1 plus cemiplimab is now showing promise in the neoadjuvant setting. Significance: VV1 is a tumor-selective oncolytic vesicular stomatitis virus engineered to express IFNβ and the thyroidal NIS reporter gene. In this phase I study, we have demonstrated that a single administration of VV1, as a monotherapy or with an immune checkpoint inhibitor is safe, infects tumor lesions resulting in intratumoral infiltration of immune cells, and exhibits early signs of antitumor activity in patients with advanced unresectable and metastatic solid tumors.

Background: Salivary duct carcinomas (SDC) are a rare and aggressive subtype of salivary gland neoplasm. They can present with distinct immunoprofiles, such as androgen receptor (AR) and HER-2/Neu-positivity. To date, no consensus exists on how to best manage this entity. Methods: All patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic AR+ SDC of the parotid from 2013 to 2019 treated with curative intent were included. Immunologic tumor profiling was conducted using 24 distinct markers. Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to estimate locoregional recurrence (LRR), distant control, and overall survival (OS). Results: Fifteen patients were included. Nine (60%) patients presented with T4 disease and eight (53%) had positive ipsilateral cervical lymphadenopathy. Ten (67%) patients underwent trimodality therapy, including surgery followed by adjuvant radiation and concurrent systemic therapy. The median follow-up was 5.5 years (interquartile range, 4.8–6.1). The estimated 5-year rates of LRR, distant progression, and OS were 6%, 13%, and 87%, respectively. Conclusion: Despite only including AR+ SDC of the parotid, immunoprofiles, such as expression of HER-2, were highly variable, highlighting the potential to tailor systemic regimens based on individual histologic profiles in the future. Studies with larger patient numbers using tumor-specific molecular profiling and tumor heterogeneity analyses are justified to better understand the biology of these tumors. Molecularly informed treatment approaches, including the potential use of AR- and HER-2/Neu-directed therapies upfront in the definitive setting, may hold future promise to further improve outcomes for these patients.

Background and purpose: A bolus is required when treating scalp lesions with photon radiation therapy. Traditional bolus materials face several issues, including air gaps and setup difficulty due to irregular, convex scalp geometry. A 3D-milled bolus is custom-formed to match individual patient anatomy, allowing improved dose coverage and homogeneity. Here, we describe the creation process of a 3D-milled bolus and report the outcomes for patients with scalp malignancies treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) utilizing a 3D-milled bolus. Materials and methods: Twenty-two patients treated from 2016 to 2022 using a 3D-milled bolus and VMAT were included. Histologies included squamous cell carcinoma (n = 14, 64%) and angiosarcoma (n = 8, 36%). A total of 7 (32%) patients were treated in the intact and 15 (68%) in the postoperative setting. The median prescription dose was 66.0 Gy (range: 60.0–69.96). Results: The target included the entire scalp for 8 (36%) patients; in the remaining 14 (64%), the median ratio of planning target volume to scalp volume was 35% (range: 25–90%). The median dose homogeneity index was 1.07 (range: 1.03–1.15). Six (27%) patients experienced acute grade 3 dermatitis and one (5%) patient experienced late grade 3 skin ulceration. With a median follow-up of 21.4 months (range: 4.0–75.4), the 18-month rates of locoregional control and overall survival were 75% and 79%, respectively. Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study to report the clinical outcomes for patients with scalp malignancies treated with the combination of VMAT and a 3D-milled bolus. This technique resulted in favorable clinical outcomes and an acceptable toxicity profile in comparison with historic controls and warrants further investigation in a larger prospective study.

3090 Background: VV1 (Voyager V1) is derived from VSV, an RNA virus with low human seroprevalence, engineered to replicate selectively in and kill human cancer cells. In Part 1 of this study, we demonstrated the safety of intratumoral VV1 and dose-response, using serum IFNβ as a biomarker; we observed viral replication in tumor and concomitant lymphocyte/neutrophil trafficking (SITC 2018). 2 other studies suggested greater efficacy and higher IFNβ levels with IV administration. Longer infusion durations were reported to mitigate infusion reactions (IRRs) for another oncolytic. Methods: We studied 3 different infusion durations of VV1 monotherapy at the recommended phase 2 IV dose (1.7 x 1010 TCID50) in patients with advanced solid tumors. Endpoints included safety, preliminary anti-tumor activity, viral titers, IFNβ PD and shedding. Patients received IV VV1 once on D1 and were monitored for DLT over 21 days with efficacy assessments every 6 weeks. IRRs were classified using Lee 2014 criteria for CRS as either constitutional symptoms only (G1) or involving hypotension (G2). Results: 18 patients were treated at 30, 60 and 180-minute durations (n = 7, 5 and 6, respectively). No DLTs, deaths or G3-4 related IRR AEs were observed. Most pts were female (67%), white (100%), with ECOG PS 0 (61%) and median 4 lines of prior systemic therapy (range 1-14) for colorectal (CRC; 56%), squamous cell carcinoma (11%), pheochromocytoma (11%), sarcoma (11%) or other (11%) cancers. The table shows results (number of patients) by infusion duration. Conclusions: There was no difference in safety between the 3 infusion durations, while efficacy and PD markers suggested better anti-tumor effect with 30-minute infusion. VV1 is safe for caregivers, with no viral shedding. Part 3 of this study will now treat CRC patients with VV1 in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (avelumab). A 5-arm phase 2 basket study in combination with cemiplimab is proceeding with 30-minute infusions. Clinical trial information: NCT02923466 . [Table: see text]