Hefazi, Mehrdad

ABSTRACT We examined the prognostic value of routine NGS data in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive (7 + 3 backbone) induction, specified by AML subtype. A contemporary (2015–2025) series of 545 Mayo Clinic patients (median age 56 years, females 44%) was considered. Median follow‐up was 49 months with 341 (63%) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (AHSCT) recorded. AML subtypes included core‐binding factor (CBF; N = 72; 13%), primary non‐CBF ( N = 403; 74%), post‐myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or post‐myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN; N = 28; 5%), post‐MPN ( N = 15; 3%), and therapy‐related (t‐AML; N = 27; 5%). Corresponding complete remission rates, with/without count recovery (CR/CRi), were 89%, 76%, 64%, 27%, and 78% ( p < 0.01) and 5‐year transplant‐censored survival rates 68%, 57%, 21%, 0%, and 55% ( p < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, the prognostic value of specific mutations was mostly limited to primary non‐CBF AML where adverse karyotype (OR 1.9; p = 0.04) predicted inferior and FLT3 ‐ITD (OR 0.4; p < 0.01) or NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (OR 0.1; p < 0.01) superior CR/CRi while KRAS MUT (HR 8.8; p < 0.01), TP53 MUT (HR 5.4; p < 0.01), and TET2 MUT (HR 2.3; p = 0.01) predicted inferior and NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (HR 0.3; p = 0.01) superior survival. Prognostication in intensively‐treated AML should start with subtype specification and recognition of the limited value of NGS in non‐primary AML. Post‐MPN AML is particularly associated with dismal outcomes and should be prognostically distinguished from post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN AML. In primary non‐CBF AML, in addition to previously established risk factors, the favorable impact of FLT3 ‐ITD on achieving CR/CRi and the unfavorable impact of KRAS MUT and TET2 MUT on transplant‐censored survival were noted and require confirmation from additional studies.

ABSTRACT Hypomethylating agents (HMA) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have both demonstrated remissions in VEXAS; however, comparative data is lacking. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 66 patients diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome treated with HMA ( n = 35) or alloHSCT ( n = 31). Baseline characteristics such as genetics, co‐morbidities, and performance status were balanced between the groups, except older age in the HMA group. Median follow‐up from therapy initiation was 18 months (95% CI: 11–26), and 14 (21%) deaths were reported (alloHSCT n = 3; HMA n = 11). Among all evaluable patients within the alloHSCT cohort, all patients achieved molecular remission, and a substantial proportion of patients discontinued glucocorticoids (58%). In contrast, HMA therapy was associated with lower but meaningful rates of molecular remission (22%) and glucocorticoid discontinuation (6%). In a real‐world setting, HMA therapy was associated with a high discontinuation rate related to toxicity or lack of response. On multivariable analysis adjusted for age and Charlson Comorbidity Index, alloHSCT was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.81; p = 0.024). This association remained consistent across multiple ancillary sensitivity analyses, including restriction to transplant‐eligible patients, patients aged ≤ 75 years, 1:1 matching, and propensity score‐based weighted analyses. Although limited by retrospective design, these findings suggest that alloHSCT remains an attractive and potentially curative strategy in selected patients with VEXAS. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted.

Abstract Gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are rising in people &lt; 50 and remain major causes of cancer mortality despite therapeutic advances. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has transformed treatment of hematological cancers. However, its efficacy in GI cancers has been hindered by antigen heterogeneity and immunosuppressive cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs) in the tumor microenvironment (TME.) Here we aimed to 1) study CART-CAF interactions and 2) engineer CART cells capable of eliminating CAFs to overcome their inhibitory role and enhance their antitumor activity in GI cancers. We first analyzed primary CAFs from 20 GI cancer patients. CAFs showed high fibroblast activation protein (FAP) expression and significantly suppressed T cells proliferation (26-77%, p≤0.0001). We next generated CART cells capable of safely eliminating both GI cancer cells and CAFs. To target cancer cells, we developed a novel nanobody (VHH)-based CAR against Claudin18.2, a GI cancer specific target. To avoid off-tumor toxicity in healthy FAP+ tissues, we incorporated an inducible FAP-CAR using the synNotch platform, enabling conditional targeting upon engagement with Claudin18.2+ cells, restricting FAP targeting within the TME. VHH Claudin18.2 CART cells showed superior specificity and efficacy vs scFv-based CART cells (hu8E85 or zolbetuximab). In Claudin18.2+ SNU-C2B xenografts, tumors were 92mm3 (VHH) vs 48mm3 (huE85) vs 211mm3 (zolbetuximab) on day 23 post-CART, median survival undefined vs 17 days vs 23 days respectively; p=0005. In Claudin18.2+ LS411N xenografts, tumors were 315mm3 vs 106mm3 vs 382 mm3 respectively at 23 days post-CART, median survival undefined vs 19 days vs undefined respectively; p=0004. VHH Claudin18.2 CART cells showed no off-tumor effects, while hu8E85 CART induced significant toxicity. We next established a co-engraftment model. NSG mice received 1x106 SNU-C2B and 6x106 CAFs from a GI cancer patient. At 500 mm3 tumors, mice received 5x106 VHH Claudin18.2 or inducible Claudin18.2/FAP CART. Dual-targeting CART cells showed greater antitumor response (728mm3 vs 320mm3, p=0.0011 at day 20 post-CART), expansion (61 vs 2,350 CART/µl of blood, p=0.0037), and tumor infiltration (8.71 x 105 vs 1.03 x 106 CART/g of tumor, p&lt;0.0001). This was also observed in gastric, colon, and pancreatic PDX models, with no observable off-tumor cytotoxic effects with inducible dual-targeting Claudin18.2/FAP CART. Our findings demonstrate that our novel VHH-based Claudin18.2 CART cells are highly specific and effective against GI malignancies, and that inducible Claudin18.2/FAP dual-targeting CART cells safely remodel the TME into an immune-permissive state. This approach represents a mechanistically innovative and translationally relevant strategy to overcome CAF-mediated immunosuppression, enhance CART cell efficacy, and improve clinical outcomes in refractory solid tumors. Citation Format: Omar L. Gutierrez Ruiz, Jennifer Feigin, Brooke Kimball, R. Leo Sakemura, Elizabeth L. Siegler, Dominic A. Skeele, Ateka Saleh, Claudia Manriquez Roman, Ismail Can, Olivia Sirpilla, Kun Yun, Carli M. Stewart, Mehrdad Hefazi, Yoh Yamaguchi, Lionel Aurelien Kankeu Fonkoua, Long K. Mai, Truc Huynh, Sophia Y. Goldberg, Grace E. DeFranco, Sara Foote, Ekene Johnkennedy Newton Ogbodo, Hong Xia, Michael Redig, Matthew L. Matthew, Tamiel Nichole Turley, Skyeler Klinge, John Alton Copland, Saad J. Kenderian. Optimized CART cell therapy to remodel the tumor microenvironment and eliminate GI malignancies [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 1525.

Abstract The comparative value of liposomal cytarabine/daunorubicin (CPX-351) versus venetoclax plus a hypomethylating agent (Ven-HMA) in the frontline treatment of older adults with primary ( de novo ) or secondary acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains uncertain. In the current study, we retrospectively examined outcomes of 600 patients with newly diagnosed AML treated with CPX-351 (N = 112) or Ven-HMA (N = 488). AML subtypes included de novo (46%), post-myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) (19%), post-myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) (12%), post-MDS/MPN (6%), therapy-related (17%) and AML with myelodysplasia-related genetic abnormalities (AML-MR; 46%). Patients receiving CPX-351 were younger (median 65 vs. 73 years; p < 0.01), predominantly female (50% vs. 38%; p = 0.02), more likely to have secondary AML (68% vs. 51%; p < 0.01), and less likely to harbor NPM1 MUT (5% vs. 12%; p = 0.02). Rates of complete response with or without count recovery (CR/CRi) were comparable between CPX-351 and Ven-HMA (55% vs. 60%; p = 0.30), including in AML-MR (60% vs. 63%; p = 0.70). Ven-HMA use was associated with fewer infectious complications (62% vs. 83%; p < 0.01) and yielded higher CR/CRi rates in males (60% vs. 45%; p = 0.04), de novo AML (68% vs. 50%; p = 0.03), and in the presence of STAG2 MUT (86% vs. 44%; p = 0.02), or CEBPA MUT (88% vs. 50%; p = 0.03). Overall survival censored for transplant, was similar (median 10 vs. 13 months; p = 0.90), with Ven-HMA being superior in post-MDS AML (median 12 vs. 7 months; p = 0.02) and CPX-351 in the presence of SF3B1 MUT (not reached vs. 14 months; p < 0.01). Our findings suggest that Ven-HMA is as effective and less toxic than CPX-351 in newly diagnosed AML, including AML-MR, despite selection of younger, fitter patients for CPX-351.

ABSTRACT Background IDH mutations are found in 15%–20% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Recent evidence suggests that IDH mutation subtypes may respond differently to intensive chemotherapy. We evaluated blast clearance patterns, remission outcomes, and overall survival (OS) in AML patients with IDH2 R140, IDH2 R172, and IDH1 R132 mutations to assess differences in treatment response. Methods We retrospectively reviewed AML patients diagnosed at Mayo Clinic, Rochester (2016–2023) with NGS data and treated with intensive chemotherapy (7+3 or CPX‐351). Bone marrow blasts were assessed at diagnosis, mid‐induction, and end‐of‐cycle; blast clearance was defined as < 5%. Composite remission (CRc) included CR/CRi per ELN 2022. IDH2 responders were classified as early (after Cycle 1) or late (≥ 2 cycles). Blast reduction was calculated as log 10 (diagnosis blasts/end‐induction blasts) and normalized per day. OS was measured from diagnosis. Results Among 381 patients, 31 had IDH2 mutations (23 R140, 8 R172) and eight had IDH1 R132. Baseline blasts were similar. Mid‐cycle blasts were lower in R140 versus R172 (4% vs. 10%), with higher clearance (68% vs. 38%). End‐induction blasts were lower in R140 versus R172 (2% vs. 4%) with higher clearance (100% vs. 75%). IDH1 and IDH2 showed similar clearance patterns. Log 10 analyses showed deeper and faster blast reduction in R140 versus R172, with comparable kinetics between IDH1 and IDH2 . OS did not differ across subtypes. Early CRc in IDH2 ‐mutated patients was associated with numerically longer OS. Conclusion IDH2 R140 demonstrated faster blast clearance than R172, while remission and survival were similar across IDH subtypes. Trial Registration : The authors have confirmed clinical trial registration is not needed for this submission.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor T (CART) cell therapy has shown unprecedented success in the treatment of hematological malignancies. However, the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of both solid and liquid tumors is a major barrier for CART efficacy. Immunosuppressive myeloid cells inhibit CART efficacy. Colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) promotes macrophage proliferation, survival, and anti-inflammatory response and is upregulated on myeloid cells in many cancers, making CSF1R an appealing therapeutic target. We aimed to test the interactions between CSF1R, myeloid cells, and CART response, and to study CSF1R targeting in the context of CART cell therapy. We utilized CD19-targeted CART cell therapy (CART19) in lymphoma preclinical models and thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR)-targeting CART cell therapy (TSHR-CART) in thyroid cancer models. We first measured CSF1R expression on myeloid cells in vitro. Suppressive myeloid cells, polarized from healthy donor monocytes using an anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) cell line, 8505c, or mantle cell lymphoma cell line, JeKo-1, significantly upregulate CSF1R (p=0.0002) compared to media control. After polarization, myeloid cells significantly inhibit TSHR-CART and CART19 antigen-specific proliferation compared to freshly isolated monocytes (p=0.012, p&lt;0.01, respectively) indicating that suppressive myeloid cells contribute to CART failure in multiple tumor types. We then performed single cell RNA sequencing on peripheral blood taken at baseline from patients with mantle cell lymphoma treated with CART19. We found a significant increase of CSF1R on monocyte subsets in CART19 non-responders vs responders (padj=0.0037). Next, we determined the impact of CSF1R blockade on CART cell therapy in vivo. Using lymphoma models, B6 mice were engrafted with the luciferase+ CD19+ murine lymphoma cell line TBL-12 (1x106 cells i.v. 1 day after 250 mg/kg cyclophosphamide). Tumor burden was significantly reduced after 7 days of treatment with low dose CART19 (0.5x106 i.v.) + anti-mouse CSF1R antibody (16mg/kg i.p. twice weekly) vs CART19 + IgG control (p=0.0146). We then tested the impact of CSF1R blockade in mice experiencing tumor relapse. After TBL-12 engraftment, mice were treated with anti-mouse CSF1R or IgG control antibody followed two days later with high dose CART19 (1x106 i.v.) to induce remission. Mice were re-challenged with TBL-12 14 days later. Mice treated with anti-mouse CSF1R antibody showed increased tumor control and significantly higher survival (p=0.0416). Using thyroid cancer models, first we identified high macrophage infiltration in biopsy specimens of patients with ATC compared to normal thyroid tissue and benign thyroid tumors through immunohistochemistry (IHC) of patient samples (p&lt;0.01, p&lt;0.0001, respectively). To test if macrophages are associated with CART failure in ATC, NSG mice were subcutaneously engrafted with 1x106 TSHR+ THJ529 tumors, an ATC cell line derived from patient biopsy samples from the Mayo Clinic thyroid cancer biobank, followed by i.v. treatment with 1x107 TSHR-CART or untransduced T cell control (UTD). IHC staining of tumor tissue collected at experimental endpoints revealed a dose-dependent, significant infiltration of human CD3+ T cells into the tumors which inversely correlated with murine F4/80+ myeloid cell and murine YM-1+ M2 macrophage infiltration. This led us to hypothesize that myeloid cell targeting with CSF1R blockade can improve TSHR-CART efficacy. We utilized the same ATC model described above to test CSF1R targeting. When TSHR+ THJ529 tumors reached approximately 100 mm3, mice were randomized by tumor volume and treated with CSF1R inhibitor PLX5622 (600mg/kg) or vehicle control, followed by either UTD or TSHR-CART cells 5x106 i.v. Mice treated with TSHR-CART + PLX5622 showed significantly improved tumor control vs TSHR-CART + vehicle control (p&lt;0.0001) or UTD + PLX5622 (p&lt;0.0001). Together, our results highlight immunosuppressive myeloid cells which express CSF1R as a major cell type limiting CART efficacy in both solid and liquid tumors. We also identified a strategy to overcome myeloid-mediated suppression of CART cells by targeting CSF1R with antibody or small molecule inhibitors.

Abstract Venetoclax (Ven) in combination with hypomethylating agents (HMA) is widely used as frontline treatment in older or unfit patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Liposomal cytarabine and daunorubicin (CPX-351) is FDA-approved for the treatment of secondary AML, including therapy-related (t-AML) and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MR). The current study aimed to provide a comprehensive comparison between the two treatment strategies to better inform clinical decisions. Methods The current retrospective analysis was performed under an institutional review board approved minimal risk protocol at Mayo Clinic (MN, AZ, FL). AML-MR gene mutations or cytogenetic abnormalities were categorized according to the International Consensus Classification (Arber et al. Blood 2022;140:1200). Treatment response was assessed according to the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) criteria (Dohner et al. Blood 2022;140:1345). Overall survival (OS) analysis was censored for allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT). Statistical analyses were performed using JMP Pro (Version 18.0.0). Results A total of 600 patients with newly diagnosed AML (ND-AML) treated with CPX-351 (N-112, 19%), or Ven-HMA (N=488, 81%) were included. AML subtypes included de novo (N=277, 46%), post-myelodysplastic syndrome (post-MDS, N=114,19%), post-myeloproliferative neoplasm (post-MPN, N=70, 12%), post-MDS/MPN (N=36, 6%), t-AML (N=103, 17%) and AML-MR (N=274, 46%). Compared with those treated with Ven-HMA, patients receiving CPX-351 were younger (median age 65 vs 73 years; p&lt;0.01), more likely to be female (50% vs 38%; p=0.02), more frequently diagnosed withsecondaryAML (68% vs 51%; p&lt;0.01), and less likely to have NPM1MUT (5% vs 12%; p=0.02) whereas ELN 2022 cytogenetic risk distribution was similar between the two (adverse risk; 43% vs 40%; p=0.5). Comparison of treatment response and survival Complete response rates with (CR) or without (CRi) count recovery were similar between CPX-351 and Ven-HMA overall (55% vs 60%) as well as specifically in patients with AML-MR (60% vs 63%), adverse karyotype (44% vs 44%), NPM1MUT (100% vs 89%), TP53MUT(32% vs 45%), IDH1MUT (60% vs 76%), IDH2MUT (63% vs 77%), SF3B1MUT(71% vs 45%), and CBLMUT (33% vs 69%) [p&gt;0.05 in all instances]. Compared to those with CPX-351, CR/CRi rates with Ven-HMA were superior in males (60% vs. 45%; p=0.04) and in patients with de novo AML (68% vs. 50%; p=0.03), STAG2MUT (86% vs. 44%; p=0.02), or CEBPAMUT (88% vs. 50%; p=0.03); infectious complications were significantly more frequent with CPX-351 (83% vs 62%, p&lt;0.01). At a median follow-up of 12 months (range; 1-88), 416 (69%) deaths, 179 relapses (44% in CPX-351 and 52% in Ven-HMA responders) and 149 ASCTs (53% in CPX-351 and 18% in Ven-HMA) were documented. OS rates were similar between CPX-351 and Ven-HMA, in general (median 10 vs 13 months), as well as in patients with adverse karyotype, TP53MUT, IDH1MUT, and IDH2MUT (p&gt;0.05 in all instances). By contrast, OS was superior in Ven-HMA-treated patients with post-MDS AML (median 12 vs. 7 months; age-adjusted p=0.02) and in CPX-351-treated patients harboring SF3B1MUT(median not reached vs 14 months; age-adjusted p&lt;0.01). In addition, a borderline-significant OS advantage for CPX-351 was apparent in patients with PTPN11MUT (13.5 vs 8 months; p=0.08). Comparison in ICC defined AML-myelodysplasia-related CR/CRi and OS rates were comparable between patients treated with CPX-351 (N=57) or Ven-HMA (N=217), with response rates of 60% vs 63% (p=0.68) and median OS of 10 vs 14 months (p=0.61), respectively. However, OS was superior with Ven-HMA in patients with post-MDS AML (15 vs 8 months; age-adjusted p=0.02) and with CPX-351 in those with SF3B1MUT (NR vs 14 months; age-adjusted p=0.02). Conclusions: The current study suggests that Ven-HMA was as effective and possibly less toxic than CPX-351 for the treatment of ND-AML, including AML-MR, despite the bias for younger and fitter patients treated with the latter regimen. Observed differences involving patients with SF3B1MUT or post-MDS AML require validation in prospective studies and provide parameters for developing treatment-specific predictive models that will be presented at the meeting.

Abstract Background: The primary goal of induction therapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is to induce complete remission with (CR) or without (CRi) hematologic recovery. In order to accomplish this, re-induction might be necessary based on D14-residual AML. The current study examines the impact of re-induction on relapse, transplant-censored survival, and post-transplant survival in a consecutive series of AML patients who have achieved CR/CRi following intensive chemotherapy. The study also examined the impact of variations in consolidation chemotherapy including the use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy (AC) in the first consolidation cycle and the use of high (HiDAC) vs. intermediate (IDAC) dose cytarabine. Methods: The current study was conducted under IRB-approved minimum risk protocols that allowed retrospective collection and analysis of patient data. Formal criteria were used for AML diagnosis, genetic risk stratification, and adjudication of response (Blood 2022;140:1345). Patients who received less intensive induction regimens or failed to achieve CR/CRi were excluded. Relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis was calculated from the date of documented CR/CRi. Patients who underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant (ASCT) were censored at the time of transplant. Conventional statistical methods were utilized (JMP Pro 17.1.0, SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA). Results: A total of 279 AML patients diagnosed between 2004 and 2020 were included: median age 58 years, males 60%, de novo 75%, post-chronic myeloid neoplasm (post-CMN) 16%, and therapy-related 9%. Induction regimens included idarubicin (Ida) + cytarabine (Cyt) in 183 (66%) patients, daunorubicin (Da) 60 mg/m² + Cyt in 76 (27%), and Da 90 mg/m2 + Cyt in 19 (7%). Re-induction was utilized to achieve CR/CRi in 72 (27%) at a median of 18 days from start of first induction regimen. The indication for re-induction was based on residual bone marrow blast (median 30%; range 4-90) on day14 (N=53) or day 21-28 (N=15), persistent extramedullary disease (N=2) or the presence of circulating blast (N=2). At a median transplant censored follow-up of 26 months (mos), 93 (33%) deaths, 117 (42%) relapses, and 134 (48%) ASCTs were documented; ASCTs were performed in CR1 (50%) or CR2 (50%). Median RFS was 18 mos, with respective 1-, 2-, 3- year RFS of 63%, 42% and 35%. In multivariable analysis (MVA), age ≥65 years (HR 1.5, p=0.04), European LeukemiaNet (ELN) adverse karyotype (vs. intermediate HR 1.7, p=0.02; vs. favorable HR 2.8, p&lt;0.01), and the need for re-induction to achieve CR/CRi (HR 1.7, p=0.01) were independently predictive of relapse. RFS was not impacted by NPM1 mutation ( HR 0.5, p=0.09) or FLT3-ITD (HR 1.3, p=0.3). The median OS was 80 mos, with 5-year OS of 53%. In MVA, age ≥65 years (HR 2, p=0.01), ELN adverse karyotype (vs. intermediate HR 3.3, p&lt;0.01; vs. favorable HR 4.7, p&lt;0.01), FLT3-ITD (HR 1.9, p=0.04), and the need for re-induction (HR 1.9, p=0.03) independently predicted inferior OS. RFS was similar among patients who received AC (N=84; Idarubicin 9 mg/m2 or Da 60 mg/m2 days 1 to 2/3 + 100 mg/m2 Cyt days 1 to 5/7; median 18 mos) as their first consolidation cycle vs. those who received HiDAC (N=99; 3 g/m2 q12 hours on days 1,3 and 5; median 16 mos) or IDAC (N=58; IDAC; 1-2 g/m2 q12 hours on days 1, 3 and 5; median 24 mos; p=0.9); the corresponding median OS were 125, 85, and 40 mos (p=0.4). In patients aged ≥65 years, but not younger patients, both RFS (p&lt;0.01; median 23 (N=36) vs. 8 (N=24) mos) and OS (median 40 vs. 12 mos, p&lt;0.01) were significantly longer with IDAC vs. AC as their first consolidation cycle. In the AC consolidation cohort, patients who received 2-3 additional HiDAC/IDAC cycles displayed longer OS (p&lt;0.01) and RFS (p=0.047), compared to those who received less. In both the HiDAC and IDAC cohorts, RFS and OS were not significantly different between those who received 3-4 versus 1-2 consolidation cycles. The need for re-induction did not affect post-transplant survival (p=0.5), which was superior in patients receiving Ida + Cyt induction (vs. Da 60mg/m2 + Cyt, HR 0.6, p=0.04) and in those transplanted in CR1 (HR 0.5, p&lt;0.01). Conclusions: The current study signals the need for re-induction to achieve CR1 as a negative predictor of outcome in AML patients achieving CR/CRi following intensive induction chemotherapy. The particular information is potentially actionable in terms of the choice of consolidation strategy.