Reichard, Kaaren K.

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of cytokine‐directed therapies in VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X‐linked, autoinflammatory somatic) syndrome using previously proposed treatment response criteria. Methods All patients with genetically confirmed VEXAS syndrome who received targeted therapies with JAK inhibitors (JAKi), tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors (TNFαi), or interleukin‐1 (IL‐1) or IL‐6 inhibitors were identified. Clinical and biochemical data were recorded for patients at time of targeted therapy initiation, and at 3‐, 6‐, and 12‐month follow‐up time points. Treatment response was labeled as complete response (CR; normalization of C‐reactive protein [CRP], prednisone <10 mg/day, and resolution of disease activity), partial response (PR; >50% improvement in CRP, >50% prednisone dose reduction, improvement or resolution of disease features), treatment failure (TF; worsening CRP, increasing prednisone, worsening of disease features), or no response (not meeting criteria for CR, PR, or TF). Results Overall, 52 patients received an IL‐1i, IL‐6i, or JAKi therapy. At six‐month follow‐up, 3 of 19 IL‐6i patients experienced CR, 4 of 19 experienced PR, and 7 of 19 experienced TF. 2 of 17 patients receiving JAKi experienced CR, 3 of 17 experienced PR, and 6 of 17 experienced TF. No patients receiving IL‐1i or TNFαi experienced CR, and only 1 of 5 IL‐1i patients experienced PR. Among those still receiving biologic therapy at 12 months, only 1 of 11 receiving IL‐6i and 0 of 7 receiving JAKi experienced CR. Conclusion IL‐6i and JAKi therapies demonstrated limited, unsustained efficacy for management of VEXAS syndrome. IL‐1i and TNFαi therapies were not efficacious. Useful application of previously reported treatment response criteria was demonstrated, but future incorporation of hematologic parameters may be beneficial.

ABSTRACT We examined the prognostic value of routine NGS data in newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with intensive (7 + 3 backbone) induction, specified by AML subtype. A contemporary (2015–2025) series of 545 Mayo Clinic patients (median age 56 years, females 44%) was considered. Median follow‐up was 49 months with 341 (63%) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (AHSCT) recorded. AML subtypes included core‐binding factor (CBF; N = 72; 13%), primary non‐CBF ( N = 403; 74%), post‐myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) or post‐myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN; N = 28; 5%), post‐MPN ( N = 15; 3%), and therapy‐related (t‐AML; N = 27; 5%). Corresponding complete remission rates, with/without count recovery (CR/CRi), were 89%, 76%, 64%, 27%, and 78% ( p < 0.01) and 5‐year transplant‐censored survival rates 68%, 57%, 21%, 0%, and 55% ( p < 0.01). In multivariable analyses, the prognostic value of specific mutations was mostly limited to primary non‐CBF AML where adverse karyotype (OR 1.9; p = 0.04) predicted inferior and FLT3 ‐ITD (OR 0.4; p < 0.01) or NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (OR 0.1; p < 0.01) superior CR/CRi while KRAS MUT (HR 8.8; p < 0.01), TP53 MUT (HR 5.4; p < 0.01), and TET2 MUT (HR 2.3; p = 0.01) predicted inferior and NPM1 MUT / FLT3 WT (HR 0.3; p = 0.01) superior survival. Prognostication in intensively‐treated AML should start with subtype specification and recognition of the limited value of NGS in non‐primary AML. Post‐MPN AML is particularly associated with dismal outcomes and should be prognostically distinguished from post‐MDS‐MDS/MPN AML. In primary non‐CBF AML, in addition to previously established risk factors, the favorable impact of FLT3 ‐ITD on achieving CR/CRi and the unfavorable impact of KRAS MUT and TET2 MUT on transplant‐censored survival were noted and require confirmation from additional studies.

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a tumor mass involving any extramedullary site composed of myeloid-lineage blasts with myeloid, myelomonocytic, or monocytic differentiation. Distinguishing MS from malignant histiocytic neoplasms (MHNs) is diagnostically challenging due to morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap, particularly for MS with monocytic differentiation, which can mimic MHNs, especially the subtypes of histiocytic sarcoma and interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma, leading to potential misdiagnosis and inappropriate management. Cyclin D1 overexpression is implicated in MHNs, but its utility in differentiating these entities has not been systematically characterized. We evaluated cyclin D1 immunostaining in 43 MS cases and 30 MHNs. The median age at MS diagnosis was 59 years (range: 0.1 to 90), while the median age at MHN diagnosis was 62 years (range: 9 to 90), with heterogeneous sites of involvement. Cyclin D1 evaluation showed 100% MHNs with strong cyclin D1 positivity in ≥50% tumor cells, compared with 7% MS with weak-to-intermediate positivity in a minor subset of tumor cells. Additional immunohistochemical evaluation showed no difference in PU.1 expression in MHNs (93%) versus MS (84%) but demonstrated a higher proportion of OCT2-positivity in MHNs over MS (52% vs. 23%, P <0.05). Our study demonstrates a high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (93%) in utilizing cyclin D1 to distinguish MHNs (mature phenotype) from MS (immature phenotype) in diagnostic practice. It is particularly valuable in challenging scenarios of MS with the absence of immature/myeloid lineage-defining markers (MPO, CD34, or CD117) and provides a cost-effective tool to resolve this diagnostic pitfall, ensuring an accurate subclassification.

ABSTRACT Hypomethylating agents (HMA) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHSCT) have both demonstrated remissions in VEXAS; however, comparative data is lacking. We conducted a multicenter, retrospective analysis of 66 patients diagnosed with VEXAS syndrome treated with HMA ( n = 35) or alloHSCT ( n = 31). Baseline characteristics such as genetics, co‐morbidities, and performance status were balanced between the groups, except older age in the HMA group. Median follow‐up from therapy initiation was 18 months (95% CI: 11–26), and 14 (21%) deaths were reported (alloHSCT n = 3; HMA n = 11). Among all evaluable patients within the alloHSCT cohort, all patients achieved molecular remission, and a substantial proportion of patients discontinued glucocorticoids (58%). In contrast, HMA therapy was associated with lower but meaningful rates of molecular remission (22%) and glucocorticoid discontinuation (6%). In a real‐world setting, HMA therapy was associated with a high discontinuation rate related to toxicity or lack of response. On multivariable analysis adjusted for age and Charlson Comorbidity Index, alloHSCT was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.05–0.81; p = 0.024). This association remained consistent across multiple ancillary sensitivity analyses, including restriction to transplant‐eligible patients, patients aged ≤ 75 years, 1:1 matching, and propensity score‐based weighted analyses. Although limited by retrospective design, these findings suggest that alloHSCT remains an attractive and potentially curative strategy in selected patients with VEXAS. Prospective validation of these findings is warranted.