Network, on behalf of the Histio-care

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a tumor mass involving any extramedullary site composed of myeloid-lineage blasts with myeloid, myelomonocytic, or monocytic differentiation. Distinguishing MS from malignant histiocytic neoplasms (MHNs) is diagnostically challenging due to morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap, particularly for MS with monocytic differentiation, which can mimic MHNs, especially the subtypes of histiocytic sarcoma and interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma, leading to potential misdiagnosis and inappropriate management. Cyclin D1 overexpression is implicated in MHNs, but its utility in differentiating these entities has not been systematically characterized. We evaluated cyclin D1 immunostaining in 43 MS cases and 30 MHNs. The median age at MS diagnosis was 59 years (range: 0.1 to 90), while the median age at MHN diagnosis was 62 years (range: 9 to 90), with heterogeneous sites of involvement. Cyclin D1 evaluation showed 100% MHNs with strong cyclin D1 positivity in ≥50% tumor cells, compared with 7% MS with weak-to-intermediate positivity in a minor subset of tumor cells. Additional immunohistochemical evaluation showed no difference in PU.1 expression in MHNs (93%) versus MS (84%) but demonstrated a higher proportion of OCT2-positivity in MHNs over MS (52% vs. 23%, P <0.05). Our study demonstrates a high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (93%) in utilizing cyclin D1 to distinguish MHNs (mature phenotype) from MS (immature phenotype) in diagnostic practice. It is particularly valuable in challenging scenarios of MS with the absence of immature/myeloid lineage-defining markers (MPO, CD34, or CD117) and provides a cost-effective tool to resolve this diagnostic pitfall, ensuring an accurate subclassification.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare disease characterized by the accumulation of neoplastic histiocytes in various extra-nodal tissues. Tissue biopsies involved by ECD are difficult to distinguish from reactive inflammatory infiltrates given the bland appearance of the neoplastic histiocytes. Confirmation of the ECD diagnosis often relies on molecular studies to confirm BRAF V600E mutation or other activating mutations involving MAPK pathway genes. In this study, we examined the diagnostic utility of cyclin D1 and pERK as immunohistochemical markers of MAPK pathway activation in ECD compared with its histopathologic mimics. The cohort included 41 clinically confirmed ECD patients, most with known genetic alterations in MAPK pathway genes (n=38). In 3 cases no mutation was identified. 37 of 41 (90%) of ECD cases showed cyclin D1 overexpression, with frequent staining in the cytoplasm as well as the nucleus. pERK expression was observed in 32 of 39 (82%) cases. Cyclin D1 staining was negative in histopathologic mimics of ECD, apart from weak patchy staining in fat necrosis and uniform staining in a subset of cases of juvenile/adult xanthogranuloma. While not entirely sensitive or specific, in the proper clinical and radiologic context strong nuclear and cytoplasmic cyclin D1 expression within histiocytic infiltrates helps to support a diagnosis of ECD.