Ravindran, Aishwarya

Abstract Objectives Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is one of 3 major types of histiocytic neoplasms, along with Rosai-Dorfman disease and Langerhans cell histiocytosis. It was first recognized as a neoplasm in the 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Haematolymphoid Tumours. About 80% to 90% of cases harbor MAPK pathway mutations. Methods We discuss the diagnosis of ECD using 3 illustrative cases, consider interpretative challenges, and present a diagnostic algorithm. Results Erdheim-Chester disease is a systemic disease that shows a characteristic pattern of organ involvement including bone, perinephric soft tissue, skin, heart, and central nervous system. Histologically, ECD shows a spectrum of xanthogranulomatous, lymphohistocytic, or fibrohistiocytic infiltrates. By immunohistochemistry, the neoplastic histiocytes have a macrophage phenotype with expression of CD163, negative to focal S100, and negative CD1a and langerin. These features alone are not specific and thus insufficient for diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry for cyclin D1 and BRAF V600E, correlation with clinical and imaging findings, and mutational analysis for MAPK pathway mutations all play important roles in establishing an ECD diagnosis. Conclusions The diagnosis of ECD is often challenging due to its clinical and histologic overlap with reactive inflammatory processes. Correlation of histology features with clinical findings, immunohistochemistry, and genetic studies is essential for an accurate and timely diagnosis.

Myeloid sarcoma (MS) is a tumor mass involving any extramedullary site composed of myeloid-lineage blasts with myeloid, myelomonocytic, or monocytic differentiation. Distinguishing MS from malignant histiocytic neoplasms (MHNs) is diagnostically challenging due to morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap, particularly for MS with monocytic differentiation, which can mimic MHNs, especially the subtypes of histiocytic sarcoma and interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma, leading to potential misdiagnosis and inappropriate management. Cyclin D1 overexpression is implicated in MHNs, but its utility in differentiating these entities has not been systematically characterized. We evaluated cyclin D1 immunostaining in 43 MS cases and 30 MHNs. The median age at MS diagnosis was 59 years (range: 0.1 to 90), while the median age at MHN diagnosis was 62 years (range: 9 to 90), with heterogeneous sites of involvement. Cyclin D1 evaluation showed 100% MHNs with strong cyclin D1 positivity in ≥50% tumor cells, compared with 7% MS with weak-to-intermediate positivity in a minor subset of tumor cells. Additional immunohistochemical evaluation showed no difference in PU.1 expression in MHNs (93%) versus MS (84%) but demonstrated a higher proportion of OCT2-positivity in MHNs over MS (52% vs. 23%, P <0.05). Our study demonstrates a high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (93%) in utilizing cyclin D1 to distinguish MHNs (mature phenotype) from MS (immature phenotype) in diagnostic practice. It is particularly valuable in challenging scenarios of MS with the absence of immature/myeloid lineage-defining markers (MPO, CD34, or CD117) and provides a cost-effective tool to resolve this diagnostic pitfall, ensuring an accurate subclassification.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare disease characterized by the accumulation of neoplastic histiocytes in various extra-nodal tissues. Tissue biopsies involved by ECD are difficult to distinguish from reactive inflammatory infiltrates given the bland appearance of the neoplastic histiocytes. Confirmation of the ECD diagnosis often relies on molecular studies to confirm BRAF V600E mutation or other activating mutations involving MAPK pathway genes. In this study, we examined the diagnostic utility of cyclin D1 and pERK as immunohistochemical markers of MAPK pathway activation in ECD compared with its histopathologic mimics. The cohort included 41 clinically confirmed ECD patients, most with known genetic alterations in MAPK pathway genes (n=38). In 3 cases no mutation was identified. 37 of 41 (90%) of ECD cases showed cyclin D1 overexpression, with frequent staining in the cytoplasm as well as the nucleus. pERK expression was observed in 32 of 39 (82%) cases. Cyclin D1 staining was negative in histopathologic mimics of ECD, apart from weak patchy staining in fat necrosis and uniform staining in a subset of cases of juvenile/adult xanthogranuloma. While not entirely sensitive or specific, in the proper clinical and radiologic context strong nuclear and cytoplasmic cyclin D1 expression within histiocytic infiltrates helps to support a diagnosis of ECD.

Abstract Introduction Histiocytic neoplasms (HN) are a rare, heterogeneous group of hematologic disorders derived from myeloid-dendritic cell lineages. The most common forms include Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD). These disorders are driven by recurrent activating mutations in the MAPK pathway, most frequently involving BRAF, MAP2K1, PIK3CA, KRAS, and NRAS. This discovery enabled a major therapeutic advance with the use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, resulting in durable responses. For patients harboring KRAS mutations, MEK inhibitors (MEKi) remain the primary therapeutic approach. However, the impact of KRAS mutation subtypes on treatment response remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to characterize the spectrum of KRAS mutations in LCH, ECD, and RDD and evaluate the responses to MEKi, providing insights to guide future treatment strategies. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients with LCH, ECD, and RDD who were evaluated at Mayo Clinic or University of Alabama at Birmingham. Patients were included if next-generation sequencing identified a KRAS mutation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation under the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Results We identified 23 patients with a KRAS mutation: 17 females (73.9%) and 6 males (26.1%), with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years (range, 20–78). RDD accounted for 73.9% (17/23) and ECD for 26.1% (6/23); no KRAS mutations were detected in LCH patients. The most frequent KRAS variants were p.K117N (34.8%), p.G12D (17.4%), p.A146T (13.0%), p.G13C (8.7%), and p.G13D (8.7%), with additional variants including p.T58I, p.A59G, p.A146P, and p.A146V. Mutation distribution differed by disease group: p.G12D was more common in ECD (50%) than RDD (5.9%) (p=0.01), whereas p.K117N occurred in 47.1% of RDD and was absent in ECD. Regarding treatment, 57% (13/23) received MEKi, all initially cobimetinib, with 1 patient switched to trametinib due to progression. Of the 10 patients who did not receive MEKi, 1 was treated with vemurafenib for a concurrent BRAF p.V600E mutation; 3 remained on observation; 2 underwent surgery without recurrence; 3 received other systemic therapies including corticosteroid, methotrexate, rituximab, lenalidomide, or sirolimus; and 1 developed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, treated with R-CHOP. The overall response rate in the 12 patients on MEKi (excluding 1 patient too early for assessment) was 75%—3 (25%) CR and 6 (50%) PR (including 1 who initially progressed on cobimetinib but responded to trametinib). All 3 non-responders had RDD. Among the 5 patients with p.K117N, 3 had no response to cobimetinib, 1 achieved PR, and 1 achieved CR; notably, 1 non-responder switched to trametinib and achieved PR in 2 months. All 3 patients with codon 146 mutations achieved PR. Of the 2 patients with p.G12D, 1 achieved CR with a co-occurring MAP2K1 mutation, and 1 had no response. No additional genotype–response patterns were observed. Similar heterogeneity has been reported in prior studies. In a phase II cobimetinib trial, an ECD patient with p.R149G achieved PR, whereas another ECD patient with p.G12R and an LCH patient with p.G13C achieved CR in the presence of co-occurring ARAF and NRAS mutations, respectively. A retrospective cohort described an ECD patient with p.K117N achieving PR on dabrafenib and trametinib with a concurrent BRAF mutation and another with p.G12A achieving PR on trametinib. In a multicenter analysis of trametinib, a patient with p.A59T (co-occurring BRAF and NRAS mutations) had no response, whereas another with p.A146P achieved PR. Collectively, these findings, together with our data, underscore that KRAS-mutated histiocytoses exhibit heterogeneous responses to MEKi, likely influenced by variant type and co-mutations. Discussion KRAS mutations represent an important subset of MAPK pathway alterations in HN, although their prevalence varies by disease type and appears extremely rare in LCH, with no cases identified in our cohort. The most common variants include p.K117N and p.G12D, which may be linked to suboptimal response to MEKi in the absence of concurrent MAPK pathway alterations. As MEKi acts downstream, efficacy likely depends on the level of pathway activation conferred by specific KRAS variants. Larger studies are needed to confirm these observations and identify mutation-specific predictors to guide personalized treatment.

Abstract Introduction: Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm, with approximately 90% of patients exhibiting alterations in the MAPK pathway. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown promising results in treating MAPK pathway-altered LCH. However, treatment interruptions due to adverse effects are common, and limited access to targeted therapies complicates care globally. While chemotherapy remains a common treatment for LCH, the outcomes for patients with MAPK pathway-altered LCH specifically receiving chemotherapy are still unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional international retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients with BRAF or MAP2K (gain-of-function, GOF) altered LCH that were consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic, MN, AZ, and FL, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China between 2007 and 2024. All patients who were included in this study were treated with chemotherapy, and those who have received targeted therapies or other modalities of frontline treatment were excluded. All time-to-event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy initiation, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) included death and progression as events and was measured from the time of treatment initiation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation in accordance with the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Risk organ involvement was defined as disease involving the liver, spleen, bone marrow or central nervous system. Results: A total of 63 patients with LCH were included. The median age of the population was 34 years (range: 27-43), and males were 59%. Risk organ involvement was seen in 44 (70%) of patients and multisystemic LCH was observed in 48 (76%) patients. Among the 63 patients, BRAF gain-of-function alterations were observed in 79%, MAP2K mutations in 19%, and BRAF fusions in 2%. Of the BRAF gain-of-function alterations, BRAFV600E mutation was seen in 64% patients and [p.N486_P490del] deletion in 36%. There was no significant difference in organ involvement (single-system versus multisystem) or risk organ involvement between patients with BRAF and MAP2K alterations. All 63 patients received systemic therapy with chemotherapy and the regimens included Cytarabine (n=43), Cladribine (n=5), Etoposide (n=1), Methotrexate (n=1), and combined Methotrexate and Cytarabine (n=13). The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.8 years (range 3.2–5.0 years), with similar durations observed in patients with single-system vs. multisystem involvement and those with risk-organ involvement vs. no risk-organ involvement. The overall response rate among patients who received chemotherapy was 89%, with complete responses in 15 patients (26%) and partial responses in 40 patients (64.5%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 2.61 years (95% CI: 2.06–NA). The 3-year PFS did not significantly differ based on risk organ involvement: 50.6% (95% CI: 36–71) for patients with risk organ involvement versus 47.4% (95% CI: 28–81) for those without, p=0.52. Patients with single-system disease experienced longer PFS compared to those with multisystem disease; the 3-year PFS was 80.2% (95% CI: 58.7–100) versus 42.2% (95% CI: 29–61.5), respectively, p=0.04. Conclusions: Our results indicate that LCH patients with a GOF alteration in the MAPK pathway derive significant clinical benefit from chemotherapy, achieving deep and durable responses. Therefore, patients should not be excluded from treatment due to the absence of targeted therapies, as they can still attain substantial responses and clinical improvement with chemotherapy, even in the context of MAPK pathway-driven disease.

Abstract Purpose. Malignant histiocytoses (MHs) including Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS), interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma (IDCS), and histiocytic sarcoma (HS) are rare, aggressive neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineage. Prognosis is generally poor, particularly in disseminated disease. While mutation-specific therapies are increasingly used in indolent histiocytic neoplasms, their role in MH remains unclear due to the frequent presence of complex mutational profiles. Our understanding of the genomic landscape of MH is limited. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize the molecular alterations in MH.Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review of MH patients seen at Mayo Clinic and the University of Alabama at Birmingham who underwent comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS), including DNA ± RNA analysis. A systematic literature review using PubMed identified additional MH cases with available molecular data.Results. We identified 17 institutional MH cases (3 IDCS, 3 LCS, 11 HS) and 72 cases from the literature (6 IDCS, 11 LCS, 55 HS) with NGS data. Among the 89 total patients, 26 (29%) had DNA-only sequencing and 63 (71%) had combined DNA/RNA sequencing. Twelve patients (n=12; 13%) had a single mutation; the majority had multiple alterations. The most frequently mutated genes were: RAS (n=26; 29%), CDKN1/2 (n=26; 29%), MAP2K1 (n=15; 17%), PTEN (n=11; 12%), BRAF non-V600E (n=8; 9%), PTPN11 (n=8; 9%), CREBBP (n=8; 9%), TET2 (n=8; 9%), DNMT3A (n=7; 8%), fusions (n=7; 8%), BRAFV600E (n=6; 7%), and NF1 (n=4; 4%). Fusions included BRAF::NRF11, BRAF::CLIP2, BRAF::MBP, EGFR::CYTOR, CDKN2A::ADGRG6, IGH::BCL6, and CLIP2-BRAF. Two patients had no alteration detected. Non-V600E BRAF mutations included D594G (n=3), G596R (n=1), G466A (n=1), N581T (n=1), N581I (n=1), and N581S (n=1). Common co-mutations with BRAF included CDKN2A/B (n=9), TP53 (n=6), KRAS/NRAS (n=5), and PDGFR (n=1). Only 2 of 15 MAP2K1-mutated patients (13%) had isolated mutations; the rest had co-mutations, most frequently TP53 (n=3) and BCL2 (n=3). MAP2K1 mutations included F53I (n=2), C121S (n=2), I103N (n=1), Q56P(n=3), E203K (n=1), F53-K57del (n=1), and F53-Q58del (n=1).NRAS mutations (n=6) included Q16K (n=2), G12C (n=1), Q61R (n=1), and 2 unspecified. KRAS mutations (n=20) included G13D (n=3), Q61H (n=3), G12V (n=2), K117N (n=1), V14I (n=1), and 10 unspecified. The most frequent co-mutational pattern (24%) was RAS plus another gene: BRAF (n=3), TP53 (n=6), MAP2K1 (n=2), PTEN (n=4), and CDKN2A/B (n=6).Twelve patients (12/26; 46%) were treated with targeted therapies. Responses included 6 partial and 5 complete responses. Median duration of response was 27.5 months (range 7–54). The sole non-responder had co-occurring NRASand TP53 mutations and received trametinib. Responders received a range of agents matched to their mutations: trametinib (BRAFV600E, MAP2K1F53I, KRASQ16H/PTEND24G/EPHB1R327C, MAP2K1F53I/BCL2/CDKN1B/KIT, and CALR), dabrafenib + trametinib(BRAFG596R/KRASQ61H), imatinib (MAP2K1C121S/METG28881T/DUSP2G137D/HIST1H3BC97Y/GRIN2AS1216C and PTPN11/STK11/GNA11/JAK2), chidamide + sintilimab(IDH2G515A/RHOAG50T/TET23344delC), sirolimus(PTEN/FGFR3/SETD2) and sorafenib (BRAFD594G/KRASK117N/TP53). Most responders (8/11) had multiple mutations; only 3 had single alterations, suggesting multi-mutant MH may still be targetable. Common complex patterns included BRAF+CDKN2A + CDKN2B (n=4), BRAF + CDKN2A + TP53 (n=2), and BRAF + CDKN2A + KRAS (n=2).Conclusion. The MAPK pathway (BRAF, MAP2K1, RAS) is the most altered signaling axis in MH, often accompanied by mutations in tumor suppressors and cell cycle regulators such as TP53, CDKN2A/B, and PTEN. Most MH patients exhibit multiple genomic alterations. Despite this complexity, durable clinical responses to targeted agents are achievable, even in heavily mutated cases. These findings support the use of comprehensive genomic profiling in MH to identify therapeutic targets and guide precision treatment strategies.