Rodriguez-Rosario, Alanis Enid

Abstract Purpose. Malignant histiocytoses (MHs) including Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS), interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma (IDCS), and histiocytic sarcoma (HS) are rare, aggressive neoplasms of the macrophage-dendritic cell lineage. Prognosis is generally poor, particularly in disseminated disease. While mutation-specific therapies are increasingly used in indolent histiocytic neoplasms, their role in MH remains unclear due to the frequent presence of complex mutational profiles. Our understanding of the genomic landscape of MH is limited. This study aimed to comprehensively characterize the molecular alterations in MH.Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review of MH patients seen at Mayo Clinic and the University of Alabama at Birmingham who underwent comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS), including DNA ± RNA analysis. A systematic literature review using PubMed identified additional MH cases with available molecular data.Results. We identified 17 institutional MH cases (3 IDCS, 3 LCS, 11 HS) and 72 cases from the literature (6 IDCS, 11 LCS, 55 HS) with NGS data. Among the 89 total patients, 26 (29%) had DNA-only sequencing and 63 (71%) had combined DNA/RNA sequencing. Twelve patients (n=12; 13%) had a single mutation; the majority had multiple alterations. The most frequently mutated genes were: RAS (n=26; 29%), CDKN1/2 (n=26; 29%), MAP2K1 (n=15; 17%), PTEN (n=11; 12%), BRAF non-V600E (n=8; 9%), PTPN11 (n=8; 9%), CREBBP (n=8; 9%), TET2 (n=8; 9%), DNMT3A (n=7; 8%), fusions (n=7; 8%), BRAFV600E (n=6; 7%), and NF1 (n=4; 4%). Fusions included BRAF::NRF11, BRAF::CLIP2, BRAF::MBP, EGFR::CYTOR, CDKN2A::ADGRG6, IGH::BCL6, and CLIP2-BRAF. Two patients had no alteration detected. Non-V600E BRAF mutations included D594G (n=3), G596R (n=1), G466A (n=1), N581T (n=1), N581I (n=1), and N581S (n=1). Common co-mutations with BRAF included CDKN2A/B (n=9), TP53 (n=6), KRAS/NRAS (n=5), and PDGFR (n=1). Only 2 of 15 MAP2K1-mutated patients (13%) had isolated mutations; the rest had co-mutations, most frequently TP53 (n=3) and BCL2 (n=3). MAP2K1 mutations included F53I (n=2), C121S (n=2), I103N (n=1), Q56P(n=3), E203K (n=1), F53-K57del (n=1), and F53-Q58del (n=1).NRAS mutations (n=6) included Q16K (n=2), G12C (n=1), Q61R (n=1), and 2 unspecified. KRAS mutations (n=20) included G13D (n=3), Q61H (n=3), G12V (n=2), K117N (n=1), V14I (n=1), and 10 unspecified. The most frequent co-mutational pattern (24%) was RAS plus another gene: BRAF (n=3), TP53 (n=6), MAP2K1 (n=2), PTEN (n=4), and CDKN2A/B (n=6).Twelve patients (12/26; 46%) were treated with targeted therapies. Responses included 6 partial and 5 complete responses. Median duration of response was 27.5 months (range 7–54). The sole non-responder had co-occurring NRASand TP53 mutations and received trametinib. Responders received a range of agents matched to their mutations: trametinib (BRAFV600E, MAP2K1F53I, KRASQ16H/PTEND24G/EPHB1R327C, MAP2K1F53I/BCL2/CDKN1B/KIT, and CALR), dabrafenib + trametinib(BRAFG596R/KRASQ61H), imatinib (MAP2K1C121S/METG28881T/DUSP2G137D/HIST1H3BC97Y/GRIN2AS1216C and PTPN11/STK11/GNA11/JAK2), chidamide + sintilimab(IDH2G515A/RHOAG50T/TET23344delC), sirolimus(PTEN/FGFR3/SETD2) and sorafenib (BRAFD594G/KRASK117N/TP53). Most responders (8/11) had multiple mutations; only 3 had single alterations, suggesting multi-mutant MH may still be targetable. Common complex patterns included BRAF+CDKN2A + CDKN2B (n=4), BRAF + CDKN2A + TP53 (n=2), and BRAF + CDKN2A + KRAS (n=2).Conclusion. The MAPK pathway (BRAF, MAP2K1, RAS) is the most altered signaling axis in MH, often accompanied by mutations in tumor suppressors and cell cycle regulators such as TP53, CDKN2A/B, and PTEN. Most MH patients exhibit multiple genomic alterations. Despite this complexity, durable clinical responses to targeted agents are achievable, even in heavily mutated cases. These findings support the use of comprehensive genomic profiling in MH to identify therapeutic targets and guide precision treatment strategies.

Introduction Malignant histiocytoses (MH), encompassing histiocytic sarcoma (HS), interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma (IDCS), and Langerhans cell sarcoma (LCS), are a group of rare, hematologic neoplasms with diverse clinical presentations and poor outcomes. There are no established or effective treatments for patients with MH. The discovery of MAPK/ERK pathway mutations in non-malignant histiocytoses have revolutionized the treatment paradigm, but it is unknown whether novel treatments are efficacious for MH. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of targeted agents (TA) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in MH. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of MH patients seen at our two institutions. Only patients treated with TA and/or ICI were included. We captured the mutational status by next generation sequencing and PD-L1 expression level by immunohistochemistry, where available. We also conducted a systematic literature review using PubMed to identify additional cases of MH patients treated with TA and/or ICI. Responses were reported as complete (CR), partial (PR), or none (NR) using previously published criteria for histiocytic disorders. Results From our institutions, we identified 12 MH patients (7 HS; 4 LCS; 1 IDCS) who received 14 instances of these treatments including TA (n=9) and/or ICI (n=5). The median age at diagnosis was 55 years (range, 33-70) and 50% were males. TAs included BRAF inhibitor (vemurafenib [1]), MEK inhibitors (binimetinib [1], cobimetinib [2], trametinib [2]) and others (dasatinib [1], pazopanib [1], pexidartinib [1]), while ICIs were exclusively pembrolizumab (5). The median number of prior treatments for those who received TAs and ICIs were 4 and 2, respectively. Responses were observed in 44.4% (1 CR, 3 PRs, 5 NR) and 40% (2 CRs, 3 NRs) of patients who received TA and ICI, respectively. Only 1 patient (20%) treated with MEK inhibitor responded [DOCK8-BRAF; PR 5+ mos]. Other responders received dasatinib [PDFGRA-V608I; PR 2 mos], pexidartinib [PTPN11-A72T; PR 5 mos], and vemurafenib [BRAF-V600E; CR 10+ mos]. Two patients (40%) who received pembrolizumab responded (both CRs 12+ [10% PD-L1] and 44+ mos [40% PD-L1]). We identified 29 MH patients in the literature (27 HS; 2 LCS) treated with TAs (22) and/or ICIs (10). TAs included BRAF inhibitor only (vemurafenib [3], dabrafenib [3]), MEK inhibitor only (trametinib [5]), BRAF + MEK inhibitors (2), and others (apatinib, anlotimib, bevacizumab, daratumumab, dasatinib, imatinib, pazopanib, sorafenib, or combinations [9]), while ICIs included pembrolizumab (4), nivolumab (4), tislelizumab (1), and sintilimab (1). Responses were observed in 77% (7 CRs, 10 PRs, 5 NRs) and 100% (2 CRs, 8 PRs) of patients who received targeted agents and ICI, respectively. Most patients carrying BRAF (7/8; V600E, G596R, D594G, TRIM::BRAF) or MAP2K1 (3/3; C121S, F53I) mutations responded to treatments, irrespective of the number of mutations present. The median durations of response for ICI and targeted agents were 10.5 months (range: 1-36+) and 12+ months (range: 3-44+), respectively. After combining the datasets from our institutions and literature review, we analyzed the association between the extent of PD-L1 expression and response to ICI. Those who responded to ICI had higher PDL-1 expression (median 75% [range, 10-75] vs 25% [range, 1-30]; P=0.0097). Conclusion TAs and ICIs can be considered in the management of MH. The responses to ICI therapy may be associated with the degree of PDL1 expression

Introduction. Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) belong to a group of histiocytic neoplasms often driven by mutations in the mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, most commonly in BRAF, MAP2K1 and K/NRAS. Currently, there are 2 drugs approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of histiocytic neoplasms, cobimetinib and vemurafenib, both small molecule kinase inhibitors (SMKI) targeting mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) and BRAF, respectively. BRAF mutations are functionally classified as RAS-independent - either monomers (class I) or dimers (class II) - and RAS-dependent (class III). MAP2K1 mutations are functionally classified as RAF-independent, RAF-regulated, or RAF-dependent. Preclinical studies suggest class I, but not classes II-III, BRAF mutations are sensitive to RAF monomer inhibitors (dabrafenib, encorafenib, vemurafenib) while classes I-II, but not class III, BRAF mutations are sensitive to MEK inhibitors (Yaeger R, Cancer Discovery 2019). In contrast, RAF-regulated MAP2K1 mutants have variable sensitivities to allosteric MEK inhibitors (binimetinib, cobimetinib, selumetinib, trametinib) while RAF-dependent and RAF-independent MAP2K1 mutations are resistant. KRAS mutations are generally resistant to MEK inhibitors (Johnson C, Cancer Discovery 2022). Our study described the clinical efficacy of commercially available SMKIs in patients with histiocytic neoplasms harboring non-BRAFV600E mutations and compared the findings with preclinical data. Methods. We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients with histiocytic neoplasms who were treated with SMKI at Mayo Clinic. Only those who had adequate genomic testing and non-BRAFV600E mutations were included. Responses were categorized as complete (CR), partial (PR), or none (NR) based on established criteria. Results. We identified 31 non-BRAFV600E patients treated with SMKI (2 LCH; 20 ECD; 9 RDD). The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (range: 16-76) and 52% were females. The distribution of BRAF mutations was: class I (V600delinsRE [1]), class II (V495A [1], V471F [1], N486_P490del [2], GAB2-BRAF [1], UBR2-BRAF [1], RNF11-BRAF [1], UBTD2-BRAF [1]), and class III (G466E [1], D594A [1]). The only patient with class I mutation received cobimetinib and had PR. Among those with BRAF class II mutations, 2 received vemurafenib and had NR, while 9 received MEK inhibitors (binimetinib, cobimetinib, trametinib) and most responded (3 CRs, 5 PRs). The patient who had NR required dose reductions due to side effects. Both patients with class III mutation did not respond to cobimetinib. The median duration of responses was 19 months (range: 3+ to 45+) and 3 patients progressed subsequently. The distribution of MAP2K1 mutations was: RAF-independent (E102_103del [2]), RAF-regulated (I103N [1], K57T [1], Q56P [3], F53L [1], K57N [1]) and RAF-dependent (Y130C [1], D67N [1]). Both patients with RAF-independent mutations treated with cobimetinib had PRs. All patients with RAF-regulated mutations treated with allosteric MEK inhibitors responded (3 CRs, 5 PRs). Both patients with RAF-dependent mutations treated with cobimetinib responded (1 CR, 1 PR). The median duration of responses was 15 months (2 to 29+) with 3 patients progressing after treatment cessation due to intolerance. The distribution of RAS mutations was: NRAS (Q16R [1]) and KRAS (K117N [3], A146T [1], T581 [1], G13C [1], G12D [1]). Most patients treated with allosteric MEK inhibitors responded (3 CR, 4 PR, 1 NR). The median duration of response was 15 months (5 to 41) and 2 patients subsequently progressed, one of them after treatment cessation. Conclusions. Among patients with histiocytic neoplasms with non-BRAFV600E mutations receiving SMKI, our study found mixed patterns of concordance between pre-clinical predictions and clinical responses. There was concordance of efficacy in the setting of BRAF classes I-III and MAP2K1 RAF-regulated mutations. However, we found discordant findings in patients harboring RAF-dependent and RAF-independent MAP2K1 mutations as well as KRAS mutations as most responded to allosteric MEK inhibitors.