Cao, Xin-Xin

Abstract Introduction: Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm, with approximately 90% of patients exhibiting alterations in the MAPK pathway. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown promising results in treating MAPK pathway-altered LCH. However, treatment interruptions due to adverse effects are common, and limited access to targeted therapies complicates care globally. While chemotherapy remains a common treatment for LCH, the outcomes for patients with MAPK pathway-altered LCH specifically receiving chemotherapy are still unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional international retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients with BRAF or MAP2K (gain-of-function, GOF) altered LCH that were consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic, MN, AZ, and FL, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China between 2007 and 2024. All patients who were included in this study were treated with chemotherapy, and those who have received targeted therapies or other modalities of frontline treatment were excluded. All time-to-event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy initiation, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) included death and progression as events and was measured from the time of treatment initiation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation in accordance with the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Risk organ involvement was defined as disease involving the liver, spleen, bone marrow or central nervous system. Results: A total of 63 patients with LCH were included. The median age of the population was 34 years (range: 27-43), and males were 59%. Risk organ involvement was seen in 44 (70%) of patients and multisystemic LCH was observed in 48 (76%) patients. Among the 63 patients, BRAF gain-of-function alterations were observed in 79%, MAP2K mutations in 19%, and BRAF fusions in 2%. Of the BRAF gain-of-function alterations, BRAFV600E mutation was seen in 64% patients and [p.N486_P490del] deletion in 36%. There was no significant difference in organ involvement (single-system versus multisystem) or risk organ involvement between patients with BRAF and MAP2K alterations. All 63 patients received systemic therapy with chemotherapy and the regimens included Cytarabine (n=43), Cladribine (n=5), Etoposide (n=1), Methotrexate (n=1), and combined Methotrexate and Cytarabine (n=13). The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.8 years (range 3.2–5.0 years), with similar durations observed in patients with single-system vs. multisystem involvement and those with risk-organ involvement vs. no risk-organ involvement. The overall response rate among patients who received chemotherapy was 89%, with complete responses in 15 patients (26%) and partial responses in 40 patients (64.5%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 2.61 years (95% CI: 2.06–NA). The 3-year PFS did not significantly differ based on risk organ involvement: 50.6% (95% CI: 36–71) for patients with risk organ involvement versus 47.4% (95% CI: 28–81) for those without, p=0.52. Patients with single-system disease experienced longer PFS compared to those with multisystem disease; the 3-year PFS was 80.2% (95% CI: 58.7–100) versus 42.2% (95% CI: 29–61.5), respectively, p=0.04. Conclusions: Our results indicate that LCH patients with a GOF alteration in the MAPK pathway derive significant clinical benefit from chemotherapy, achieving deep and durable responses. Therefore, patients should not be excluded from treatment due to the absence of targeted therapies, as they can still attain substantial responses and clinical improvement with chemotherapy, even in the context of MAPK pathway-driven disease.

Introduction: Autoimmunity in Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD) has been reported in several case reports and small case series. The recent consensus RDD guidelines even classify “immune-related RDD” as a distinct entity, but little is known about the prevalence and patterns of autoimmune conditions in this rare disease. We conducted this study to evaluate a large cohort of patients with RDD for concomitant autoimmunity. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of cases diagnosed with RDD from five referral centers globally. Data pertaining to autoimmunity were captured in terms of serology and a clinical diagnosis of autoimmune disease (AID) and compared to previously reported prevalence of AID and autoimmunity in the general population and in patients with other lymphomas. Results: We included 157 patients diagnosed with RDD from 2003-2023. Median age at the time of RDD diagnosis was 48 years, IQR 35.5-60. This included 103 females (65.6%) and 54 male (34.4%). Racial distribution included 54 Black (34.4%), 52 White (33.1%), 40 Asian (25.5%), 7 Middle Eastern (4.5%) and 4 other (2.5%). 83 patients had multi-systemic disease (52.8%) and 74 had single organ involvement (47.2%). Most common organs involved were skin/subcutaneous tissue (78, 49.7%), lymph nodes (63, 40.1%), bone (54, 34.2%). Tissue next generation sequencing data was available for 100 patients (63.7 %) and showed KRAS mutation (19, 19 %), MAP2K/MEK (13, 13%), other mutations (27, 27 %), and no mutations (41, 41%). Mean ESR at diagnosis of RDD was 28.42 mm/Hr and mean CRP was 19.5 mg/L. In our cohort, 28 patients (17.8%) were diagnosed with an AID. 19 (67.8%) were diagnosed with the AID prior to the diagnosis of RDD. Most common AID was systemic lupus erythematosus (6, 21.4%), rheumatoid arthritis (5, 17.8%), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (3, 10.7%), polymyalgia rheumatica (2, 7.1%). AID was more common in female vs male (64.3% vs 35.7%, p 0.8) and were more commonly seen in patients with multisystem compared to single organ RDD (60.7% vs 39.3%, p 0.3). Mean ESR and CRP at the time of RDD diagnosis in patients with AID were 40.63 mm/Hr and 37.04 mg/L respectively. Autoimmune antibodies were tested in 90 patients (57.3%), of which 43 (47.8%) were positive for atleast one autoantibody which included 15 patients (16.7%) with AID and a positive autoantibody and 6 (6.6%) with AID and negative antibodies (p 0.01). Most common antibodies were ANA (29/83, 34.9%), 42.3% with a titer higher than 1:160. Other antibodies include RF (10/60, 16.67%), anti-neutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (3/19, 15.8%), double stranded DNA (6/56, 10.7%). Positive Antibodies were more common in female compared to male patients (72% vs 23%, p 0.04) and in patients from China compared to North America (45.7% vs 22.6%, p 0.007). Autoantibody positivity was common in multi-system vs single organ RDD (53.5% vs 46.5%, p 0.9). Mean ESR and CRP in this group of patients were 34.54 mm/Hr and 23.93 mg/L respectively. Median duration of follow up for our cohort was 32 months (IQR 14-65). Five-year survival was 93.4%. There were a total 8 deaths reported in the cohort, none of which were in patients with underlying AID. In a multivariable analysis, AID was associated with race (odds ratio [OR] for Middle Eastern compared with Chinese, OR 7, p=0.02) but other factors like organ involvement, mutational status, sex and age at diagnosis were not significant. Conclusions: Our study reveals a high prevalence of autoimmunity in RDD, both in terms of AID (17.8 %) and positive autoantibodies (47.8 %), which is much higher than the general population rates of approximately 3% and 16% respectively, and higher than patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma, 7.6% and 39%, respectively. There was a trend toward association of AID with multisystem RDD and among individuals from North America and Middle East compared to China, although auto-antibody positivity was more common in Chinese patients. Mean ESR and CRP at the time of diagnosis of RDD was higher in the patients who had AID. We did not find any statistically significant association between AID and autoantibody positivity with the underlying driver mutation. Nearly half of the patients with RDD who also had AID did not have a positive autoantibody, thereby implying the need of clinical evaluation for rheumatological symptoms rather than empiric serological testing. Overall, this study also highlights the need to explore the biological link between RDD and autoimmunity.

Purpose: The discovery of MAPK/ERK pathway mutations has led to the approval of MEK-inhibitor (MEKi) cobimetinib in histiocytic neoplasms. However, the pivotal clinical trial that led to the approval of cobimetinib included only 4 patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH). Therefore, there is a need to define outcomes with MEKi therapy in patients with LCH. We undertook a multi-center collaboration through the Adult LCH Working Group for the Histiocyte Society to address this gap in knowledge. Methods: Adults with LCH who received MEKi therapy were included from five institutions. Objective response rate (ORR) was evaluated using PET/CT criteria, and CT/MRI if PET scan was not available; response categories were categorized into complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD). Progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated from the time of targeted therapy initiation. Risk organ disease was defined as liver, spleen, or bone marrow involvement. Results: 25 adults with LCH were included in this study; median age at MEKi initiation 43y (range, 18-85). Most common systems involved at diagnosis were bone (52%), pituitary (44%), and lung (36%). Risk organ involvement was observed in 7 (28%, 6 liver, 1 liver and spleen) and 2 (8%) patients had intra-axial CNS involvement. Median lines of prior therapy received were 2 (range: 1-5), and 4 (16%) patients received MEKi in first-line. MAPK/ERK pathway status was assessed via target capture next generation sequencing (NGS) in 22 (96%) cases. Amongst those who underwent NGS, alterations identified included: BRAF V600E (2/22, 9%), BRAF deletions (11/22 50%), MAP2K1 or MEK mutations (4/22, 18%), and MAPK1 or ERK2 (n=1, 5%). Overall, 5 patients also received BRAF inhibitors (4 patients as first therapy prior to MEKi and 1 concomitantly due to BRAF V600E positive melanoma). Specific MEKi agents utilized included cobimetinib (n=13) and trametinib (n=12). Among the response evaluable patients (n=23), ORR to MEKi treatment was 78% (9 CR, 9 PR, 4 SD, 1 PD). Among the 7 patients with liver involvement, responses were seen in 2 (29%) cases. ORR did not significantly differ according to mutation status among those with NGS data (78% MAPK mutated vs. 100% unmutated; p=1.0). In this subcohort, all of the 4 cases that did not respond to MEKi had liver involvement; 3 had BRAF deletions (2 SD and 1 PD), and one had MAPK1 mutation (SD). Median follow-up duration after MEKi initiation in the entire cohort was 18 months (95% CI 6 - 30). The median PFS and OS were not reached; 2-year PFS and OS were 78.1% and 79.9%, respectively (Figure 1A). The median PFS was much shorter in those with liver involvement (7 months [95% CI 0 - 14]) compared with those without liver disease (not reached [95% CI 19-not reached] P=0.047; Figure 1B). PFS did not differ significantly between MAPK pathway mutated and unmutated patients (p=0.34) Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 36% (n=9) and most commonly included rash (n=5) and fatigue (n=3). Four patients experienced grade 3-4 AEs including rash, fatigue, and thrombocytopenia. Common causes of MEKi discontinuation included AEs (n=3), progression (n=2), and drug holiday (n=2). At last follow-up, 5 patients died and 18 remained on MEKi. Death was attributable to LCH (n=3), concomitant malignancy (n=1), or unknown causes (n=1). Conclusions: In our multi-institutional study of adults with LCH, we found MEKi therapy to be highly efficacious. However, liver involvement correlated with a lack of response and worse PFS, while mutational status did not. Future studies are needed to evaluate optimum treatment for high-risk subgroups of LCH like liver disease.

Abstract Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) can affect children and adults with a wide variety of clinical manifestations, including unifocal, single-system multifocal, single-system pulmonary (smoking-associated), or multisystem disease. The existing paradigms in the management of LCH in adults are mostly derived from the pediatric literature. Over the last decade, the discovery of clonality and MAPK-ERK pathway mutations in most cases led to the recognition of LCH as a hematopoietic neoplasm, opening the doors for treatment with targeted therapies. These advances have necessitated an update of the existing recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of LCH in adults. This document presents consensus recommendations that resulted from the discussions at the annual Histiocyte Society meeting in 2019, encompassing clinical features, classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment algorithm, and response assessment for adults with LCH. The recommendations favor the use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-based imaging for staging and response assessment in the majority of cases. Most adults with unifocal disease may be cured by local therapies, while the first-line treatment for single-system pulmonary LCH remains smoking cessation. Among patients not amenable or unresponsive to these treatments and/or have multifocal and multisystem disease, systemic treatments are recommended. Preferred systemic treatments in adults with LCH include cladribine or cytarabine, with the emerging role of targeted (BRAF and MEK inhibitor) therapies. Despite documented responses to treatments, many patients struggle with a high symptom burden from pain, fatigue, and mood disorders that should be acknowledged and managed appropriately.

Abstract Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a rare histiocytosis that was recently recognized as a neoplastic disorder owing to the discovery of recurrent activating MAPK (RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK) pathway mutations. Typical findings of ECD include central diabetes insipidus, restrictive pericarditis, perinephric fibrosis, and sclerotic bone lesions. The histopathologic diagnosis of ECD is often challenging due to nonspecific inflammatory and fibrotic findings on histopathologic review of tissue specimens. Additionally, the association of ECD with unusual tissue tropism and an insidious onset often results in diagnostic errors and delays. Most patients with ECD require treatment, except for a minority of patients with minimally symptomatic single-organ disease. The first ECD consensus guidelines were published in 2014 on behalf of the physicians and researchers within the Erdheim-Chester Disease Global Alliance. With the recent molecular discoveries and the approval of the first targeted therapy (vemurafenib) for BRAF-V600–mutant ECD, there is a need for updated clinical practice guidelines to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of this disease. This document presents consensus recommendations that resulted from the International Medical Symposia on ECD in 2017 and 2019. Herein, we include the guidelines for the clinical, laboratory, histologic, and radiographic evaluation of ECD patients along with treatment recommendations based on our clinical experience and review of literature in the molecular era.