Saha, Aditi

Abstract Secondary central nervous system (CNS) large B-cell lymphoma (SCNSL) occurs in the de novo setting, as a CNS-isolated relapse, or synchronous (concomitant CNS and systemic) relapse. SCNSL is a devastating event without therapeutic consensus. Thus, we aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes in an international cohort. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR, estimated using competing-risk models) were reported. Prognostic factors were identified in a 6-month landmark multivariate analysis. Outcomes after thiotepa autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy (CAR-T) delivered at relapse were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). A total of 1139 patients were included in the analysis (de novo: 537; relapsed SCNSL: 602). Two-year PFS estimates were 40.4%, 43.9%, and 16.2% for de novo SCNSL, CNS-isolated relapse, and synchronous relapse, respectively. Patients with CNS-isolated relapse demonstrated low rates of systemic recurrence (24-month CIR, 6%). Thiotepa-ASCT correlated with longer survival in de novo SCNSL (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; P = .005; and OS: HR, 0.62; P = .023) and CNS-isolated relapses (PFS: HR, 0.55; P = .002; and OS: HR, 0.39; P< .0001). ASCT (thiotepa or no thiotepa) also associated with improved survival in synchronous relapses (PFS: HR, 0.57; P = .023; and OS: HR, 0.48; P = .019). Higher survival with thiotepa-ASCT than CAR-T was observed after PSM (PFS: HR, 0.45; P = .005 and OS: HR, 0.41; P = .014). These data support thiotepa-ASCT in eligible patients, particularly de novo disease and CNS-isolated relapses. CNS-isolated relapse was infrequently associated with systemic recurrence, supporting treatment regimens adopted from primary CNS lymphoma.

Abstract Introduction Histiocytic neoplasms (HN) are a rare, heterogeneous group of hematologic disorders derived from myeloid-dendritic cell lineages. The most common forms include Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), and Rosai-Dorfman disease (RDD). These disorders are driven by recurrent activating mutations in the MAPK pathway, most frequently involving BRAF, MAP2K1, PIK3CA, KRAS, and NRAS. This discovery enabled a major therapeutic advance with the use of BRAF and MEK inhibitors, resulting in durable responses. For patients harboring KRAS mutations, MEK inhibitors (MEKi) remain the primary therapeutic approach. However, the impact of KRAS mutation subtypes on treatment response remains poorly understood. Our study aimed to characterize the spectrum of KRAS mutations in LCH, ECD, and RDD and evaluate the responses to MEKi, providing insights to guide future treatment strategies. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients with LCH, ECD, and RDD who were evaluated at Mayo Clinic or University of Alabama at Birmingham. Patients were included if next-generation sequencing identified a KRAS mutation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation under the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Results We identified 23 patients with a KRAS mutation: 17 females (73.9%) and 6 males (26.1%), with a median age at diagnosis of 61 years (range, 20–78). RDD accounted for 73.9% (17/23) and ECD for 26.1% (6/23); no KRAS mutations were detected in LCH patients. The most frequent KRAS variants were p.K117N (34.8%), p.G12D (17.4%), p.A146T (13.0%), p.G13C (8.7%), and p.G13D (8.7%), with additional variants including p.T58I, p.A59G, p.A146P, and p.A146V. Mutation distribution differed by disease group: p.G12D was more common in ECD (50%) than RDD (5.9%) (p=0.01), whereas p.K117N occurred in 47.1% of RDD and was absent in ECD. Regarding treatment, 57% (13/23) received MEKi, all initially cobimetinib, with 1 patient switched to trametinib due to progression. Of the 10 patients who did not receive MEKi, 1 was treated with vemurafenib for a concurrent BRAF p.V600E mutation; 3 remained on observation; 2 underwent surgery without recurrence; 3 received other systemic therapies including corticosteroid, methotrexate, rituximab, lenalidomide, or sirolimus; and 1 developed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, treated with R-CHOP. The overall response rate in the 12 patients on MEKi (excluding 1 patient too early for assessment) was 75%—3 (25%) CR and 6 (50%) PR (including 1 who initially progressed on cobimetinib but responded to trametinib). All 3 non-responders had RDD. Among the 5 patients with p.K117N, 3 had no response to cobimetinib, 1 achieved PR, and 1 achieved CR; notably, 1 non-responder switched to trametinib and achieved PR in 2 months. All 3 patients with codon 146 mutations achieved PR. Of the 2 patients with p.G12D, 1 achieved CR with a co-occurring MAP2K1 mutation, and 1 had no response. No additional genotype–response patterns were observed. Similar heterogeneity has been reported in prior studies. In a phase II cobimetinib trial, an ECD patient with p.R149G achieved PR, whereas another ECD patient with p.G12R and an LCH patient with p.G13C achieved CR in the presence of co-occurring ARAF and NRAS mutations, respectively. A retrospective cohort described an ECD patient with p.K117N achieving PR on dabrafenib and trametinib with a concurrent BRAF mutation and another with p.G12A achieving PR on trametinib. In a multicenter analysis of trametinib, a patient with p.A59T (co-occurring BRAF and NRAS mutations) had no response, whereas another with p.A146P achieved PR. Collectively, these findings, together with our data, underscore that KRAS-mutated histiocytoses exhibit heterogeneous responses to MEKi, likely influenced by variant type and co-mutations. Discussion KRAS mutations represent an important subset of MAPK pathway alterations in HN, although their prevalence varies by disease type and appears extremely rare in LCH, with no cases identified in our cohort. The most common variants include p.K117N and p.G12D, which may be linked to suboptimal response to MEKi in the absence of concurrent MAPK pathway alterations. As MEKi acts downstream, efficacy likely depends on the level of pathway activation conferred by specific KRAS variants. Larger studies are needed to confirm these observations and identify mutation-specific predictors to guide personalized treatment.

Abstract Introduction: Langerhans Cell Histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare histiocytic neoplasm, with approximately 90% of patients exhibiting alterations in the MAPK pathway. BRAF and MEK inhibitors have shown promising results in treating MAPK pathway-altered LCH. However, treatment interruptions due to adverse effects are common, and limited access to targeted therapies complicates care globally. While chemotherapy remains a common treatment for LCH, the outcomes for patients with MAPK pathway-altered LCH specifically receiving chemotherapy are still unclear. Methods: This multi-institutional international retrospective cohort study analyzed adult patients with BRAF or MAP2K (gain-of-function, GOF) altered LCH that were consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic, MN, AZ, and FL, University of Alabama at Birmingham, and Peking Union Medical College Hospital in China between 2007 and 2024. All patients who were included in this study were treated with chemotherapy, and those who have received targeted therapies or other modalities of frontline treatment were excluded. All time-to-event analyses were performed from the frontline therapy initiation, using the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression-free survival (PFS) included death and progression as events and was measured from the time of treatment initiation. The response assessment was based on radiographic evaluation in accordance with the most recent Histiocyte Society consensus guideline. Risk organ involvement was defined as disease involving the liver, spleen, bone marrow or central nervous system. Results: A total of 63 patients with LCH were included. The median age of the population was 34 years (range: 27-43), and males were 59%. Risk organ involvement was seen in 44 (70%) of patients and multisystemic LCH was observed in 48 (76%) patients. Among the 63 patients, BRAF gain-of-function alterations were observed in 79%, MAP2K mutations in 19%, and BRAF fusions in 2%. Of the BRAF gain-of-function alterations, BRAFV600E mutation was seen in 64% patients and [p.N486_P490del] deletion in 36%. There was no significant difference in organ involvement (single-system versus multisystem) or risk organ involvement between patients with BRAF and MAP2K alterations. All 63 patients received systemic therapy with chemotherapy and the regimens included Cytarabine (n=43), Cladribine (n=5), Etoposide (n=1), Methotrexate (n=1), and combined Methotrexate and Cytarabine (n=13). The median follow-up for the entire cohort was 3.8 years (range 3.2–5.0 years), with similar durations observed in patients with single-system vs. multisystem involvement and those with risk-organ involvement vs. no risk-organ involvement. The overall response rate among patients who received chemotherapy was 89%, with complete responses in 15 patients (26%) and partial responses in 40 patients (64.5%). The median progression-free survival (PFS) for the entire cohort was 2.61 years (95% CI: 2.06–NA). The 3-year PFS did not significantly differ based on risk organ involvement: 50.6% (95% CI: 36–71) for patients with risk organ involvement versus 47.4% (95% CI: 28–81) for those without, p=0.52. Patients with single-system disease experienced longer PFS compared to those with multisystem disease; the 3-year PFS was 80.2% (95% CI: 58.7–100) versus 42.2% (95% CI: 29–61.5), respectively, p=0.04. Conclusions: Our results indicate that LCH patients with a GOF alteration in the MAPK pathway derive significant clinical benefit from chemotherapy, achieving deep and durable responses. Therefore, patients should not be excluded from treatment due to the absence of targeted therapies, as they can still attain substantial responses and clinical improvement with chemotherapy, even in the context of MAPK pathway-driven disease.

Abstract Background:Erdheim-Chester Disease (ECD) is a rare, incurable histiocytic neoplasm. Since its recognition in 1930, our understanding of ECD's pathophysiology has evolved. The identification of its clonal nature after 2015 established ECD as a cancer, prompting increased disease awareness and treatment advances. Targeted therapies show promising responses, but changes in ECD mortality over time have not been extensively documented. Methods:A multi-institutional retrospective cohort study analyzed adults with ECD consecutively seen at Mayo Clinic MN, AZ, and FL and the University of Alabama at Birmingham between 2007 and 2024. Clinical and prognostic data were abstracted. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared to expected survival using U.S. Census data, based on age at diagnosis (by calendar year), date of diagnosis, and sex. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated by dividing the number of observed deaths in the study population by the expected number of deaths using U.S. population data. Risk of death was compared by date of diagnosis (pre- and post-2015) using Cox proportional hazards analysis. Statistical analysis was performed with R software. Results:A total of 159 ECD patients were included (median age 58 years [range 19-82], 65% male). Forty-nine patients were diagnosed between 1990-2014 and 110 between 2015-2024. Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 4.0 years (95% CI: 3.2-4.4). Median follow-up for those diagnosed between 1990-2014 was 10.4 years (CI: 3.2-16.8), compared to 3.5 years (CI: 3.0-4.2) for those diagnosed between 2015-2024. The 5-year overall survival rate was 80% (95% CI: 72-88). Patients with ECD had an increase in mortality over expected, with 28 deaths compared to an expected 11.2, an SMR of 2.5 (95% CI: 1.7-3.6, p<0.001). Of 17 patients with an identified cause of death, death was attributable to ECD in 11 (65%), secondary malignancy in 1 (7%), and unrelated causes in 5 (29%). Cause of death was unknown in 11 patients. Among deaths, 11 (39%) were treated with targeted therapy, 8 (29%) with chemotherapy, and 1 (4%) received both. One patient (4%) received steroids, 1 received immunomodulator and targeted therapy (4%), and 6 (21%) received no disease-directed therapy. Of the patients whose death was related to ECD, 10 (91%) had multisystem disease. For 49 patients diagnosed pre-2015, 14 deaths occurred during the follow-up, significantly higher than the expected 5.2 deaths based on U.S. population data (SMR of 2.7 [95% CI: 1.5-4.4, p=0.001]). Among those diagnosed between 2015 and 2024, 14 deaths occurred, compared to expected 6.1 (SMR of 2.3 [95% CI: 1.3-3.8, p=0.006]). In an age- and sex-adjusted Cox proportional hazards model, diagnosis after 2015 vs. diagnosis prior to 2015 yielded a hazard ratio of 0.59 (95% CI: 0.27-1.31, p=0.19). Conclusion:The mortality rate of ECD patients remains higher than the general population, despite advancements in disease recognition and development of targeted therapies. While our data suggest a possible trend toward improved survival among patients diagnosed after 2015, we did not find statistically significant evidence of decreased mortality compared to those diagnosed prior to 2015. Larger cohorts with longer follow-up periods are needed to draw definitive conclusions regarding mortality.

Abstract Introduction: CD20xCD3 bispecific antibodies (BsAb) have been approved for use in relapsed/refractory (RR) large B-Cell lymphomas (LBCLs) with manageable toxicities. The main adverse events of clinical interest are cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). The risk factors for CRS and ICANS are not well understood. Knowledge of variables that contribute to increased risk may help clinicians identify and tailor management for high-risk patients (pts) and increase the comfort level for providers using these therapies in community practices. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study at 21 US centers evaluating pts with RR LBCLs receiving commercially available epcoritamab (epco) or glofitamab (glofit) between 2023 and 2025. We obtained baseline characteristics, safety and efficacy outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed to identify associations between CRS, ICANS, and clinical variables of interest. Results: As of May 31, 2025, a total of 312 pts with RR LBCLs were treated with BsAb, Epco n=193 (62%), Glofit n= 119 (38%); median age 68; 63% male; 70% ECOG PS 0-1. Most common histologic type was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (DLBCL, NOS) (n=239, 84%) followed by high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL) (n=46, 16%). 179 pts (57%) were previously treated with chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy, with 47% receiving CAR-T <6 months (mo) prior to BsAb. Among pts with prior CAR-T, CRS with CAR-T therapy of any grade occurred in 63%, with 26% ≥ grade 2. ICANS of any grade (G) occurred in 25% of pts (9.4% ≥ G3). Overall and complete response (ORR and CR) rates to BsAb were 51% and 29%, respectively. With a median follow up of 5 mo, median progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) were 2.3 and 7.3 mo, respectively. With BsAb treatment, CRS of any grade occurred in 117 (39%) patients: 24% G1, 8.7% G2, 4% G3, 1% G4 and 1% G5. The max grade CRS occurred most frequently after the third dose of epco (35%) and the first dose of glofit (23%). CRS was managed with additional steroids in 24% of pts and tocilizumab in 22%. 13% of pts experienced ICANS: 5.8% G1, 3.4% G2, 2% G3, 1% G4 and 0.3% G5. Factors that increased the risk for any grade CRS included: bulky disease ≥ 7.5 cm at time of BsAb treatment (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.17 – 3.55, p = 0.012), elevated LDH (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.45– 4.76, p = 0.002) and treatment with epco compared to glofit (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.04- 2.77, p = 0.036). As G ≥2 CRS generally requires inpatient monitoring and management, we next compared the risk factors between pts with no CRS or G1 CRS and G ≥2 CRS. Factors associated with increased risk for high grade CRS included: bone marrow involvement by lymphoma (OR 3.47, 95% CI 0.97 – 11.3, p = 0.043), platelet count ≤ 75 (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.21 – 4.87, p = 0.011), ≥ 2 extra nodal sites (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.07 – 3.97, p = 0.032) and ≥G2 CRS with prior CAR-T (OR 3.35, 95% CI 1.13 – 9.97, p = 0.027). Factors that increased the risk for ICANS included: bulky disease (OR 2.67, 95% CI 1.28 – 5.49, p = 0.008), elevated Cr ≥ 1.5x ULN (OR 3.79, 95% CI 1.25 – 10.4, p = 0.012), elevated AST/ALT ≥ 3x ULN (OR 4.65, 95% CI 0.92 – 19.9, p = 0.042), low albumin (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.49 - 5.5, p = 0.002), and co-occurrence of CRS with BsAb (OR 9.1, 95% CI 3.85- 25, p < 0.001). No other clinical variables including older age, histologic subtype, ECOG PS, B symptoms, IPI score, cell of origin or histologic subtype, baseline labs such as ALC, CRP, fibrinogen or D-dimer were significantly associated with CRS or ICANS risk. There was no difference in ORR or CR rates in patients who experienced CRS or ICANS. Conclusions: Our analysis of pts treated with commercial BsAb for LBCL shows an increased risk for CRS and ICANs based on clinical variables that are routinely obtained at baseline including tumor bulk, sites of disease, laboratory parameters, and history of prior CRS with CAR-T therapy. Differences in baseline populations receiving epco and glofit treatments in this real-world analysis have been previously reported (Brooks et al, Blood 2025) and the comparative risk for CRS between these treatments remains unclear. Future plans including multivariable analysis may allow for development of a predictive model to identify pts at high risk of CRS and ICANS with BsAb treatment, potentially leading to prospective clinical trials evaluating prophylactic interventions for high-risk pts.

Abstract Introduction: Epcoritamab (epco) and glofitamab (glofit) are bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) approved for the treatment of patients (pts) with multiply relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Though response rates are relatively high, most patients (pts) eventually experience progression of disease (POD). We sought to investigate the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes following POD post-BsAb for r/r LBCL Pts, as this has not previously been described. Methods: We performed a multicenter retrospective study including 21 US centers evaluating pts with r/r LBCL receiving commercially available epco or glofit between 2023 and 2025. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were extracted from medical records. Efficacy and survival outcomes were assessed by site investigators and included overall response rate (ORR), complete and partial response (CR, PR) rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method. Results: As of May 15, 2025, a total of 312 pts with r/r LBCLs were treated with BsAb, of whom a total of 168 (53.8%) pts experienced POD [104 of 193 (53.8%) treated with prior epco and 64 of 119 (53.8%) treated with prior glofit]. Pts with POD had a median age at BsAb start of 67 years (interquartile range [IQR] 58-76), most were male (68.4%), and the most common histology was diffuse large B-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (n=122 [71.8%]). Sixty-seven of 168 pts (39.9%) with POD after BsAb had experienced primary refractory disease defined as failure to achieve PR or CR to frontline therapy. A total of 102 (60.7%) pts with POD to BsAb had received chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy prior to BsAbs, with 33.3% of these pts being refractory to CAR T and 30.4% progressing within 6 months of CAR T-cell infusion. The median time to progression following BsAb start was 48 days. Following POD, 70 pts received no further anti-lymphoma therapy. Among 98 pts receiving subsequent therapy, 85 initially received systemic therapy and 13 initially received local therapy with radiation (concurrently with systemic therapy in 8 pts). The most commonly-used next line of systemic therapies included: loncastuximab tesirine in 19 pts (ORR 16.7%, all PR); commercial CAR T in 11 pts (ORR 50% [CR 36.4%, PR 18.2%); tafasitamab with lenalidomide in 7 (no responses); and other chemotherapy in 46 pts (ORR 27.6% [CR 24.1%]). The median follow-up time from POD was 9.2 months among survivors (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.8-13.3). Among those who initiated subsequent-line therapy following BsAbs, the median progression-free survival (PFS2) was 1.9 months (95% CI 1.5-2.4) and median overall survival (OS) from initiation of subsequent-line therapy was 3.9 months (95% CI 2.4-5.5). The estimated 1-year OS following initiation of next therapy was 12%. Conclusions: We report the outcomes of largest cohort of pts with POD post-BsAbs in r/r LBCL. Progression events occurred early after initiation of single agent BsAbs, and almost half of pts who progressed did not receive subsequent therapy. For those who received standard subsequent-line therapy after POD, response rates and survival outcomes were poor. Pts with POD after BsAB should be strongly considered for clinical trials of novel therapeutics or combination therapies.