Hermiston, Michelle L.

Abstract Defining prognostic variables in T-lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LL) remains a challenge. AALL1231 was a Children’s Oncology Group phase 3 clinical trial for newly diagnosed patients with T acute lymphoblastic leukemia or T-LL, randomizing children and young adults to a modified augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster backbone to receive standard therapy (arm A) or with addition of bortezomib (arm B). Optional bone marrow samples to assess minimal residual disease (MRD) at the end of induction (EOI) were collected in T-LL analyzed to assess the correlation of MRD at the EOI to event-free survival (EFS). Eighty-six (41%) of the 209 patients with T-LL accrued to this trial submitted samples for MRD assessment. Patients with MRD <0.1% (n = 75) at EOI had a superior 4-year EFS vs those with MRD ≥0.1% (n = 11) (89.0% ± 4.4% vs 63.6% ± 17.2%; P = .025). Overall survival did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Cox regression for EFS using arm A as a reference demonstrated that MRD EOI ≥0.1% was associated with a greater risk of inferior outcome (hazard ratio, 3.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-12.40; P = .032), which was independent of treatment arm assignment. Consideration to incorporate MRD at EOI into future trials will help establish its value in defining risk groups. CT# NCT02112916.

PURPOSE To improve the outcomes of patients with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) and lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LL), the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib was examined in the Children's Oncology Group phase III clinical trial AALL1231, which also attempted to reduce the use of prophylactic cranial radiation (CRT) in newly diagnosed T-ALL. PATIENTS AND METHODS Children and young adults with T-ALL/T-LL were randomly assigned to a modified augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster chemotherapy regimen with/without bortezomib during induction and delayed intensification. Multiple modifications were made to the augmented Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster backbone used in the predecessor trial, AALL0434, including using dexamethasone instead of prednisone and adding two extra doses of pegaspargase in an attempt to eliminate CRT in most patients. RESULTS AALL1231 accrued 824 eligible and evaluable patients from 2014 to 2017. The 4-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for arm A (no bortezomib) versus arm B (bortezomib) were 80.1% ± 2.3% versus 83.8% ± 2.1% (EFS, P = .131) and 85.7% ± 2.0% versus 88.3% ± 1.8% (OS, P = .085). Patients with T-LL had improved EFS and OS with bortezomib: 4-year EFS (76.5% ± 5.1% v 86.4% ± 4.0%; P = .041); and 4-year OS (78.3% ± 4.9% v 89.5% ± 3.6%; P = .009). No excess toxicity was seen with bortezomib. In AALL0434, 90.8% of patients with T-ALL received CRT. In AALL1231, 9.5% of patients were scheduled to receive CRT. Evaluation of comparable AALL0434 patients who received CRT and AALL1231 patients who did not receive CRT demonstrated no statistical differences in EFS ( P = .412) and OS ( P = .600). CONCLUSION Patients with T-LL had significantly improved EFS and OS with bortezomib on the AALL1231 backbone. Systemic therapy intensification allowed elimination of CRT in more than 90% of patients with T-ALL without excess relapse.

Abstract Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) can affect children and adults with a wide variety of clinical manifestations, including unifocal, single-system multifocal, single-system pulmonary (smoking-associated), or multisystem disease. The existing paradigms in the management of LCH in adults are mostly derived from the pediatric literature. Over the last decade, the discovery of clonality and MAPK-ERK pathway mutations in most cases led to the recognition of LCH as a hematopoietic neoplasm, opening the doors for treatment with targeted therapies. These advances have necessitated an update of the existing recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of LCH in adults. This document presents consensus recommendations that resulted from the discussions at the annual Histiocyte Society meeting in 2019, encompassing clinical features, classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment algorithm, and response assessment for adults with LCH. The recommendations favor the use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-based imaging for staging and response assessment in the majority of cases. Most adults with unifocal disease may be cured by local therapies, while the first-line treatment for single-system pulmonary LCH remains smoking cessation. Among patients not amenable or unresponsive to these treatments and/or have multifocal and multisystem disease, systemic treatments are recommended. Preferred systemic treatments in adults with LCH include cladribine or cytarabine, with the emerging role of targeted (BRAF and MEK inhibitor) therapies. Despite documented responses to treatments, many patients struggle with a high symptom burden from pain, fatigue, and mood disorders that should be acknowledged and managed appropriately.

Background: The prognosis for patients (pts) with relapsed T-ALL and T-LL is dismal; the primary goal of T-ALL/T-LL treatment is to prevent relapse. AALL1231 was a COG phase 3 clinical trial that randomized children and young adults (age 1-30 years) to a modified augmented BFM (aBFM) backbone +/- the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib during induction and delayed intensification (DI) (1.3mg/m2 x 4 doses per block). Bortezomib was tested in frontline therapy based on strong preclinical data and data in relapse on COG AALL07P1. Pts were stratified as standard (SR), intermediate (IR), or very high risk (VHR), primarily based on disease response: morphologic and minimal residual disease (MRD) at end induction and end consolidation (T-ALL) and radiographic response (T-LL). To eliminate cranial radiation (CXRT) in all pts, (except VHR: Day 29 M3 marrow or EOC MRD >0.1% or pts with overt CNS leukemia at diagnosis, CNS3), the aBFM backbone was modified to use dexamethasone (dex) as the sole corticosteroid and an extra pegaspargase dose was added in both induction and DI, following the MRC strategy. IR pts received a second interim maintenance (IM) phase (one Capizzi MTX; one HD-MTX). Following consolidation, VHR pts received 3 BFM high-risk intensification blocks in lieu of IM. Results: AALL1231 accrued 847 patients (824 eligible and evaluable) of 1400 anticipated from 2014 until early closure in 2017 when COG AALL0434 established that nelarabine (NEL) improved DFS in T-ALL (AALL1231 did not include NEL). The 3-year EFS for Arm A (no bortezomib) vs Arm B (bortezomib) were 81.7±2.4% and 85.1±2.2 % (HR=0.782, p=0.074) (3/31/20 data cut-off; see Table 1 for additional outcomes). SR and IR pts, who account for 95% of pts, had significantly improved EFS on Arm B as compared with Arm A. Yet, VHR patients had improved EFS on Arm A. Patients with T-LL had improved EFS and OS with bortezomib: 3-year EFS (76.5±5.9% vs 88.3±4.5%; p = 0.01); 3-year OS (78.0±5.8% vs 89.5±4.2%, p = 0.007). A similar improvement in EFS and OS was not seen in T-ALL; however, with longer follow-up this may change. No excess toxicity was seen on Arm B. A dex-based Induction did result in lower MRD rates; more T-ALL pts on AALL1231 had Day 29 MRD <0.1% as compared with AALL0434 which used a prednisone-based Induction (AALL1231 Arm A: 69.6%; Arm B: 72.2%; AALL0434: 64.6%; p = 0.02). However, this did not translate into improved survival. Indeed OS, but not EFS was worse on AALL1231 than AALL0434. On-going analyses are investigating the increased mortality on AALL1231, but preliminary analyses suggest a combination of increased toxic deaths and overall poor outcome in the VHR group. On AALL0434, 90.8% of T-ALL pts received CXRT. On AALL1231, 9.5% of subjects were scheduled to receive CXRT (CNS3 T-ALL/T-LL: 5.7%; VHR T-ALL: 4.1%). A comparison of AALL0434 pts that received CXRT with similar AALL1231 pts not receiving CXRT on AALL1231 demonstrated similar EFS (p = 0.14) and OS (p = 0.42) (Table 2). CNS relapse rates were higher in these pts on AALL1231 (4.5%) as compared with AALL0434 (1.7%), but overall relapse rates were the same (6.5% vs 6.4%). Notably the benefit of NEL in AALL0434 was due to reduction of CNS relapses. 128 AALL1231 pts came off protocol therapy after the study was closed for physician or patient/parent choice. Data collection is underway to understand the reasons for removal, including if it was to receive NEL. Conclusions: Outcomes for SR and IR pts with T-ALL and T-LL treated with bortezomib were excellent despite the elimination of prophylactic CXRT. Bortezomib significantly improved 3-year EFS for these groups, comprising ~95% of pts. Outcomes for VHR pts were dismal and worse on the bortezomib arm. T-LL pts had significantly improved EFS and OS with bortezomib on the AALL1231 backbone. This is the first trial to demonstrate an OS benefit for de novo pediatric T-LL with a new agent; however, longer follow-up is needed. Therapy intensification allowed elimination of CXRT in the majority of pts without excessive relapse. These results should be interpreted cautiously as the 3-yr OS on AALL1231 was inferior to AALL0434. Nevertheless, incorporating bortezomib into standard therapy for de novo T-LL appears advantageous. Future COG T-ALL/T-LLy trials will build on the positive findings from AALL0434 and AALL1231, balancing intensity while mitigating toxicity to maintain high cure rates without routine cranial radiation. (MLL, SPH, EAR contributed equally) Disclosures Teachey: Amgen: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; La Roche: Consultancy; Sobi: Consultancy. Dunsmore:Dexcom: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Galardy:Abbott: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; Abbvie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Harker-Murray:Regerenon Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Hermiston:Sobi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Shimano:Novartis: Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Dova Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. McKay:Immunogen: Current Employment. Bollard:Mana Therapeutics: Other: IP. Loh:Medisix Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Other: Institutional Research Funding. Hunger:Novartis: Consultancy; Amgen Inc.: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company, Honoraria. Raetz:Celgene/BMS: Other; Pfizer: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Bortezomib for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia under an IND

Abstract BACKGROUND: Burkitt Lymphoma (BL) represents approximately 40% of all childhood and adolescent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Miles/Cairo, BJH 2012). Children with relapsed or progressive BL develop chemoimmunotherapy-resistant disease and can rarely be cured with salvage therapy (Cairo et al, JCO 2012). Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a regulator of normal B-cell development and is activated upon B-cell receptor (BCR) stimulation. Chronic active BCR signaling through BTK activation can be inhibited by the selective and covalent BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib (Young/Staudt et al, Nat Rev Drug Dicov 2013). Preclinical studies of ibrutinib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) suggest that its inhibitory effect on cell proliferation is in the range of 1.0uM to 25.0uM (Herman et al, Blood 2011; Cinar et al, Leuk Res 2013), which is higher than the typical plasma concentration range in patients at the recommended dose of 560mg (<0.6uM) (Advani et al, JCO 2013). Despite these relatively high IC50 values in vitro, ibrutinib has been highly effective in the treatment of patients with refractory CLL and MCL (Byrd et al, NEJM 2013 and Wang et al, NEJM 2013). Ibrutinib was initially approved by the FDA (IMBRUVICA, USPI) for patients with MCL in November 2013 and CLL in February 2014, who have received at least one prior therapy. BL, however, is associated with tonic vs chronic active BCR signaling; while, both CLL and MCL have chronic active BCR signaling. These findings suggest that the antitumor activity of ibrutinib in BL, which is associated with tonic BCR signaling, may be less pronounced than in Activated B cell-like diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL), CLL or MCL. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent in the treatment of BL. Therefore, we investigated the in vivo anti-tumor activity of ibrutinib in BL xenografted NSG mice. METHODS: Raji Burkitt lymphoma (BL) cells (ATCC) were exposed to ibrutinib (0-10uM, generously provided by Janssen R&D LLC) alone and in combination with dexamethasone (1uM) for 5 days and then MTS cell proliferation assay (Promega) was performed. The IC50 values were determined with CompuSynTM software (Chou and Martin, ComboSyn, 2005) based on data derived from MTS assay. Raji BL cells were stably transfected with a firefly luciferase expression plasmid (ffluc-zeo), kindly provided by Laurence Cooper MD, PhD. NSG mice (NOD.Cg-PrkdcscidIl2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ, 6-8 weeks old) from Jackson laboratory were irradiated (2.5 Gy) and then mice were subcutaneously injected with one million ffluc-zeo tumor cells. Tumor progression and tumor burden were monitored by Bioluminescent Imaging system using the Xenogen IVIS-200 (Caliper Life Sciences). Mice were orally gavaged with either vehicle or ibrutinib (12.5mg/kg) for 10 days (once a day) at post-tumor cells injection. Analysis of survival rates were determined by the Kaplan-Meier method and differences evaluated by log-rank test using the Prism Version 6.0 software. RESULTS: Ibrutinib compared to control induced a significant dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation in Raji BL cells (5uM, 0.561 ± 0.170, p<0.03, IC50=5.20uM) following 120 hours (5 days) of ibrutinib treatment. Interestingly, we observed a significant decrease in cell proliferation in Raji BL cells (5uM, 0.213 ± 0.078, p<0.002, IC=0.50 ± 0.374uM) following ibrutinib and 1uM dexamethasone combination treatment following 120 hours (5 days) of treatment. We observed a significant decrease of tumor progression by tumor luminescence signal intensity following ibrutinib treated Raji BL xenografted NSG mice at day 20 (12.5mg/kg, p<0.001 and 25mg/kg, p<0.05) and day 25 (12.5mg/kg, p<0.05 and 25mg/kg, p<0.05) compared to control (Figure 1A).Ibrutinib (12.5 mg/kg) treated mice (n=39) significantly prolonged survival compared to vehicle controls (n=28) (p<0.0001) (Figure 1B). CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib (12.5mg/kg) significantly decreased tumor progression and significantly increased survival in Raji BL xenografted NSG mice, suggesting that ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent for therapy in the treatment of BL. Future studies will investigate the efficacy of combination therapy with ibrutinib on survival in BL xenografted NOD/SCID mice. Disclosures Galardy: Mission Therapeutics: Research Funding.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Primary Mediastinal B-Cell Lymphoma (PMBL) is a rare form of B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Lones/Cairo et al, JCO 2000). We have previously reported a significant decrease in EFS among pediatric and adolescent patients with PMBL compared with other stage III non-PMBL diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients following FAB/LMB 96 therapy, suggesting that new therapeutic targeted agents are needed (Gerrard/Cairo et al, Blood 2013). Activation of the B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway has now emerged as a central oncogenic pathway that promotes growth and survival in both normal and malignant B-cells. The cascade of signaling pathways downstream of the BCR includes BTK, MAPK, NF-κB and AKT. PMBL has a constitutively activated NF-kB pathway (Rosenwald et al, JEM 2003). Ibrutinib is a selective and covalent BTK inhibitor that inhibits chronic active BCR signaling and downstream signaling including the NF-kB pathway (Herman et al, Blood 2014) and is an active agent in ABC-DLBCL, which also has an activated NF-kB pathway (Griner et al, PNAS 2014). Preclinical studies of ibrutinib in CLL and MCL suggested that the inhibitory effects on cell proliferation were seen in the range of 1.0uM to 25.0uM (Herman et al, Blood 2011; Cinar et al, Leuk. Res 2013). Despite these relatively high IC50 values in vitro, ibrutinib has been highly effective in the treatment of patients with refractory CLL and MCL (Byrd et al, NEJM 2013 and Wang et al, NEJM 2013). Ibrutinib was approved by the FDA (IMBRUVICA, USPI) for patients with MCL in November 2013 or CLL in February 2014, who have received at least one prior therapy. However, the antitumor activity against PMBL of ibrutinib alone and in combination with other agents is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: We hypothesize that ibrutinib in combination with other agents may be a future targeted agent in the treatment of PMBL. Therefore, we investigated the effect of ibrutinib alone and in combination with dexamethasone, rituximab and carfilzomib on cell proliferation and apoptosis in a PMBL cell line. METHODS: The Karpas-1106P PMBL cell line (DSMZ, Germany) was treated with ibrutinib alone (0-10uM, generously provided by Janssen R&D LLC) and in combination with dexamethasone (1uM), rituximab (20ug/ml) and carfilzomib (5nM) for 5 days treatment. The MTS cell proliferation assay (Promega) and western blot analysis were performed. Significant differences were determined by Student's t -test.The IC50 values were determined with CompuSyn software (Chou and Martin, ComboSyn, 2005). RESULTS: We observed a significant down-regulation of phosphorylated BTK after 5 days with ibrutinib treatment in Karpas-1106P cell line with 1uM ibrutinib (0.178 ± 1.63, p<0.0001) and the expression of total BTK protein was also significantly decreased with 1uM ibrutinib following 5 days of treatment (0.803±0.190, p<0.005) compared to control (1.000±0.00). We also observed a significant dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation (0-10uM, p<0.0001) in ibrutinib-treated Karpas-1106P PMBL cell line. In combination with dexamethasone, the ibrutinib IC50 values for inhibition of cell proliferation were significantly decreased from 0.71uM ± 0.172 (ibrutinib alone) to 0.04uM ± 0.007 (p<0.005) with 1.0uM dexamethasone combination following 5 days of treatment. Second, in combination with rituximab experiment, the ibrutinib IC50 values was significantly decreased from 0.845uM ± 0.289 (ibrutinib alone) to 0.37uM ± 0.056 (p<0.05) with 20ug/ml rituximab following 5 days of treatment. Lastly, the ibrutinib IC50 values were significantly decreased from 0.72uM ± 0.185 (ibrutinib alone) to 0.002uM ± 0.001 (p<0.005) with 5nM carfilzomib combination following 5 days of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib alone and in combination with dexamethasone, rituximab and carfilzomib significantly inhibited cell proliferation in the Karpas-1106P PMBL cell line. Ibrutinib's potential as an adjuvant agent in combination treatment in patients with PMBL is supported by these experiments. Future studies will focus on the in vivo effects of ibrutinib alone and in combination with dexamethasone and carfilzomib in a NOD/SCID PMBL xenograft mouse model. Disclosures Galardy: Mission Therapeutics: Research Funding.

SummaryNon‐Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is the third most common malignancy in children, adolescents and young adults (CAYA). NHL is a diverse set of diseases that arise at key regulatory checkpoints during B or T cell development in the bone marrow, germinal centre or thymus. While advances in the use of conventional cytotoxic agents have led to dramatic improvements in survival, these cures are associated with significant acute and long‐term toxicities. Moreover, the prognosis for CAYA patients with relapsed or refractory NHL remains dismal, with the vast majority dying of their disease. Thanks to a large number of candidate‐based biological studies, together with large‐scale sequencing efforts, there has been an explosion of knowledge regarding the molecular pathophysiology of B‐ and T‐NHL. This has ushered development of a flurry of novel therapeutic approaches that may simultaneously provide new hope for relapsed patients and an opportunity to reduce the therapeutic burden in newly diagnosed CAYA. Here we review a selection of the most promising new therapeutic approaches to these diseases. While the vast majority of these agents are untested in children, on‐going work from many cooperative groups will soon explore their use in paediatric disease, in hope of further improving outcomes while maximizing quality of life.

Abstract BACKGROUND: Burkitt lymphoma (BL) represents approximately 40% of all childhood and adolescent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (Miles/Cairo, BJH, 2012). Children with relapsed or progressive BL develop chemotherapy-resistant disease and can rarely be cured with salvage therapy (Cairo et al, JCO, 2012). Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is a regulator of normal B-cell development and is activated upon B-cell receptor (BCR) stimulation. Chronic active BCR signaling through BTK activation can be inhibited by the selective and covalent BTK inhibitor, ibrutinib (Young et al, Nat Rev, 2013). Ibrutinib has been highly effective in the treatment of refractory patients with CLL and MCL and has been approved by the FDA for patients with CLL or MCL who have received at least one prior therapy (USPI) (Byrd et al, NEJM, 2013 and Wang et al, NEJM, 2013). BL, however, is associated with tonic or possibly chronic active BCR signaling; while, both CLL and MCL have chronic active BCR signaling. We have previously demonstrated ibrutinib significantly decrease BL proliferation and viability in vitro (Lee/Cairo et al, ASH, 2014) OBJECTIVE: We hypothesize that ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent in the treatment of BL. Therefore, we investigated the in vivo anti-tumor activity of ibrutinib in BL xenografted NOD/SCID (NSG) mice. METHODS: The luciferase expression plasmid (ffluc-Zeo), kindly provided by L. Cooper, MD) was transfected into Raji cells. Cells were subcutaneously injected into NSG mice (6-8wks old, NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ, Jackson lab). Tumor cells engraftment and progression were examined by Bioluminescent Imaging using the Xenogen IVIS-200 (Caliper Life Sciences). Mice were orally gavaged with vehicle control or Ibrutinib (1.25, 12.5 and 25mg/kg/day, generously provided by Janssen R&D, LLC) for 10 days. Statistical probability of survival and curve were determined by Kaplan Meier method. RESULTS: We observed a significant decrease in tumor luminescence intensity following ibrutinib treated BL xenografted NSG mice at day 20 (12.5mg/kg, p&lt;0.001 and 25mg/kg, p&lt;0.05) and at day 25 (12.5mg/kg, p&lt;0.05 and 25mg/kg, p&lt;0.05) compared to vehicle control. Furthermore, ibrutinib (12.5 mg/kg) treated mice significantly prolonged survival compared to vehicle control mice (p&lt;0.05). The median survival of mice following ibrutinib treatment (1.25, 12.5 and 25 mg/kg) were 31.5, 37.5 and 22.5 days, respectively, compared to control (24 days). CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib significantly decreased tumor progression and significantly increased the survival in BL xenografted NSG mice following 12.5mg/kg ibrutinib treatment. These results indicate that ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent therapy in the treatment of BL. Future directions will be investigated the efficacy of ibrutinib in combination with dexamethasone in BL xenografted NSG mice. Citation Format: Sanghoon Lee, Changhong Yin, Timmy O'Connell, Matthew Barth, Janet Ayello, Lauren Harrison, Carmella van de Ven, Rodney Miles, Paul Galardy, Stanton C. Goldman, Megan Lim, Michelle Hermiston, Linda McAllister-Lucas, Lisa G. Roth, Sherrie L. Perkins, Mitchell S. Cairo. Ibrutinib significantly improves survival in a human Burkitt lymphoma (BL) xenograft NSG mouse model: Ibrutinib may be a potential adjuvant agent in the treatment of BL. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2608. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2608