Stupp, Roger

ABSTRACT Bispecific T cell engagers (BTEs) induce MHC‐independent cytotoxicity by bridging T cells to tumor cells via binding a T cell–activating receptor and a tumor‐associated antigen. BTEs have proven effective in hematologic malignancies and some solid tumors, yet their potential in glioblastoma (GBM) is largely unexplored. We developed a fully humanized BTE (hBTE) targeting interleukin‐13 receptor alpha 2 (IL13RA2), a tumor‐associated antigen widely expressed in GBM and associated with poor prognosis. In vitro, hBTE activated T cells and induced antigen‐dependent cytokine release and cytotoxicity against IL13RA2‐positive GBM cells. In vivo, hBTE showed robust target‐specific activity and markedly prolonged survival in primary and recurrent GBM xenograft models, without detectable off‐target local or systemic toxicity. Beyond GBM, hBTE also exhibited antitumor activity in IL13RA2‐expressing solid tumors, demonstrating selective tumor accumulation and therapeutic efficacy in models of breast cancer brain metastases and extracranial lung cancer. This work highlights the therapeutic potential of BTEs in IL13RA2‐expressing tumors and establishes a strong preclinical rationale for advancing hBTE therapy toward clinical translation in GBM and other tumors.

Abstract Background: Glioblastoma recurrence is inevitable despite aggressive surgical resection of contrast enhancing (CE) tumor. Unlike the deep molecular characterization of CE glioblastoma, unresected infiltrating tumor, representing minimal residual disease (MRD) has not been well profiled. Increasingly, clinical trials are being conducted in the MRD setting for glioblastoma patients, necessitating understanding of unresected infiltrating tumor for targeted therapeutic development. Methods: Visium HD spatial transcriptomics was used to profile a cohort of newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve glioblastoma patients that underwent supramaximal resection, with both core and infiltrating in situ components. Spatial profiles generated expression signatures of infiltrative and CE tumor. For in silico prediction of therapeutics targeting the MRD, expression signatures of infiltrative and CE tumor were compared with drug perturbation signatures from the NIH L1000 database using the sRGES method to predict reversal of disease expression patterns. IC50 data from human cell lines were aggregated from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer or individual study data while blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetrance was predicted using the CNS-MPO approach. Findings: Infiltrative tumor expression profiles were enriched for genes corresponding to neural and oligodendrocyte progenitor like cells. In contrast CE glioblastoma displayed mesenchymal and astrocytic programs, suggesting spatial concentration of glioblastoma states within MRD and CE tumor. For CE glioblastoma, proteasome inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor agonists were predicted to have the highest antitumor activity. In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) were highly ranked for MRD while exhibiting low predicted efficacy in CE tumor. Synergy analysis of drug candidates provided multiple dual treatment options for both the CE and MRD contexts. Conclusions: Cumulatively, these data indicate that the resected tumor does not reflect the MRD state, providing clarity on why targeted therapeutics for glioblastoma have not been particularly successful. Spatial profiling of the MRD demonstrates vulnerability to unique drug targets, which if utilized in the correct setting could confer greater survival benefit. Citation Format: Harrshavasan Congivaram, Shashwat Tripathi, Mateo Gomez, Katy McCortney, Ching Man Wai, Ruochen Du, Thomas K. Sears, Jianzhong Zhang, Daniel J. Brat, Craig M. Horbinski, Mark W. Youngblood, Jared T. Ahrendsen, Adam M. Sonabend, Stephen T. Magill, Matthew C. Tate, Maciej S. Lesniak, Sean Sachdev, Timothy Sita, Priya Kumthekar, Karan Dixit, Robin Buerki, Ditte Primdahl, Mustafa Khasraw, John de Groot, David A. Reardon, Rimas V. Lukas, Roger Stupp, Amy B. Heimberger. In silico screening of therapeutics candidates targeting minimal residual disease in glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2496.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is highly aggressive with poor prognosis, especially in recurrent cases where treatments are limited. Intra-arterial (IA) Yttrium-90 (Y90) microsphere therapy, FDA-approved for hepatocellular carcinoma, offers the potential for targeted radiotherapy in recurrent GBM (rGBM). The FRONTIER trial evaluated the safety and feasibility of IA Y90-glass microsphere treatment for rGBM under an FDA Investigational Device Exemption. Materials and METHODS This prospective, single-arm, multi-center study included patients with rGBM in non-dominant, non-eloquent regions. The primary endpoint was 30-day incidence of treatment-related limiting toxicities (primarily ≥grade 3 non-hematologic, with exclusions). Secondary endpoints included adverse event (AE) rate, neurological changes, technical success (PET absorbed dose within ±20% of target), and efficacy. Treatment regions, defined via cerebral angiography-MRI fusion to cover the recurrent lesion, were targeted with 40±4Gy. Post-treatment evaluations included MRI, Y90-PET, and neurological assessments. RESULTS The procedure was well-tolerated by all twelve subjects and discharge occurred the following day with no decline in neurologic status. No limiting toxicities or device-related AEs were reported. Five patients experienced 8 procedure-related AEs (6 Grade 1, 2 Grade 3). Technical success was 100%, with post-treatment Y90-PET derived median absorbed dose of 41.5 Gy to the treatment region (median volume 80.3 cc). The median tumor absorbed dose was considerably higher at 124.2 Gy (median tumor volume 5.8 cc), indicating preferential tumor perfusion. At 2 months, 67% had stable disease, and 33% showed reduced T1-contrast enhancing volume within the treated area. Median progression-free survival was 3.1 (95% CI 0.92-NE) and overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.0-NE) from Y90 treatment. Exploratory analysis revealed a significant OS benefit for patients receiving a tumor absorbed dose above the median (11.9 vs 5.7 months, p=0.0073). CONCLUSION Results from this initial cohort suggest IA Y90-microsphere therapy is technically feasible and well-tolerated in rGBM. Further investigation is warranted.

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) is highly aggressive with poor prognosis, especially in recurrent cases where treatments are limited. Intra-arterial (IA) Yttrium-90 (Y90) microsphere therapy, CE-marked for hepatic neoplasia, offers the potential for targeted high-dose beta radiation in GBM by leveraging tumor hypervascularity. The FRONTIER trial evaluated the safety and feasibility of IA Y90-glass microsphere treatment for recurrent GBM. MATERIAL AND METHODS FRONTIER is a prospective, single-arm, multi-center study with Investigational Device Exemption approval from the US FDA. This initial cohort included patients with recurrent GBM in non-dominant, non-eloquent regions after 1-2 lines of prior therapy. The primary endpoint was the 30-day incidence of treatment-related toxicities (primarily ≥grade 3 non-hematologic, with exclusions). Secondary endpoints included overall treatment-related adverse events (AE), neurological function changes, technical success, and efficacy measures. Treatment regions, defined via cerebral angiography-MRI fusion to cover the recurrent lesion were targeted with 40±4Gy. Post-treatment evaluations included MRI, Y90-PET for absorbed dose distribution, and serial neurological assessments. Changes in post-contrast T1-enhancing tissue volume (T1C-vol) were tracked longitudinally. RESULTS Twelve subjects (67% male; average age 57 years) were treated. The procedure was well-tolerated with no limiting toxicities reported or device-related AEs reported. Five patients experienced 8 procedure-related AEs (6 Grade 1, 2 Grade 3). At discharge one day after treatment, there was no decline in neurologic status per NIHSS. Technical success was 100%, with post-treatment Y90-PET showing a median absorbed dose of 41.5 Gy (range 39.2-45.4) to the treatment region (median volume 80.3 cc [40.9-118.5]). The median tumor absorbed dose was significantly higher at 124.2 Gy (range 58.5-508.5) within a median tumor volume of 5.8 cc (range 0.5-55.4), indicating preferential tumor perfusion. At 1 month, the best response was partial response in 17% (2/12), stable disease (SD) in 67% (8/12), and progressive disease in 17% (2/12). At 2 months, 73% (8/11 evaluable) had SD, and 33% (4/12) showed reduced T1C-vol within the treated area. Median progression-free survival was 3.0 (95% CI 1.1-3.7) and median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.0-NE) from Y90 treatment. Exploratory analysis revealed a significant OS benefit for patients receiving a tumor absorbed dose above the median (>124 Gy) compared to those below (13.1 vs 5.8 months, p=0.0054). CONCLUSION Results from this initial cohort of the FRONTIER trial suggest IA Y90 glass microsphere therapy is technically feasible and well-tolerated in patients with recurrent GBM. The observed dose-response relationship warrants further investigation of this modality as a potential treatment option.

Abstract BACKGROUND Yttrium-90 (Y90) microsphere treatment is an FDA-approved endovascular radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma; however, extra-hepatic experience is limited. The FRONTIER trial (NCT05303467) is a first-in-human study conducted under an IDE from the FDA evaluating the safety and feasibility of intra-arterial Y90 endovascular radiotherapy in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM). METHODS The primary endpoint is the incidence of treatment-related limiting toxicities through 30 days, in 12 patients with rGBM. Eight subjects (50% male) with non-dominant hemisphere rGBM have been enrolled to date, with 6 patients reported herein. The treatment region, encompassing the recurrent lesion, excluding eloquent regions, and defined using cerebral angiography-MRI fusion, was selectively targeted with 40±4Gy. Immediate post-treatment imaging included MRI to evaluate acute treatment-related effects and Y90-PET to evaluate the absorbed dose distribution. Neurological assessments were performed pre- and post-treatment. Analysis of post-contrast T1w enhancing tissue volume (T1wvol) inside and outside the treated region was performed longitudinally. RESULTS All patients tolerated the procedure well and were discharged the following day. No decrease in neurological function and no limiting toxicities were reported through 30 days. Post-treatment MRI revealed no device-related acute ischemia or hemorrhage. Mean absorbed dose to the treatment region was 42.1±2.4Gy, within 3% of the targeted value, suggesting technical feasibility. Mean tumor absorbed dose within the treatment region was 65.1±22.6Gy most likely due to increased tumor perfusion in the treatment region. A reduction in T1wvol at 2m was observed in 4/6 patients, with the remaining 2 patients showing increased T1wvol. Disease progression by T1wvol occurred more rapidly outside the treatment region than within. All patients received subsequent therapy, with 2 patients receiving surgery 82 and 120 days post Y90 treatment. CONCLUSION Interim results in this first-in-human feasibility study demonstrated technical feasibility and no limiting toxicities through 30 days. Enrollment is ongoing. These data warrant additional investigation.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) presents as a highly aggressive and malignant brain tumor with limited treatment options. Despite the availability of existing therapies, the invasive characteristics of GBM frequently result in tumor recurrence and poor prognosis. We previously developed a B-cell-based therapy (BVax) that has shown promising results in its ability to induce therapeutic responses in preclinical models of GBM. Our research revealed potency of BVax can be attributed to its robust antigen-presenting capability, cognate antigen specificity with T cells, and ability to generate tumor-reactive antibodies. The present study aims to characterize the unique antigenic reactivity of BVax-derived antibodies by evaluating their immunological effects and therapeutic potential in both murine models and GBM patient-specific samples. Leveraging CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic mouse models, we first revealed that BVax preferentially migrated to glioma-bearing brains upon intravenous injection, resulting in a CD38+CD20-CD19+ plasmablast phenotype. To further characterize the reactivity of BVax-derived immunoglobulins (Ig), we utilized proteomic analysis and identified preferential targets of Gelsolin, Fibronectin, Versican, Fibrinogen, and collagen type IV alpha, commonly associated with cell motility and the extracellular matrix. Microdialysis data confirmed the increased presence of many of these BVax-derived Igs-recognized antigens in tumor regions compared to normal brain regions in GBM patients. Utilizing purified BVax-derived antibodies from patient specimen, in vitro cell motility assays demonstrated a significant prevention of the invasion and migration of cell lines from patient derived xenograft (PDX). In this study, we concluded that BVax elicits antitumor activity through targeted migration to tumor-bearing regions, differentiation into plasmablasts, and robust secretion of specific Igs that retain the ability to inhibit functionalities associated with cell invasion and migration. Here, we present the first in-depth study that characterizes GBM patients’ antibody reactivity, specifically a subset of inflammatory B cells (BVax) with therapeutic effects that offer an indication for a new direction of immunotherapies.

PURPOSE The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time, some limitations of these criteria were identified, and challenges emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. METHODS Informed by data from studies evaluating the different criteria, updates to the RANO criteria are proposed (RANO 2.0). RESULTS We recommend a standard set of criteria for both high- and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the postradiotherapy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), rather than the postsurgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for comparison with subsequent scans. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks after radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, are required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for the evaluation of treatment for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (two-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH wild-type glioblastoma, the nonenhancing disease will no longer be evaluated except when assessing response to antiangiogenic agents. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant nonenhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and nonenhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION The revised RANO 2.0 criteria refine response assessment in gliomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND The Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria for high-grade gliomas (RANO-HGG) and low-grade gliomas (RANO-LGG) were developed to improve reliability of response assessment in glioma trials. Over time some limitations of these criteria were identified, and uncertainty emerged regarding integrating features of the modified RANO (mRANO) or the immunotherapy RANO (iRANO) criteria. MATERIAL AND METHODS Informed by data from a cohort of glioblastoma patients and other evaluations of RANO criteria that allowed evaluation of features of the different criteria, the RANO working group developed updates to the RANO criteria (RANO 2.0). RESULTS Based on the 2021 WHO classification of gliomas, we recommend a standard set of criteria for both high and low-grade gliomas, to be used for all trials regardless of the treatment modalities being evaluated. In the newly diagnosed setting, the post-radiotherapy MRI, rather than the post-surgical MRI, will be used as the baseline for future comparison. Since the incidence of pseudoprogression is high in the 12 weeks following radiotherapy, continuation of treatment and confirmation of progression during this period with a repeat MRI, or histopathologic evidence of unequivocal recurrent tumor, is required to define tumor progression. However, confirmation scans are not mandatory after this period nor for recurrent tumors. For treatments with a high likelihood of pseudoprogression, mandatory confirmation of progression with a repeat MRI is highly recommended. The primary measurement remains the maximum cross-sectional area of tumor (2-dimensional) but volumetric measurements are an option. For IDH-wildtype glioblastoma, the non-enhancing disease will no longer be evaluated. In IDH-mutated tumors with a significant non-enhancing component, clinical trials may require evaluating both the enhancing and non-enhancing tumor components for response assessment. CONCLUSION These criteria represent a work in progress that will hopefully improve the assessment of response in glioma trials. Future updates will incorporate novel developments, advanced imaging techniques, and endpoints as they become validated.