Sonabend, Adam M

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) presents as a highly aggressive and malignant brain tumor with limited treatment options. Despite the availability of existing therapies, the invasive characteristics of GBM frequently result in tumor recurrence and poor prognosis. We previously developed a B-cell-based therapy (BVax) that has shown promising results in its ability to induce therapeutic responses in preclinical models of GBM. Our research revealed potency of BVax can be attributed to its robust antigen-presenting capability, cognate antigen specificity with T cells, and ability to generate tumor-reactive antibodies. The present study aims to characterize the unique antigenic reactivity of BVax-derived antibodies by evaluating their immunological effects and therapeutic potential in both murine models and GBM patient-specific samples. Leveraging CD45.1 and CD45.2 congenic mouse models, we first revealed that BVax preferentially migrated to glioma-bearing brains upon intravenous injection, resulting in a CD38+CD20-CD19+ plasmablast phenotype. To further characterize the reactivity of BVax-derived immunoglobulins (Ig), we utilized proteomic analysis and identified preferential targets of Gelsolin, Fibronectin, Versican, Fibrinogen, and collagen type IV alpha, commonly associated with cell motility and the extracellular matrix. Microdialysis data confirmed the increased presence of many of these BVax-derived Igs-recognized antigens in tumor regions compared to normal brain regions in GBM patients. Utilizing purified BVax-derived antibodies from patient specimen, in vitro cell motility assays demonstrated a significant prevention of the invasion and migration of cell lines from patient derived xenograft (PDX). In this study, we concluded that BVax elicits antitumor activity through targeted migration to tumor-bearing regions, differentiation into plasmablasts, and robust secretion of specific Igs that retain the ability to inhibit functionalities associated with cell invasion and migration. Here, we present the first in-depth study that characterizes GBM patients’ antibody reactivity, specifically a subset of inflammatory B cells (BVax) with therapeutic effects that offer an indication for a new direction of immunotherapies.

Abstract Purpose: The epigenetic mechanisms involved in transcriptional regulation leading to malignant phenotype in gliomas remains poorly understood. Topoisomerase IIB (TOP2B), an enzyme that decoils and releases torsional forces in DNA, is overexpressed in a subset of gliomas. Therefore, we investigated its role in epigenetic regulation in these tumors. Experimental Design: To investigate the role of TOP2B in epigenetic regulation in gliomas, we performed paired chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing for TOP2B and RNA-sequencing analysis of glioma cell lines with and without TOP2B inhibition and in human glioma specimens. These experiments were complemented with assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing, gene silencing, and mouse xenograft experiments to investigate the function of TOP2B and its role in glioma phenotypes. Results: We discovered that TOP2B modulates transcription of multiple oncogenes in human gliomas. TOP2B regulated transcription only at sites where it was enzymatically active, but not at all native binding sites. In particular, TOP2B activity localized in enhancers, promoters, and introns of PDGFRA and MYC, facilitating their expression. TOP2B levels and genomic localization was associated with PDGFRA and MYC expression across glioma specimens, which was not seen in nontumoral human brain tissue. In vivo, TOP2B knockdown of human glioma intracranial implants prolonged survival and downregulated PDGFRA. Conclusions: Our results indicate that TOP2B activity exerts a pleiotropic role in transcriptional regulation of oncogenes in a subset of gliomas promoting a proliferative phenotype.

Abstract BACKGROUND Extent of resection (EOR) correlates with glioblastoma outcomes. Resectability and EOR depend on anatomical, clinical, and surgeon factors. Resectability likely influences outcome in and of itself, but an accurate measurement of resectability remains elusive. An understanding of resectability and the factors that influence it may provide a means to control a confounder in clinical trials and provide reference for decision making. OBJECTIVE To provide proof of concept of the use of the collective wisdom of experienced brain tumor surgeons in assessing glioblastoma resectability. METHODS We surveyed 13 academic tumor neurosurgeons nationwide to assess the resectability of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Participants reviewed 20 cases, including digital imaging and communications in medicine-formatted pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance images and clinical vignettes. The selected cases involved a variety of anatomical locations and a range of EOR. Participants were asked about surgical goal, eg, gross total resection, subtotal resection (STR), or biopsy, and rationale for their decision. We calculated a “resectability index” for each lesion by pooling responses from all 13 surgeons. RESULTS Neurosurgeons’ individual surgical goals varied significantly ( P = .015), but the resectability index calculated from the surgeons’ pooled responses was strongly correlated with the percentage of contrast-enhancing residual tumor ( R = 0.817, P < .001). The collective STR goal predicted intraoperative decision of intentional STR documented on operative notes ( P < .01) and nonresectable residual ( P < .01), but not resectable residual. CONCLUSION In this pilot study, we demonstrate the feasibility of measuring the resectability of glioblastoma through crowdsourcing. This tool could be used to quantify resectability, a potential confounder in neuro-oncology clinical trials.