Schwartz, Theodore H.

ABSTRACT Objective There is limited consensus on endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) reconstruction principles. This study aims to generate comprehensive themes regarding ESBS reconstruction by pooling the experiences of ESBS experts, with comparison to a literature review of current published evidence. Methods Structured qualitative interviews of ESBS experts regarding postoperative management and reconstruction of various defect locations were conducted. Results A total of 68 experts comprising 40 academic teams across 13 countries with an average of 18 years of ESBS experience were included. We propose 10 stepwise algorithms for common skull base reconstruction scenarios based on these expert interviews. When available, the nasoseptal flap is used for all high_flow cerebrospinal leak defects. Multilayered reconstruction is favored at all anatomical subsites with increasing number of layers for increasing defect size and complexity. Heterogeneity exists in terms of inlay technique and materials, free grafting versus various pedicled flap options for low‐flow defects or in the absence of a nasal septum, nasal packing, tissue sealant, lumbar drain use, and postoperative management. Commonalities and discrepancies between experts were summarized. Conclusion Skull base reconstruction and post‐ESBS management is highly complex with a wide variety of practice patterns and expert strategies. Further research of higher quality evidence is warranted to identify optimal management patterns, though the current work aims to inform surgeons on these controversial areas by drawing from numerous experiences.

TPS2098 Background: Liquid biopsy in glioblastoma (GBM) is hindered by a lack of requisite circulating tumor (ct) and cell-free (cf) DNA levels in blood due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This limits the identification of blood-based tumor biomarkers along with the development and use of biomarker-driven systemic therapies. Real-time image-guided low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) combined with intravenously administered microbubble oscillators, leads to non-invasive disruption of the BBB. This trial aims to evaluate the utility of LIFU for boosting blood ctDNA and cfDNA for enhanced liquid biopsy in GBM patients. Methods: LIBERATE is an ongoing, prospective, multi-center, self-controlled, pivotal trial evaluating safety and technical efficacy of LIFU-based BBB disruption for increasing blood ctDNA and cfDNA levels in adults (aged 18-80 years) with GBM. Patients with suspected GBM planned for tumor biopsy or resection at ten centers in the US are being enrolled. Patients with multifocal tumors or tumors arising from deep midline, thalamus, cerebellum, or brainstem are excluded. Patients are administered IV microbubbles for enhanced sonication effects, after which MR-guided BBB disruption using a 220 kHz LIFU device is performed with real-time acoustic feedback control for effective microbubble activation. Before and after procedure, phlebotomy and MRI brain are performed to evaluate outcomes. Primary study endpoint is defined, per subject, as ratio between their cfDNA level in blood 1-hour post-LIFU procedure compared to cfDNA level in blood pre-procedure. Primary study hypothesis is that BBB disruption with LIFU leads to a ≥2-fold rise in blood cfDNA. The secondary hypothesis is that there exists ≥75% agreement between biomarker pattern in blood cfDNA sample obtained 1-hour post-LIFU and the biomarker pattern in tumor tissue obtained later. The trial has been powered to evaluate both primary and secondary hypotheses. Based on an assumed true agreement rate of 91% and a one-sided alpha of 0.025, an exact test for binomial proportions provides a sample of N = 50 with 84% power for the secondary hypothesis. Exploratory endpoints include (1) sensitivity of detection of known specific somatic mutations in ctDNA from blood samples collected before and after LIFU, (2) estimation of ctDNA levels post-LIFU in samples collected at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 3 hour to determine the time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of MRI parameters related to grading of BBB disruption and ctDNA-based biomarkers from post-LIFU blood samples. Patient enrollment commenced in 2022 and 22 patients have been recruited by January 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT05383872 .

Abstract BACKGROUND Liquid biopsy in glioblastoma (GBM) is hindered by a lack of requisite circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) blood levels in due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). Real-time image-guided low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) with intravenously administered microbubble oscillators non-invasively causes BBB disruption (BBBD). This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the utility of LIFU for increasing cfDNA in blood for liquid biopsy in GBM. METHODS LIBERATE is an ongoing, prospective, multi-center, self-controlled, ongoing, pivotal trial evaluating the safety and technical efficacy of LIFU for BBBD to increase cfDNA in blood for GBM. Patients aged 18-80 years with suspected GBM planned for tumor biopsy or resection at ten centers in the US are being included. Patients are administered intravenous oscillating microbubbles for enhancing sonication, after which MR-guided BBBD using 220 kHz LIFU device is performed, with real-time acoustic feedback for effective sonication. Pre- and post-procedure, phlebotomies, and MRI brain are performed. The primary study endpoint is defined, per subject, as the ratio between cfDNA levels in blood 1-hour post-LIFU procedure compared to cfDNA level in blood pre-procedure. The primary study hypothesis is that BBBD with LIFU leads to ≥2-fold increase in cfDNA in blood. The secondary hypothesis is that there exists ≥75% concordance between biomarker patterns in the cfDNA sample from 1-hour post-LIFU sample and tumor tissue obtained later. Exploratory endpoints include (1) sensitivity of detection of known somatic mutations in cfDNA from blood samples collected before and after LIFU, (2) estimation of cfDNA levels in samples collected at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 3 hours post-LIFU to determine the time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of MRI parameters related to BBBD grading and biomarkers in cfDNA from post-LIFU samples. Patient enrollment commenced in 2022, and 13 patients have been recruited by 06/09/2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05383872.

Abstract BACKGROUND Liquid biopsy in glioblastoma (GBM) is hindered by a lack of requisite circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) levels in blood due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This results in challenges to the identification of blood-based biomarkers and the development of novel biomarker-driven systemic therapies. Real-time image-guided low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) combined with intravenously administered microbubble oscillators non-invasively causes BBB disruption (BBBD). This clinical trial aimed to evaluate the utility of LIFU for increasing cfDNA in blood for liquid biopsy in GBM. METHODS LIBERATE is a prospective, multi-center, self-controlled, ongoing, pivotal trial evaluating the safety and technical efficacy of LIFU for BBBD to increase cfDNA in blood for GBM. Patients aged 18-80 years with suspected GBM planned for tumor biopsy or resection at ten centers in the US are being included. Patients with multifocal tumors or tumors arising from deep midline, thalamus, cerebellum, or brainstem are excluded. Patients are administered intravenous oscillating microbubbles for enhancing sonication, after which MR-guided BBBD using a 220 kHz LIFU device is performed with real-time acoustic feedback for effective cavitation. Before and after the procedure, phlebotomies and MRI brain are performed to evaluate outcomes. The primary study endpoint is defined, per subject, as the ratio between their cfDNA level in blood 1-hour post-LIFU procedure compared to cfDNA level in blood pre-procedure. The primary study hypothesis is that BBBD with LIFU leads to a ≥2-fold increase in cfDNA in blood. The secondary hypothesis is that there exists ≥75% agreement between biomarker pattern in cfDNA sample from 1-hour post-LIFU sample and biomarker pattern in tumor tissue obtained later. The trial has been powered to evaluate both primary and secondary hypotheses. Based on an assumed true agreement rate of 91% and a one-sided alpha of 0.025, an exact test for binomial proportions provides a sample of N=50 with 84% power for the secondary hypothesis. Exploratory endpoints include (1) sensitivity of detection of known somatic mutations in cfDNA from blood samples collected before and after LIFU, (2) estimation of cfDNA levels post-LIFU in samples collected at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, and 3 hours to determine the time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of MRI parameters related to grading of BBBD and biomarkers positive in cfDNA from post-LIFU blood samples. RESULTS Patient enrollment commenced in 2022, and 8 patients have been recruited by 04/11/2023. CONCLUSION Findings from this trial will be critical to liquid biopsy in GBM (Clinical trial information: NCT05383872).

TPS2084 Background: Liquid biopsy in glioblastoma (GBM) is hindered by a lack of requisite circulating-free DNA (cfDNA) levels in blood due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This results in challenges to the identification of blood-based biomarkers and the development of novel biomarker-driven systemic therapies. Real-time image-guided low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) combined with IV microbubble oscillators (DEFINITY), non-invasively causes BBB disruption (BBBD). This clinical trial aims to evaluate the utility of LIFU for increasing cfDNA in blood for liquid biopsy in GBM. Methods: LIBERATE is a prospective, multi-center, self-controlled, ongoing, pivotal trial evaluating safety and technical efficacy of LIFU for BBBD to increase cfDNA in blood for GBM. Patients aged >18-80 years with suspected GBM planned for tumor biopsy or resection at eleven centers in North America are being included. Patients with multifocal tumors or tumors arising from deep midline, thalamus, cerebellum, or brainstem are excluded. Patients are administered IV oscillating microbubbles for enhancing sonication, after which MR-guided BBBD using a 220 kHz LIFU device is performed with real-time acoustic feedback for effective cavitation. Before and after procedure, phlebotomies and MRI brain are performed to evaluate outcomes. The primary study endpoint is defined, per subject, as the ratio between their cfDNA level in blood 1-hour post-LIFU compared to cfDNA level in blood pre-procedure. The primary study hypothesis is that BBBD with LIFU leads to ≥2-fold increase in cfDNA in blood. The secondary hypothesis is that there exists ≥75% agreement between biomarker pattern in cfDNA sample from 1-hour post-LIFU sample and biomarker pattern in tumor tissue obtained later. The trial has been powered to evaluate both primary and secondary hypotheses. Based on an assumed true agreement rate of 91% and a one-sided alpha of 0.025, an exact test for binomial proportions provides a sample of N=50 with 84% power for the secondary hypothesis. Exploratory endpoints include (1) sensitivity of detection of known somatic mutations in cfDNA from blood samples collected before and after LIFU, (2) estimation of cfDNA levels post-LIFU in samples collected at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 3 hour to determine time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of MRI parameters related to grading of BBBD and biomarkers positive in cfDNA from post-LIFU blood samples. Patient enrollment commenced in 2022 and 7 patients have been recruited by 02/13/2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05383872 .

Abstract BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GBM) has dismal outcome of 14-16 months. One of the challenges of drug development in GBM is lack of requisite circulating-free (cfDNA) in blood samples to develop biomarker driven targeted therapy trials. The Exablate focused ultrasound with circulating microbubble resonators uses the concept of real-time imaging to treat small target spots focusing energy in a non-invasive manner, thereby disrupting the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBBD) with potential to increase cfDNA in blood. METHODS LIBERATE is a prospective, multi-center, self-controlled pivotal ongoing clinical trial in subjects with suspected GBM evaluating the safety and effectiveness of Exablate Model 4000 to disrupt BBB to achieve a greater proportion of cfDNA in samples taken post-BBB disruption as compared to the sample taken before BBBD. Fifty eligible subjects with suspected GBM who are scheduled to undergo brain tumor resection or biopsy at 10 centers in the U.S. will participate in this study. The primary endpoint is defined for each subject as ratio between his/her cfDNA amount found in the blood sample 1-hour post-BBBD procedure compared to the cfDNA amount found in the blood sample collected pre-BBBD procedure. This study proposes to demonstrate that on average there is at least 2-fold increase in cfDNA (measured by central laboratory) at 1 hour post BBBD. Confirmatory secondary analysis will evaluate correlation between patterns obtained in panel of biomarkers evaluated in the resected tumor tissue and/or biopsy sample and blood sample collected 1-hour post-BBBD. Exploratory endpoints will include: (1) sensitivity of detection of known somatic mutations in the circulating blood samples (circulating tumor DNA) before and after BBBD, (2) time of greatest yield of cfDNA in the samples collected post BBBD blood samples (at 30 min, 1-hour, 2-hour and 3-hour) to determine time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of biomarkers between the imaging and the post-BBBD biomarker samples. (NCT05383872)

Background Endoscopic skull‐base surgery (ESBS) is employed in the management of diverse skull‐base pathologies. Paralleling the increased utilization of ESBS, the literature in this field has expanded rapidly. However, the rarity of these diseases, the inherent challenges of surgical studies, and the continued learning curve in ESBS have resulted in significant variability in the quality of the literature. To consolidate and critically appraise the available literature, experts in skull‐base surgery have produced the International Consensus Statement on Endoscopic Skull‐Base Surgery (ICAR:ESBS). Methods Using previously described methodology, topics spanning the breadth of ESBS were identified and assigned a literature review, evidence‐based review or evidence‐based review with recommendations format. Subsequently, each topic was written and then reviewed by skull‐base surgeons in both neurosurgery and otolaryngology. Following this iterative review process, the ICAR:ESBS document was synthesized and reviewed by all authors for consensus. Results The ICAR:ESBS document addresses the role of ESBS in primary cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, intradural tumors, benign skull‐base and orbital pathology, sinonasal malignancies, and clival lesions. Additionally, specific challenges in ESBS including endoscopic reconstruction and complication management were evaluated. Conclusion A critical review of the literature in ESBS demonstrates at least the equivalency of ESBS with alternative approaches in pathologies such as CSF rhinorrhea and pituitary adenoma as well as improved reconstructive techniques in reducing CSF leaks. Evidence‐based recommendations are limited in other pathologies and these significant knowledge gaps call upon the skull‐base community to embrace these opportunities and collaboratively address these shortcomings.

Abstract BACKGROUND Extent of resection (EOR) correlates with glioblastoma outcomes. Resectability and EOR depend on anatomical, clinical, and surgeon factors. Resectability likely influences outcome in and of itself, but an accurate measurement of resectability remains elusive. An understanding of resectability and the factors that influence it may provide a means to control a confounder in clinical trials and provide reference for decision making. OBJECTIVE To provide proof of concept of the use of the collective wisdom of experienced brain tumor surgeons in assessing glioblastoma resectability. METHODS We surveyed 13 academic tumor neurosurgeons nationwide to assess the resectability of newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Participants reviewed 20 cases, including digital imaging and communications in medicine-formatted pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance images and clinical vignettes. The selected cases involved a variety of anatomical locations and a range of EOR. Participants were asked about surgical goal, eg, gross total resection, subtotal resection (STR), or biopsy, and rationale for their decision. We calculated a “resectability index” for each lesion by pooling responses from all 13 surgeons. RESULTS Neurosurgeons’ individual surgical goals varied significantly ( P = .015), but the resectability index calculated from the surgeons’ pooled responses was strongly correlated with the percentage of contrast-enhancing residual tumor ( R = 0.817, P < .001). The collective STR goal predicted intraoperative decision of intentional STR documented on operative notes ( P < .01) and nonresectable residual ( P < .01), but not resectable residual. CONCLUSION In this pilot study, we demonstrate the feasibility of measuring the resectability of glioblastoma through crowdsourcing. This tool could be used to quantify resectability, a potential confounder in neuro-oncology clinical trials.