Fessler, A. James

SummaryObjectiveEvaluate the seizure‐reduction response and safety of brain‐responsive stimulation in adults with medically intractable partial‐onset seizures of neocortical origin.MethodsPatients with partial seizures of neocortical origin were identified from prospective clinical trials of a brain‐responsive neurostimulator (RNS System, NeuroPace). The seizure reduction over years 2–6 postimplantation was calculated by assessing the seizure frequency compared to a preimplantation baseline. Safety was assessed based on reported adverse events. Additional analyses considered safety and seizure reduction according to lobe and functional area (e.g., eloquent cortex) of seizure onset.ResultsThere were 126 patients with seizures of neocortical onset. The average follow‐up was 6.1 implant years. The median percent seizure reduction was 70% in patients with frontal and parietal seizure onsets, 58% in those with temporal neocortical onsets, and 51% in those with multilobar onsets (last observation carried forward [LOCF] analysis). Twenty‐six percent of patients experienced at least one seizure‐free period of 6 months or longer and 14% experienced at least one seizure‐free period of 1 year or longer. Patients with lesions on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 77% reduction, LOCF) and those with normal MRI findings (45% reduction, LOCF) benefitted, although the treatment response was more robust in patients with an MRI lesion (p = 0.02, generalized estimating equation [GEE]). There were no differences in the seizure reduction in patients with and without prior epilepsy surgery or vagus nerve stimulation. Stimulation parameters used for treatment did not cause acute or chronic neurologic deficits, even in eloquent cortical areas. The rates of infection (0.017 per patient implant year) and perioperative hemorrhage (0.8%) were not greater than with other neurostimulation devices.SignificanceBrain‐responsive stimulation represents a safe and effective treatment option for patients with medically intractable epilepsy, including adults with seizures of neocortical onset, and those with onsets from eloquent cortex.

Object The aim of this study was to determine whether ictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is useful in localizing the site of seizure onset in patients in whom surgery for intractable epilepsy failed and who are being considered for repeated surgery. Methods Subtraction ictal SPECT coregistered to magnetic resonance imaging (SISCOM) studies were retrospectively analyzed in 58 patients who were being evaluated for possible repeated resection for intractable partial epilepsy between January 1, 1996, and October 31, 1999. All patients had persistent seizures subsequent to an initial resection and underwent another excision. The SISCOM-demonstrated abnormalities were classified as concordant, discordant, or indeterminate, compared with the localization of the epileptogenic zone revealed on video electroencephalography monitoring. The ability of SISCOM to predict operative outcome was also determined in patients who had undergone repeated surgical procedures. The SISCOM studies revealed a localized hyperperfused alteration in 46 (79%) of 58 patients. Forty-one (89%) of these 46 patients had a SISCOM-demonstrated alteration in the hemisphere of the previous epilepsy surgery. Imaging changes in 33 (72%) of the 46 patients were at the site of the previous focal cortical resection. Eight (17%) of the 46 had SISCOM-demonstrated abnormalities remote from the lobe in which surgery had been performed but in the ipsilateral hemisphere. The hyperperfusion focus was in the contralateral hemisphere in the remaining five patients (11%). The site of the epileptogenic zone was concordant with the SISCOM focus in 32 (70%) of 46 patients. Twenty-six patients underwent repeated resection and were followed up for a mean of 44 months thereafter; 11 of these patients (42%) had a significant reduction in seizure tendency. Only five patients (19%) were seizure free. Ten (50%) of 20 patients with a concordant SISCOM focus compared with none (0%) of three patients with a discordant focus had a favorable surgical outcome (p = 0.23). Conclusions The SISCOM method might be useful in the evaluation of, and the surgical planning for, patients with intractable partial epilepsy in whom previous resective treatment has failed and who are being considered for reoperation.