Back to Authors

Patel, Toral

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3021-7361

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Citations 3

P14.05.A A PROSPECTIVE, MULTICENTER TRIAL OF FOCUSED ULTRASOUND FOR BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER DISRUPTION FOR LIQUID BIOPSY IN GLIOBLASTOMA (LIBERATE)
Ozair, Ahmad , Sahgal, Arjun , Groot, John Frederick De, Hibert, Matthew , Zhu, James , Achrol, Achal S. , Shah, Bhavya , Patel, Toral , Rincon-Toroella, Jordina, Sporrer, Justin, Hilliard, Justin D. , Bezchlibnyk, Yarema , Rezai, Ali R. , Lipsman, Nir , Woodworth, Graeme F., Ozair, Ahmad , Ahluwalia, Manmeet S. , Burns, Terry C. , McDermott, Michael , Mogilner, Alon Y. , Mishra, Mark V. , Everson, Richard G. , Weinberg, Jeffrey S. , Cifarelli, Christopher P.

Neuro-Oncology | October 17, 2024 | Volume: 26 | Issue: Supplement_5 | Pages: v77-v78

10.1093/neuonc/noae144.256 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND Liquid biopsy in glioblastoma (GBM) is hindered by a lack of requisite circulating tumor (ct) and cell-free (cf) DNA levels in blood due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This limits the identification of blood-based tumor biomarkers along with the development and use of biomarker-driven systemic therapies. Real-time image-guided low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) combined with intravenously administered microbubble oscillators, leads to non-invasive disruption of the BBB. This trial aims to evaluate the utility of LIFU for boosting blood ctDNA and cfDNA for enhanced liquid biopsy in GBM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS LIBERATE is an ongoing, prospective, multi-center, self-controlled, pivotal trial evaluating safety and technical efficacy of LIFU-based BBB disruption for increasing blood ctDNA and cfDNA levels in adults, aged 18-80 years with GBM. Patients with suspected GBM planned for tumor biopsy or resection at ten centers in the US are being enrolled. Patients with multifocal tumors or tumors arising from deep midline, thalamus, cerebellum, or brainstem are excluded. Patients are administered IV microbubbles for enhanced sonication effects, after which MR-guided BBB disruption using a 220 kHz LIFU device is performed with real-time acoustic feedback control for effective microbubble activation. Before and after procedure, phlebotomy and MRI brain are performed to evaluate outcomes. Primary study endpoint is defined, per subject, as ratio between their cfDNA level in blood 1-hour post-LIFU procedure compared to cfDNA level in blood pre-procedure. Primary study hypothesis is that BBB disruption with LIFU leads to a ≥2-fold rise in blood cfDNA. The secondary hypothesis is that there exists ≥75% agreement between biomarker pattern in blood cfDNA sample obtained 1-hour post-LIFU and the biomarker pattern in tumor tissue obtained later. The trial has been powered to evaluate both primary and secondary hypotheses. Based on an assumed true agreement rate of 91% and a one-sided alpha of 0.025, an exact test for binomial proportions provides a sample of N = 50 with 84% power for the secondary hypothesis. Exploratory endpoints include (1) sensitivity of detection of known specific somatic mutations in ctDNA from blood samples collected before and after LIFU, (2) estimation of ctDNA levels post-LIFU in samples collected at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 3 hour to determine the time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of MRI parameters related to grading of BBB disruption and ctDNA-based biomarkers from post-LIFU blood samples. RESULTS Patient enrollment commenced in 2022, and 22 patients have been recruited by 05/2024. CONCLUSION Findings from this trial will be critical to liquid biopsy in GBM (Clinical trial information: NCT05383872).
A prospective, multicenter trial of low-intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) for blood-brain barrier disruption for liquid biopsy in glioblastoma (LIBERATE).
Ozair, Ahmad , Sahgal, Arjun , Groot, John Frederick De, Achrol, Achal S. , Shah, Bhavya , Patel, Toral , Sporrer, Justin, Rezai, Ali R. , Lipsman, Nir , Woodworth, Graeme F., Ozair, Ahmad , Ahluwalia, Manmeet S. , Burns, Terry C. , Mogilner, Alon Y. , Bettegowda, Chetan , Schwartz, Theodore H. , Mishra, Mark V. , Everson, Richard G. , Amankulor, Nduka , McDermott, Michael , Cifarelli, Christopher P.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | July 11, 2024 | Volume: 42 | Issue: 16_suppl | Pages: TPS2098-TPS2098

10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.tps2098 Get It

TPS2098 Background: Liquid biopsy in glioblastoma (GBM) is hindered by a lack of requisite circulating tumor (ct) and cell-free (cf) DNA levels in blood due to the blood-brain barrier (BBB). This limits the identification of blood-based tumor biomarkers along with the development and use of biomarker-driven systemic therapies. Real-time image-guided low intensity focused ultrasound (LIFU) combined with intravenously administered microbubble oscillators, leads to non-invasive disruption of the BBB. This trial aims to evaluate the utility of LIFU for boosting blood ctDNA and cfDNA for enhanced liquid biopsy in GBM patients. Methods: LIBERATE is an ongoing, prospective, multi-center, self-controlled, pivotal trial evaluating safety and technical efficacy of LIFU-based BBB disruption for increasing blood ctDNA and cfDNA levels in adults (aged 18-80 years) with GBM. Patients with suspected GBM planned for tumor biopsy or resection at ten centers in the US are being enrolled. Patients with multifocal tumors or tumors arising from deep midline, thalamus, cerebellum, or brainstem are excluded. Patients are administered IV microbubbles for enhanced sonication effects, after which MR-guided BBB disruption using a 220 kHz LIFU device is performed with real-time acoustic feedback control for effective microbubble activation. Before and after procedure, phlebotomy and MRI brain are performed to evaluate outcomes. Primary study endpoint is defined, per subject, as ratio between their cfDNA level in blood 1-hour post-LIFU procedure compared to cfDNA level in blood pre-procedure. Primary study hypothesis is that BBB disruption with LIFU leads to a ≥2-fold rise in blood cfDNA. The secondary hypothesis is that there exists ≥75% agreement between biomarker pattern in blood cfDNA sample obtained 1-hour post-LIFU and the biomarker pattern in tumor tissue obtained later. The trial has been powered to evaluate both primary and secondary hypotheses. Based on an assumed true agreement rate of 91% and a one-sided alpha of 0.025, an exact test for binomial proportions provides a sample of N = 50 with 84% power for the secondary hypothesis. Exploratory endpoints include (1) sensitivity of detection of known specific somatic mutations in ctDNA from blood samples collected before and after LIFU, (2) estimation of ctDNA levels post-LIFU in samples collected at 30 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hour, and 3 hour to determine the time of greatest yield, (3) correlation of MRI parameters related to grading of BBB disruption and ctDNA-based biomarkers from post-LIFU blood samples. Patient enrollment commenced in 2022 and 22 patients have been recruited by January 2024. Clinical trial information: NCT05383872 .
An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma
Hasanov, Elshad , Yeboa, D.N. , Tucker, Mathew D., Swanson, Todd A. , Ene, Chibawanye , Hasanov, Merve , Derks, Sophie H. A. E. , Smits, Marion , Dudani, Shaan , Heng, Daniel Y.C., Bex, Axel , Hanalıoğlu, Şahin , Weinberg, Jeffrey S. , Hirsch, Laure , Carlo, Maria I. , Aizer, Ayal A. , Brown, Paul D. , Bilen, Mehmet Asım , Chang, Eric L. , Jaboin, Jerry J. , Choueiri, Toni K. , Halasz, Lia M. , Patel, Toral , Soltys, Scott G. , Elder, J. Bradley , Başkaya, Mustafa K. , Timmerman, Robert , Kim, Michelle Miran, Mut, Melike , Beal, Kathryn , Lang, Frederick F. , Giles, Rachel , Patel, Toral , Brown, Paul David, Choueiri, Toni K , Smits, Marion , Hanalioglu, Sahin , Patel, Toral R , Beckham, Thomas Hendrix , Rini, Brian I. , Brastianos, Priscilla K. , Brugarolas, James , Atkins, Michael B. , McGregor, Bradley A. , McDermott, David F. , Yu, James B. , Kim, Michelle H. , Markert, James M. , Tannir, Nizar , Samandouras, George , Jonasch, Eric W.

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | June 16, 2022 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 454-489

10.3322/caac.21729 Get It

Abstract Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454‐489.