Back to Authors

Hasanov, Merve

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-4917

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Citations 2

An interdisciplinary consensus on the management of brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma
Hasanov, Elshad , Yeboa, D.N. , Tucker, Mathew D., Swanson, Todd A. , Ene, Chibawanye , Hasanov, Merve , Derks, Sophie H. A. E. , Smits, Marion , Dudani, Shaan , Heng, Daniel Y.C., Bex, Axel , Hanalıoğlu, Şahin , Weinberg, Jeffrey S. , Hirsch, Laure , Carlo, Maria I. , Aizer, Ayal A. , Brown, Paul D. , Bilen, Mehmet Asım , Chang, Eric L. , Jaboin, Jerry J. , Choueiri, Toni K. , Halasz, Lia M. , Patel, Toral , Soltys, Scott G. , Elder, J. Bradley , Başkaya, Mustafa K. , Timmerman, Robert , Kim, Michelle Miran, Mut, Melike , Beal, Kathryn , Lang, Frederick F. , Giles, Rachel , Patel, Toral , Brown, Paul David, Choueiri, Toni K , Smits, Marion , Hanalioglu, Sahin , Patel, Toral R , Beckham, Thomas Hendrix , Rini, Brian I. , Brastianos, Priscilla K. , Brugarolas, James , Atkins, Michael B. , McGregor, Bradley A. , McDermott, David F. , Yu, James B. , Kim, Michelle H. , Markert, James M. , Tannir, Nizar , Samandouras, George , Jonasch, Eric W.

CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians | June 16, 2022 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 454-489

10.3322/caac.21729 Get It

Abstract Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454‐489.
A Phase II Study of Glembatumumab Vedotin for Metastatic Uveal Melanoma
Hasanov, Merve , Rioth, Matthew J. , Kendra, Kari , Hernandez‐Aya, Leonel F. , Williamson, Stephen K. , Chandra, Sunandana , Shirai, Keisuke , Turner, Christopher D. , Lewis, Karl D. , Crowley, Elizabeth, Moscow, Jeffrey A. , Patel, Sapna P. , Williamson, Stephen , Patel, Sapna , Moscow, Jeffrey A , Joseph, Richard W. , Carter, Brett

Cancers | August 13, 2020 | Volume: 12 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 2270

10.3390/cancers12082270 Get It

Glembatumumab vedotin (CDX-011, GV) is a fully human Immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody directed against glycoprotein NMB coupled via a peptide linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor. This phase II study evaluated the overall response rate and safety of GV, glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) expression, and survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Eligible patients with metastatic uveal melanoma who had not previously been treated with chemotherapy received GV 1.9 mg/kg every three weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included GPNMB expression, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity analysis. GPNMB expression was assessed pre- and post-treatment via immunohistochemistry for patients with available tumor tissue. Out of 35 patients who received treatment, two patients had confirmed partial responses (PRs; 6%), and 18 patients had a stable disease (SD; 51%) as the best objective response. 38% of the patients had stable disease >100 days. The grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in two or more patients were neutropenia, rash, hyponatremia, and vomiting. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.5–5.6), and the median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI 9.0–16.9) in the evaluable study population. GV is well-tolerated in metastatic uveal melanoma. The disease control rate was 57% despite a low objective response rate. Exploratory immune correlation studies are underway to provide insight into target saturation, combination strategies, and antigen release.