Joseph, Richard W.

Over the past few years, the NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous have been expanded to include pathways for treatment of microscopic satellitosis (added in v2.2020), and the following Principles sections: Molecular Testing (added in v2.2019), Systemic Therapy Considerations (added in v2.2020), and Brain Metastases Management (added in v3.2020). The v1.2021 update included additional modifications of these sections and notable revisions to Principles of: Pathology, Surgical Margins for Wide Excision of Primary Melanoma, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Completion/Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection, and Radiation Therapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the important changes to pathology and surgery recommendations, as well as additions to systemic therapy options for patients with advanced disease.

335 Background: Systematic reviews are outdated quickly when the evidence is rapidly evolving as the process is laborious and there is little incentive for primary author team of an index SRMA to update the evidence. Consequently, there is an epidemic of redundant SRMAs performed by different teams—sometimes with conflicted results—for treatment of first line mRCC. Methods: We have created a living, interactive systematic review (LISR)and network meta-analysis(LINMA) for the treatment of first line mRCC using an Artificial intelligence (AI) assisted framework for evidence synthesis (Living, Interactive evidence synthesis framework) (LIvE) . The framework is implemented in five-layered architecture (application layer, shared module layer, core service layer, middleware layer, and storage layer) which work together to automate the identification of new studies and analysis and semi-automate the screening and data extraction. Dynamic features such as interactive tables, figures and evidence maps are enabled using Python and JavaScript programming languages. Results: We have maintained a living, interactive evidence profile for the first line treatment mRCC since September 2019 ( LIVING WEBSITE) . Living search strategy identifies new studies as they become available. As of October 13, 2020 LISR, includes data 14 clinical trials ( PRISMA ). Baseline characteristics are summarized in an interactive table ( TABLE) . Cabozantinib& Nivolumab (Cabo-Nivo) is the highest ranked drug for improving Overall Response (OR), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) whereas Ipilimumab in combination with Nivolumab (Ipi-Nivo) is highest ranked drug for achieving complete response (CR). Ipi-Nivo and Atezolizumab & Bevacizumab (Ate-Bev) ranked highest and Cabo-Nivo ranked lowest for treatment related Adverse events (TRAEs). Results of network meta-analysis are summarized as interactive tables and plots ( NMA ), summary of findings tables ( MULTIPLE COMAPRISONS ) and evidence maps ( MAP ). Conclusions: LISRs can potentially reduce redundancy, increase transparency, reproducibility, enable shared-decision making (at a guideline level, or in a patient-clinician dyad) and support living guidelines.

Glembatumumab vedotin (CDX-011, GV) is a fully human Immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody directed against glycoprotein NMB coupled via a peptide linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor. This phase II study evaluated the overall response rate and safety of GV, glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) expression, and survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Eligible patients with metastatic uveal melanoma who had not previously been treated with chemotherapy received GV 1.9 mg/kg every three weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included GPNMB expression, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity analysis. GPNMB expression was assessed pre- and post-treatment via immunohistochemistry for patients with available tumor tissue. Out of 35 patients who received treatment, two patients had confirmed partial responses (PRs; 6%), and 18 patients had a stable disease (SD; 51%) as the best objective response. 38% of the patients had stable disease >100 days. The grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in two or more patients were neutropenia, rash, hyponatremia, and vomiting. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.5–5.6), and the median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI 9.0–16.9) in the evaluable study population. GV is well-tolerated in metastatic uveal melanoma. The disease control rate was 57% despite a low objective response rate. Exploratory immune correlation studies are underway to provide insight into target saturation, combination strategies, and antigen release.

Objective To evaluate patient‐reported outcome (PRO) data from the IMmotion150 study. The phase 2 IMmotion150 study showed improved progression‐free survival with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab vs sunitinib in patients with programmed death‐ligand 1 (PD‐L1)+ tumours and suggested activity of atezolizumab monotherapy in previously untreated metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Patients and methods Patients with previously untreated mRCC were randomised to atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks ( n = 103), the atezolizumab regimen plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg i.v. every 3 weeks ( n = 101), or sunitinib 50 mg orally daily (4 weeks on, 2 weeks off; n = 101). The MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI) and Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) were administered on days 1 and 22 of each 6‐week cycle. Time to deterioration (TTD), change from baseline in MDASI core and RCC symptom severity, interference with daily life, and BFI fatigue severity and interference scores were reported for all comers. The TTD was the first ≥2‐point score increase over baseline. Absolute effect size ≥0.2 suggested a clinically important difference with checkpoint inhibitor therapy vs sunitinib. Results Completion rates were >90% at baseline and ≥80% at most visits. Delayed TTD in core and RCC symptoms, symptom interference, fatigue, and fatigue‐related interference was observed with atezolizumab (both alone and in combination) vs sunitinib. Improved TTD (hazard ratio [HR], 95% confidence interval [CI]) was more pronounced with atezolizumab monotherapy: core symptoms, 0.39 (0.22–0.71); RCC symptoms, 0.22 (0.12–0.41); and symptom interference, 0.36 (0.22–0.58). Change from baseline by visit, evaluated by the MDASI, also showed a trend favouring atezolizumab monotherapy vs sunitinib. Small sample sizes may have limited the ability to draw definitive conclusions. Conclusion PROs suggested that atezolizumab alone or with bevacizumab maintained daily function compared with sunitinib. Notably, symptoms were least severe with atezolizumab alone vs sunitinib (IMmotion150; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01984242).

9096 Background: HD IL-2 is an approved immunotherapy that can achieve durable cures in MM pts. Due to toxicity and low ORR, identification of predictors of clinical benefit would enhance pt selection and outcomes with HD IL-2. Recent research identified a positive correlation for ALC ≥ 1000 (either at baseline or at dose 3) with OS among MM pts treated with the immunotherapy agent ipilimumab. We tested the hypothesis that ALC (≥ 1000) or other hematological parameters correlates with clinical benefit from HD IL2. Methods: Results of hematologic testing in patients (n=98) treated with HD IL2 at MD Anderson Cancer Center were collected, including absolute levels of neutrophils (ANC), lymphocytes (ALC), monocytes (AMC), eosinophils (AEC), and platelets (APC) at baseline, after cycle 1 (C1), and after cycle 2 (C2) of HD IL-2; changes in each parameter for each interval were also calculated. Hematologic values were assessed as categorical (for ALC, ≥ 1000 Yes/No; other parameters, above upper limit of normal [ULN] Yes/No) and continuous variables. Associations between these parameters and PFS and ORR were analyzed. Results: ALC was≥ 1000 in 75 pts (76%) at baseline, in 81 (83%) after C1, and in 80 of 86 pts (93%) after completion of C2 of HD IL-2. PFS was not significantly associated with ALC ≥ 1000 at baseline (HR 0.69, p=0.13), after C1 (HR 1.32, p=0.33), or after C2 (HR 1.01, p=0.98). ALC ≥ 1000 at each timepoint was not significantly associated with ORR or OS. There was no significant difference in the change in ALC with HD IL2 treatment among responders versus non-responders. Among baseline hematological factors, APC > ULN was significantly associated with PFS (p=0.001), but it was rare (2/98 patients). Exploratory analyses identified significantly shorter PFS for patients with baseline APC > 300 (11%, HR 2.75, p=0.002). Analysis of hematologic factors as continuous values identified significant associations with PFS for AMC (HR 2.42, p=0.03) and AEC (HR 1.73, p=0.009) after C2. Conclusions: ALC ≥ 1000 did not correlate with PFS, ORR, or OS with HD IL-2 therapy in this cohort of metastatic melanoma pts.

9009 Background: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) is an inhibitory T-cell co-receptor that may lead to suppression of antitumor immunity. Lambrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal IgG4 antibody against PD-1. This study explored the safety and clinical activity of lambrolizumab in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma (MEL). Methods: In this ongoing phase 1b expansion study of MEL pts with or without previous ipilimumab (IPI) treatment, lambrolizumab was administered IV every 2 or 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 12 weeks by independent, central, blinded radiographic review per immune-related response criteria and RECIST 1.1. Results: As of December 1, 2012, 294 pts with MEL were enrolled, including 179 IPI-naive and 115 IPI-pretreated. Pts received lambrolizumab 10 mg/kg (n = 183) or 2 mg/kg (n = 111). Preliminary data from the first 85 consecutive pts dosed before April 25, 2012, who had independent radiologic review available as of December 3, 2012, indicate a confirmed overall response rate per RECIST 1.1 of greater than 35%, pooled across all doses and schedules and including both IPI-naive and IPI-pretreated patients. The median duration of response has not been reached as only 2 pts who had initial response discontinued due to disease progression, but the duration of confirmed responses range from 28+ to 240+ days (up to 8+ months). Among 133 pts who were dosed with lambrolizumab before July 31, 2012, and evaluable for adverse events (AEs) as of September 28, 2012, fatigue (22%), rash (18%), and pruritus (14%) were the most common drug-related AEs (mostly grade 1/2). The incidence of drug-related grade 3/4 AEs was 10% (24% regardless of attribution). Four drug-related cases of pneumonitis were reported, all of grade 1/2. Grade 3/4 drug-related hypothyroidism (n = 1) and hyperthyroidism (n = 1) were noted. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that lambrolizumab has significant antitumor activity and is well tolerated with manageable side effects in both IPI-naive and IPI-pretreated MEL pts. These data have led to an ongoing, international, randomized study of lambrolizumab versus chemotherapy in IPI-pretreated MEL. Clinical trial information: NCT01295827.

4567 Background: Trials combining anti-PDL1 and anti-VEGF therapies for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) are underway; however the relationship between the expression of PDL1 and genes in the VEGF pathway is poorly understood. Using the Affymetrix platform, we observed an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway. Herein, we validate this inverse association using an independent set of 100 primary ccRCC tumors. Methods: From our registry database we sampled 100 ccRCC tumors with varying PDL1 protein expression (0%-100%) determined by immunohistochemistry (IHC). We extracted RNA from FFPE slides and performed RT-PCR to quantify gene expression of PDL1, VEGF, VEGFR1, and VEGFR2. All genes were normalized to the POLR2a gene. We evaluated the association of PDL1 protein expression and VEGF gene expression using Spearman rank correlation. In addition, we employed a linear mixed effects model to compare the fold-change in expression of VEGF genes between PDL1 low (0-5%, n=68) and PDL1 high (>5%, n=32) tumors. Results: As expected, PDL1 protein expression positively correlates with PDL1 geneexpression (corr=0.42, p<0.001). Validating our array data, PDL1 protein expression inversely correlates with expression of key VEGF genes: VEGF (corr=-0.23, p=0.01), VEGFR1 (corr=-0.34, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (corr=-0.23, p=0.01). In our dichotomized analysis, we noted significantly higher expression of VEGF genes in the PDL1 low compared to the PDL1 high group: VEGF (fold change=1.82, p<0.001), VEGFR1 (FC=2.63, p<0.001), and VEGFR2 (FC=2.13, p=0.001). Conclusions: We independently validate an inverse association between the expression of PDL1 and key genes in the VEGF pathway in primary ccRCC. If validated further in larger studies, the existence of an immune evasive and an angiogenic phenotype within ccRCC could inform current clinical trials targeting these two pathways. Ultimately, whether VEGF signaling affects PDL1 expression, or whether angiogenic or immune evasive phenotypes predict response to anti-PDL1, anti-VEGF, or a combination of the two therapies remains unclear.

e15539 Background: Despite the development of prognostic algorithms based on clinico-pathologic features, the ability to identify aggressive forms of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) remains suboptimal. Topoisomerase IIA (TOP2a) is a biomarker of DNA replication and a target for antineoplastic agents. Herein, we evaluate the association of TOP2a expression in ccRCC tumors with pathologic features of aggressiveness and risk of cancer-specific death. Methods: We identified 1,380 patients who underwent nephrectomy to treat clinically localized ccRCC between 1/16/1990 and 4/14/2009. TOP2a expression was assessed using IHC and scored as number of positive cells per mm2. We evaluated TOP2a expression using a continuous variable and tertile categories. For associations with pathologic features we employed Kruskal-Wallis tests and for associations with cancer-specific survival we generated Cox proportional hazard regression models. Results: HigherTOP2a expression is associated with later stage, higher grade and higher MayoSSIGN score (all p < 0.001). The risk of death from RCC increases with increasing TOP2a expression (p trend < 0.0001), and this association remained strong after after multivariate adjustment for well-known predictors of RCC aggressiveness. Compared to patients in the lowest tertile, those patients with tumors in the highest tertile of TOP2a expression were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=2.62 95% CI 1.95-3.54; p<0.0001). Interestingly, among those patients with low risk disease (SSIGN score 0-3; ~95% 10 year survival), those with high TOP2a were at increased risk of RCC death (HR=3.48 95% CI 1.56-7.76; p =0.002). Conclusions: Higher TOP2a expression is associated with more aggressive pathologic features and increased risk of cancer-specific death among patients undergoing surgery for localized ccRCC. If confirmed, these data support further inquiry for TOP2a as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for ccRCC patients.

8590 Background: Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is an aggressive cutaneous malignancy of neuroendocrine origin associated with immunosuppression presumably through infection with Merkel Cell Polyomavirus present in >80% of patients (pts). The impact of immune status on clinical outcomes in pts with MCC is unknown. The primary objective of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and outcomes of pts with MCC who are immunosuppressed (ISP) versus non-immunosuppressed (non-ISP). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review on pts with MCC diagnosed at the Mayo Clinic between 1981 and 2009. A dermatopathologist confirmed all cases. ISP was defined as pts diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, HIV, solid organ transplant recipients, or chronic immunosuppressive medication. The association between ISP status and overall survival was summarized using the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) estimated from a Cox regression model. Results: Of the 268 pts identified and included in the study, 38 (14%) were ISP. We found no differences in age, tumor size, tumor location, stage of disease, or recurrence rate in ISP vs Non-ISP. Among pts who had Stage 3-4 disease, there was no difference in the size of the primary between groups. Among pts with Stage 1-2 disease, ISP status was not significantly associated with poorer survival (HR 1.5, 95% CI 0.7-3.3). However, among pts with Stage 3-4 disease, ISP pts had significantly poorer survival compared to non-ISP pts (HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.2 - 6.2). Conclusions: Baseline clinical characteristics of pts with MCC do not differ based on immunosuppression, and outcomes do not differ in pts in regards to immunosuppression in early stage MCC (Stage 1-2). However, in pts with Stage III-IV MCC, ISP pts have a worse clinical outcome suggesting that metastatic MCC either behaves more aggressively in ISP pts either through intrinsic differences in the biology of the tumor or improved immune evasion in ISP pts. These results should be cautiously interpreted given the small number (n=12) of immunosuppressed pts with advanced stage MCC. The authors will update their data with an additional 58 patients by the date of presentation.

696 Background: A number of treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been FDA approved since December, 2005. Trials evaluating these agents excluded non-clear cell histologies and therefore the efficacy of these treatments remains unclear in patients (pts) with metastatic non-clear cell RCC (mncRCC). Methods: This is a single arm Phase II study designed to determine the efficacy of pazopanib in mncRCC. Treatment was pazopanib 800 mg by mouth daily until progression or intolerability of treatment. Dose reductions were allowed for toxicity with dose level -1 being 600 mg daily and dose level -2, 400 mg daily. Cycles were every 28 days. Main eligibility criteria included: (1) age ³ 18 years old; (2) histologic confirmation of ncRCC; (3) ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0, 1, or 2; (4) up to one prior treatment for mncRCC (5) measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease per RECIST criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were best tumor response rates after two cycles, PFS, OS and toxicity. Results: 38 pts were enrolled between May 16, 2013 and February 1, 2018. 35 pts were evaluable for primary endpoint. Median age 63 years old and 22/35 (62.9%) were male. Most common histology was papillary RCC, 14/35 (40%), and most common number of metastatic sites was 1. 29/35 (82.9%) had prior nephrectomy and 30/35 (85.7%) had no prior systemic therapy. Median number of cycles was 5. 12-month OS was 65.7% (90% CI, 50.5-78.9%). Best response in first 2 cycles: PR 11%, SD 60%, PD 9%, not evaluated 20%. Median PFS was 7.5 months (90% CI, 5.0-11.0); median OS 18.9 months (90% CI, 13.0-NE). Grade 3 / 4 AEs seen in 25 pts with hypertension, transaminitis and abdominal pain being most common (seen in >10%). Conclusions: There are limited data about the efficacy of available therapies for mncRCC. This study shows that pazopanib has similar efficacy compared to historical data in clinical trials using other TKIs in mncRCC. The safety profile of pazopanib in pts with mncRCC was found to be similar to that found in prior clinical trials studying pazopanib. Our findings warrant further investigation into the utility of pazopanib in metastatic ncRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01767636.