Swetter, Susan M.

The NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous provide strategies for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma, which is among the most common cancers in the United States. The outcome of cutaneous melanoma is significantly influenced by stage at initial presentation. Generally, localized disease and smaller primary tumors have been associated with more favorable prognosis. Thus, the select content featured in this issue focuses on risk factors associated with cutaneous melanoma development and which should be considered during an initial assessment. These include (1) phenotypic predispositions, (2) personal medical history or comorbidities, (3) genetic predispositions, and (4) environmental factors.

Background: Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is a promising treatment modality for melanoma in situ (MIS). However, variations in surgical technique limit the generalizability of existing data and may impede future study of MMS in clinical trials. Methods: A modified Delphi method was selected to establish consensus on optimal MMS techniques for treating MIS in future clinical trials. The Delphi method was selected due to the limited current data, the wide range of techniques used in the field, and the intention to establish a standardized technique for future clinical trials. A literature review and interviews with experienced MMS surgeons were performed to identify dimensions of the MMS technique for MIS that (1) likely impacted costs or outcomes of the procedure, and (2) showed significant variability between surgeons. A total of 8 dimensions of technical variation were selected. The Delphi process consisted of 2 rounds of voting and commentary, during which 44 expert Mohs surgeons across the United States rated their agreement with specific recommendations using a Likert scale. Results: Five of eight recommendations achieved consensus in Round 1. All 3 of the remaining recommendations achieved consensus in Round 2. Techniques achieving consensus in Round 1 included the use of a starting peripheral margin of ≤5 mm, application of immunohistochemistry, frozen tissue processing, and resecting to the depth of subcutaneous fat. Consensus on the use of Wood’s lamp, dermatoscope, and negative tissue controls was established in Round 2. Conclusions: This study generated 8 consensus recommendations intended to offer guidance for Mohs surgeons treating MIS. The adoption of these recommendations will promote standardization to facilitate comparisons of aggregate data in multicenter clinical trials.

The NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma (termed Melanoma: Cutaneous ) provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the update to neoadjuvant systemic therapy options and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma.

Over the past few years, the NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous have been expanded to include pathways for treatment of microscopic satellitosis (added in v2.2020), and the following Principles sections: Molecular Testing (added in v2.2019), Systemic Therapy Considerations (added in v2.2020), and Brain Metastases Management (added in v3.2020). The v1.2021 update included additional modifications of these sections and notable revisions to Principles of: Pathology, Surgical Margins for Wide Excision of Primary Melanoma, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Completion/Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection, and Radiation Therapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the important changes to pathology and surgery recommendations, as well as additions to systemic therapy options for patients with advanced disease.

9013 Background: Pediatric melanoma (PM) care has been extrapolated from adult melanoma data. PM and atypical melanocytic neoplasms (AMNs) appear to have different biology. An international database (DB) was developed to clarify their behavior. Methods: IRB approval was obtained at 12 institutions. An SQL-DB was developed for web entry of de-identified demographic and pathologic data for PM and AMN patients (pts) < 21yr through an honest broker system at the University of Pittsburgh. Institutions retained a key of pts entered with assigned numbers for quality assurance and updates. Statistical analysis used Kaplan-Meier survival curves, univariate linear trends and log rank tests. In situ melanoma was excluded from PM survival analysis. Results: 828 pts were registered as of 31 Oct 2008 (ages 11mo-23; median 15yr). 34 pts 21–23yr entered were left in the DB for statistical comparison. Diagnosis years ranged from 1936–2008. 455 pts had complete follow-up. Too few AMN pts had complete follow-up for analysis (18/208). After excluding 32 in situ and 40 with other incomplete data, 365 PM out of 415 total PM were evaluable for OS and 351 for DFS (Stage IV removed). Mean/median age for evaluable PM pts was 16.44/17-yrs (range 1–21yr). 591 pts were age 10–20 while 203 were < 10. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy showed spread in 30.1 % PM pts (compared to 50% [4/8] of AMN SLN pts). 10-yr PM OS was 80.6%, and pts 0–10 yr had 100% 10-yr OS compared to 69.6% for pts age 10–15 and 79.49% for age 15–20 (p= 0.1473). OS did not differ significantly by gender. Stage predicted OS (p<0.0001). 10-yr OS was 94.13% for Stage I (n=174), 79.62% for stage II (n=67) & 77.14% for stage III (n=75). Thickness affected 10-yr OS: 0–1mm=97% (n=147), 1.1–2mm 70% (n=84), 2.01–4mm 78% (n=71) & >4mm 81% (n=25), p= 0.0099. Survival was similar for pts with PM > 1mm of the several T stage groupings. Ulceration adversely affected OS (p=0.022). Mitosis, defined as present/absent did not alter survival. Nodal metastasis correlated with worse OS (p= 0.170). Conclusions: Stage, thickness, ulceration, and nodal status are significant predictors of OS for PM. Further study will focus on multivariable analysis of PM and AMNs after updating pts, increasing accrual, and cleaning data. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cutaneous melanoma have been significantly revised over the past few years in response to emerging data on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and BRAF-targeted therapy. This article summarizes the data and rationale supporting extensive changes to the recommendations for systemic therapy as adjuvant treatment of resected disease and as treatment of unresectable or distant metastatic disease.

Recent progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma has led to unprecedented improvements in overall survival and, as these new melanoma treatments have been developed and deployed in the clinic, much has been learned about the natural history of the disease. Now is the time to apply that knowledge toward the design and clinical evaluation of new chemoprevention agents. Melanoma chemoprevention has the potential to reduce dramatically both the morbidity and the high costs associated with treating patients who have metastatic disease. In this work, scientific and clinical melanoma experts from the national Melanoma Prevention Working Group, composed of National Cancer Trials Network investigators, discuss research aimed at discovering and developing (or repurposing) drugs and natural products for the prevention of melanoma and propose an updated pipeline for translating the most promising agents into the clinic. The mechanism of action, preclinical data, epidemiological evidence, and results from available clinical trials are discussed for each class of compounds. Selected keratinocyte carcinoma chemoprevention studies also are considered, and a rationale for their inclusion is presented. These data are summarized in a table that lists the type and level of evidence available for each class of agents. Also included in the discussion is an assessment of additional research necessary and the likelihood that a given compound may be a suitable candidate for a phase 3 clinical trial within the next 5 years.

BACKGROUNDThe management of pediatric melanoma (PM) has largely been extrapolated from adult data. However, the behavior of PM appears to differ from its adult counterparts. Therefore, an international PM registry was created and analyzed.METHODSTwelve institutions contributed deidentified clinicopathologic and outcome data for patients diagnosed with PM from 1953 through 2008.RESULTSOverall survival (OS) data were reported for 365 patients with invasive PM who had adequate follow‐up data. The mean age of the patients was 16 years (range 1 year‐21 years). The 10‐year OS rate, 80.6%, tended to vary by patient age: 100% for those aged birth to 10 years, 69.7% for those aged > 10 years to 15 years, and 79.5% for those aged > 15 years to 20 years (P = .147). Patients with melanomas measuring ≤ 1 mm had a favorable prognosis (10‐year OS rate of 97%), whereas survival was lower but similar for patients with melanomas measuring > 1 mm to 2 mm, > 2 mm to 4 mm, and > 4 mm (70%, 78%, and 80%, respectively; P = .0077). Ulceration and lymph node metastasis were found to be correlated with worse survival (P = .022 and P = .017, respectively). The 10‐year OS rate was 94.1% for patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I disease, 79.6% for those with stage II disease, and 77.1% for patients with stage III disease (P < .001).CONCLUSIONSTumor thickness, ulceration, lymph node status, and stage were found to be significant predictors of survival in patients with PM, similar to adult melanoma. There is a trend toward increased survival in children aged ≤ 10 years versus adolescents aged > 10 years. Further analyses are needed to probe for potential biological and behavioral differences in pediatric versus adult melanoma. Cancer 2013;119:4012–4019. © 2013 American Cancer Society.