Marghoob, Ashfaq A.

Abstract Lentigo maligna (LM) is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma in situ that develops on chronically sun‐damaged skin in elderly individuals. Its diagnosis and management remain challenging due to its slow progression, frequent occurrence on cosmetically sensitive areas in frail individuals, and tendency for subclinical peripheral extension. Despite its potential for invasive transformation, the natural history of LM remains incompletely understood and evidence‐based management strategies for this specific entity remain limited. This work aims to bridge the gap between scarce high‐quality evidence and the clinicians' need for practical guidance on LM management by formulating evidence‐based and expert consensus‐driven recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Under the coordination of the International Dermoscopy Society, a global, multidisciplinary consortium of 53 experts—including dermatologists, dermato‐oncologists, dermatologic surgeons, radiologists, radiotherapists, pathologists and epidemiologists—formulated recommendations through structured consensus, informed by a comprehensive review of current scientific evidence and clinical practice standards. Optimal management of LM requires accurate diagnosis and individualized treatment planning. Non‐invasive skin imaging techniques, especially dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy, aid in diagnosis, biopsy orientation, lesion delineation and post‐treatment monitoring. Multiple partial biopsies help confirm diagnosis and rule out invasion. Complete surgical excision remains the first treatment option. No definitive safety margins can be recommended for standard surgery; margin‐controlled techniques are preferable for large or ill‐defined lesions. Topical imiquimod and radiotherapy are effective alternatives where surgery is unsuitable. Topical imiquimod is useful as primary, adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Blind destructive methods should be avoided. Close clinical and imaging follow‐up is needed. Patient‐centred care, shared decision‐making, and a multidisciplinary approach are critical for optimal outcomes. These international consensus recommendations summarize current best practices for LM management, offering practical, evidence‐informed guidance to clinicians while acknowledging the potential of future research in refining these conclusions.

Introduction: Porokeratosis is a group of keratinization disorders characterized by the histopathological presence of the cornoid lamella, a hallmark feature across all subtypes. The clinical diagnosis of porokeratosis can be challenging due to its similarity to other dermatological conditions. While polarized light dermatoscopy (PLD) enhances diagnostic accuracy, certain features remain difficult to identify. Ultraviolet-induced fluorescence dermatoscopy (UVFD) is a novel imaging technique that may improve the visualization of porokeratosis features, particularly the peripheral keratin rim. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of UVFD compared with PLD in identifying the dermatoscopic features of porokeratosis. Methods: In this retrospective study, dermatologists from five institutions in Chile, Brazil, Poland, and the United States contributed with dermatoscopic images of porokeratosis cases. Both PLD and UVFD images were obtained for each lesion. Two independent investigators evaluated each lesion in PLD and UVFD for the presence of peripheral keratin rim, rim continuity, central scaling, follicular plugs, vascular structures, and photodamaged surrounding skin. A third investigator reviewed discrepancies. Frequencies and means were calculated. McNemar’s chi-square was used for comparison. Results: A total of 136 lesions from 35 patients with biopsy-proven porokeratosis were analyzed. UVFD significantly improved the visualization of the peripheral keratin rim (95.6% vs. 66.2% in PLD; P<0.001) and increased identification rates for central scaling, follicular plugs, and interrupted rims. PLD remained superior for detecting vascular structures(P<0.001). Conclusions: UVFD enhances the visualization of key dermatoscopic features of porokeratosis, particularly the peripheral keratin rim and other keratin-related structures.

Importance: Dermoscopy is increasingly recognized by skin cancer experts and professional leaders as an essential skill for physicians in dermatology and primary care. A substantial number of patients in both settings also receive care from physician assistants (PAs), who provide additional opportunities to evaluate patients with concerning skin lesions. Earning dermatology-specific credentials from the National Commission on Certification for PAs requires passing a written exam with dermoscopic content, and 77% of practicing PAs (all specialties) believe dermoscopy should be a standard element of their formal education. No published studies have identified precise learning objectives that would represent appropriate foundational proficiency in dermoscopy for PAs. Objective: We sought to identify common diagnoses with distinct dermoscopic features and delineate which of these represent appropriate proficiency expectations for early-career PAs in primary care and dermatology. Design, setting, and participants: A panel of 14 dermoscopists was assembled (8 dermatologists; 6 PAs), reflecting contributors to existing consensus statements on physician dermoscopy proficiency benchmarks, dermatologist-recommended competencies for PAs, and/or standardized test content for dermatology PAs. Panelists completed a modified Delphi consensus process involving electronic surveys and roundtable discussions. Main outcomes and measures: Consensus on which specific dermoscopic diagnoses reflect appropriate foundational proficiency expectations for PAs in both primary care and dermatology. Results: Twelve of 14 panelists (86%) reported using dermoscopy for over 12 years (mean: 15.5 y). All panelists completed 2 iterations of an electronic survey regarding 54 diagnoses, with 39 (72%) reaching a final consensus for inclusion in PA curricula and 15 (28%) being identified as non-priority items for early-career PAs. Panelists recommended 14 conditions for primary care PAs and 25 conditions for dermatology PAs. Conclusions and Relevance: Consensus achieved in this modified Delphi process identified diagnoses that represent pragmatic learning objectives to achieve foundational proficiency in dermoscopy for PAs in both primary care and dermatology. This list of validated objectives provides a consensus-based guide to help educators, supervising physicians, and professional leaders to cultivate specialty-appropriate dermoscopic proficiency among early-career PAs.

Background: Patients with skin lesions suspicious for skin cancer or atypical melanocytic nevi of uncertain malignant potential often present to dermatologists, who may have variable dermoscopy triage clinical experience. Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of a digital dermoscopy image-based artificial intelligence algorithm (DDI-AI device) on the diagnosis and management of skin cancers by dermatologists. Methods: Thirty-six United States board-certified dermatologists evaluated 50 clinical images and 50 digital dermoscopy images of the same skin lesions (25 malignant and 25 benign), first without and then with knowledge of the DDI-AI device output. Participants indicated whether they thought the lesion was likely benign (unremarkable) or malignant (suspicious). Results: The management sensitivity of dermatologists using the DDI-AI device was 91.1%, compared to 84.3% with DDI, and 70.0% with clinical images. The management specificity was 71.0%, compared to 68.4% and 64.9%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of dermatologists using the DDI-AI device was 86.1%, compared to 78.8% with DDI, and 63.4% with clinical images. Diagnostic specificity using the DDI-AI device increased to 80.7%, compared to 75.9% and 73.6%, respectively. Conclusion: The use of the DDI-AI device may quickly, safely, and effectively improve dermoscopy performance, skin cancer diagnosis, and management when used by dermatologists, independent of training and experience.

Abstract OBJECTIVE: We hypothesize that patients with neurocutaneous melanocytosis-associated melanoma and ventriculoperitoneal shunts are at risk of developing intraperitoneal spread of melanoma. BACKGROUND: Neurocutaneous melanocytosis, a rare condition characterized by excessive proliferation and deposition of melanocytes in the leptomeninges and brain parenchyma, typically occurs in children with large congenital melanocytic nevi and multiple smaller congenital nevi. These patients are at heightened risk for developing NRAS+ melanomas in the central nervous system, which in turn may lead to symptomatic hydrocephalus requiring cerebrospinal fluid diversion for symptom relief. METHODS: Retrospective single-institution study of patients with histologically or radiographically confirmed NCM evaluated at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) from 2001-2022. RESULTS: Of the 47 patients with a diagnosis of NCM, 44 patients had symptomatic neurological complications. Eleven patients developed hydrocephalus, 10 had CNS melanoma, and required ventriculoperitoneal shunt placement. Nine of the 10 patients ultimately died of their disease. Three patients were diagnosed with intraperitoneal melanoma, though data are unavailable for the remaining eight. CONCLUSIONS: All (n=11) patients with NCM-associated CNS melanoma required VP shunts for symptomatic relief. Ten of these patients died within 4.3 years of VP shunt placement, with a range of 1 month to 13.5 years prior to succumbing to their disease. While the intraperitoneal pathology remains unknown for 7 of the cases, 3 had confirmed intraperitoneal melanoma, suggesting that VP shunts provided the conduit to CNS melanoma seeding of the peritoneum. Obtaining baseline abdominal imaging studies prior to VP shunt placement may be helpful in the follow-up of these patients.

Recent progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma has led to unprecedented improvements in overall survival and, as these new melanoma treatments have been developed and deployed in the clinic, much has been learned about the natural history of the disease. Now is the time to apply that knowledge toward the design and clinical evaluation of new chemoprevention agents. Melanoma chemoprevention has the potential to reduce dramatically both the morbidity and the high costs associated with treating patients who have metastatic disease. In this work, scientific and clinical melanoma experts from the national Melanoma Prevention Working Group, composed of National Cancer Trials Network investigators, discuss research aimed at discovering and developing (or repurposing) drugs and natural products for the prevention of melanoma and propose an updated pipeline for translating the most promising agents into the clinic. The mechanism of action, preclinical data, epidemiological evidence, and results from available clinical trials are discussed for each class of compounds. Selected keratinocyte carcinoma chemoprevention studies also are considered, and a rationale for their inclusion is presented. These data are summarized in a table that lists the type and level of evidence available for each class of agents. Also included in the discussion is an assessment of additional research necessary and the likelihood that a given compound may be a suitable candidate for a phase 3 clinical trial within the next 5 years.