Swanson, David L

Abstract Lentigo maligna (LM) is a subtype of cutaneous melanoma in situ that develops on chronically sun‐damaged skin in elderly individuals. Its diagnosis and management remain challenging due to its slow progression, frequent occurrence on cosmetically sensitive areas in frail individuals, and tendency for subclinical peripheral extension. Despite its potential for invasive transformation, the natural history of LM remains incompletely understood and evidence‐based management strategies for this specific entity remain limited. This work aims to bridge the gap between scarce high‐quality evidence and the clinicians' need for practical guidance on LM management by formulating evidence‐based and expert consensus‐driven recommendations for diagnosis, treatment and follow‐up. Under the coordination of the International Dermoscopy Society, a global, multidisciplinary consortium of 53 experts—including dermatologists, dermato‐oncologists, dermatologic surgeons, radiologists, radiotherapists, pathologists and epidemiologists—formulated recommendations through structured consensus, informed by a comprehensive review of current scientific evidence and clinical practice standards. Optimal management of LM requires accurate diagnosis and individualized treatment planning. Non‐invasive skin imaging techniques, especially dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy, aid in diagnosis, biopsy orientation, lesion delineation and post‐treatment monitoring. Multiple partial biopsies help confirm diagnosis and rule out invasion. Complete surgical excision remains the first treatment option. No definitive safety margins can be recommended for standard surgery; margin‐controlled techniques are preferable for large or ill‐defined lesions. Topical imiquimod and radiotherapy are effective alternatives where surgery is unsuitable. Topical imiquimod is useful as primary, adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. Blind destructive methods should be avoided. Close clinical and imaging follow‐up is needed. Patient‐centred care, shared decision‐making, and a multidisciplinary approach are critical for optimal outcomes. These international consensus recommendations summarize current best practices for LM management, offering practical, evidence‐informed guidance to clinicians while acknowledging the potential of future research in refining these conclusions.

Background: Proper diagnosis in primary care is crucial due to the large number of skin cancer diagnoses each year and its associated growing economic burden. Understanding how primary care providers can be best trained in dermoscopy is instrumental in helping primary care providers differentiate benign and malignant cutaneous lesions so that appropriate action can be taken (eg, biopsy/referral to dermatology or reassurance). Objective: To assess the success of concise dermoscopy training among primary care providers. Design: A cohort study was conducted in primary care at Mayo Clinic, Rochester, including primary care physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants in internal medicine and family medicine. Diagnostic accuracy was measured on standardized testing through image-based recognition and in clinical practice through observation of referral and biopsy patterns both before and after dermoscopy education, focused on the TADA plus method. Results: Forty-three primary care providers completed the image-based recognition tests, with significant improvement in mean score measured after dermoscopy training workshop (20%). Among the thirteen primary care providers who continued to use dermoscopy in clinical practice, a significant improvement (31%) in mean clinical diagnostic accuracy was observed comparing 1 year of practice data before versus after dermoscopy training. Conclusion: Improvement in diagnostic accuracy with utilization of the TADA plus method translates into clinical practice. Therefore, training primary care providers in dermoscopy may improve the dermatologic care patients receive in primary care, especially in rural or medically underserved areas where access to dermatology is limited.

AbstractBackgroundImmunotherapies have changed the landscape of late‐stage melanoma; however, data evaluating timely access to immunotherapy are lacking.MethodsA retrospective cohort study utilizing the National Cancer Database was conducted. Stage III and IV melanoma cases diagnosed between 2011 and 2018 that received systemic treatment with either immunotherapy or chemotherapy were included. Chemotherapy included BRAF/MEK inhibitors. Multivariable logistic regression models were utilized to evaluate factors associated with the likelihood of receiving immunotherapy as primary systemic treatment relative to chemotherapy; additionally, Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to incorporate time from diagnosis to primary systemic therapy into the analysis.ResultsThe study population was comprised of 14,446 cases. The cohort included 12,053 (83.4%) immunotherapy and 2393 (16.6%) chemotherapy cases. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, factors significantly associated with immunotherapy receipt included population density, circle distance, year of diagnosis, Breslow thickness, and cancer stage. Immunotherapy timing was evaluated using multivariable Cox regression analysis. Minorities were less likely to receive timely immunotherapy than non‐Hispanic Whites (HR 0.83, CI 0.74–0.93, p = 0.001). Patients at circle distances of 10–49 miles (HR 0.94, CI 0.89–0.99, p = 0.02) and ≥50 miles (HR 0.83, CI 0.77–0.90, p < 0.001) were less likely to receive timely immunotherapy.ConclusionPatients traveling ≥10 miles and minorities have a decreased likelihood of receiving timely immunotherapy administration for primary systemic treatment. Future research is needed to identify what barriers and approaches can be leveraged to address these inequities.

Abstract Background Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is associated with substantial morbidity. Few studies have addressed the natural history and mortality rates associated with HS. A higher risk of cardiovascular death in patients with HS has been reported. We investigated whether patients with HS have an increased overall risk of death compared with age‐ and gender‐matched referents. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota, with incident HS between January 1, 1980, and December 31, 2008, and age‐ and gender‐matched referents. The main outcomes and measures were the overall and cause‐specific risks of death. Results We identified 226 incident cases of HS and 678 age‐ and gender‐matched referents among Olmsted County residents during the study period. Compared to referents, patients with HS had a significantly higher risk of all‐cause death (hazard ratio [HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.53–4.03, P < 0.001) and cardiovascular‐ or cerebrovascular‐related death (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.10–7.40, P = 0.03). However, these risks were attenuated by adjusting for smoking history: all‐cause HR, 1.65 (95% CI, 0.97–2.82, P = 0.07) and cardiovascular‐ or cerebrovascular‐related HR, 2.03 (95% CI, 0.71–5.81, P = 0.18). The 71% of patients were former or current smokers at the time of HS diagnosis. Conclusions Hidradenitis suppurativa patients have a substantially increased risk of death from any cause, including cardiovascular or cerebrovascular causes; the risk is especially dependent on smoking history.

AbstractBackgroundThe International Dermoscopy Society (IDS) recently released a set of five basic dermoscopic parameters (vessels, scales, follicular findings, “other structures,” and specific clues) encompassing a total of 31 subitems to standardize the use of dermoscopy in non‐neoplastic dermatoses, yet they have been developed taking into account Caucasian/Asian skin, with consequent possible limitations if used in dark skin.ObjectivesTo validate the abovementioned criteria for the use in dark‐skinned patients (phototypes IV–VI) through an expert consensus.MethodsThe two‐round Delphi method was adopted, with an iterative process consisting of two rounds of email questionnaires. Potential panelists were recruited via e‐mail from all over the world based on their expertise on dermoscopy of non‐neoplastic dermatoses in skin of color.ResultsTwenty‐two panelists took part in the validation process. All of the five originally proposed parameters and subitems reached agreement during the first round, aside from “follicular red dots.” Additionally, during round 1, five new subitems were proposed (perifollicular scales distribution, follicular openings obliteration, broken hairs, eccrine pigmentation, and eccrine ostia obliteration), along with the possibility to change the denomination of parameter 3 (from “follicular findings” to “follicular/eccrine findings”) and split it into two subparameters (“follicular findings” and “eccrine findings”). All such proposals reached agreement during the second round and therefore were included in the final list, for a total of 37 items.ConclusionsAlthough nearly all the dermoscopic criteria originally proposed by the IDS are applicable even to darker phototypes, several additional variables need to be assessed.

AbstractTrichothiodystrophy is a rare autosomal recessive disorder resulting in a broad range of systemic abnormalities. Polarizing microscopy of the hair reveals the pathognomic “tiger tail” of alternating light and dark bands, but the need for a microscope prevents rapid bedside diagnosis. We describe a new technique for the bedside diagnosis of trichothiodystrophy using a handheld polarizing dermatoscope, precluding the need for microscopic examination.

AbstractBackgroundDiagnosis of suspected basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is typically confirmed with incisional biopsy before referral to final surgery.ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical confidence and accuracy of physicians making a diagnosis of BCC based on dermoscopic and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) features.MethodsThis study was designed as a simulation to determine the certainty and willingness to refer to surgery without previous biopsy confirmation of BCC. Study subjects were identified with suspected BCC. Dermoscopic and RCM lesion images were obtained before biopsy. Eight clinicians with various expertise levels blindly interpreted these images and chose among four hypothetical treatment options: definite BCC, refer directly to surgery without biopsy; other malignancy, perform biopsy for diagnosis; uncertain diagnosis, perform biopsy; benign, do not biopsy. Decisions for treatment were based on dermoscopic images alone and, subsequently, on dermoscopic and RCM images combined.ResultsThe sensitivity for referral to surgery without biopsy was 67.6% with the use of dermoscopy; the positive predictive value (PPV) was 97.0%. Adding RCM increased the sensitivity to 76.5% and the PPV to 98.6%.ConclusionsDermoscopy provides a high PPV for BCC. The addition of RCM to dermoscopy increases diagnostic sensitivity, particularly in less experienced dermoscopists. Physician behavior might be different if actual referrals were made for surgery without biopsy.