Back to Authors

Trask, David

Mayo Clinic

Oregon Dermatology & Research Center

Citations 1

Clinical Utility of a Digital Dermoscopy Image-Based Artificial Intelligence Device in the Diagnosis and Management of Skin Cancer by Dermatologists
Witkowski, Alexander , Burshtein, Joshua , Cockerell, Clay J. , Correa‐Selm, Lilia , Cotter, David G. , Ellis, Darrell L., Farberg, Aaron S. , Grant-Kels, Jane M, Greiling, Teri M. , Grichnik, James M. , Leachman, Sancy A. , Linfante, Anthony , Marghoob, Ashfaq A. , Paragh, György , Rabinovitz, Harold , Rigel, Darrell S. , Siegel, Daniel M. , Song, Eingun James , Swanson, David C. , Trask, David, Łudzik, Joanna , Correa, Lilia , Greiling, Teri M , Grichnik, James M , Leachman, Sancy A , Paragh, Gyorgy , Siegel, Daniel M , Song, Eingun James , Swanson, David, Ludzik, Joanna , Christopher, Michael, Ellis, Darrell L., Grant-Kels, Jane Margaret , Marks, Etan , Nguyen, Khoa, Ortega‐Loayza, Alex G. , Pellacani, Giovanni , Trask, David

Cancers | October 25, 2024 | Volume: 16 | Issue: 21 | Pages: 3592

10.3390/cancers16213592 Get It

Background: Patients with skin lesions suspicious for skin cancer or atypical melanocytic nevi of uncertain malignant potential often present to dermatologists, who may have variable dermoscopy triage clinical experience. Objective: To evaluate the clinical utility of a digital dermoscopy image-based artificial intelligence algorithm (DDI-AI device) on the diagnosis and management of skin cancers by dermatologists. Methods: Thirty-six United States board-certified dermatologists evaluated 50 clinical images and 50 digital dermoscopy images of the same skin lesions (25 malignant and 25 benign), first without and then with knowledge of the DDI-AI device output. Participants indicated whether they thought the lesion was likely benign (unremarkable) or malignant (suspicious). Results: The management sensitivity of dermatologists using the DDI-AI device was 91.1%, compared to 84.3% with DDI, and 70.0% with clinical images. The management specificity was 71.0%, compared to 68.4% and 64.9%, respectively. The diagnostic sensitivity of dermatologists using the DDI-AI device was 86.1%, compared to 78.8% with DDI, and 63.4% with clinical images. Diagnostic specificity using the DDI-AI device increased to 80.7%, compared to 75.9% and 73.6%, respectively. Conclusion: The use of the DDI-AI device may quickly, safely, and effectively improve dermoscopy performance, skin cancer diagnosis, and management when used by dermatologists, independent of training and experience.