Kirkwood, John M.

TPS9607 Background: The majority of 100,000 annual new U.S. cases of mel consist of localized early-stage disease that undergo wide local excision (WLE) +/- SLN biopsy (SLNB). The tumor draining lymph node is the initial site of immune response including formation of tumor mediated immune suppression and pre-metastatic niches. SLN positivity is a key prognostic factor in early stage mel. Thus, the SLN is a target for local immune intervention to boost the antitumor response. Vusolimogene oderparepvec (RP1) is an intratumorally administered oncolytic immunotherapy with unique potential for neo-adjuvant therapeutic application. RP1 is constructed from a high potency HSV1 strain (RH018A) modified to replicate selectively in tumors (deletion of neurovirulence factors ICP34.5 and ICP47). RP1 encodes GM-CSF and a fusogenic GALV-GP R- protein to maximize oncolytic potency and induce immunogenic cell death. Preclinical and clinical data demonstrate robust antitumor efficacy (including non-injected lesions) of RP1 alone and in combination with checkpoint inhibitors in advanced mel. This trial addresses a crucial gap in understanding the impact of RP1 on SLN dynamics and preventing disease recurrence in high-risk patients (pts). We hypothesize that in pts with high risk, clinically node negative mel (pT3b-T4b), RP1 will reduce rates of SLN positivity as compared to a historic control by favorably reshaping the immune landscape of the primary tumor, SLN, and the peripheral blood. Methods: This is an investigator-initiated, single arm phase 1/2 trial (NCT06216938) designed to assess efficacy and safety of neo-adjuvant RP1 in high-risk, clinically node-negative, non-uveal mel. Eligibility criteria: pT3b, T4a, or T4b non-uveal mel with visible residual tumor or positive biopsy margins, ECOG ≤1, and no prior oncolytic virus therapy. Pts receive 3 doses of neo-adjuvant RP1 (10e6 PFU day 1, 10e7 PFU on days 15 and 21), injected at the primary tumor site followed by standard WLE and SLNB within 35 days of dose 1. Biopsy of residual tumor or archival tumor tissue is obtained pre-RP1 and archival tissue from WLE and SLNB is obtained post-RP1. Blood samples are obtained with each RP1 dose and 3 months post-therapy. Pts are followed for 3 years. Primary endpoint: rate of SLN positivity in the overall cohort. Secondary endpoints: treatment related adverse events (per CTCAE), recurrence free survival, and overall survival. Exploratory endpoints: immunophenotype and microenvironment of the primary tumor, SLN and peripheral blood pre- and post- RP1 (via IHC, IF, and flow cytometry). The observed rate of SLN positivity will be compared to the predicted rate (Melanoma Institute of Australia Prediction Tool for SLN metastatic risk) with a one-sided, one-sample proportion test. Kaplan-Meier estimates will be provided for survival endpoints. The trial is active with 13 of 25 pts enrolled in January 2025. Clinical trial information: NCT06216938 .

Acral melanoma (AM) has distinct characteristics as compared with cutaneous melanoma and exhibits poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Tumor-intrinsic mechanisms of immune exclusion have been identified in many cancers but less studied in AM. We characterized clinically annotated tumors from patients diagnosed with AM at our institution in correlation with ICI response using whole transcriptome RNAseq, whole exome sequencing, CD8 immunohistochemistry, and multispectral immunofluorescence imaging. A defined interferon-γ-associated T cell-inflamed gene signature was used to categorize tumors into non-T cell-inflamed and T cell-inflamed phenotypes. In combination with AM tumors from two published studies, we systematically assessed the immune landscape of AM and detected differential gene expression and pathway activation in a non-T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME). Two single-cell(sc) RNAseq AM cohorts and 11 bulk RNAseq cohorts of various tumor types were used for independent validation on pathways associated with lack of ICI response. In total, 892 specimens were included in this study. 72.5% of AM tumors showed low expression of the T cell-inflamed gene signature, with 23.9% of total tumors categorized as the non-T cell-inflamed phenotype. Patients of low CD3 + CD8 + PD1 + intratumoral T cell density showed poor prognosis. We identified 11 oncogenic pathways significantly upregulated in non-T cell-inflamed relative to T cell-inflamed TME shared across all three acral cohorts (MYC, HGF, MITF, VEGF, EGFR, SP1, ERBB2, TFEB, SREBF1, SOX2, and CCND1). scRNAseq analysis revealed that tumor cell-expressing pathway scores were significantly higher in low versus high T cell-infiltrated AM tumors. We further demonstrated that the 11 pathways were enriched in ICI non-responders compared with responders across cancers, including AM, cutaneous melanoma, triple-negative breast cancer, and non-small cell lung cancer. Pathway activation was associated with low expression of interferon stimulated genes, suggesting suppression of antigen presentation. Across the 11 pathways, fatty acid synthase and CXCL8 were unifying downstream target molecules suggesting potential nodes for therapeutic intervention. A unique set of pathways is associated with immune exclusion and ICI resistance in AM. These data may inform immunotherapy combinations for immediate clinical translation.

9013 Background: Pediatric melanoma (PM) care has been extrapolated from adult melanoma data. PM and atypical melanocytic neoplasms (AMNs) appear to have different biology. An international database (DB) was developed to clarify their behavior. Methods: IRB approval was obtained at 12 institutions. An SQL-DB was developed for web entry of de-identified demographic and pathologic data for PM and AMN patients (pts) < 21yr through an honest broker system at the University of Pittsburgh. Institutions retained a key of pts entered with assigned numbers for quality assurance and updates. Statistical analysis used Kaplan-Meier survival curves, univariate linear trends and log rank tests. In situ melanoma was excluded from PM survival analysis. Results: 828 pts were registered as of 31 Oct 2008 (ages 11mo-23; median 15yr). 34 pts 21–23yr entered were left in the DB for statistical comparison. Diagnosis years ranged from 1936–2008. 455 pts had complete follow-up. Too few AMN pts had complete follow-up for analysis (18/208). After excluding 32 in situ and 40 with other incomplete data, 365 PM out of 415 total PM were evaluable for OS and 351 for DFS (Stage IV removed). Mean/median age for evaluable PM pts was 16.44/17-yrs (range 1–21yr). 591 pts were age 10–20 while 203 were < 10. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy showed spread in 30.1 % PM pts (compared to 50% [4/8] of AMN SLN pts). 10-yr PM OS was 80.6%, and pts 0–10 yr had 100% 10-yr OS compared to 69.6% for pts age 10–15 and 79.49% for age 15–20 (p= 0.1473). OS did not differ significantly by gender. Stage predicted OS (p<0.0001). 10-yr OS was 94.13% for Stage I (n=174), 79.62% for stage II (n=67) & 77.14% for stage III (n=75). Thickness affected 10-yr OS: 0–1mm=97% (n=147), 1.1–2mm 70% (n=84), 2.01–4mm 78% (n=71) & >4mm 81% (n=25), p= 0.0099. Survival was similar for pts with PM > 1mm of the several T stage groupings. Ulceration adversely affected OS (p=0.022). Mitosis, defined as present/absent did not alter survival. Nodal metastasis correlated with worse OS (p= 0.170). Conclusions: Stage, thickness, ulceration, and nodal status are significant predictors of OS for PM. Further study will focus on multivariable analysis of PM and AMNs after updating pts, increasing accrual, and cleaning data. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

10006 Background: Treatment options are limited for patients with advanced melanoma who have progressed on checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapies. Adoptive cell therapy using tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) leverages and enhances the body’s natural defense against cancer and has shown durable responses in heavily pretreated melanoma patients. Methods: C-144-01 is a global Phase 2 open-label, multicenter study of efficacy & safety of lifileucel in patients with unresectable metastatic melanoma who have progressed on checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, if BRAFv600 mutant. We report on Cohort 2 (N = 66) patients who have received TIL. Tumors were resected at local institutions, processed in central GMP facilities for TIL production, manufactured, cryopreserved & shipped back to sites in a 22-day process. Therapy consisted of one week of lymphodepletion, a single lifileucel infusion, and up to 6 IL-2 doses. ORR was based on RECIST v1.1 by investigator assessment. Data cutoff was Feb 2, 2020. Results: Baseline characteristics: 3.3 mean prior therapies (anti-PD1 100%; anti-CTLA-4 80%; BRAF/MEK inhibitor 23%), high baseline tumor burden (106 mm mean target lesion sum of diameters), 44% liver/brain lesions, 40.9% LDH > ULN. ORR by investigator was 36.4% (2 CR, 22 PR) and DCR was 80.3%. Mean time to response was 1.9 months (range: 1.3-5.6). After a median study follow-up of 17.0 months, median DOR (mDOR) was still not reached. Six responders have progressed, 2 have died and 2 started other anti-cancer therapy without progression. The adverse event profile was consistent with the underlying advanced disease and the lymphodepletion and IL-2 regimens. Additional follow-up data will be available for presentation. Conclusions: Lifileucel treatment results in a 36.4% ORR and mDOR was not reached at 17.0 months of median study follow up in a heavily pretreated metastatic melanoma patients with high baseline disease burden who progressed on multiple prior therapies, including anti-PD1 and BRAF/MEK inhibitors, if BRAFv600 mutant. Clinical trial information: NCT02360579.

TPS3154 Background: Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) are rare but serious sequelae of treatment with immuno-oncology (IO) therapeutics. These therapeutics, including monoclonal antibodies targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), have had transformative effects on outcomes for patients (pts) with advanced cancers. Although most pts tolerate the therapies well, a few experience irAEs ranging in severity up to life-threatening. These irAEs involve diverse organs including the heart, kidney, liver and lung, and gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, central and peripheral nervous systems. Because of the relatively low incidence and wide variety of irAEs due to various immunotherapies for multiple tumor types, establishment of an efficient centralized repository for acquisition and organized distribution of well-annotated biospecimens is vital for translational studies that improve understanding of the molecular pathogenesis and treatment of these significant toxicities. Methods: This multi-institutional study is open at sites across the National Clinical Trial Network to pts who received ≥ 1 IO therapeutics (e.g., CTLA-4, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor) and experienced 1) ≥ 1 serious (grade 3–5) adverse events that are likely immune-related, 2) rare infection or 3) tumor hyperprogression. IrAEs of interest include myocarditis, colitis, hepatitis, nephritis, myositis, pneumonitis, meningitis/encephalitis, dermatitis, endocrinopathies and neuropathy. Pts may be on an NCTN or non-NCTN IO trial or be receiving standard-of-care therapy. Registration must occur ≤ 72 hours after confirmation of the irAE event. Clinical data are collected at registration, 1 month after registration and for up to 1 year. Biospecimens (tumor blocks, biopsies of inflammatory tissues used to establish irAE diagnosis, and serial blood samples for isolation of plasma, serum and peripheral blood mononuclear cells) are collected at 1-2 timepoints. Stool samples are collected from pts experiencing colitis. Imaging data are collected for pts with hyperprogression or pneumonitis. Goal accrual is 240 pts. Biospecimens and data will be made available to investigators following future submission and approval of proposals. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171; U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180888 (SWOG); U10CA180868 (NRG); https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org; Clinical trial information: NCT04242095 .

8526 Background: Many randomised trials have evaluated the role of adjuvant interferon-a (IFN) in high-risk melanoma, some suggesting benefit and others not. To assess the totality of current evidence, an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis of all available trials was performed. Methods: Standard IPD meta-analysis methods were used to assess event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS), with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) calculated. Trials were divided by dose of IFN - high (20 MU/m2), intermediate (5–10 MU), low (3 MU) and very low (1 MU). Subgroup analyses by patient age, gender and disease characteristics were also performed. Results: IPD was provided for 10 of 13 reported trials of IFN vs. no IFN (for the other 3 trials published data were used). 6067 patients (IPD available for 85%) were included in the analysis, with over 3,700 and 3,000 events for EFS and OS. There was statistically significant benefit for IFN for both EFS (OR=0.87, CI=0.81–0.93, p=0.00006) and OS (0.9, 0.84–0.97, p=0.008). There was no evidence of differences according to dose (Table 1; trend p>0.1) or duration of IFN. This proportional survival advantage translates into an absolute benefit of about 3% (CI 1%-5%) at 5 years. The effect of IFN did not differ with age, gender, tumor site, Breslow thickness, clinical nodes or disease stage. Only for ulceration was there some evidence of an interaction (p=0.03); patients with ulcerated tumors had greater benefit from IFN (EFS: OR=0.76, OS: OR=0.77) than those with no ulceration (EFS: OR=0.94, OS: OR=0.98). Conclusions: This meta-analysis provides evidence that adjuvant IFN significantly reduces the risk of relapse and improves overall survival, although the absolute survival benefit is relatively small. This analysis does not however, clarify the optimal (high, intermediate or low) dose of IFN. Given the large number of subgroup analyses performed, the apparent increased benefit in patients with ulceration requires confirmation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

e14144 Background: There is little real-world evidence evaluating treatment patterns and outcomes with IO therapies for pts with advanced melanoma (aMEL). We present results from the OPTIMIzE (NCT02780089) study in pts with aMEL receiving IO therapies. Methods: OPTIMIzE is a US-based multisite (150 sites), community-based study of adult pts with aMEL. Pts receiving first-line (1L) nivolumab (NIVO)+ipilimumab (IPI), anti-PD-1 (NIVO/pembrolizumab), or IPI between 2011-2018 with a minimum 1 y of follow-up were included. Baseline characteristics, objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), and quality of life (QoL) were analyzed. QoL assessments included the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Melanoma (FACT-M), EQ-5D index, and visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Cohort size: 81 NIVO+IPI, 147 anti-PD-1, and 16 IPI (IPI arm not included in the analysis). Overall, mean age was 64.5 y; 42% had BRAF mutation. Mean follow-up was 14.1 mo. Pts in the NIVO+IPI group were younger, had better ECOG performance status, and a higher likelihood of M1c disease and elevated LDH vs the anti-PD-1 group. ORR was higher for pts treated with NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 (48% vs 33%, P= 0.08). Unadjusted 1-y OS was 78.4% for NIVO+IPI and 73.1% for anti-PD-1. In multivariate Cox model analysis, the hazard ratio for OS for NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.46–1.33; P= 0.36). Grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 53% and 22% of pts in the NIVO+IPI and anti-PD-1 groups, respectively ( P˂0.001). QoL changes from baseline were clinically meaningful for EQ-5D VAS and FACT-M in the NIVO+IPI group at 12 mo (Table). After adjusting for baseline covariates, the difference at 12 mo between NIVO+IPI vs anti-PD-1 was 6.7 ( P= 0.04) for EQ-5D VAS and 8.8 ( P= 0.02) for FACT-M. Conclusions: Safety and efficacy outcomes from this prospective real-world study are consistent with those reported in prior clinical trials in treatment-naive aMEL pts. No clinically meaningful deterioration in QoL measures was observed in either group. Clinical trial information: NCT02780089. [Table: see text]