Thompson, John A.

The NCCN Guidelines for the Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities are intended to provide oncology practitioners with guidance on how to manage the wide-ranging and potentially fatal toxicities that may occur with cancer immunotherapy. The guidelines address immune-related adverse events related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR T-cell therapies, and lymphocyte engagers (which include T-cell–engaging bispecific antibodies). These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight recent guideline updates pertaining to the management of emerging toxicities related to cancer immunotherapy.

The aim of the NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities is to provide guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events resulting from cancer immunotherapy. The NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions, consisting of medical and hematologic oncologists with expertise across a wide range of disease sites, and experts from the areas of dermatology, gastroenterology, endocrinology, neurooncology, nephrology, cardio-oncology, ophthalmology, pulmonary medicine, and oncology nursing. The content featured in this issue is an excerpt of the recommendations for managing toxicities related to CAR T-cell therapies and a review of existing evidence. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines, including recommendations for managing toxicities related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, visitNCCN.org.

Over the past few years, the NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous have been expanded to include pathways for treatment of microscopic satellitosis (added in v2.2020), and the following Principles sections: Molecular Testing (added in v2.2019), Systemic Therapy Considerations (added in v2.2020), and Brain Metastases Management (added in v3.2020). The v1.2021 update included additional modifications of these sections and notable revisions to Principles of: Pathology, Surgical Margins for Wide Excision of Primary Melanoma, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Completion/Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection, and Radiation Therapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the important changes to pathology and surgery recommendations, as well as additions to systemic therapy options for patients with advanced disease.

Abstract CD40 is a co-stimulatory receptor of the TNF receptor superfamily expressed on antigen presenting cells (APCs). Antibodies targeting CD40 may have therapeutic benefit via multiple mechanisms including innate immune activation that can support generation of antigen-specific, antitumor T cell responses, and binding to CD40-expressing cancer cells leading to antibody-mediated target cell killing. Multiple CD40-directed antibodies are in clinical development and differ by immunoglobulin isotype, affinity to CD40, and selectivity for FcγR-binding. These alterations could lead to differences in pharmacodynamic and antitumor activity. SEA-CD40 is an agonistic non-fucosylated, humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against CD40. SEA-CD40 has enhanced FcγRIIIa binding (~10x greater than parent IgG1 antibody) that drives increased effector function, resulting in more potent immune stimulatory activity than antibodies with muted or selective FcγR binding. The enhanced effector function of SEA-CD40 may confer greater immune stimulation and antitumor activity relative to other CD40-directed therapeutics. Preclinically, SEA-CD40 exposure results in a distinct signature of responses including activation of APCs, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and NK cells, and targeted depletion of CD40+ B cells. SEA-CD40 demonstrates superior activity compared to other CD40-targeted antibodies in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that the enhanced effector function is critical for optimal immune cell agonism. For example, SEA-CD40 drove in vitro ADCC activity 100-fold above the parent antibody and exhibited robust ADCC with the low and high affinity FcγRIIIA genotype. At matched dose levels in cynomolgus monkeys, SEA-CD40 induced circulating cytokines and sustained B cell depletion that were up to 50-fold above that induced with the parent antibody. The SEA-CD40 signature of activation translates to increased antitumor activity as a single agent and in combination with standard of care treatments in preclinical models, suggesting the potential for beneficial combination therapy in the clinic. The SEA-CD40 immune signature was confirmed by pharmacodynamic changes in an ongoing phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic solid tumors (NCT02376699). SEA-CD40 treatment induced dose-dependent increases in circulating cytokines and chemokines associated with myeloid and lymphoid immune activation and trafficking. SEA-CD40 treatment also resulted in activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD40-targeted B cell depletion in the periphery. These findings support continued clinical evaluation of SEA-CD40. The ongoing phase 1 clinical trial is actively enrolling and includes a cohort in pancreatic cancer assessing the combination of SEA-CD40, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab. Citation Format: Haley Neff-LaFord, Juneko E. Grilley-Olson, David C. Smith, Brendan Curti, Sanjay Goel, Timothy M. Kuzel, Svetomir N. Markovic, Olivier Rixe, David L. Bajor, Thomas F. Gajewski, Martin Gutierrez, Elisabeth I. Heath, John Thompson, Sahar Ansari, Shyra Gardai, Celine Jacquemont, Michael Schmitt, Andrew L. Coveler. SEA-CD40 is a non-fucosylated anti-CD40 antibody with potent pharmacodynamic activity in preclinical models and patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5535.

The NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities provide interdisciplinary guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) resulting from cancer immunotherapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights describe symptoms that may be caused by an irAE and should trigger further investigation, and summarize the NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel discussions for the 2020 update to the guidelines regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor–related diarrhea/colitis and cardiovascular irAEs.

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cutaneous melanoma have been significantly revised over the past few years in response to emerging data on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and BRAF-targeted therapy. This article summarizes the data and rationale supporting extensive changes to the recommendations for systemic therapy as adjuvant treatment of resected disease and as treatment of unresectable or distant metastatic disease.

The aim of the NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities is to provide guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events resulting from cancer immunotherapy. The NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions and ASCO, consisting of medical and hematologic oncologists with expertise in a wide array of disease sites, and experts from the fields of dermatology, gastroenterology, neuro-oncology, nephrology, emergency medicine, cardiology, oncology nursing, and patient advocacy. Several panel representatives are members of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC). The initial version of the NCCN Guidelines was designed in general alignment with recommendations published by ASCO and SITC. The content featured in this issue is an excerpt of the recommendations for managing toxicity related to immune checkpoint blockade and a review of existing evidence. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines, including recommendations for managing toxicities related to chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, visit NCCN.org .

Recent progress in the treatment of advanced melanoma has led to unprecedented improvements in overall survival and, as these new melanoma treatments have been developed and deployed in the clinic, much has been learned about the natural history of the disease. Now is the time to apply that knowledge toward the design and clinical evaluation of new chemoprevention agents. Melanoma chemoprevention has the potential to reduce dramatically both the morbidity and the high costs associated with treating patients who have metastatic disease. In this work, scientific and clinical melanoma experts from the national Melanoma Prevention Working Group, composed of National Cancer Trials Network investigators, discuss research aimed at discovering and developing (or repurposing) drugs and natural products for the prevention of melanoma and propose an updated pipeline for translating the most promising agents into the clinic. The mechanism of action, preclinical data, epidemiological evidence, and results from available clinical trials are discussed for each class of compounds. Selected keratinocyte carcinoma chemoprevention studies also are considered, and a rationale for their inclusion is presented. These data are summarized in a table that lists the type and level of evidence available for each class of agents. Also included in the discussion is an assessment of additional research necessary and the likelihood that a given compound may be a suitable candidate for a phase 3 clinical trial within the next 5 years.

368 Background: SGN-75 is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized anti-CD70 mAb conjugated to the microtubule-disrupting agent MMAF via a plasma-stable linker. Upon binding to CD70, SGN-75 internalizes and releases cys‑mcMMAF which binds tubulin and induces G2/M arrest and apoptosis. Methods: A phase 1, dose-escalation, multicenter study was initiated to investigate the safety, tolerability, PK, and antitumor activity of SGN-75 monotherapy in pts with CD70-positive metastatic RCC or relapsed/refractory NHL (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT01015911). SGN-75 was administered IV in cohort-specific doses using 2 schedules [every 3 weeks (q3wk) or weekly (days 1, 8, 15 q28 days)] at doses of 0.3-4.5 mg/kg. Pts were eligible to receive treatment until PD. Results: A total of 58 pts (39 RCC/19 NHL) with a median age of 60.5 yrs (range 30-82) were treated. The MTD was 3 mg/kg q3wk; 2 pts had DLTs at 4.5 mg/kg q3wk (NHL pt had neutropenia and RCC pt had proteinuria). Weekly dosing (N=11) was terminated at the 0.6 mg/kg dose level after 2 pts with NHL developed idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. At the MTD, adverse events (AEs) in ≥30% of RCC pts (N=21) were fatigue (52%), dry eye (48%), nausea (38%), constipation (33%), and corneal epithelium defect (33%). AEs ≥ Grade 3 in >10% of RCC pts treated at the MTD were corneal epithelium defect (19%) and thrombocytopenia (14%). PK analysis suggested that SGN-75 exposure was approximately dose-proportional with a mean terminal half-life of 6-11 days. Among the 32 pts with RCC treated in the q3wk schedule, all had prior nephrectomy and a median of 3 prior therapies (range 1-6). All pts had clear cell RCC, with the exception of 2 pts who had papillary RCC. Most pts had high CD70 expression by central IHC analysis (2 or 3+, 80-100% of cells). The best clinical responses of RCC pts treated q3wk were 2 PR, 12 SD, 12 PD, and 6 were not evaluable. Durations of response for the 2 responding pts were 23 and 41 weeks. The median duration of disease control (PR and SD) was 46.4 weeks [95% CI (12, 46)]. Conclusions: SGN-75 monotherapy was generally well tolerated in pts with metastatic RCC. Evidence of antitumor activity was observed in heavily pretreated RCC pts and further studies of SGN-75 in RCC are warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT01015911.