Grilley‐Olson, Juneko E.

11514 Background: The role of immunotherapy remains uncertain in most sarcomas. We recently showed significant antitumor benefit for cabozantinib (C) with N in AS previously treated with a taxane. Since chemotherapy-immunotherapy combinations may synergize, and paclitaxel remains a standard of care option for advanced AS, we hypothesized that P+N would be more effective than P alone. Methods: We report Arm 1 (P+N) and Arm 2 (P) of this open label, multi-arm, phase II study. Pts all had locally advanced/metastatic AS, and no prior taxane (including adjuvant) or checkpoint inhibitor prior to entry. Pts were randomized 1:1 (stratified scalp/face vs other) to receive P 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 every 4 weeks (wks), with (Arm 1) or without (Arm 2) N (480 mg intravenously every 4 wks). A pt could remain on study beyond disease progression (PD), after the initial 12 wk evaluation (4 wk confirmatory scan required), but responses were censored at 12 wks. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) comparing P+N to P, with an assumed improvement from a median of 4 to 7 months with N added to P (power = 85.3%, alpha = 0.148, and one interim analysis (Wieand rule) for futility planned after 30 events). Secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS), and pt reported outcomes (PRO). At PD, Arm 2 (P) pts were permitted to receive C+N. Results: 62 evaluable pts (P+N = 30, P = 32 pts) were balanced for age, race, ECOG PS 0 vs. 1, site of disease (including radiation related vs. not), while P+N had more females (60%) and P had more males (63%). Median PFS for P+N was 7.2 mo (5.3-17 mo), and 8.3 mo (4.0-18 mo) for P (hazard ratio (HR) 1.01 (95%CI: 0.55-1.9), p = 0.96). Median PFS for scalp/face was 16 mo (95%CI: 10-NR) for P+N and 8.3 mo (95%CI: 3.7-NR) for P. Median PFS for all others was 5.5 mo (95%CI 4.3-16) for P+N, and 6.0 mo (95%CI 4.1-NR) for P. Median OS was 18 mo (13-NR) in P+N, and 23 mo (15-NR) in P (HR 1.3 (95%CI: 0.63-2.7), p = 0.48). Overall confirmed ORR: P+N = 33% (10/30 pts, with 4 partial responses (PR) and 6 complete responses (CR) with scalp/face ORR = 73%, all others ORR = 11%). Overall ORR for P = 34% (11/32 pts, with 7 PR and 4 CR, with scalp/face ORR = 38%, all others ORR = 26%). Grade 3-4 AEs regardless of attribution occurred in 57% of P+N, and 44% of P, most commonly ( > 10%) fatigue, AST increase, and dyspnea for P+N (n = 3 each), and anemia (n = 4) for P. Conclusions: P alone can be an effective therapy in a subset of pts with AS. The combination of P+N failed to demonstrate improvement in median PFS over P alone, but may show benefit in scalp/face AS. OS trended better with P alone. No new safety signals were observed. The impact of weekly steroid premedication prior to P+N on these outcomes remains to be determined. PRO and exploratory analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; NCT04339738. https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT04339738 .

Background SEA-CD40 is an investigational, non-fucosylated, humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that activates CD40, an immune-activating tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member. SEA-CD40 exhibits enhanced binding to activating FcγRIIIa, possibly enabling greater immune stimulation than other CD40 agonists. A first-in-human phase 1 trial was conducted to examine safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SEA-CD40 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma. Methods SEA-CD40 was administered intravenously to patients with solid tumors or lymphoma in 21-day cycles with standard 3+3 dose escalation at 0.6, 3, 10, 30, 45, and 60 µg/kg. An intensified dosing regimen was also studied. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety and tolerability and identify the maximum tolerated dose of SEA-CD40. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the pharmacokinetic parameters, antitherapeutic antibodies, pharmacodynamic effects and biomarker response, and antitumor activity. Results A total of 67 patients received SEA-CD40 including 56 patients with solid tumors and 11 patients with lymphoma. A manageable safety profile was observed, with predominant adverse events of infusion/hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) reported in 73% of patients. IHRs were primarily ≤grade 2 with an incidence associated with infusion rate. To mitigate IHRs, a standardized infusion approach was implemented with routine premedication and a slowed infusion rate. SEA-CD40 infusion resulted in potent immune activation, illustrated by dose dependent cytokine induction with associated activation and trafficking of innate and adaptive immune cells. Results suggested that doses of 10–30 µg/kg may result in optimal immune activation. SEA-CD40 monotherapy exhibited evidence of antitumor activity, with a partial response in a patient with basal cell carcinoma and a complete response in a patient with follicular lymphoma. Conclusions SEA-CD40 was tolerable as monotherapy and induced potent dose dependent immune cell activation and trafficking consistent with immune activation. Evidence of monotherapy antitumor activity was observed in patients with solid tumors and lymphoma. Further evaluation of SEA-CD40 is warranted, potentially as a component of a combination regimen. Trial registration number NCT02376699.

11503 Background: Collectively, sarcomas have demonstrated less benefit from immunotherapy than many other cancers. Pts with AS have limited options, particularly after taxane chemotherapy. Although AS is a vascular malignancy, anti-VEGF therapies have minimal monotherapy clinical activity. Some cutaneous AS have a high UV damage signature, but other AS often do not. Cabozantinib (C) is a multikinase inhibitor that may alter PD-1 expression in regulatory T cells, promoting an immune permissive environment when combined with nivolumab (N), a fully human anti PD-1 MAB. We hypothesize that the combination of C+N will be an effective therapy in AS, across AS subtypes. Methods: This open-label multi-arm study enrolled pts with locally advanced/metastatic AS. Arm 3, reported here, enrolled pts who had received a taxane for AS (including adjuvant) prior to study enrollment. Pts were not restricted on number of prior lines, but prior anti-VEGF and immunotherapies were not allowed. Eligible pts received C (40 mg po daily) with N (480 mg IV every 4 wks). Treatment was permitted beyond progressive disease (PD) in the 1st 12 wks (4 wk confirmatory scan), but PD response was censored at 12 wks. The Simon 2-stage design (null and alternative overall response rate (ORR) were 10% and 35%, respectively) required ≥1 confirmed response in 9 pts in the 1st stage, and >4 of 18 pts (91.4% power, alpha 0.095) for the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AEs), progression free, overall survival (PFS, OS), and pt-reported outcomes (PRO). Results: 21 eligible pts [median age 66 yrs (32-92), 10 female] received ≥1 dose of C+N. Primary disease sites: 12 cutaneous (scalp/face), 1 liver, 2 breast, 6 other. All pts received prior taxanes (11/21 = 52% as adjuvant therapy) and 5/21 (24%) had also received prior anthracycline (all relapsed AS). Primary endpoint: 13 of the first 18 evaluable patients (72%) experienced objective response (OR, 95%CI: 47%-90%). After a median follow-up of 11.2 mo, 13 of 21 pts achieved OR (11 partial response, 2 complete), for ORR 62% (95%CI: 38-82%). Responses were seen in pts with primary cutaneous disease 7/12 (58%) and noncutaneous disease 6/9 (67%). Median PFS was 9.6 mo (5.3-NR), and OS 20.5 mo (14.4-NR). Off treatment reasons include: progressive disease (14), comorbid condition unrelated to AS or study (1); 6 pts remain on study. Grade (G) 3 hypertension was the only possibly treatment related AE (TRAE) occurring in ³10%. No G 4/5 TRAE were reported. Conclusions: C + N demonstrated significant antitumor activity in taxane-pretreated AS and was well tolerated without new safety concerns. Activity of the combination was seen across AS subtypes. PRO and exploratory analyses are ongoing. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24 CA196171; U10CA180820; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . U10CA180868; U10CA180888. NCT04339738. Clinical trial information: NCT04339738 .

Abstract CD40 is a co-stimulatory receptor of the TNF receptor superfamily expressed on antigen presenting cells (APCs). Antibodies targeting CD40 may have therapeutic benefit via multiple mechanisms including innate immune activation that can support generation of antigen-specific, antitumor T cell responses, and binding to CD40-expressing cancer cells leading to antibody-mediated target cell killing. Multiple CD40-directed antibodies are in clinical development and differ by immunoglobulin isotype, affinity to CD40, and selectivity for FcγR-binding. These alterations could lead to differences in pharmacodynamic and antitumor activity. SEA-CD40 is an agonistic non-fucosylated, humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against CD40. SEA-CD40 has enhanced FcγRIIIa binding (~10x greater than parent IgG1 antibody) that drives increased effector function, resulting in more potent immune stimulatory activity than antibodies with muted or selective FcγR binding. The enhanced effector function of SEA-CD40 may confer greater immune stimulation and antitumor activity relative to other CD40-directed therapeutics. Preclinically, SEA-CD40 exposure results in a distinct signature of responses including activation of APCs, CD8+ and CD4+ T cells and NK cells, and targeted depletion of CD40+ B cells. SEA-CD40 demonstrates superior activity compared to other CD40-targeted antibodies in vitro and in vivo, suggesting that the enhanced effector function is critical for optimal immune cell agonism. For example, SEA-CD40 drove in vitro ADCC activity 100-fold above the parent antibody and exhibited robust ADCC with the low and high affinity FcγRIIIA genotype. At matched dose levels in cynomolgus monkeys, SEA-CD40 induced circulating cytokines and sustained B cell depletion that were up to 50-fold above that induced with the parent antibody. The SEA-CD40 signature of activation translates to increased antitumor activity as a single agent and in combination with standard of care treatments in preclinical models, suggesting the potential for beneficial combination therapy in the clinic. The SEA-CD40 immune signature was confirmed by pharmacodynamic changes in an ongoing phase 1 clinical trial in patients with relapsed/refractory metastatic solid tumors (NCT02376699). SEA-CD40 treatment induced dose-dependent increases in circulating cytokines and chemokines associated with myeloid and lymphoid immune activation and trafficking. SEA-CD40 treatment also resulted in activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD40-targeted B cell depletion in the periphery. These findings support continued clinical evaluation of SEA-CD40. The ongoing phase 1 clinical trial is actively enrolling and includes a cohort in pancreatic cancer assessing the combination of SEA-CD40, gemcitabine, nab-paclitaxel, and pembrolizumab. Citation Format: Haley Neff-LaFord, Juneko E. Grilley-Olson, David C. Smith, Brendan Curti, Sanjay Goel, Timothy M. Kuzel, Svetomir N. Markovic, Olivier Rixe, David L. Bajor, Thomas F. Gajewski, Martin Gutierrez, Elisabeth I. Heath, John Thompson, Sahar Ansari, Shyra Gardai, Celine Jacquemont, Michael Schmitt, Andrew L. Coveler. SEA-CD40 is a non-fucosylated anti-CD40 antibody with potent pharmacodynamic activity in preclinical models and patients with advanced solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5535.

8008 Background: Morphology remains the best biomarker for chemotherapy selection in NSCLC. Both bevacizumab and pemetrexed (in first line) are FDA indicated for non-SC histology only, making precise diagnosis key, although data are few on the reproducibility of their categorization. The standard of care, consensus-based World Health Organization diagnostic classification system, Ed. 4 (WHOC) includes 44 diagnostic categories (DC), does not include immunohistochemical (IHC) data, and is not independently validated. In this study, we estimate the reproducibility of SC versus non-SC classification to be only moderately precise. Methods: Pathologists (P) assigned WHOC diagnoses to virtual H&E slides from an incident surgical cohort of 96 primary lung tumors. At a power of 80% we estimated 24 P reviewing 48 slides each would allow for a reproducibility measure in the clinically useful range kappa=0.7, standard error=0.09. In addition to the 44 DC, we also considered the reproducibility of a simplified 10 category system and a chemotherapy-directed 2 class system. Results: 12 self-identified “lung experts” (E) and 12 community (C) P scored slides based on the 44 possible WHOC DC totaling 222 pathologist-pairs and 7130 slides-pairs. P rated confidence in their choices as: high 53%, somewhat 38%, and not confident 8%. 92% of slides were rated as having sufficient quality. Distribution of DC included SC 30% and adenocarcinoma 36%. Conclusions: To our knowledge this is the largest study ever performed of the WHOC, the only one to consider all 44 DC and to distinguish E vs C P. Although this model tests the reproducibility of the WHOC, not clinical lung cancer diagnoses, it shows that reproducible diagnosis of SC based on H&E morphology alone is inadequate. In the era of histology guided therapy, it highlights the need for strict diagnostic criteria and confirmatory IHC stains in the diagnosis of SC. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.