Phillips, Tycel

Abstract Background: Recent approvals and clinical trials have established covalent BTK inhibitors (BTKis), including ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, and zanubrutinib, as effective agents for the treatment of mantle cell lymphoma. Multiple BTKi-based regimens are recommended by experts and clinical guidelines in both the first-line and later-line settings. Additional approvals of the noncovalent BTKi pirtobrutinib and multiple CAR T-cell therapies have also advanced the management of patients who have progressed on covalent BTKi therapy. In light of these developments in treatment strategies for mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), this study compares trends in treatment choice among experts and healthcare professionals (HCPs) in an online treatment decision support tool. Methods: An online decision support tool, developed with 5 US-based experts in MCL, was launched in April 2023 and updated in April 2025. The tool provided treatment recommendations for various clinical scenarios involving newly diagnosed (ND) or relapsed/refractory (R/R) MCL, incorporating factors such as age, fitness, previous therapies, and response duration. HCPs entered specific patient characteristics along with their intended treatment choice. The tool then displayed expert recommendations for that scenario, and HCPs were asked whether these recommendations influenced their treatment decision. HCP-entered data and expert recommendations were analyzed to identify common trends and divergence in current BTKi therapy use. Results: The 2023 online tool was used by 119 HCPs who entered 148 patient scenarios, and the 2025 online tool was used by 69 HCPs who entered 96 patient scenarios. In 2023, for patients with ND MCL who had later-stage disease or were not eligible for radiation therapy (n = 75), 64% of expert-recommended treatments included BTKis, with the ECHO and TRIANGLE regimens representing 12% and 17% of recommendations, respectively. In 2025, 81% of expert recommendations were BTKi-based regimens, with ≥3 experts recommending a BTKi regimen in 66 of 67 unique ND case scenarios. The ECHO and TRIANGLE regimen each represented 28% to 29% of expert recommendations. In addition, 51% of recommendations for patients with 17p deletions or TP53 mutations consisted of the BOVen regimen. The percentage of HCPs who indicated that they were considering a BTKi-based regimen in the setting of ND MCL was 17% (13 of 75 ND cases) in 2023 and 66% (44 of 67 ND cases) in 2025. The use of both the ECHO and TRIANGLE regimens by HCPs increased from 5% and 4%, respectively, in 2023 to 19% for each in 2025. In 2025, 6% of HCPs considered the BOVen regimen for patients with TP53 mutation (n = 17). In 2023 and 2025, approximately 50% of the HCP-entered patient cases for previously treated MCL had not received a BTKi (n = 48 and n = 18, respectively). For these scenarios, 94% and 98% of expert recommendations consisted of covalent BTKis in 2023 and 2025, respectively. HCPs selected covalent BTKis for 68% of cases in 2023 and 89% of cases in 2025. For patients with R/R MCL previously treated with a BTKi, CAR T-cell therapy represented 36% of expert recommendations in 2023 (23 scenarios) and 60% in 2025 (18 scenarios). By contrast, 4% and 11% of HCPs considered CAR T-cell therapy for these patients in 2023 and 2025, respectively. For HCPs reporting on the tool's clinical impact (n = 96), 35% indicated expert recommendations changed their intended therapy, 41% stated their treatment plan matched the recommendations, 10% cited barriers to implementing recommendations, and 14% remained undecided on optimal treatment. Conclusions:This analysis highlights the ongoing adoption of expert-recommended treatments into real-world clinical practice. Our data suggest that expert and HCP use of BTKi therapy in the ND MCL setting has increased in recent years. In R/R MCL, CAR T-cell therapy appears to be considered infrequently by HCPs. Barriers to implementation of expert recommendations warrant further investigation. Enhanced decision support tools and targeted educational initiatives could help increase the use of expert treatment recommendations and potentially improve patient outcomes.

Abstract Introduction: cBTKi have made a substantial impact in pts w/ MCL, but pts who develop PD while on treatment w/ cBTKi have historically had poor responses to subsequent lines of therapy (LOT). Brexucel, lisocel, and the non-covalent BTKi pirto have been approved in this population. While two RW studies have substantiated the benefit of brexucel, similar data for pirto are lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to evaluate the outcomes of pts treated w/ pirto in the RW setting. Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective cohort study of adult pts w/ a diagnosis of MCL who experienced PD after any approved cBTKi and subsequently received pirto. Pts who received pirto w/ bridging intent and those who switched to pirto due to intolerance of cBTKi were excluded. The 95% exact binomial confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for overall response rate (ORR) and complete response rate (CRR). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were defined as the time from pirto start to PD or death, whichever occurred first, and the time from pirto start to death, respectively, and calculated w/ the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was used to compare survival curves. A multivariate (MV) Cox proportional hazard model was built to calculate adjusted hazard ratio (aHR). Analyses were performed w/ SAS, version 9.4. Results: Data on 111 pts w/ MCL treated across 21 institutions were collected. Median (mdn) age was 72 (range 33 – 93) years. Twenty-seven pts (24%) were female, 3 (3%) were Asian, 5 (5%) Black, 9 (8%) Hispanic, 86 (77%) White. Among the 53 (48%) pts w/ available MIPI-c at diagnosis, 28 (53%) pts were high-risk. Ki67 at diagnosis was available in 84 (76%) pts: of those, 58 (69%) had a Ki67 ≥30%, and 41 (49%) ≥50%. TP53 mutational status was available in 70 (63%) pts: 33 (47%) had documented TP53 mutation and 10/52 (19%) pts had a disease w/ complex karyotype. Pts had a mdn of 3 (range 1 – 9) prior LOT (n=106). Ninety-one pts (86%) received chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), 16 (15%) autologous stem cell transplant, 19 (18%) venetoclax (ven), 29 (27%) chimeric antigen receptor T-cell, 4 (4%) allogeneic stem cell transplant. For cBTKi, 39 (35%) pts received ibrutinib, 56 (50%) pts acalabrutinib, 33 (30%) pts zanubrutinib, and 17 (15%) pts received more than one cBTKi. The mdn time from the last dose of cBTKi to pirto start was 55 (range 0 – 2587) days, w/ 51 (46%) pts who switched from a cBTKi directly to pirto. Thirty (27%) pts had no response (stable disease or PD as best response) to cBTKi, and 40 (36%) pts had no response to the last LOT. Two (2%) pts received pirto in combination w/ CIT, 8 (7%) w/ an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (mAb), 11 (10%) w/ ven ± a mAb, while 86 (77%) pts as single agent. In 104 (94%) pts, pirto was given at full dose, 10 (9%) pts had a subsequent dose reduction. A total of 35 serious (grade ≥3) adverse events (AE) were documented in 27 (24%) pts: 4 (4%) pts had a serious bleeding AE, 5 (5%) pts a serious cardiac AE, 10 (9%) a serious GI AE, and 16 (14%) a serious infectious AE. Ninety-eight (88%) pts were evaluable for response. The ORR was 40% (95% CI 30% – 50%) w/ a CRR of 29% (95% CI 20%– 39%). At the last follow-up, 29 (26%) pts remained on pirto w/ a mdn treatment duration of 15.1 months (range 0.4 – 26). Fifty-eight (52%) pts died, 35 (78%) because of PD. At a mdn follow-up of 15.8 (range 0.4 – 26) months among survivors, the mdn PFS was 4.7 months (95% CI 3.3 – 8.2) and the mdn OS was 13 months (95% CI 9.2 – not available). Using the log-rank test, age (quartile groups), number of LOT (1-2 vs. 3-4 vs. 5+), time from cBTKi to pirto (quartile groups), Ki67≥30%, and high MIPI-C did not result in a statistically significant difference in PFS (p>0.05). Presence of TP53 mutation was associated w/ a non-statistically significant adverse trend in PFS (p=0.0585). No response to cBTKi and Ki67≥50% were associated w/ a statistically significant inferior PFS in log-rank test (p=<0.05), which persisted in a MV Cox regression model (aHR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4-4.2, and aHR 2.6, 95% CI 1.6-4.4, respectively). Conclusions: This is the first RW report on pirto in MCL pts. In this high-risk population, ORR to pirto was comparable to the BRUIN trial, while PFS was significantly worse, especially in pts w/ no response to cBTKi and w/ a high Ki67. However, prolonged remissions were seen in a subset of pts, suggesting that a better characterization of this population w/ durable benefit from pirto is needed.

Abstract This real-world retrospective cohort study evaluated utilization and comparative effectiveness of covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (cBTKi) monotherapies in relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma (R/R MCL) from electronic health records in the United States. Adults with R/R MCL who received second- or third-line (2L/3L) zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, or ibrutinib monotherapy, on or after 1 January 2018, were included. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used in adjusted Cox models to compare real-world time-to-next treatment (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS). Among 698 patients who received 2L/3L cBTKi monotherapy, 49%, 32%, and 19% received acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, and zanubrutinib, respectively. Unadjusted analyses showed median rwTTNT for 2L zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, and ibrutinib was 14.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 11.0-23.2), 12.8 (95% CI, 10.5-15.6), and 10.3 (95% CI, 7.6-13.7) months, and median rwOS was 26.4 (95% CI, 23.2 to not reached [NR]), 29.2 (95% CI, 22.9-38.1), and 29.3 (95% CI, 21.8-41.6) months, respectively. Median rwTTNT for 3L zanubrutinib, acalabrutinib, and ibrutinib was 21.1 (95% CI, 3.9 to NR), 9.2 (95% CI, 6.8-14.7), and 9.6 (95% CI, 4.8-18.0) months, and median rwOS was NR (95% CI, 27.3 to NR), 27.4 (95% CI, 15.1-42.2), and 27.0 (95% CI, 15.6 to NR) months, respectively. Adjusted models in the 2L/3L cohorts combined showed numerically longer rwTTNT and statistically significantly longer rwOS for zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib (hazard ratio, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.96), and trends for improved rwTTNT and rwOS for zanubrutinib over acalabrutinib. Toxicity was a frequent reason for changing to another cBTKi. These findings suggest potential improvements in rwTTNT and rwOS with the use of second- and next-generation cBTKis for R/R MCL from 2018 and beyond.

Introduction: Treatments for R/R MCL have evolved with NTs, including BTK inhibitors (BTKis). Little is known about RW treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of pts with R/R MCL for chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) vs NTs among pts of different race/ethnicity. Data on RW testing and clinical outcomes of pts with R/R MCL harboring a TP53 mutation are limited. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult pts with R/R MCL who initiated second-line (2L) or third-line (3L) treatment on 1/1/2018 or later and were followed up until loss to follow-up, death, or data cut-off using US Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified databases. Median RW time to next treatment (mrwTTNT) and median RW overall survival (mrwOS) were estimated based on Kaplan-Meier analyses and adjusted for age and sex. CIT included any MCL treatment with chemotherapy + anti-CD20 antibody. NTs included BTKis, BCL2 inhibitors, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and CAR-T, or combinations. Results:This study included 1,377 pts with R/R MCL who received 2L+ therapy. Of these, 1,028 (75%) were non-Latinx (NL)-White, 53 (4%) were NL-Black, 86 (6%) were Latinx, 108 (8%) were NL-Asian or other race, and 102 (7%) were of unknown/undocumented race. The overall 2L+ population had a median age of 71 y (range 63-78), were mostly male (74%), had a diagnosis of MCL not otherwise specified (NOS; 85%), and had stage IV disease (62%). Sixty-three percent had disease progression within 24 mo from first-line (1L) treatment (POD24) before starting 2L therapy. Relative to all pts, NL-Black and NL-Asian/other race pts had more variants of MCL (blastic, leukemic, pleomorphic) and higher Ki67% and lactose dehydrogenase (LDH) levels at 2L/3L index date. In contrast, Latinx pts had more MCL NOS (92%) and lower Ki67% and LDH levels at 2L index date. More NL-Black and unknown race pts had POD24 than did other races (70% and 76%, respectively). Overall, the most common NTs used were BTKis. 1L treatments were bendamustine-rituximab (BR; 54%), R-CHOP (18%), and cytarabine-containing CIT (9.7%). The most common 2L treatments were BR (32%), acalabrutinib (31%), ibrutinib (21%), zanubrutinib (11%), and RCHOP (11%). The most common 3L therapies were BR (34%), acalabrutinib (21%), zanubrutinib (12%), ibrutinib (10%), R-CHOP (9.2%), and brexucabtagene autoleucel (7.4%). Transplantation rates before 2L and CAR-T use in 3L was highest among White pts. When assessing mrwTTNT and mrwOS by therapy in 2L, 766 pts (70%) received NTs and 333 (30%) received CIT. Among all pts, mrwTTNT (mo [95% CI]) was longer with 2L NT (11.9 [10.6, 14.5]) vs CIT (9.9 [8.1, 12.9]). NL-White, NL-Black, and NL-Asian/other race pts had longer mrwTTNT with NT (11.9 [10.5, 14.6], 12.9 [7.6, NR], and 14.6 [8.5, 21.4], respectively) vs CIT (9.9 [7.6, 12.9], 9.7 [3.0, NR], and 6.0 [3.2, 21.2]). Latinx pts had longer mrwTTNT with CIT (14.9 [11.8, NR]) vs NT (9.0 [3.8, 24.2]). Among all pts, mrwOS (mo [95% CI]) was longer with 2L CIT (43.0 [34.1, 56.5]) vs NT (35.6 [29.9, 41.2]). White and Latinx pts had longer mrwOS with CIT (47.3 [33.9, NR] and NR [33.3, NR], respectively) vs NT (35.0 [28.8, 48.4] and 42.3 [31.0, NR]). Black and Asian/other race pts had longer mrwOS with NT (41.2 [32.8, NR] and 38.8 [23.5, NR], respectively) vs CIT (34.8 [9.7, NR] and 13.5 [8.3, NR]). Among all 3L pts (n=364 on NTs, n=119 on CIT), mrwTTNT (mo [95% CI]) improved when using NTs (7.9 [6.8, 10.3]) vs CIT (4.4 [3.5, 6.9]). NTs demonstrated better mrwTTNT vs CIT in all race/ethnic groups except Latinx pts. For all race/ethnic groups, mrwOS was improved with NTs (32.5 [24.7, 42.6]) vs CIT (19.5 [13.7, 47.3]). Overall RW testing for TP53 aberrations was limited, with 72 pts (5%) found to be positive for a TP53 mutation. For pts with TP53 mutations, mrwTTNT and mrwOS were longer for 2L NTs (3.3 [2.2, 6.4] and 18.3 [9.0, NR], respectively; n=42) vs CIT (3.0 [1.9, 7.6] and 15.0 [7.2, NR]; n=16). Conclusions: High-risk features, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes for NTs vs CIT in R/R MCL differed by race/ethnicity. Use of 2L+ NTs was associated with a trend towards improved mrwTTNT and mrwOS among NL-Black and NL-Asian/other race pts. NT use in 3L numerically improved mrwTTNT and mrwOS for most pts vs CIT. RW pts with TP53 mutations had a poor prognosis and numerically improved outcomes with the use of 2L NT, although testing remains limited. Future research evaluating reasons for these differences and increased RW TP53 testing is warranted.

Introduction: Treatment for R/R MCL has evolved with the use of cBTKi monotherapy. Previously, we reported differences in RW time to next treatment (rwTTNT) and overall survival (rwOS) among patients (pts) treated with ibrutinib (ibr), acalabrutinib (acala), and zanubrutinib (zanu), but reasons for the differences were unknown (Phillips et al. EHA 2024). Our objectives were to re-evaluate trends in rwTTNT and rwOS; assess treatment patterns of cBTKis, including switching; describe reasons for cBTKi discontinuation; and compare RW effectiveness of ibr, acala, and zanu monotherapy. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult pts diagnosed with R/R MCL who initiated second-line (2L) or third-line (3L) first cBTKi treatment 01/2018-11/2023 and were followed until loss to follow-up or death using the US nationwide Flatiron Health EHR deidentified database. Patient characteristics and survival estimates based on Kaplan-Meier (KM) analyses were summarized. Adjusted analysis using a multivariate Cox model was applied to assess rwTTNT and rwOS. Key model variables were age, sex, POD24 (2L start ≤24 mo from first-line start), and number of prior lines of therapy. Reasons for discontinuation were abstracted from documentation in notes and included non-mutually exclusive categories. Results: This study included 698 pts who received cBTKi monotherapy in 2L or 3L for MCL. The median age at cBTKi start was 73 (range, 34-85 yrs); the majority of pts were male (74%) and White (White 78%, Black 3.2%, Asian 1.3%, Other Race 7.6%, Unknown 10%) and non-Hispanic/Latino (non-Hispanic/Latino 74%, Hispanic/Latino 6.0%, Unknown 20%). Patients varied by socioeconomic status (Yost index 1 [12%], 2 [16%], 3 [19%], 4 [24%], 5 [19%], Unknown [10%]). Patients also varied by baseline ECOG performance status, Ki67, comorbidities, and LDH. Most pts had stage III/IV at diagnosis (75%). Among pts who received a cBTKi at 2L or 3L index therapy, 135 received zanu (2L [79%], 3L [21%]), 342 received acala (2L [76%], 3L [24%]), and 221 received ibr (2L [75%], 3L [25%]). Follow-up time (median [IQR]) from start of 2L/3L for each cBTKi were zanu 15 mo (10, 25), acala 36 mo (20, 52), and ibr 57 mo (35, 67). Among the overall 2L/3L cBTKi monotherapy cohort, median rwTTNT was 11.5 mo (95% CI 10.0, 13.5) and median rwOS was 30.4 mo (24.7, 36.1). For each cBTKi therapy in unadjusted KM analyses, median rwTTNT for zanu was 16.8 mo (95% CI 11.1, 23.2), acala 11.9 mo (9.2, 14.6), and ibr 9.8 mo (7.6, 13.1); median rwOS was 28.8 for zanu (95% CI 23.7, not reached), acala 29.2 mo (22.9, 36.5), and ibr 29.3 mo (21.2, 39.1). Adjusted multivariate model showed a trend of longer rwTTNT with zanu compared to ibr (HR 0.76 [95% CI 0.57, 1.01]; P=.06) and acala (0.88 [0.67, 1.16]; P=.40), and significantly longer rwOS for zanu compared to ibr (0.67 [0.46, 0.98]; P=.04) but a nonsignificant trend in rwOS favoring zanu compared to acala (0.73 [0.51, 1.05]; P=.09). Forty-seven pts (6.7%) who received cBTKi monotherapy in 2L or 3L switched to another cBTKi; 31 (4.4%) switched from ibr to acala or zanu, 12 (1.7%) from acala to zanu, and <5 (0.1%) from zanu to acala. Reasons for discontinuation (~60% documented in cohort) varied by cBTKi monotherapy use. The most common documented reasons for discontinuation were disease progression (30% overall; zanu [24%], acala [35%], ibr [26%]) and toxicity (11% overall; zanu [7%], acala [10%], ibr [17%]). Among pts who switched from one cBTKi to another, the most documented reason for discontinuation was toxicity for ibr to acala or zanu (61%) and for acala to zanu (58%). Other reasons included financial (1%), non-cancer-related medical issue (4%), cancer-related symptoms not due to therapy (2%), and pt request (1%). Conclusions: Among RW pts with R/R MCL who received cBTKi monotherapy, zanu had a longer rwOS compared to ibr, and a trend of longer rwTTNT and rwOS compared to acala. Reasons for discontinuation were most commonly disease progression and toxicity. Among pts who switched cBTKis, the most common reason for switching was toxicity, which provides a broader scope of reasons for differences in rwTTNT that are not exclusive to disease progression.

Background: Epcoritamab (epcor) is a first-in-class CD3xCD20 bispecific antibody (bsAb) approved for the treatment of 3L+ LBCL and follicular lymphoma. In the single-arm, phase 1/2, EPCORE NHL-1 trial (NCT03625037), epcor given until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, demonstrated deep and durable responses, a median overall survival (OS) of 18.5 months, and a manageable safety profile in R/R LBCL. A second CD3xCD20 bsAb given as fixed-treatment duration, glofitamab (glofit), also demonstrated durable responses, conferring a median OS of 11.5 months in the pivotal study. Understanding how long-term outcomes compare among bsAb agents remains an important knowledge gap. With over 2 years of follow-up, in the absence of a head-to-head study, it is now relevant to compare the efficacy of these agents via indirect comparison. This study evaluated OS, progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of complete response (DoCR) of epcor vs glofit in R/R LBCL using data from the respective pivotal trials. Methods: Two analyses were conducted to compare the efficacy of epcor and glofit. First, a matching-adjusted indirect treatment comparison (MAIC) was conducted using published OS and PFS data from the full cohort of the glofit pivotal trial (12.6 months of follow-up, Dickinson et al, 2022) and the epcor pivotal trial (EPCORE NHL-1). Piece-wise hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated when proportional hazards assumptions were not met. Baseline characteristic prognostic variables were selected based on literature, clinical judgement, and empirical statistical testing and were adjusted between epcor and glofit cohorts. Second, in sensitivity analyses, indirect comparisons were conducted using an updated analysis of glofit with longer follow-up that included DoCR, together with OS and PFS data starting at cycle (C) 3 with 32 months of follow-up (Hutchings et al, ASH 2023). Sensitivity analyses with longer follow-up could not be adjusted because glofit pt baseline characteristics were not presented. Aggregate OS and PFS curves for glofit were derived from subgroups of pts with complete response/partial response/no response (CR/PR/NR) at C3 (Hutchings et al, ASH 2023). Aggregate epcor OS and PFS curves were similarly derived for pts with CR/PR/NR at C3 without prior disease progression. Weighted Cox proportional-hazards models were used to estimate the OS and PFS HRs between the 2 comparators. The DoCR comparison included all glofit and epcor pts achieving CR. All comparisons used EPCORE NHL-1 data with a median of 37.1 months of follow-up. Results: Pts enrolled into the pivotal trials of epcor and glofit were comparable by several key baseline characteristics before adjustment: age ≥65 y; male gender; Ann Arbor disease stage III-IV; primary refractory disease; refractory to most recent anti-CD20 therapy; previous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR T); refractory to CAR T; and previous autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). MAIC analysis revealed no significant difference in OS benefit from C1 until month 6 (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.71, 1.64; P=0.72), but a demonstrable OS advantage from 6 months onward (HR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37, 0.98; P=0.04) in favor of epcor. An OS comparison starting at C3 with longer glofit follow-up demonstrated a consistent survival advantage in favor of epcor (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.46, 1.01; P=0.05). The proportion of pts who received CAR T or ASCT subsequent therapy were similar for epcor and glofit (CAR T: 7.0% vs 8.9%; ASCT: 6.4% vs 6.3%) (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Glofit Single Technology Appraisal, 2023). The MAIC analysis showed comparable PFS between epcor and glofit (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.79, 1.41; P=0.71), although there was substantial censoring in the glofit PFS curve due to immature follow-up. With longer follow-up in the analysis starting at C3, with less censoring, the glofit PFS curve remained similar to the epcor PFS curve from C3 until month 6 (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.42, 1.07; P=0.10), where separation of the PFS curves were observed favoring epcor (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.33, 0.97; P=0.04). Median DoCR was longer for epcor (36.1 months) vs glofit (26.9 months). Conclusion: These indirect treatment comparisons suggest that epcor may provide an overall survival benefit over glofit through longer PFS with more mature follow-up, potentially driven by longer DoCR. Survival data with longer follow-up in the full glofit cohort are needed to confirm these findings.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare lymphoma with a median age at diagnosis of 60-70 years. Front line therapy has traditionally been bendamustine-rituximab (BR) in older patients and then Bruton Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) for relapsed disease. Due to their efficacy, BTKi are now being combined with chemotherapy as induction treatment. The TRIANGLE trial of R-CHOP/R-DHAP +/- ibrutinib +/- transplant showed the benefit of adding a BTKi in young patients (Dreyling M, 2022). The SHINE trial, a phase III trial of BR +/- ibrutinib in patients >65 years, showed a significant improvement in median PFS (81 months vs. 53 months) (Wang M, 2022). However, this came with an increase in toxicity with more treatment related deaths in the ibrutinib arm (11% vs. 6%) and no difference in overall survival. Therefore, a better tolerated approach is still needed in older patients. A phase II study of rituximab + indefinite ibrutinib in 50 patients >65 years demonstrated efficacy of frontline BTKi with a 96% ORR and 71% CR (Jain P, 2021). However, a disadvantage of BTKi therapy is continuous treatment until disease progression or intolerance. In this study half of patients required dose reductions and almost a third of patients stopped treatment due to drug toxicity, most frequently atrial fibrillation or bleeding. If front line intermittent BTKi therapy is as effective as continuous therapy, it could minimize cumulative toxicity. A052101 (NCT05976763), an Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trial, is a randomized phase 3 multicenter trial of upfront zanubrutinib that asks the question “in older patients with previously untreated MCL who obtain a CR with zanubrutinib-rituximab, is it safe and equally effective to stop treatment and restart it upon disease progression rather than continuing indefinitely?” The A052101 trial is enrolling pts with previously untreated MCL who are either >70 years old or 60-69 years old but are not transplant candidates due to cardiac ejection fraction <45%, DLCO <60% of predicted, creatinine clearance <70, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of >2, or a Cumulative Illness Rating Scales score of >6. Key exclusion criteria include: history of a severe bleeding disorder or clinically significant cardiac arrhythmias. Patients will take zanubrutinib 320 mg daily and rituximab/rituximab biosimilar once monthly for 6 cycles. Patients with less than partial response after 6 cycles will go off study treatment. Patients with a complete remission will be randomized in a 1:1 manner to intermittent treatment versus continuous treatment. Randomization will be stratified by age (60-69 years vs ≥70 years) and MIPI score. Those randomized to the continuous arm will receive zanubrutinib until intolerance or disease progression. Those randomized to the intermittent arm will stop all study drugs after those initial 6 cycles and will restart zanubrutinib at first disease progression and continue it until intolerance or second disease progression. In order to make the study results generalizable to clinical practice, disease progression will be defined by clinical parameters rather than minimal residual disease testing. The primary objective of this study is to compare time from randomization to first progression or death (PFS1) in the continuous treatment arm to the time to second progression or death (PFS2) in the intermittent treatment arm. The primary evaluation will be to determine whether, for patients in a CR, active monitoring followed by retreatment with zanubrutinib therapy upon disease progression will result in non-inferior clinical outcomes compared to indefinite zanubrutinib. Serial quality of life testing and adverse event monitoring will be performed throughout the study to gain a full understanding of the impact of continuous vs intermittent zanubrutinib on patients' lives. A052101 has the potential to change management of older patients with previously untreated MCL. If our study demonstrates that the time to second progression/death when using the stop and retreat strategy is non-inferior to time to first progression/death when using continuous BTK therapy, then it might lead to a new standard of care in this patient population. This could result in decreased health care costs, decreased toxicity and improved quality of life for older patients with mantle cell lymphoma. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org

Background SEA-CD40 is an investigational, non-fucosylated, humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that activates CD40, an immune-activating tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member. SEA-CD40 exhibits enhanced binding to activating FcγRIIIa, possibly enabling greater immune stimulation than other CD40 agonists. A first-in-human phase 1 trial was conducted to examine safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SEA-CD40 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma. Methods SEA-CD40 was administered intravenously to patients with solid tumors or lymphoma in 21-day cycles with standard 3+3 dose escalation at 0.6, 3, 10, 30, 45, and 60 µg/kg. An intensified dosing regimen was also studied. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety and tolerability and identify the maximum tolerated dose of SEA-CD40. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the pharmacokinetic parameters, antitherapeutic antibodies, pharmacodynamic effects and biomarker response, and antitumor activity. Results A total of 67 patients received SEA-CD40 including 56 patients with solid tumors and 11 patients with lymphoma. A manageable safety profile was observed, with predominant adverse events of infusion/hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) reported in 73% of patients. IHRs were primarily ≤grade 2 with an incidence associated with infusion rate. To mitigate IHRs, a standardized infusion approach was implemented with routine premedication and a slowed infusion rate. SEA-CD40 infusion resulted in potent immune activation, illustrated by dose dependent cytokine induction with associated activation and trafficking of innate and adaptive immune cells. Results suggested that doses of 10–30 µg/kg may result in optimal immune activation. SEA-CD40 monotherapy exhibited evidence of antitumor activity, with a partial response in a patient with basal cell carcinoma and a complete response in a patient with follicular lymphoma. Conclusions SEA-CD40 was tolerable as monotherapy and induced potent dose dependent immune cell activation and trafficking consistent with immune activation. Evidence of monotherapy antitumor activity was observed in patients with solid tumors and lymphoma. Further evaluation of SEA-CD40 is warranted, potentially as a component of a combination regimen. Trial registration number NCT02376699.