Back to Authors

Kaffenberger, B

0000-0001-8079-0011

Mayo Clinic

The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center

Citations 8

Pyoderma Gangrenosum Phenotype Classification
Gaurav, Ahana , Gregoire, Samantha, Xia, Eric, McIntosh, Basil Alex, Alavi, Afsaneh, Bolognia, Jean, Cowen, Edward, Dominguez, Arturo R., Fivenson, David, Heffernan, Michael, Huang, William, Madigan, Lauren, Mauskar, Melissa, Nelson, Caroline, Patsatsi, Aikaterini , Pugliese, Douglas, Rojek, Nathan W. , Rosenbach, M., Shaigany, Sheila, Shinkai, Kanade , Smith, Gideon, SWERLICK, ROBERT, Ortega-Loayza, Alex, Gregoire, Samantha , Xia, Eric , Fernandez, Anthony P , Fivenson, David , Kaffenberger, B , Madigan, Lauren M. , Mauskar, Melissa , Means, Alexander D. , Pugliese, Douglas J., Rosenbach, Misha , Shaigany, Sheila , Smith, Gideon Piers , Swerlick, Robert A. , Ortega‐Loayza, Alex G. , Mostaghimi, Arash

JAMA Dermatology | August 5, 2026 | Volume: No volume available | Issue: No issue available | Pages: No page available

10.1001/jamadermatol.2026.2285 Get It

Importance Pyoderma gangrenosum (PG) is a rare neutrophilic dermatosis characterized by sterile ulcerative skin lesions. Multiple comorbidities and clinical features have been associated with PG, but no standardized guidelines exist for classifying PG phenotypes. Objective To develop an expert-established classification framework for PG phenotypes to inform treatment guidelines and future research endeavors. Evidence Review In this modified Delphi consensus study that included 23 board-certified dermatologists and Medical Dermatology Society members with expertise in PG, panelists completed 5 rounds of anonymous, iterative online surveys that were administered from December 2023 through July 2025. Before the beginning of the consensus exercise, a literature review was performed by nonvoting researchers to summarize existing data on PG clinical associations and comorbidities. A PubMed search from inception to September 2023 identified observational studies, narrative reviews, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses describing PG clinical associations and comorbidities that were published in English. Experts indicated their agreement with proposed PG phenotypes and disease modifiers with a consensus threshold of 70% or greater. Anonymous comments and aggregated results were presented in each subsequent round. In the final round, a framework of PG phenotypes and disease modifiers was proposed for agreement. Findings Twenty-three board-certified dermatologists and Medical Dermatology Society members with expertise in PG completed 5 rounds of iterative surveys. Consensus was reached on the final set of PG phenotypes and disease modifiers, with 83% of experts in agreement. PG phenotypes were overall classified into 2 major groups: PG with autoinflammatory syndromes and nonsyndromic PG. Nonsyndromic PG included 4 phenotypes: inflammatory bowel disease–associated PG, PG in association with hematologic cancers and blood dyscrasias, drug-induced PG, and other (including idiopathic) PG. Disease modifiers of PG phenotype presentations included involvement of special sites (head/neck, genitals, or peristomal skin) and extracutaneous manifestations. Conclusions and Relevance This expert-established, descriptive framework provides a standardized classification system for distinct PG phenotypes and its modifiers. This nomenclature may inform upcoming clinical guidelines and allow for consistency in reporting epidemiological research and outcomes among patients with PG.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 2.2024
Thompson, John A. , Schneider, Bryan J. , Brahmer, Julie R. , Zaid, Mohammad Abu , Achufusi, Amaka, Armand, Philippe , Bermas, Bonnie L. , Braaten, Tawnie , Chokshi, Saurin , Crees, Zachary , Davies, Marianne, Deng, Changchun , Gesthalter, Yaron , Jallouk, Andrew , Khalil, Maya, Marr, Alissa , McGettigan, Suzanne , Medina, Theresa , Mohindra, Nisha , Patel, Sandip Pravin , Prosek, Jason, Reddy, Sunil , Reid, Pankti , Ryder, Mabel , Shofer, Scott , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Zucker, Stephen D. , Lyons, Megan , Hang, Lisa, Ryder, Mabel , Berkenstock, Meghan , Bermas, Bonnie , Budde, Lihua E. , Jain, Michael D. , Jain, Prantesh , Kaffenberger, B , Lechner, Melissa G , Li, Tianhong , McPherson, Jordan P. , Medina, Theresa Michelle , Olszanski, Anthony J. , Oluwole, Olalekan O. , Ryan, John, Salman, Huda , Santomasso, Bianca , Wang, Yinghong , Zaha, Vlad G , Awotiwon, Ajibola

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | November 13, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 9 | Pages: 582-592

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0057 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for the Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities are intended to provide oncology practitioners with guidance on how to manage the wide-ranging and potentially fatal toxicities that may occur with cancer immunotherapy. The guidelines address immune-related adverse events related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR T-cell therapies, and lymphocyte engagers (which include T-cell–engaging bispecific antibodies). These NCCN Guidelines Insights highlight recent guideline updates pertaining to the management of emerging toxicities related to cancer immunotherapy.
Development of a Skin-Directed Scoring System for Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Epidermal Necrolysis
Waters, Margo , Dobry, Allison S. , Le, Stephanie T. , Shinkai, Kanade , Beachkofsky, Thomas M. , Davis, Mark D.P. , Markova, Alina , Pasieka, Helena B. , Rosenbach, Misha , Seminario‐Vidal, Lucia , Trinidad, John , Altman, Emily , Arakaki, Ryan, Ardern‐Jones, Michael R. , Bridges, Alina G. , Cardones, Adela R. , Chen, Jennifer K. , Chen, Steven T. , Cheng, Kyle , Harp, Joanna, King, Brett , Lowenstein, Eve J. , Luxenberg, Erin, Mancuso, Jennifer , Mauskar, Melissa , Milam, Philip , Nelson, Caroline A. , Nguyen, Cuong V. , Nutan, Fnu, Patel, Tejesh , Rahnama‐Moghadam, Sahand , Rekhtman, Sergey , Rojek, Nathan W. , Sarihan, Mansi, Shaigany, Sheila , Sharma, Timmie R. , Shearer, Sabrina M, Shields, Bridget E. , Strowd, Lindsay C. , Tartar, Danielle , Walls, Andrew C., Ziemer, Carolyn, Kaffenberger, Benjamin H. , Nguyen, C V , Seminario-Vidal, L , Kaffenberger, B , Dominguez, Arturo Ricardo , Kroshinsky, Daniela , Micheletti, Robert , Mostaghimi, Arash , Albrecht, Joerg , Chadha, Angad , Daveluy, Steven , DeNiro, Katherine L. , Keller, Jesse Joel , Korman, Abraham Moris , Motaparthi, Kiran , Ortega‐Loayza, Alex G. , Shaigany, Sheila , Thomas, Cristina , Wanat, Karolyn A. , Walls, Andrew F. , Zaba, Lisa C. , Maverakis, Emanual Michael

JAMA Dermatology | May 31, 2023 | Volume: 159 | Issue: 7 | Pages: 772

10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1347 Get It

Importance Scoring systems for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and epidermal necrolysis (EN) only estimate patient prognosis and are weighted toward comorbidities and systemic features; morphologic terminology for EN lesions is inconsistent. Objectives To establish consensus among expert dermatologists on EN terminology, morphologic progression, and most-affected sites, and to build a framework for developing a skin-directed scoring system for EN. Evidence Review A Delphi consensus using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness criteria was initiated with a core group from the Society of Dermatology Hospitalists to establish agreement on the optimal design for an EN cutaneous scoring instrument, terminology, morphologic traits, and sites of involvement. Findings In round 1, the 54 participating dermatology hospitalists reached consensus on all 49 statements (30 appropriate, 3 inappropriate, 16 uncertain). In round 2, they agreed on another 15 statements (8 appropriate, 7 uncertain). There was consistent agreement on the need for a skin-specific instrument; on the most-often affected skin sites (head and neck, chest, upper back, ocular mucosa, oral mucosa); and that blanching erythema, dusky erythema, targetoid erythema, vesicles/bullae, desquamation, and erosions comprise the morphologic traits of EN and can be consistently differentiated. Conclusions and Relevance This consensus exercise confirmed the need for an EN skin-directed scoring system, nomenclature, and differentiation of specific morphologic traits, and identified the sites most affected. It also established a baseline consensus for a standardized EN instrument with consistent terminology.
Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Thompson, John A. , Schneider, Bryan J. , Brahmer, Julie R. , Achufusi, Amaka, Armand, Philippe , Bhatia, Shailender , Chokshi, Saurin , Davies, Marianne, Elshoury, Amro, Gesthalter, Yaron , Kaffenberger, Benjamin H. , Li, Tianhong , Marr, Alissa , McGettigan, Suzanne , Medina, Theresa , Mohindra, Nisha , Oluwole, Olalekan O. , Patel, Sandip Pravin , Patil, Pradnya D. , Reddy, Sunil , Ryder, Mabel , Shofer, Scott , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Lyons, Megan , Dwyer, Mary A., Hang, Lisa, Oluwole, Olalekan O , Kaffenberger, B , Ryder, Mabel , Berkenstock, Meghan , Budde, Lihua E. , Hegde, Aparna , Jain, Michael D. , Lechner, Melissa G , McPherson, Jordan P. , Medina, Theresa Michelle , Olszanski, Anthony J. , Santomasso, Bianca , Wang, Yinghong , Zaha, Vlad G

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 7, 2022 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 387-405

10.6004/jnccn.2022.0020 Get It

The aim of the NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities is to provide guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events resulting from cancer immunotherapy. The NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel is an interdisciplinary group of representatives from NCCN Member Institutions, consisting of medical and hematologic oncologists with expertise across a wide range of disease sites, and experts from the areas of dermatology, gastroenterology, endocrinology, neurooncology, nephrology, cardio-oncology, ophthalmology, pulmonary medicine, and oncology nursing. The content featured in this issue is an excerpt of the recommendations for managing toxicities related to CAR T-cell therapies and a review of existing evidence. For the full version of the NCCN Guidelines, including recommendations for managing toxicities related to immune checkpoint inhibitors, visitNCCN.org.
NCCN Guidelines Insights: Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities, Version 1.2020
Thompson, John A. , Schneider, Bryan J. , Brahmer, Julie R. , Andrews, Stephanie, Armand, Philippe , Davies, Marianne, Dunnington, David, Frigault, Matthew J. , Kaffenberger, Benjamin H. , Lunning, Matthew A. , McGettigan, Suzanne , McPherson, Jordan P. , Mohindra, Nisha , Naidoo, Jarushka , Olszanski, Anthony J. , Oluwole, Olalekan O. , Patel, Sandip Pravin , Reddy, Sunil , Ryder, Mabel , Santomasso, Bianca , Shofer, Scott , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Weight, Ryan , Johnson-Chilla, Alyse, Zuccarino-Catania, Griselda, Engh, Anita M. , Oluwole, Olalekan O , Naidoo, Jarushka , Olszanski, Anthony J , Kaffenberger, B , Ryder, Mabel , Bhatia, Shailender , Budde, Lihua E. , Costa, Luciano J. , Ernstoff, Marc S. , Pennell, Nathan A , Wang, Yinghong

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | March 5, 2020 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 230-241

10.6004/jnccn.2020.0012 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities provide interdisciplinary guidance on the management of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) resulting from cancer immunotherapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights describe symptoms that may be caused by an irAE and should trigger further investigation, and summarize the NCCN Management of Immunotherapy-Related Toxicities Panel discussions for the 2020 update to the guidelines regarding immune checkpoint inhibitor–related diarrhea/colitis and cardiovascular irAEs.