Back to Authors

Fields, Ryan C.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6176-8943

Mayo Clinic

University of Rochester Medicine

Citations 6

Abstract 94: Liquid biopsy profiling of the tumor microenvironment to determine response to immunotherapy regimens across solid tumors.
Brown, Erin L. , Zhang, W., Hashmi, Ayesha , Olelewe, Chibuzor, Viswanathan, Anushka , Kang, Minji , Jeon, Hyun Soo , Avagyan, Susanna , Bergsagel, Matteo , Schwab, Janella C. , Sachs, Chloe M., Qaium, Faridi , Bacchiocchi, Antonella , Cai, Qingyuan , Gentles, Andrew J. , Graham, Rondell, Orme, Jacob J. , Sznol, Mario, Halaban, Ruth, Chen, D., Newman, Aaron M. , Chaudhuri., Aadel A., Zhang, Wubing , Usmani, Abul , Earland, Noah , Chauhan, Pradeep S. , Steen, Chloé Beate , Alahi, Irfan , Semenkovich, Nicholas P. , Harris, Peter K , Lucas, Peter C. , Fields, Ryan C. , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Halaban, Ruth , Chaudhuri, Aadel A.

Cancer Research | April 3, 2026 | Volume: 86 | Issue: 7_Supplement | Pages: 94-94

10.1158/1538-7445.am2026-94 Get It

Abstract Background: Spatial cellular ecosystems in the tumor microenvironment (TME) form dynamic signaling hubs that critically influence cancer disease progression and response to therapy, including response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, tumor sampling bias and the impracticality of acquiring serial tumor biopsies have made it challenging to profile the TME clinically. To address this challenge, we developed Liquid EcoTyper, a multi-analyte AI framework to quantify TME spatial cellular ecosystems—termed spatial ecotypes (SEs)—noninvasively from cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation data. Methods: In previous work, we discovered nine spatial ecotypes, including SEs associated with ICI response (e.g., SE7 with benefit, SE4 with resistance), and quantified them from 1,249 bulk tumor RNA-seq profiles of melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and bladder cancer (BC) patients (Cancer Res (2025) 85 (8_Supplement_1): 153). Here we trained Liquid EcoTyper, an interpretable deep learning model, to transfer SE profiling to cell-free DNA using CpG methylation profiles. Performance was quantified using simulated and real data, including methylation profiles (EM-seq) of plasma cfDNA paired with tumor biopsy-derived SE levels determined by EM-seq (n=20 pairs) or 10x Visium (n=15 pairs). Clinical outcome prediction was evaluated using pretreatment plasma from patients treated with ICI alone (n=78 melanoma pts), chemotherapy and ICI (n=25 NSCLC pts), and enfortumab vedotin and ICI (n=10 localized muscle-invasive BC (MIBC) pts). Tumor mutational burden (TMB), tumor PD-L1, or circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) were profiled as a comparator where possible. Results: We observed striking concordance between plasma-derived SE levels and tumor biopsy-confirmed SE levels from the same patients, demonstrating that liquid biopsy analysis of cfDNA methylomes can recapitulate TME spatial biology. Underscoring specificity, no reliable SE signal was detectable from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In pre-ICI plasma, liquid SE levels were significantly associated with ICI-based response (SE7) versus resistance (SE4) in patients with melanoma, NSCLC, and MIBC, with a mean cross-cancer area under the curve (AUC) of 0.87 for SE7 (range 0.8-0.97) and 0.81 for SE4 (range 0.76-0.85)—far surpassing TMB, tumor PD-L1, and ctDNA in evaluable patients, both in binary analyses of response and multivariable models of survival. Our results also showed potential to predict pathologic complete response in the neoadjuvant setting. Conclusion: Liquid EcoTyper is a scalable noninvasive AI-based framework for spatiotemporal assessment of the TME. By enabling TME-informed risk stratification without surgical biopsies, Liquid EcoTyper has potential to enable more precise and actionable decision making in patients with solid tumors. Citation Format: Erin L. Brown, Wubing Zhang, Abul Usmani, Noah Earland, Ayesha Hashmi, Chibuzor Olelewe, Anushka Viswanathan, Pradeep S. Chauhan, Minji Kang, Chloé B. Steen, Hyun Soo Jeon, Susanna Avagyan, Irfan Alahi, Nicholas P. Semenkovich, Matteo Bergsagel, Janella C. Schwab, Chloe M. Sachs, Faridi Qaium, Peter K. Harris, Antonella Bacchiocchi, Qingyuan Cai, Andrew J. Gentles, Rondell P. Graham, Peter C. Lucas, Ryan C. Fields, Jacob J. Orme, Aaron S. Mansfield, Mario Sznol, Ruth Halaban, David Y. Chen, Aaron M. Newman, Aadel A. Chaudhuri. Liquid biopsy profiling of the tumor microenvironment to determine response to immunotherapy regimens across solid tumors [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 94.
Abstract 153: High-resolution profiling of the tumor microenvironment with spatial ecotypes
Brown, Erin L. , Jeon, Hyun Soo , Semenkovich, Nicholas P. , Schwab, Janella C. , Sachs, Chloe M., Gungoren, Bilge , Qaium, Faridi , Mudd, Jacqueline L. , Cai, Qingyuan , Bacchiocchi, Antonella , Halaban, Ruth , Chaudhuri, Aadel A., Semenkovich, Nicholas P , Zhang, Wubing , Usmani, Abul , Earland, Noah , Alahi, Irfan , Steen, Chloé Beate , Harris, Peter K , Fields, Ryan C. , Sznol, Mario , Chen, David Y. , Chaudhuri, Aadel A. , Newman, Aaron M.

Cancer Research | April 21, 2025 | Volume: 85 | Issue: 8_Supplement_1 | Pages: 153-153

10.1158/1538-7445.am2025-153 Get It

Background: Multicellular programs in the tumor microenvironment (TME) drive cancer pathogenesis and response to therapy but remain challenging to identify and profile clinically. Here, we present Spatial EcoTyper, a multimodal machine learning framework for large-scale profiling of spatially dependent cell states and multicellular ecosystems, termed spatial ecotypes (SEs). Methods and Findings: By integrating five million single-cell and spot-level spatial transcriptomes from 10 diverse human neoplasms, including carcinomas and melanomas, we identified a rich tapestry of conserved regional plasticity across nine TME cell types. We then applied Spatial EcoTyper to deeply dissect these data, revealing nine novel SEs with broad conservation - each with unique biology, TME cell states, geospatial features, and clinical outcome associations. SEs were linked to specific biogeographic domains, including the tumor core, margin, and adjacent stroma, and were remarkably well-validated in 235 held-out tumor samples profiled by either single-cell RNA sequencing, sequencing-based spatial transcriptomics (10x Visium), or high-resolution imaging-based spatial transcriptomics (Vizgen MERSCOPE and NanoString CosMx). By deconvolving SEs from over 1,200 bulk tumor RNA-seq profiles, we discovered striking associations between SE levels and response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), outperforming nearly 40 potential correlates of ICI response, including previously described signatures of tertiary lymphoid structures and tumor tissue PD-L1 expression. Notably, baseline levels of a proinflammatory SE - localized to the tumor core and defined by a hub of unique T cell, macrophage, fibroblast, and endothelial cell states - strongly forecasted ICI benefit, while another SE - localized to the tumor margin and defined by myofibroblast and hypoxia-associated endothelial cell states - portended ICI resistance. Conclusion: Our data reveal fundamental units of TME organization and demonstrate a platform for large-scale profiling of spatial cellular ecosystems in any tissue, with implications for improved forecasting of immunotherapy response and the development of novel therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: Wubing Zhang,Erin L. Brown,Abul Usmani,Noah Earland,Hyun Soo Jeon,Irfan Alahi,Nicholas P. Semenkovich,Janella C. Schwab,Chloé B. Steen,Chloe M. Sachs,Bilge Gungoren,Faridi Qaium,Peter K. Harris,Jacqueline Mudd,Qingyuan Cai,Antonella Bacchiocchi,Ryan C. Fields,Mario Sznol,Ruth Halaban,David Y. Chen,Aadel A. Chaudhuri,Aaron M. Newman. High-resolution profiling of the tumor microenvironment with spatial ecotypes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 153.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2024
Johnson, Douglas B. , Albertini, Mark R. , Barker, Christopher A. , Bateni, Sarah B. , Baumgartner, Joel , Bichakjian, Christopher K. , Chandra, Sunandana , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Dronca, Roxana , Fleming, Martin D. , Galan, Anjela , Guild, Samantha, Hyngstrom, John , Karakousis, Giorgos C. , Kendra, Kari , Lange, Julie R., Lanning, Ryan M. , Logan, Theodore F. , Ott, Patrick A. , Ross, Merrick I. , Skitzki, Joseph J. , Smith, Emily , Tsai, Katy K., Wuthrick, Evan , Xing, Yan, McMillian, Nicole R., Espinosa, Sara, Olson, Daniel J. , Swetter, Susan M. , Bhatia, Shailender , Boland, Genevieve M. , Chmielowski, Bartosz , Fields, Ryan C. , Kiuru, Maija H. , Olson, Daniel, Olszanski, Anthony J. , Rothermel, Luke D. , Salama, April K.S. , Sharma, Rohit R. , Xing, Yan

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | July 26, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 290-298

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0036 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma (termed Melanoma: Cutaneous ) provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the update to neoadjuvant systemic therapy options and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma.
Priorities to Promote Participant Engagement in the Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network
Schuster, Anne L. R. , Crossnohere, Norah L. , Bachini, Melinda , Blair, Cindy K. , Carpten, John D. , Claus, Elizabeth B. , Colditz, Graham A. , Ding, Li , Drake, Bettina F. , Fields, Ryan C. , Janeway, Katherine A. , Kwan, Bethany M. , Lenz, Heinz‐Josef , Mishra, Shiraz I. , Ricker, Charité , Sussman, Andrew L. , Tiner, Jessica C. , Trent, Jeffrey M. , Verhaak, Roel G.W. , Wagle, Nikhil , Bridges, John F. P. , Network, for the Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS), Schuster, Anne Lr , Ma, Qin , Mishra, Shiraz I , Paskett, Electra D , Rebbeck, Timothy R , Ricker, Charité , Stern, Mariana Carla , Sussman, Andrew L , Tiner, Jessica C , Trent, Jeffrey M , Verhaak, Roel Gw , Wagle, Nikhil , Willman, Cheryl , Bridges, John Fp , Colditz, Graham A , Bachini, Melinda , Paskett, Electra D. , Rebbeck, Timothy R. , Willman, Cheryl L. , Network, for the Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS)

Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention | February 15, 2023 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 487-495

10.1158/1055-9965.epi-22-0356 Get It

Abstract Background: Engaging diverse populations in cancer genomics research is of critical importance and is a fundamental goal of the NCI Participant Engagement and Cancer Genome Sequencing (PE-CGS) Network. Established as part of the Cancer Moonshot, PE-CGS is a consortium of stakeholders including clinicians, scientists, genetic counselors, and representatives of potential study participants and their communities. Participant engagement is an ongoing, bidirectional, and mutually beneficial interaction between study participants and researchers. PE-CGS sought to set priorities in participant engagement for conducting the network's research. Methods: PE-CGS deliberatively engaged its stakeholders in the following four-phase process to set the network's research priorities in participant engagement: (i) a brainstorming exercise to elicit potential priorities; (ii) a 2-day virtual meeting to discuss priorities; (iii) recommendations from the PE-CGS External Advisory Panel to refine priorities; and (iv) a virtual meeting to set priorities. Results: Nearly 150 PE-CGS stakeholders engaged in the process. Five priorities were set: (i) tailor education and communication materials for participants throughout the research process; (ii) identify measures of participant engagement; (iii) identify optimal participant engagement strategies; (iv) understand cancer disparities in the context of cancer genomics research; and (v) personalize the return of genomics findings to participants. Conclusions: PE-CGS is pursuing these priorities to meaningfully engage diverse and underrepresented patients with cancer and posttreatment cancer survivors as participants in cancer genomics research and, subsequently, generate new discoveries. Impact: Data from PE-CGS will be shared with the broader scientific community in a manner consistent with participant informed consent and community agreement.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2021
Thompson, John A. , Albertini, Mark R. , Barker, Christopher A. , Baumgartner, Joel , Boland, Genevieve M. , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Durham, Alison B. , Fleming, Martin D. , Galan, Anjela , Gastman, Brian , Grossmann, Kenneth F. , Guild, Samantha, Holder, Ashley M. , Johnson, Douglas B. , Karakousis, Giorgos C. , Kendra, Kari , Lange, Julie R., Lanning, Ryan M. , Ott, Patrick A. , Ross, Merrick I. , Skitzki, Joseph J. , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Wuthrick, Evan , McMillian, Nicole R., Engh, Anita M. , Swetter, Susan M. , Chmielowski, Bartosz , Fields, Ryan C. , Joseph, Richard W. , Margolin, Kim , Olszanski, Anthony J. , Salama, April K.S. , Sharma, Rohit R. , Boland, Genevieve

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | November 26, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 364-376

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0018 Get It

Over the past few years, the NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous have been expanded to include pathways for treatment of microscopic satellitosis (added in v2.2020), and the following Principles sections: Molecular Testing (added in v2.2019), Systemic Therapy Considerations (added in v2.2020), and Brain Metastases Management (added in v3.2020). The v1.2021 update included additional modifications of these sections and notable revisions to Principles of: Pathology, Surgical Margins for Wide Excision of Primary Melanoma, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Completion/Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection, and Radiation Therapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the important changes to pathology and surgery recommendations, as well as additions to systemic therapy options for patients with advanced disease.
Cutaneous Melanoma, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Coit, Daniel G. , Thompson, John A. , Albertini, Mark R. , Barker, Christopher A. , Carson, William E. , Contreras, Carlo M. , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Fleming, Martin D. , Freeman, Morganna , Galan, Anjela , Gastman, Brian , Guild, Valerie, Johnson, Douglas B. , Lange, Julie R., Nath, Sameer K., Olszanski, Anthony J. , Ott, Patrick A. , Gupta, Aparna Priyanath , Ross, Merrick I. , Salama, April K.S. , Skitzki, Joseph J. , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Wuthrick, Evan , McMillian, Nicole R., Engh, Anita M. , Carson, William E , Olszanski, Anthony J , Daniels, Gregory A. , Fields, Ryan C. , Joseph, Richard W. , Swetter, Susan M. , Tanabe, Kenneth K.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 8, 2019 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 367-402

10.6004/jnccn.2019.0018 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cutaneous melanoma have been significantly revised over the past few years in response to emerging data on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and BRAF-targeted therapy. This article summarizes the data and rationale supporting extensive changes to the recommendations for systemic therapy as adjuvant treatment of resected disease and as treatment of unresectable or distant metastatic disease.