Back to Authors

Ott, Patrick A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4253-943X

Mayo Clinic

Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center

Citations 4

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2024
Johnson, Douglas B. , Albertini, Mark R. , Barker, Christopher A. , Bateni, Sarah B. , Baumgartner, Joel , Bichakjian, Christopher K. , Chandra, Sunandana , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Dronca, Roxana , Fleming, Martin D. , Galan, Anjela , Guild, Samantha, Hyngstrom, John , Karakousis, Giorgos C. , Kendra, Kari , Lange, Julie R., Lanning, Ryan M. , Logan, Theodore F. , Ott, Patrick A. , Ross, Merrick I. , Skitzki, Joseph J. , Smith, Emily , Tsai, Katy K., Wuthrick, Evan , Xing, Yan, McMillian, Nicole R., Espinosa, Sara, Olson, Daniel J. , Swetter, Susan M. , Bhatia, Shailender , Boland, Genevieve M. , Chmielowski, Bartosz , Fields, Ryan C. , Kiuru, Maija H. , Olson, Daniel, Olszanski, Anthony J. , Rothermel, Luke D. , Salama, April K.S. , Sharma, Rohit R. , Xing, Yan

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | July 26, 2024 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 290-298

10.6004/jnccn.2024.0036 Get It

The NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma (termed Melanoma: Cutaneous ) provide multidisciplinary recommendations for diagnostic workup, staging, and treatment of patients. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the update to neoadjuvant systemic therapy options and summarize the new clinical data evaluated by the NCCN panel for the recommended therapies in Version 2.2024 of the NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Melanoma.
NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Melanoma: Cutaneous, Version 2.2021
Thompson, John A. , Albertini, Mark R. , Barker, Christopher A. , Baumgartner, Joel , Boland, Genevieve M. , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Durham, Alison B. , Fleming, Martin D. , Galan, Anjela , Gastman, Brian , Grossmann, Kenneth F. , Guild, Samantha, Holder, Ashley M. , Johnson, Douglas B. , Karakousis, Giorgos C. , Kendra, Kari , Lange, Julie R., Lanning, Ryan M. , Ott, Patrick A. , Ross, Merrick I. , Skitzki, Joseph J. , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Wuthrick, Evan , McMillian, Nicole R., Engh, Anita M. , Swetter, Susan M. , Chmielowski, Bartosz , Fields, Ryan C. , Joseph, Richard W. , Margolin, Kim , Olszanski, Anthony J. , Salama, April K.S. , Sharma, Rohit R. , Boland, Genevieve

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | November 26, 2021 | Volume: 19 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 364-376

10.6004/jnccn.2021.0018 Get It

Over the past few years, the NCCN Guidelines for Melanoma: Cutaneous have been expanded to include pathways for treatment of microscopic satellitosis (added in v2.2020), and the following Principles sections: Molecular Testing (added in v2.2019), Systemic Therapy Considerations (added in v2.2020), and Brain Metastases Management (added in v3.2020). The v1.2021 update included additional modifications of these sections and notable revisions to Principles of: Pathology, Surgical Margins for Wide Excision of Primary Melanoma, Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy, Completion/Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection, and Radiation Therapy. These NCCN Guidelines Insights discuss the important changes to pathology and surgery recommendations, as well as additions to systemic therapy options for patients with advanced disease.
Cutaneous Melanoma, Version 2.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Coit, Daniel G. , Thompson, John A. , Albertini, Mark R. , Barker, Christopher A. , Carson, William E. , Contreras, Carlo M. , DiMaio, Dominick J. , Fleming, Martin D. , Freeman, Morganna , Galan, Anjela , Gastman, Brian , Guild, Valerie, Johnson, Douglas B. , Lange, Julie R., Nath, Sameer K., Olszanski, Anthony J. , Ott, Patrick A. , Gupta, Aparna Priyanath , Ross, Merrick I. , Salama, April K.S. , Skitzki, Joseph J. , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Wuthrick, Evan , McMillian, Nicole R., Engh, Anita M. , Carson, William E , Olszanski, Anthony J , Daniels, Gregory A. , Fields, Ryan C. , Joseph, Richard W. , Swetter, Susan M. , Tanabe, Kenneth K.

Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network | April 8, 2019 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 367-402

10.6004/jnccn.2019.0018 Get It

The NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Cutaneous melanoma have been significantly revised over the past few years in response to emerging data on immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies and BRAF-targeted therapy. This article summarizes the data and rationale supporting extensive changes to the recommendations for systemic therapy as adjuvant treatment of resected disease and as treatment of unresectable or distant metastatic disease.
Clinical Features of Acquired Resistance to Anti–PD-1 Therapy in Advanced Melanoma
Eroglu, Zeynep , Özgün, Alpaslan, Leger, Paul, Ye, Fei , Luke, Jason J. , Haq, Rizwan , Ott, Patrick A. , Hodi, F. Stephen , Sosman, Jeffrey A. , Johnson, Douglas B. , Buchbinder, Elizabeth I. , Wang, Daniel Y. , Zhao, Shilin , Joseph, Richard W. , Luke, Jason J

Cancer Immunology Research | April 10, 2017 | Volume: 5 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 357-362

10.1158/2326-6066.cir-16-0287 Get It

Abstract Anti–PD-1 therapy has improved clinical outcomes in advanced melanoma, but most patients experience intrinsic resistance. Responding patients can develop acquired resistance to anti–PD-1. We retrospectively reviewed 488 patients treated with anti–PD-1 from three academic centers and identified 36 patients with acquired resistance, defined as disease progression following objective response. The incidence, timing, disease sites, post-progression survival (PPS), and outcomes were evaluated descriptively. The acquired resistance cohort consisted of 67% with more than 1 feature of poor prognosis (stage M1c, elevated LDH, or brain metastasis), and 67% had previously received ipilimumab. Partial and complete responses were achieved in 89% (n = 32) and 11% (n = 4) of patients, respectively, and median time to resistance (progression-free survival; PFS) was 11.1 months (range 4.3–32.8 months). Most progression was isolated (78% of patients, n = 28) and occurred while receiving therapy (78%, n = 28). The median PPS was 12.8 months (range 0.1–51.8 months), and the median overall survival was 33.7 months. Among isolated progressors, 15 received localized therapy (12 with surgery, 3 with radiation). Patients with isolated versus systemic progression exhibited a trend for improved PPS (P = 0.081), and patients with an initial PFS ≥ 15 months showed significant PPS improvement (P = 0.036). Two patients experienced subsequent responses to anti–PD-1 resumption. In conclusion, acquired resistance to anti–PD-1 was frequently associated with excellent clinical outcomes and often presented as isolated progression amenable to localized therapy (surgery or radiation) or systemic progression sensitive to therapy resumption. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(5); 357–62. ©2017 AACR.