Moscow, Jeffrey A

ABSTRACTAnetumab ravtansine, like other ADC drugs, has high inter‐patient variability in its pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) outcomes, which raises concerns about whether current dosing regimens are optimal for patients. The objective of this study was to evaluate covariates, especially body habitus and the innate immune system (IIS), which may affect anetumab ravtansine PK and PD as part of two clinical trials in patients with ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. Biomarkers of Fcγ receptors(FcγR) CD64 on IIS cells, total body weight (TBW), body surface area (BSA), and other covariates, such as sex and age, were analyzed for an association with anetumab ravtansine PK. Higher FcγR CD64, TBW, and BSA were associated with higher clearance (CL) of anetumab ravtansine (p < 0.05). However, there was no relationship between TBW or BSA and FcγR CD64. Female patients had a lower anetumab ravtansine CL (0.030 ± 0.007 L/h) compared to male patients (0.042 ± 0.006 L/h) (p < 0.05). In both studies, patients with stable disease (SD) and partial response (PR) had higher anetumab ravtansine AUC0‐inf compared to patients with progressive disease (PD). Individualizing the dose of anetumab ravtansine and potentially other ADCs based only on TBW is not optimal, whereas precision dosing of an ADC based on the inclusion of novel metrics of IIS biomarkers, body habitus, and sex may be more appropriate to reduce variability in PK exposure, reduce toxicity, and improve response.

2565 Background: Mesothelin (MSLN) is overexpressed in mesothelioma and other solid tumors making it the focus of multiple targeted therapies, including antibody drug conjugates (ADCs), T cell receptor (TCR) fusion constructs, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) products. However, the clinical efficacy of these treatments remains limited. We hypothesize that soluble MSLN (sMSLN) in the plasma binds to MSLN-targeted therapies before reaching the tumor. Our study aimed to evaluate the effects of sMSLN on a MSLN-targeting antibody, anetumab, and explore methods to reduce sMSLN. Methods: Exploratory analysis in NCT03126630: sMSLN testing was performed on blood samples from participants enrolled in NCT03126630 at the Molecular Targets Core Lab, National Cancer Institute. The median was used to categorize high and low levels of sMSLN. Survival was estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups with the log rank test. Anetumab immunoprecipitation: Anetumab was covalently coupled to Dynabeads at 5 µg per mg of beads to immunoprecipitate MSLN from two plasma samples. Assays were performed in duplicate. Therapeutics plasma exchange (TPE):Whole blood samples were collected before and after one plasma volume of TPE with albumin as the replacement fluid in patients undergoing routine TPE for various medical conditions, such as autoimmune diseases and hyperviscosity syndromes. Plasma levels of sMSLN were measured with an ELISA assay in matched pre- and post-TPE plasma samples. Results: We obtained sMSLN levels from 40 patients enrolled in NCT03126630. For patients treated with both anetumab ravtansine and pembrolizumab, median progression free survival (PFS) was shorter in the high sMSLN group (5 months) vs the low sMSLN group (12 months). For patients treated with pembrolizumab alone, PFS was similar for patients with high and low sMSLN (4 vs 3.4 months). Anetumab significantly reduced the concentration of sMSLN in plasma samples as detected by MSLN ELISA (p<0.05), demonstrating that sMSLN can bind to and sequester anetumab. Next, we evaluated TPE as a mechanism to reduce sMSLN. We obtained pre- and post-TPE plasma samples from 15 patients undergoing routine TPE for various medical conditions. TPE consistently reduced sMSLN (p<0.05) with an average decrease of 43.6% or 15.4 ng/mL. Conclusions: We found that high sMSLN levels are associated with shorter PFS for anetumab ravtansine, but not pembrolizumab. Additionally, anetumab binds to sMSLN in the plasma, which suggests that sMSLN can sequester anti-MSLN antibodies and may limit the efficacy of MSLN-targeted therapies. High levels of sMSLN could potentially be used as a biomarker to select which patients should not receive MSLN-targeting therapies. Furthermore, our results indicate that sMSLN reduction is feasible with TPE. Decreasing sMSLN could restore the activity of MSLN-targeted therapies.

Abstract Basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs (master protocols) have emerged over the last decade to study precision medicine approaches in oncology. First-generation trials like NCI-MATCH (Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice) have proven the principle that studying targeted therapies on a large scale is feasible both from the laboratory and clinical perspectives. However, single-agent targeted therapies have shown limited ability to control metastatic disease, despite careful matching of drug to target. As such, newer approaches employing combinations of targeted therapy, or targeted therapy with standard therapies, need to be considered. The NCI has recently embarked on three second-generation precision medicine trials to address this need: ComboMATCH, iMATCH, and myeloMATCH. The design of these trials and necessary infrastructure are discussed in the following perspective.

Glembatumumab vedotin (CDX-011, GV) is a fully human Immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody directed against glycoprotein NMB coupled via a peptide linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a potent cytotoxic microtubule inhibitor. This phase II study evaluated the overall response rate and safety of GV, glycoprotein NMB (GPNMB) expression, and survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Eligible patients with metastatic uveal melanoma who had not previously been treated with chemotherapy received GV 1.9 mg/kg every three weeks. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included GPNMB expression, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity analysis. GPNMB expression was assessed pre- and post-treatment via immunohistochemistry for patients with available tumor tissue. Out of 35 patients who received treatment, two patients had confirmed partial responses (PRs; 6%), and 18 patients had a stable disease (SD; 51%) as the best objective response. 38% of the patients had stable disease >100 days. The grade 3 or 4 toxicities that occurred in two or more patients were neutropenia, rash, hyponatremia, and vomiting. The median progression-free survival was 3.1 months (95% CI: 1.5–5.6), and the median overall survival was 11.9 months (95% CI 9.0–16.9) in the evaluable study population. GV is well-tolerated in metastatic uveal melanoma. The disease control rate was 57% despite a low objective response rate. Exploratory immune correlation studies are underway to provide insight into target saturation, combination strategies, and antigen release.