Chang, Eric L.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate mortality and progression outcomes in patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for breast cancer brain metastases and to identify associated risk factors using a national quality registry. METHODS The NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA) SRS Registry was employed for this study, which conducted prospective enrollment of patients undergoing SRS at 16 participating centers from 2017 to 2024. Outcomes of interest included the post-SRS EQ-5D score change, overall survival, local progression, out-of-field progression, and overall intracranial progression. For all time-to-event analyses, Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regressions with hazard ratios were used. RESULTS A total of 138 patients (127 female, mean age 59.8 years) were identified; 46.4% had a single lesion, 42.0% had 2–4 lesions, and 11.6% had ≥ 5 lesions, while 87.0% had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score between 80 and 100. The median overall survival was 17.9 months, and independent predictors of all-cause mortality included a KPS score ≤ 90 (HR 6.73) and diabetes mellitus (HR 3.35). The median time to local progression was 19.8 months. More than 5 lesions at baseline (HR 9.03) and a marginal dose ≤ 17.6 Gy (HR 8.00) were predictive of local recurrence. The median was not reached for out-of-field progression, and predictors included ≥ 2 lesions at the time of SRS (HR 3.20) and a marginal dose ≤ 17.6 Gy (HR 4.61). At the final follow-up assessment, 17.1% of patients experienced no change according to the EQ-5D, while 34.3% had improvement, 11.4% had mixed results, and 37.1% had worsened health. In the multivariable linear regression model, pre-SRS resection (r = 1.92) and baseline EQ-5D score (r = 1.29) were statistically significant predictors of quality of life at the final follow-up assessment. CONCLUSIONS Using real-world data from the NPA SRS Registry, this study demonstrated comparable outcomes in patients who underwent SRS for breast cancer brain metastases compared with those of previous literature. The number of lesions at the time of SRS and the marginal dose were independent risk factors for local recurrence, out-of-field progression, and overall intracranial progression. Pre-SRS resection and baseline EQ-5D score were independent predictors of quality of life following SRS.

OBJECTIVE The literature on non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) brain metastases (BMs) managed using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) relies mainly on single-institution studies or randomized controlled trials (RCTs). There is a literature gap on clinical and radiological outcomes of SRS for NSCLC metastases in real-world practice. The objective of this study was to benchmark mortality and progression outcomes in patients undergoing SRS for NSCLC BMs and identify risk factors for these outcomes using a national quality registry. METHODS The SRS Registry of the NeuroPoint Alliance was used for this study. This registry included patients from 16 enrolling sites who underwent SRS from 2017 to 2022. Data are prospectively collected without a prespecified research purpose. The main outcomes of this analysis were overall survival (OS), out-of-field recurrence, local progression, and intracranial progression. All time-to-event investigations included Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariable Cox regressions. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-four patients were identified, with a mean age of 66.7 years and a female proportion of 48.5%. Most patients (84.5%) had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score of 80–100, and the mean baseline EQ-5D score was 0.539 quality-adjusted life years. A single lesion was present in 53.4% of the patients, and 29.1% of patients had 3 or more lesions. The median OS was 28.1 months, and independent predictors of mortality included no control of primary tumor (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1), KPS of 80 (HR 2.4) or lower (HR 2.4), coronary artery disease (HR 2.8), and 5 or more lesions present at the time of SRS treatment (HR 2.3). The median out-of-field progression-free survival (PFS) was 24.8 months, and the median local PFS was unreached. Intralesional hemorrhage was an independent risk factor of local progression, with an HR of 6.0. The median intracranial PFS was 14.0 months and was predicted by the number of lesions at the time of SRS (3–4 lesions, HR 2.2; 5–14 lesions, HR 2.5). CONCLUSIONS In this real-world prospective study, the authors used a national quality registry and found favorable OS in patients with NSCLC BMs undergoing SRS compared with results from previously published RCTs. The intracranial PFS was mainly driven by the emergence of new lesions rather than local progression. A greater number of lesions at baseline was associated with out-of-field progression, while intralesional hemorrhage at baseline was associated with local progression.

Abstract Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454‐489.

Background: Brain metastases (BM) from differentiated thyroid cancer are rare. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is commonly used for the treatment of BMs; however, the experience with SRS for thyroid cancer BMs remains limited. The goal of this international, multi-centered study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SRS for thyroid cancer BMs. Methods: From 10 institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, we pooled patients with established papillary or follicular thyroid cancer diagnosis who underwent SRS for histologically confirmed or radiologically suspected BMs. We investigated patient overall survival (OS), local tumor control, and adverse radiation events (AREs). Results: We studied 42 (52% men) patients who underwent SRS for 122 papillary (83%) or follicular (17%) thyroid cancer BMs. The mean age at SRS was 59.86 ± 12.69 years. The mean latency from thyroid cancer diagnosis to SRS for BMs was 89.05 ± 105.49 months. The median number of BMs per patient was 2 (range: 1–10 BMs). The median SRS treatment volume was 0.79 cm 3 (range: 0.003–38.18 cm 3 ), and the median SRS prescription dose was 20 Gy (range: 8–24 Gy). The median survival after SRS for BMs was 14 months (range: 3–58 months). The OS was significantly shorter in patients harboring ≥2 BMs, when compared with patients with one BM (Log-rank = 5.452, p = 0.02). Two or more BMs (odds ratio [OR] = 3.688; confidence interval [CI]: 1.143–11.904; p = 0.03) and lower Karnofsky performance score at the time of SRS (OR = 0.807; CI: 0.689–0.945; p = 0.008) were associated with shorter OS. During post-SRS imaging follow-up of 25.21 ± 30.49 months, local failure (progression and/or radiation necrosis) of BMs treated with SRS was documented in five (4%) BMs at 7.2 ± 7.3 months after the SRS. At the last imaging follow-up, the majority of patients with available imaging data had stable intracranial disease (33%) or achieved complete (26%) or partial (24%) response. There were no clinical AREs. Post-SRS peritumoral T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery signal hyperintensity was noted in 7% BMs. Conclusion: The SRS allows durable local control of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer BMs in the vast majority of patients. Higher number of BMs and worse functional status at the time of SRS are associated with shorter OS in patients with thyroid cancer BMs. The SRS is safe and is associated with a low risk of AREs.

OBJECTIVE Radiation-induced meningiomas (RIMs) are associated with aggressive clinical behavior. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is sometimes considered for selected RIMs. The authors investigated the effectiveness and safety of SRS for the management of RIMs. METHODS From 12 institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, the authors pooled patients who had prior cranial irradiation and were subsequently clinically diagnosed with WHO grade I meningiomas that were managed with SRS. RESULTS Fifty-two patients underwent 60 SRS procedures for histologically confirmed or radiologically suspected WHO grade I RIMs. The median ages at initial cranial radiation therapy and SRS for RIM were 5.5 years and 39 years, respectively. The most common reasons for cranial radiation therapy were leukemia (21%) and medulloblastoma (17%). There were 39 multiple RIMs (35%), the mean target volume was 8.61 ± 7.80 cm 3 , and the median prescription dose was 14 Gy. The median imaging follow-up duration was 48 months (range 4–195 months). RIM progressed in 9 patients (17%) at a median duration of 30 months (range 3–45 months) after SRS. Progression-free survival at 5 years post-SRS was 83%. Treatment volume ≥ 5 cm 3 predicted progression (HR 8.226, 95% CI 1.028–65.857, p = 0.047). Seven patients (14%) developed new neurological symptoms or experienced SRS-related complications or T2 signal change from 1 to 72 months after SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS is associated with durable local control of RIMs in the majority of patients and has an acceptable safety profile. SRS can be considered for patients and tumors that are deemed suboptimal, poor surgical candidates, and those whose tumor again progresses after removal.

Abstract Primary spinal cord tumors represent a hetereogeneous group of central nervous system malignancies whose management is complex given the relatively uncommon nature of the disease and variety of tumor subtypes, functional neurologic deficits from the tumor, and potential morbidities associated with definitive treatment. Advances in neuroimaging; integration of diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive molecular testing into tumor classification; and developments in neurosurgical techniques have refined the current role of radiotherapy in the multimodal management of patients with primary spinal cord tumors, and corroborated the need for prospective, multidisciplinary discussion and treatment decision making. Radiotherapeutic technological advances have dramatically improved the entire continuum from treatment planning to treatment delivery, and the development of stereotactic radiosurgery and proton radiotherapy provides new radiotherapy options for patients treated in the definitive, adjuvant, or salvage setting. The objective of this comprehensive review is to provide a contemporary overview of the management of primary intradural spinal cord tumors, with a focus on radiotherapy.

Abstract Stereotactic Radiosurgery ( SRS ) is considered standard of care for patients with 1–3 brain metastases ( BM ). Recent observational studies have shown equivalent OS in patients with 5+ BM compared to those with 2–4, suggesting SRS alone may be appropriate in these patients. We aim to review outcomes of patients treated with SRS with 2–4 versus 5+ BM . This analysis included consecutive patients from 1994 to 2015 treated with SRS . Of 1017 patients, we excluded patients with a single BM and patients without adequate survival data, resulting in 391 patients. All risk factors were entered into univariate analysis using Cox proportional hazards model, and significant factors were entered into multivariate analysis ( MVA ). We additionally analyzed outcomes after excluding patients with prior surgery or whole‐brain radiotherapy ( WBRT ). Median follow‐up was 7.1 months. Median KPS was 90, mean age was 59, and most common histologies were melanoma and lung. Median tumor volume was 3.41 cc. Patients with 2–4 BM had a median OS of 8.1 months compared to 6.2 months for those with 5+ BM ( P = 0.0136). On MVA , tumor volume, KPS , and histology remained significant for OS , whereas lesion number did not. Similar results were found when excluding patients with prior surgery or WBRT . Rather than lesion number, the strongest prognostic factors for patients undergoing SRS were tumor volume >10 cc, KPS , and histology. BM number may therefore not be the most important criterion for candidacy for SRS . Patients with 5 or more BM should be considered for SRS .

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to identify regions of spinal column in which more than three contiguous vertebrae can be reliably and quickly aligned within 1 mm using a 6‐degree (6D) couch and full body immobilization device. We analyzed 45 cases treated over a 3‐month period. Each case was aligned using ExacTrac x‐ray positioning system with integrated 6D couch to be within 1° and 1 mm in all six dimensions. Cone‐Beam computed tomography (CBCT) with at least 17.5 cm field of view (FOV) in the superior–inferior direction was taken immediately after ExacTrac positioning. It was used to examine the residual error of five to nine contiguous vertebrae visible in the FOV. The residual error of each vertebra was determined by expanding/contracting the vertebrae contour with a margin in millimeter integrals on the planning CT such that the new contours would enclose the corresponding vertebrae contour on CBCT. Submillimeter initial setup accuracy was consistently achieved in 98% (40/41) cases for a span of five or more vertebrae starting from T2 vertebra and extending caudally to S5. The curvature of spinal column along the cervical region and cervicothoracic junction was not easily reproducible between treatment and simulation. Fifty‐seven percent (8/14) of cases in this region had residual setup error of more than 1 mm in nearby vertebrae after alignment using 6D couch with image guidance. In conclusion, 6D couch integrated with image guidance is convenient and accurately corrects small rotational shifts. Consequently, more than three contiguous vertebrae can be aligned within 1 mm with immobilization that reliably reproduces the curvature of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column. Ability of accurate setup is becoming less a concern in limiting the use of stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy to treat multilevel spinal target.

Abstract Metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC) is an oncologic emergency and if left untreated, permanent paralysis will ensue. The treatment of MESCC is governed by disease, patient, and treatment factors. Patient's preferences and goals of care are to be weighed into the treatment plan. Ideally, a patient with MESCC is evaluated by an interdisciplinary team promptly to determine the urgency of the clinical scenario. Treatment recommendations must take into consideration the risk-benefit profiles of surgical intervention and radiotherapy for the particular individual's circumstance, including neurologic status, performance status, extent of epidural disease, stability of the spine, extra-spinal disease status, and life expectancy. In patients with high spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS) or retropulsion of bone fragments in the spinal canal, surgical intervention should be strongly considered. The rate of development of motor deficits from spinal cord compression may be a prognostic factor for ultimate functional outcome, and should be taken into account when a treatment recommendation is made. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every three years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.