Chao, Samuel T.

Abstract BACKGROUND Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumour progression after radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM) remains clinically challenging, and accurate imaging is crucial to prevent unnecessary surgery or unwarranted changes in therapy. 18F-Fluciclovine is a PET radiopharmaceutical with low background uptake in the brain and increased uptake in BM. The PURSUE study (NCT04410367) aimed to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for detecting suspected recurrent BM after RT using 18F-fluciclovine PET, based on several measures of lesion uptake. MATERIAL AND METHODS Across 7 US sites, 23 patients with solid tumour BM and a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal for recurrence on MRI who were scheduled for craniotomy underwent 18F-fluciclovine PET (185 MBq) <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. Three independent, blinded readers qualitatively rated lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid gland), or ‘marked’ (above parotid gland). The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance of different thresholds of lesion uptake on qualitative (visual) reads vs central histopathology. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic performance, based on different thresholds, of quantitative (e.g., lesion standardized uptake value [SUV]), and dynamic measures. A committee, including two independent imaging physicians, reviewed all data to establish the IIC, which were subsequently used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine. RESULTS All 23 reference lesions underwent histopathological analysis, with 10 (43%) being pathologically confirmed BM recurrence. The highest performing qualitative measure of 18F-fluciclovine lesion uptake was ‘marked’, rendering 92-100% and variable (40-80%) across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8, 80% sensitivity, 85% specificity). Dynamic measures did not add diagnostic value. Thus, the committee established IIC as: "Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of a SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely." Application of these IIC resulted in 80% sensitivity, 77-85% specificity, 73-80% positive predictive value, and 83-85% negative predictive value across readers. CONCLUSION PURSUE is the first prospective, multicentre study to define IIC for 18F-fluciclovine PET for accurate identification of suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. In this initial cohort, the IIC convey excellent diagnostic performance for 18F-fluciclovine and will help evaluate 18F-fluciclovine PET in future studies. This study was sponsored by Blue Earth Diagnostics Ltd.

Abstract BACKGROUND After radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM), differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor recurrence remains challenging. PURSUE (NCT04410367) evaluated various measures of lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for 18F-fluciclovine-PET to accurately diagnose recurrent BM. METHODS Patients with solid tumor BM and a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal for recurrence on MRI who were scheduled for craniotomy underwent 18F-fluciclovine-PET (185 MBq) <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. Lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake was qualitatively rated as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid gland), or ‘marked’ (above parotid gland) by three independent blinded readers. The primary endpoint was diagnostic performance of different uptake thresholds on qualitative reads vs central histopathology. Secondary endpoints included diagnostic performance, based on different thresholds, of quantitative (e.g., lesion standardized uptake value [SUV]) and dynamic measures. IIC were determined by committee and subsequently used to assess the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine. RESULTS All 23 reference lesions from 23 enrolled patients underwent histopathological analysis; 10 (43%) were pathologically-confirmed BM recurrence. The highest performing qualitative measure was ‘marked’, rendering 92-100% sensitivity and 40-80% specificity across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8, 80% sensitivity, 85% specificity). Dynamic measures did not add diagnostic value. Thus, IIC was established as: “Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely.” Application of the IIC resulted in 80% sensitivity, 77-85% specificity, 73-80% PPV, and 83-85% NPV across the readers. CONCLUSIONS PURSUE is the first prospective, multicenter trial to establish IIC for 18F-fluciclovine-PET for suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. Finalized IIC demonstrated excellent diagnostic performance for 18F-fluciclovine and will help evaluate 18F-fluciclovine-PET in future studies.

2001 Background: Differentiating radiation necrosis from tumor progression remains one of the most commonly encountered and clinically challenging scenarios after radiation therapy (RT) for brain metastases (BM). PURSUE (NCT04410367) evaluated the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine, an amino acid PET radiopharmaceutical, based on various lesion metrics, to establish image interpretation criteria (IIC) for suspected recurrent BM after RT. Methods: Patients with solid tumor BM were enrolled across 7 US sites if they had a previously irradiated ‘reference’ lesion equivocal on MRI for recurrence and were planned for craniotomy. 18F-Fluciclovine PET (185 MBq) took place <42 days post-MRI and 1-21 days pre-craniotomy. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity, positive-, and negative-predictive value [PPV/NPV]) of different thresholds of lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake on qualitative, visual reads vs central histopathological analysis. Lesion 18F-fluciclovine uptake was assessed qualitatively by 3 independent blinded readers who visually rated the uptake as ‘mild’ (up to blood pool), ‘moderate’ (above blood pool to parotid), or ‘marked’ (above parotid). Secondary endpoints included the diagnostic performance based on different thresholds of quantitative (e.g., lesion SUV) and dynamic measures of uptake. A committee, including 2 expert imaging physicians independent to PURSUE, reviewed all data in round-table meetings to establish the IIC, which were subsequently used to assess diagnostic performance. Results: All 23 reference lesions in 23 subjects underwent histopathological analysis, with 10 (43%) confirmed as recurrent tumor. The highest performing qualitative measure was ‘marked’, rendering a sensitivity of 92-100%, with variable specificity of 40-80% across readers. SUVmax was a reader-independent, high-performing quantitative metric on ROC analysis (AUC 0.87, SUVmax threshold 4.8 conferring a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 85%). Dynamic measures did not provide added diagnostic value. After analyzing these metrics, the committee established IIC as: Lesions with 18F-fluciclovine uptake of a SUVmax equal to or greater than 4.8, or visually greater than the parotid gland, should be considered suspicious for recurrence. Otherwise, recurrence should be considered unlikely. Application of the IIC resulted in a sensitivity of 80%, specificity of 77-85%, PPV of 73-80%, and NPV of 83-85% across the readers. Conclusions: This is the first prospective multicenter trial to evaluate PET characteristics of suspected recurrent BM after RT, verified by histopathology. Qualitative and quantitative IIC show 18F-fluciclovine to be a high-performing diagnostic tool. These IIC will help evaluate the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET in future trials. Clinical trial information: NCT04410367 .

The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of the following adult CNS cancers: glioma (WHO grade 1, WHO grade 2–3 oligodendroglioma [1p19q codeleted, IDH- mutant], WHO grade 2–4 IDH- mutant astrocytoma, WHO grade 4 glioblastoma), intracranial and spinal ependymomas, medulloblastoma, limited and extensive brain metastases, leptomeningeal metastases, non–AIDS-related primary CNS lymphomas, metastatic spine tumors, meningiomas, and primary spinal cord tumors. The information contained in the algorithms and principles of management sections in the NCCN Guidelines for CNS Cancers are designed to help clinicians navigate through the complex management of patients with CNS tumors. Several important principles guide surgical management and treatment with radiotherapy and systemic therapy for adults with brain tumors. The NCCN CNS Cancers Panel meets at least annually to review comments from reviewers within their institutions, examine relevant new data from publications and abstracts, and reevaluate and update their recommendations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights summarize the panel’s most recent recommendations regarding molecular profiling of gliomas.

Abstract PURPOSE To compare outcomes of adults with high-risk grade II oligodendroglioma treated with adjuvant radiotherapy plus adjunctive TMZ versus PCV. METHODS We queried a multi-institutional database from the Cleveland Clinic and Mayo Clinic of 158 adults with WHO grade II glioma who were high-risk (age > 40 and/or subtotal-resection [STR]) and underwent adjuvant chemoradiation (TMZ or PCV) between 1997–2017. We included patients with oligodendroglioma by 1p/19q-codeletion or traditional histopathology. Fisher’s exact test was used to associate factors with chemotherapy group. The log-rank test was used to compare OS and PFS by chemotherapy group and clinical characteristics. RESULTS 52 patients were included with a median follow-up of 44 months (range, 3–259). Median age was 44 (range, 22–73), 49 (94%) underwent STR, and 28 (54%) were male. Presenting symptoms were seizure in 35 (67%) patients, sensory in 14 (27%), and motor in 8 (15%). Oligodendroglioma classification was by 1p/19q-codeletion in 27 (52%) and traditional histopathology in 25 (48%) patients. Median radiation dose was 54 Gy (range, 45–60). Chemotherapy was TMZ in 34 (65%) patients and PCV in 18 (35%). Patients who were older (P=0.003), lacked seizures (P=0.03), or had motor symptoms (P=0.04) were more likely to receive TMZ. Median OS was 223 months (95% CI, 181-not estimable) and median PFS was 118 months (95% CI, 69–223). Treatment with TMZ versus PCV was not associated with OS (median 186 vs. 223 months, respectively; P=0.71) or PFS (median 110 vs. 131 months, respectively; P=0.19). Age >40 (P=0.009) and motor symptoms (P=0.027) were associated with adverse OS. Presence of motor symptoms was associated with worse PFS (P=0.008). CONCLUSION There was no statistically significant difference in OS or PFS between adjunctive TMZ versus PCV for adult high-risk grade II oligodendroglioma. A larger cohort with longer follow-up will provide additional insight.

Abstract PURPOSE: RTOG 0933 demonstrated benefits to memory following HA-WBRT, supporting the hypothesis of hippocampal radiosensitivity and associated memory specificity. However, some patients demonstrated cognitive decline, suggesting mechanisms outside hippocampal radiosensitivity playing a role. WMI has been implicated in RT-induced cognitive decline. This secondary analysis explored the relationship between pre-treatment WMI and memory following HA-WBRT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: 113 patients received HA-WBRT. Standardized cognitive assessments were performed at baseline, 2, 4, and 6 months. The primary endpoint was Hopkins Verbal Learning Test Delayed Recall (HVLT-DR) at 4 mos. Secondary endpoints included HVLT Total Recall (HVLT-TR) and Recognition (HVLT-Recog). Of 113 patients, 34 underwent pre-treatment and 4-month post-treatment HVLT testing and pre-treatment post-contrast volumetric T1 and axial T2/FLAIR MRI. Volumetric analysis of metastatic disease burden and disease-unrelated WMI was conducted on the pre-treatment MRI. Correlational analyses were performed examining the relationship between pre-treatment WMI and HVLT outcomes following HA-WBRT. RESULTS: Correlation was found between larger volumes of pre-treatment WMI and decline in HVLT-Recog (r=.54, p&lt; .05) and a correlational trend was observed between larger volume of pre-treatment WMI and decline in HVLT-DR (r=.31, p=.08). Patients with higher pre-treatment disease burden experienced a greater magnitude of stability or positive shift in HVLT-recall and –delayed recall following HA-WBRT. (r=-.36 and r=-.36, p’s &lt; .05), compared to the magnitude of stability/positive shift in those with lesser disease burden. CONCLUSION: In patients receiving HA-WBRT, pre-treatment-WMI predicts memory decline, suggesting white matter integrity pre-treatment contributes to the pathogenesis of post-WBRT cognitive toxicity independent of hippocampal stem cell radiosensitivity. Less decline or improvement in HVLT following HA-WBRT for patients with higher pre-treatment intracranial metastatic burden supports the importance of WBRT-induced intracranial control on cognition. These imaging biomarkers for cognitive toxicity will be further explored on NRG CC001 and CC003, phase III trials of WBRT with or without HA.

Abstract BACKGROUND The influence of subtotal resection (STR) on neurocognitive function (NCF), quality of life, and symptom burden in glioblastoma is unknown. If bevacizumab preferentially benefits patients with STR is unknown. OBJECTIVE To examine these uncertainties. METHODS NCF and patient reported outcomes (PRO) were prospectively collected in NRG Oncology RTOG 0525 and 0825. Changes in NCF and PRO measures from baseline to prespecified times were examined by Wilcoxon test, and mixed effects longitudinal modeling, to assess differences between patients who received STR vs gross-total resection. Changes were also compared among STR patients on 0825 receiving placebo vs bevacizumab to assess for a preferential therapeutic effect. Overall survival between STR and gross-total resection patients was compared using the Kaplan–Meier method. RESULTS A total of 427 patients were eligible with STR present in 37%. At baseline, patients with STR had worse NCF, worse MD Anderson Symptom Inventory Brain Tumor Neurological Factor ratings ( P = .004), and European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire ( P = .002). Longitudinal multivariate analysis associated STR with worse NCF (Hopkins Verbal Learning Test–Revised Delayed Recognition [ P = .048], Trail Making Test Part A [ P = .035], and Controlled Oral Word Association [ P = .049]). One hundred eighty-three STR patients from 0825 were analyzed (89 bevacizumab, 94 placebo); bevacizumab failed to demonstrate improvement in select NCF or PRO measures. CONCLUSION STR patients had worse NCF and PROs before therapy. During adjuvant therapy, STR patients had worse objective NCF, despite accounting for tumor location. STR did not result in a detriment to OS. The addition of bevacizumab did not preferentially improve PRO or NCF outcomes in STR patients.

AbstractThe Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group consists of medical and radiation oncologists, surgeons, and interventional radiologists from multiple comprehensive cancer centers who have developed evidence- and expert opinion-based algorithms for managing metastatic spine disease. The purpose of these algorithms is to facilitate interdisciplinary referrals by providing physicians with straightforward recommendations regarding the use of available treatment options, including emerging modalities such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and percutaneous tumor ablation. This consensus document details the evidence supporting the Working Group algorithms and includes illustrative cases to demonstrate how the algorithms may be applied.Implications for Practice:The Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group algorithms can facilitate interdisciplinary referrals by providing physicians with straightforward recommendations regarding available treatment options, including emerging modalities such as stereotactic body radiation therapy and percutaneous tumor ablation.