Michalopoulos, Giorgos D.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) for patient-reported outcome metrics (PROMs) in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) lack consensus on the most appropriate calculation method. This retrospective study aimed to identify the optimal MCIDs for commonly used PROMs in CSM. METHODS: The CSM database from the Quality Outcomes Database SpineCORe Study Group was analyzed. Baseline, 3-month, and 24-month PROM values for Neck Disability Index (NDI), 5-dimension Euro-quality of life (EQ-5D) in quality-adjusted life years, modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, and neck/arm pain numeric rating scale (NRS) were collected. MCIDs were calculated for each PROM using previously validated techniques. MCID values were compared using the area under the curve (AUC) with the North American Spine Society satisfaction scale as an anchor. RESULTS: A total of 1141 patients with CSM undergoing surgery were included in this analysis. Improvement of ≥30% from baseline was the optimal MCID for NDI and neck/arm NRS. At 24 months, the optimal percentage cutoff MCID for these instruments resulted in AUCs of 0.76, 0.72, and 0.67, similar to the 30% improvement method, with AUCs of 0.73, 0.71, and 0.67, respectively. Numeric cutoffs (0.065 at 3 months; 0.149 at 24 months) were the superior MCIDs for EQ-5D. For mJOA score, a severity-adjusted MCID outperformed other methods, yielding an AUC of 0.67 at 24 months. MCIDs were achieved in 63% of patients for NDI, 59% for neck pain NRS, 61% for arm pain NRS, 52% for EQ-5D, and 59% for mJOA score at 24 months. CONCLUSION: Using the Quality Outcomes Database SpineCORe data set, we defined optimal MCIDs for key PROMs in CSM. A ≥30% improvement from baseline was optimal in NDI and arm/neck NRS. An absolute numeric cutoff was superior for EQ-5D (0.149 at the 24-month follow-up). A severity-adjusted MCID performed best for mJOA score. These redefined benchmarks better capture the treatment impact and guide care decisions for patients with CSM.

OBJECTIVE Isthmic spondylolisthesis impacts up to 11.5% of the general population. For patients who have failed conservative therapy, decompression and fusion or decompression alone are options for surgical management. However, there remains debate as to whether reduction of mobile spondylolisthesis is integral to good patient outcomes. The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to address this by comparing clinical and radiological outcomes between patients treated with fusion in situ and those undergoing fusion with reduction of isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS The Scopus, EMBASE, Medline, and Cochrane databases were systematically queried on the basis of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies comparing treatment outcomes in patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis after in situ fusion or fusion with spondylolisthesis reduction. Endpoints of interest included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, hospitalization duration, operative morbidity, and rates of surgical revision. Data from individual studies were aggregated using random-effects models to assess combined effects. RESULTS Of 277 identified studies, 7 studies were included with an aggregate 308 patients (143 underwent fusion in situ and 165 underwent reduction). Patients who underwent reduction for isthmic lumbar spondylolisthesis had significantly lower rates of pseudarthrosis at last follow-up (OR 0.22, p = 0.03). Estimated blood loss, operative time, hospitalization duration, change in ODI score, change in back pain (visual analog scale [VAS]), and reoperation rate did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS For patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis, the present data suggest that fusion with reduction of spondylolisthesis may lower rates of pseudarthrosis as compared to in situ fusion. However, operative morbidity and improvement in patient-reported outcomes were similar between strategies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) can occur in the absence of easily identifiable osseoligamentous abnormalities, such as fractures and dislocations. The role of surgery in the management of this condition remains to be elucidated. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify studies investigating outcomes after surgical management of cervical SCI without fracture and dislocation. Random-effects model meta-analysis was performed, with neurological improvement and time to surgery as primary end points. Subgroup analysis by time to surgery was performed to assess neurological improvement between patients undergoing surgery within 72 hours of injury vs later than 72 hours after injury. RESULTS: A total of 16 studies yielding 398 surgically treated patients with this condition were analyzed. The mean age at the time of injury was 52 ± 33.8 years, and male patients comprised 86.4% (95% CI: 76.6%-94.4%). The mean number of spinal cord segments affected was 2.5 ± 4. Injury was most commonly inflicted by falls (58.4%, 95% CI: 46.6%-69.9%), followed by motor vehicle accidents (30.5%, 95% CI: 23.4%-38%). Preoperatively, abnormal magnetic resonance imaging findings were observed in 125 patients (31.4%), and included: Intervertebral disk injury in 33 patients (26.4%); Cord edema in 23 patients (18.4%); Cord contusion in 22 patients (17.6%); Ligamentous injury in 6 patients (4.8%); and MRI abnormalities not specified in 41 patients (32.8%). Postoperatively, neurological improvement was noted in 62% (95% CI: 21.4%-95.2%) of patients who underwent surgery within 72 hours after injury, and in 71.1% (95% CI: 33%-98.1%) of the patients who underwent surgery later than 72 hours after injury ( P = .8). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrated high rates of neurological improvement in patients treated surgically for cervical SCI without fracture and dislocation. No significant differences were noted between patients undergoing surgery acutely, within 72 hours after injury, and patients being treated surgically later in the course of cervical SCI without fracture and dislocation.

OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to evaluate mortality and progression outcomes in patients undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for breast cancer brain metastases and to identify associated risk factors using a national quality registry. METHODS The NeuroPoint Alliance (NPA) SRS Registry was employed for this study, which conducted prospective enrollment of patients undergoing SRS at 16 participating centers from 2017 to 2024. Outcomes of interest included the post-SRS EQ-5D score change, overall survival, local progression, out-of-field progression, and overall intracranial progression. For all time-to-event analyses, Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regressions with hazard ratios were used. RESULTS A total of 138 patients (127 female, mean age 59.8 years) were identified; 46.4% had a single lesion, 42.0% had 2–4 lesions, and 11.6% had ≥ 5 lesions, while 87.0% had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score between 80 and 100. The median overall survival was 17.9 months, and independent predictors of all-cause mortality included a KPS score ≤ 90 (HR 6.73) and diabetes mellitus (HR 3.35). The median time to local progression was 19.8 months. More than 5 lesions at baseline (HR 9.03) and a marginal dose ≤ 17.6 Gy (HR 8.00) were predictive of local recurrence. The median was not reached for out-of-field progression, and predictors included ≥ 2 lesions at the time of SRS (HR 3.20) and a marginal dose ≤ 17.6 Gy (HR 4.61). At the final follow-up assessment, 17.1% of patients experienced no change according to the EQ-5D, while 34.3% had improvement, 11.4% had mixed results, and 37.1% had worsened health. In the multivariable linear regression model, pre-SRS resection (r = 1.92) and baseline EQ-5D score (r = 1.29) were statistically significant predictors of quality of life at the final follow-up assessment. CONCLUSIONS Using real-world data from the NPA SRS Registry, this study demonstrated comparable outcomes in patients who underwent SRS for breast cancer brain metastases compared with those of previous literature. The number of lesions at the time of SRS and the marginal dose were independent risk factors for local recurrence, out-of-field progression, and overall intracranial progression. Pre-SRS resection and baseline EQ-5D score were independent predictors of quality of life following SRS.

OBJECTIVE Previous research suggests elective surgical procedures performed later in the week have worse outcomes. This study investigated whether the day of the week on which elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery was performed impacts clinical outcomes. METHODS Using data from the Quality Outcomes Database, a nationwide, multicenter prospective registry, this study included patients undergoing elective ACDF for cervical spondylosis. Patients were categorized into groups based on the surgery day (early week, Monday and Tuesday; late week, Thursday and Friday). Analyzed outcomes included postoperative complications, readmissions, reoperations, and patient-reported outcomes. Statistical methods included the independent t-test, Pearson’s chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS The study analyzed 19,818 patients, with 41.7% undergoing surgery early in the week and 36.9% later. There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality, readmissions, or reoperations between the two groups. Early-week surgical procedures were associated with a higher incidence of postoperative dysphagia requiring nasogastric tubes (0.6% vs 0.3%, p = 0.02) and a higher incidence of vocal cord paralysis (0.5% vs 0.3%, p = 0.01). The data indicate a surgical selection bias with more complex surgical procedures and higher risk patients typically scheduled earlier in the week, which likely contributed to the increased rates of dysphagia. Conversely, patients who underwent operations on Fridays were more likely to be discharged on the same day compared to those earlier in the week (p = 0.02), without a significant difference in length of stay overall. Surgical procedures performed later in the week were more likely to be performed at ambulatory surgical centers rather than inpatient facilities (p < 0.01), indicating a strategic selection of healthier patients for end-of-week procedures. CONCLUSIONS The day of elective ACDF surgery does not affect mortality, readmissions, or reoperation rates. However, early-week surgical procedures may see slightly higher rates of postoperative dysphagia and vocal cord paralysis, likely due to the scheduling of more complex cases or higher risk patients during these days. Overall, the authors’ data confirm that day of surgery does not influence overall patient recovery significantly. This information is useful for surgical planning and for providing patient reassurance that the day of the week does not significantly impact surgical outcomes.

Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective The impact of paraspinal sarcopenia following fusions that extend to the upper thoracic spine remain unknown. The purpose of the present study was to assess the impact of sarcopenia on the development of PJK and PJF following spine fusion surgery from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis. Methods We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent spine fusion surgery that extended caudally to the pelvis and terminated cranially between T1-6. The cohort was divided into 2 groups: (1) patients without PJK or PJF and (2) patients with PJK and/or PJF. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine risk factors for the development of proximal junctional complications. Results We identified 81 patients for inclusion in this study. Mean HU at the UIV was 186.1 ± 47.5 in the cohort of patients without PJK or PJF, which was substantially higher than values recorded in the PJK/PJF subgroup (142.4 ± 40.2) ( P < 0.001). Severe multifidus sarcopenia was identified at a higher rate in the subgroup of patients who developed proximal junction pathology (66.7%) than in the subgroup of patients who developed neither PJK nor PJF (7.4%; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated both low HU at the UIV and moderate-severe multifidus sarcopenia to be risk factors for the development of PJK and PJF. Conclusions Severe paraspinal sarcopenia and diminished bone density at the UIV impart an increased risk of developing PJK and PJF in following thoracolumbar fusions from the upper thoracic spine to the pelvis.

OBJECTIVE Deficiency in patient education has been correlated with increased disease-related morbidity and decreased access to care. However, the associations between educational level, preoperative disease severity, and postoperative outcomes in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis have yet to be explored. METHODS The spondylolisthesis dataset of the Quality Outcomes Database (QOD)—a cohort with prospectively collected data by the SpineCORe study team of the 12 highest enrolling sites with an 81% follow-up at 5 years —was utilized and stratified for educational level. Patients were classified into three categories (high school or less, graduate, or postgraduate). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) documented at baseline and follow-up included Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, EQ-5D in quality-adjusted life years, and numeric rating scale (NRS) scores for back and leg pain. Disease severity was measured with PROMs. Postoperatively, patients also completed the North American Spine Society assessment to measure their satisfaction with surgery. Multivariable regression analysis was used to compare education level with disease severity and postoperative outcomes. RESULTS A total of 608 patients underwent analysis, with 260 individuals (42.8%) at an educational level of high school or less. On univariate analysis, baseline disease severity was worse among patients with lower levels of education. On multivariable regression analysis, patients with postgraduate level of education had significantly lower ODI scores (β = −3.75, 95% CI −7.31 to −0.2, p = 0.039) compared to graduates, while the other PROMs were not associated with significant differences at baseline. Five years postoperatively, patients from various educational backgrounds exhibited similar rates of minimal clinically important differences in PROMs. Nevertheless, patients with the lowest educational level had higher ODI scores (27.1, p < 0.01), lower EQ-5D scores (0.701, p < 0.01), and higher NRS leg pain (3.0, p < 0.01) and back pain (4.0, p < 0.01) scores compared to those with graduate or postgraduate levels of education. The odds for postoperative satisfaction were also comparable between cohorts at 5 years (reference, graduate level; high school or less, OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.46–1.64, p = 0.659; postgraduate, OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7–3.65, p = 0.262). CONCLUSIONS Lower patient education level was associated with a greater baseline disease severity in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Surgery demonstrated similar benefits irrespective of educational background; however, individuals with lower educational level reported lower outcomes overall. This emphasizes the need for enhanced health literacy to mitigate disparities for reported outcomes.