May, Jaromír

Abstract BACKGROUND Ovarian cancer rarely metastasises to the brain, thus studies reporting the outcomes of affected patients are lacking. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is now the mainstay of management for patients with brain metastases (BM) from most primary sites, but little evidence of its efficacy in ovarian cancer is available. The current study was undertaken to provide guidance for SRS management using pooled data from multiple institutions. MATERIAL AND METHODS Centers participating in the IRRF (International Radiosurgery Research Foundation) were asked to provide outcome data for patients who had SRS for ovarian cancer brain metastases between 2020 and 2024 and at least one clinical and imaging follow-up after the procedure. Primary endpoints included survival from SRS, local tumor response according to RANO-BM criteria and occurrence of adverse radiation effects (ARE). Cox regression analyses were performed to identify variables impact each endpoint. RESULTS 128 patients had SRS for a total of 532 BM treated. Epithelial histology was the most common (91%). Median age at SRS was 62 years (IQR 56-70). Median KPS was 80% (IQR 80-90%) and 71.9% of patients had neurological symptoms at presentation. Other active systemic metastases were present in 41.4%. The median number of treated BM was 2 (IQR1-3) and the median cumulative treatment volume was 6 cc (IQR 2-12.9). The median margin dose was 18 Gy (IQR 16-20). At last follow-up, 19.5% of patients were still alive. The median overall survival (OS) after SRS was 27 months, and 6-, 12- and 24-month OS was 83.8%, 74.2% and 52.2%, respectively. Multivariate analyses revealed that increasing age at SRS (HR 1.02, p=0.05), active systemic metastases (HR 2, p=0.005) and increasing number of brain metastases (HR 1.05, p=0.04) were associated with worse survival, while repeating SRS (HR 0.4, p=0.002) led to improved survival. Local failure occurred in 12.8% of treated BM. Actuarial progression-free survival (PFS) at 6, 12 and 24 months was 92.3%, 86.6% and 70.3%, respectively. Only prior WBRT (HR 4.36, p=0.03) led to worse local control on multivariate analyses. New remote BM appeared in 49.5% of patients and 14.5% suffered from leptomeningeal dissemination. ARE were seen in 12.1% of BM but were symptomatic in only 3.2%. On multivariate analyses, prior SRS (HR 3.13, p=0.002) was associated with increased risk of ARE. CONCLUSION Ovarian cancer brain metastases can be safely and effectively managed with SRS as the primary treatment modality in most patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Gynecological cancers represent 10% to 15% of cancers in women, but brain metastases (BM) are uncommon, with limited evidence regarding their management. This study investigates the role of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for BM from primary gynecological cancers. METHODS: Institutions of the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation participated in this study. Inclusion criteria required histological diagnosis of epithelial ovarian, cervical, or endometrial cancer, SRS between 2000 and 2020, and at least 1 imaging or clinical follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 276 patients having SRS for 977 BM were included. Median age at SRS was 62 years (IQR, 55-70). Primary cancer origin was ovarian in 128 (46%), cervical in 43 (16%), and endometrial in 105 patients (38%). Median Karnofsky Performance Scale was 80%, and systemic disease was active in 124 (45%) of patients. A median of 1 metastasis was treated (IQR, 1-3) per patient. Median individual metastasis volume was 0.27 cc (IQR, 0.05-1.59 cc). The majority (91%) received single-fraction SRS, using a median margin dose of 18 Gy (IQR, 16-20 Gy). Actuarial overall survival was 77%, 65%, and 44% at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. Predictors of worsened survival included older age, cervical and endometrial primary, previous whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT), active systemic disease, worsened Karnofsky Performance Scale, absence of subsequent surgery, and increasing number of BM. Actuarial local control was 94% at 6 months, 89% at 12 months, and 78% at 24 months. Previous SRS or WBRT, tumor bed treatment, and cervical histology increased the risk of local failure. New remote BM and leptomeningeal dissemination occurred in 44% and 11% of patients, respectively. Adverse radiation effects (ARE) occurred in 13% of cases but were symptomatic in only 3%. Previous WBRT or SRS and increased tumor diameter increased the risk of ARE. CONCLUSION: SRS is an effective management for BM from gynecological cancers with low risks of symptomatic ARE.

Background Given the low haemorrhagic risk of intracranial low-grade dural arteriovenous fistulas (dAVFs), the benefits of routine intervention remain controversial. This study compares patient outcomes treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) versus conservative management. Method Multicentre retrospective analysis of the Consortium for Dural Arteriovenous Fistula Outcomes Research and the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation data. Inclusion criteria were (1) intracranial low-grade dAVF diagnosed by catheter-based angiography, (2) no prior dAVF-related haemorrhage and (3) management with upfront SRS (intervention group) or conservative management (observation group). The primary outcome was symptomatic improvement. Secondary outcomes included dAVF obliteration, up-conversion, haemorrhage, improvement and favourable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at follow-up. Results 304 patients with a mean age of 56 years (SD 13.5) and a follow-up of 46.7 months (SD 45.5) were included. 135 (44.4%) were managed conservatively and 169 (55.6%) had upfront SRS. Compared with the observation group, symptomatic and mRS Score improvement (≥1-point decrease in baseline score) was more likely in the intervention group (95.1% vs 58.5%; OR=13.75 (5.61–33.69) and 37.0% vs 24.0%; OR=1.85 (1.09–3.15), respectively). These findings remained significant after multiple imputation and propensity score matching. Remaining outcomes were similar between groups. The all-cause mortality rate was 5.4% (n=16), unrelated to the dAVF or treatment. Five (3.0%) SRS-related complications were reported and resolved during the follow-up period. Conclusions SRS was associated with increased symptomatic and mRS Score improvement for low-grade dAVFs compared with conservative management. SRS had a low complication risk and did not appear to alter dAVF obliteration or haemorrhage. Future prospective trials on SRS as a first-line intervention for symptomatic low-grade dAVFs should be considered.

OBJECTIVE The objective of this study was to develop a deep learning model for automated pituitary adenoma segmentation in MRI scans for stereotactic radiosurgery planning and to assess its accuracy and efficiency in clinical settings. METHODS An nnU-Net–based model was trained on MRI scans with expert segmentations of 582 patients treated with Leksell Gamma Knife over the course of 12 years. The accuracy of the model was evaluated by a human expert on a separate dataset of 146 previously unseen patients. The primary outcome was the comparison of expert ratings between the predicted segmentations and a control group consisting of original manual segmentations. Secondary outcomes were the influence of tumor volume, previous surgery, previous stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and endocrinological status on expert ratings, performance in a subgroup of nonfunctioning macroadenomas (measuring 1000–4000 mm 3 ) without previous surgery and/or radiosurgery, and influence of using additional MRI modalities as model input and time cost reduction. RESULTS The model achieved Dice similarity coefficients of 82.3%, 63.9%, and 79.6% for tumor, normal gland, and optic nerve, respectively. A human expert rated 20.6% of the segmentations as applicable in treatment planning without any modifications, 52.7% as applicable with minor manual modifications, and 26.7% as inapplicable. The ratings for predicted segmentations were lower than for the control group of original segmentations (p < 0.001). Larger tumor volume, history of a previous radiosurgery, and nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma were associated with better expert ratings (p = 0.005, p = 0.007, and p < 0.001, respectively). In the subgroup without previous surgery, although expert ratings were more favorable, the association did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.074). In the subgroup of noncomplex cases (n = 9), 55.6% of the segmentations were rated as applicable without any manual modifications and no segmentations were rated as inapplicable. Manually improving inaccurate segmentations instead of creating them from scratch led to 53.6% reduction of the time cost (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The results were applicable for treatment planning with either no or minor manual modifications, demonstrating a significant increase in the efficiency of the planning process. The predicted segmentations can be loaded into the planning software used in clinical practice for treatment planning. The authors discuss some considerations of the clinical utility of the automated segmentation models, as well as their integration within established clinical workflows, and outline directions for future research.

BACKGROUND: Intraventricular metastases (IVMs) are uncommon, and their optimal management remains debatable. OBJECTIVE: To define the safety and efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the treatment of IVMs. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study included patients managed with SRS for IVMs. SRS-induced adverse events, local tumor or intracranial progression, and the frequency of new-onset hydrocephalus or leptomeningeal spread were documented. Analyses of variables related to patient neuroimaging or clinical outcomes were also performed. RESULTS: The cohort included 160 patients from 11 centers who underwent SRS for treatment of 1045 intracranial metastases, of which 196 were IVMs. The median survival from SRS was 10 months. Of the 154 patients and 190 IVMs with imaging follow-up, 94 patients (61%) experienced distant intracranial disease progression and 16 IVMs (8.4%) progressed locally. The 12- and 24-month local IVM control rates were 91.4% and 86.1%, respectively. Sixteen (10%) and 27 (17.5%) patients developed hydrocephalus and leptomeningeal dissemination post-SRS, respectively. Adverse radiation effects were documented in 24 patients (15%). Eleven patients (6.9%) died because of intracranial disease progression. CONCLUSION: SRS is an effective treatment option for IVMs, with a local IVM control rate comparable with SRS for parenchymal brain metastases. Leptomeningeal spread and hydrocephalus in patients with IVM occur in a minority of patients, but these patients warrant careful follow-up to detect these changes.

OBJECTIVE Radiation-induced meningiomas (RIMs) are associated with aggressive clinical behavior. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is sometimes considered for selected RIMs. The authors investigated the effectiveness and safety of SRS for the management of RIMs. METHODS From 12 institutions participating in the International Radiosurgery Research Foundation, the authors pooled patients who had prior cranial irradiation and were subsequently clinically diagnosed with WHO grade I meningiomas that were managed with SRS. RESULTS Fifty-two patients underwent 60 SRS procedures for histologically confirmed or radiologically suspected WHO grade I RIMs. The median ages at initial cranial radiation therapy and SRS for RIM were 5.5 years and 39 years, respectively. The most common reasons for cranial radiation therapy were leukemia (21%) and medulloblastoma (17%). There were 39 multiple RIMs (35%), the mean target volume was 8.61 ± 7.80 cm 3 , and the median prescription dose was 14 Gy. The median imaging follow-up duration was 48 months (range 4–195 months). RIM progressed in 9 patients (17%) at a median duration of 30 months (range 3–45 months) after SRS. Progression-free survival at 5 years post-SRS was 83%. Treatment volume ≥ 5 cm 3 predicted progression (HR 8.226, 95% CI 1.028–65.857, p = 0.047). Seven patients (14%) developed new neurological symptoms or experienced SRS-related complications or T2 signal change from 1 to 72 months after SRS. CONCLUSIONS SRS is associated with durable local control of RIMs in the majority of patients and has an acceptable safety profile. SRS can be considered for patients and tumors that are deemed suboptimal, poor surgical candidates, and those whose tumor again progresses after removal.

OBJECTIVE Investigations of the combined effects of neoadjuvant Onyx embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) on brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) have not accounted for initial angioarchitectural features prior to neuroendovascular intervention. The aim of this retrospective, multicenter matched cohort study is to compare the outcomes of SRS with versus without upfront Onyx embolization for AVMs using de novo characteristics of the preembolized nidus. METHODS The International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were categorized based on AVM treatment approach into Onyx embolization (OE) and SRS (OE+SRS) or SRS alone (SRS-only) cohorts and then propensity score matched in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome was AVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiological and symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RICs), and cyst formation. Comparisons were analyzed using crude rates and cumulative probabilities adjusted for competing risk of death. RESULTS The matched OE+SRS and SRS-only cohorts each comprised 53 patients. Crude rates (37.7% vs 47.2% for the OE+SRS vs SRS-only cohorts, respectively; OR 0.679, p = 0.327) and cumulative probabilities at 3, 4, 5, and 6 years (33.7%, 44.1%, 57.5%, and 65.7% for the OE+SRS cohort vs 34.8%, 45.5%, 59.0%, and 67.1% for the SRS-only cohort, respectively; subhazard ratio 0.961, p = 0.896) of AVM obliteration were similar between the matched cohorts. The secondary outcomes of the matched cohorts were also similar. Asymptomatic and symptomatic embolization-related complication rates in the matched OE+SRS cohort were 18.9% and 9.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Pre-SRS AVM embolization with Onyx does not appear to negatively influence outcomes after SRS. These analyses, based on de novo nidal characteristics, thereby refute previous studies that found detrimental effects of Onyx embolization on SRS-induced AVM obliteration. However, given the risks incurred by nidal embolization using Onyx, this neoadjuvant intervention should be used judiciously in multimodal treatment strategies involving SRS for appropriately selected large-volume or angioarchitecturally high-risk AVMs.

Abstract BACKGROUND Prior comparisons of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) treated using stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with or without embolization were inherently flawed, due to differences in the pretreatment nidus volumes. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of embolization and SRS, vs SRS alone for AVMs using pre-embolization malformation features. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018. Patients were categorized into the embolization and SRS (E + SRS) or SRS alone (SRS-only) cohorts. The 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores. Primary outcome was defined as AVM obliteration. Secondary outcomes were post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiologic and symptomatic radiation-induced changes (RIC), and cyst formation. RESULTS The matched cohorts each comprised 101 patients. Crude AVM obliteration rates were similar between the matched E + SRS vs SRS-only cohorts (48.5% vs 54.5%; odds ratio = 0.788, P = .399). Cumulative probabilities of obliteration at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were also similar between the E + SRS (33.0%, 46.4%, 56.2%, and 60.8%, respectively) and SRS-only (32.9%, 46.2%, 56.0%, and 60.6%, respectively) cohorts (subhazard ratio (SHR) = 1.005, P = .981). Cumulative probabilities of radiologic RIC at 3, 4, 5, and 6 yr were lower in the E + SRS (25.0%, 25.7%, 26.7%, and 26.7%, respectively) vs SRS-only (45.3%, 46.2%, 47.8%, and 47.8%, respectively) cohort (SHR = 0.478, P = .004). Symptomatic and asymptomatic embolization-related complication rates were 8.3% and 18.6%, respectively. Rates of post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, symptomatic RIC, and cyst formation were similar between the matched cohorts. CONCLUSION This study refutes the prevalent notion that AVM embolization negatively affects the likelihood of obliteration after SRS.

Abstract BACKGROUND Embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) using ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx) embolization may influence the treatment effects of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) differently than other embolysates. OBJECTIVE To compare the outcomes of pre-SRS AVM embolization with vs without Onyx through a multicenter, retrospective matched cohort study. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed International Radiosurgery Research Foundation AVM databases from 1987 to 2018. Embolized AVMs treated with SRS were selected and categorized based on embolysate usage into Onyx embolization (OE + SRS) or non-Onyx embolization (NOE + SRS) cohorts. The 2 cohorts were matched in a 1:1 ratio using de novo AVM features for comparative analysis of outcomes. RESULTS The matched cohorts each comprised 45 patients. Crude AVM obliteration rates were similar between the matched OE + SRS vs NOE + SRS cohorts (47% vs 51%; odds ratio [OR] = 0.837, P = .673). Cumulative probabilities of obliteration were also similar between the OE + SRS vs NOE + SRS cohorts (subhazard ratio = 0.992, P = .980). Rates of post-SRS hemorrhage, all-cause mortality, radiation-induced changes, cyst formation, and embolization-associated complications were similar between the matched cohorts. Sensitivity analysis for AVMs in the OE + SRS cohort embolized with Onyx alone revealed a higher rate of asymptomatic embolization-associated complications in this subgroup compared to the NOE + SRS cohort (36% vs 15%; OR = 3.297, P = .034), but the symptomatic complication rates were similar. CONCLUSION Nidal embolization using Onyx does not appear to differentially impact the outcomes of AVM SRS compared with non-Onyx embolysates. The embolic agent selected for pre-SRS AVM embolization should reflect both the experience of the neurointerventionalist and target of endovascular intervention.