Lang, Frederick F.

Abstract While immunotherapy has transformed treatment in multiple solid tumors, its efficacy in high-grade glioma (HGG) remains limited. Understanding the molecular and clinical factors that influence HGG’s response to immunotherapy is essential to improving outcomes. We identified patients with grade 4 gliomas who had been treated with checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), virus therapy, or CMV-specific T- cell therapy and determined the association between their molecular, clinical, and demographic characteristics and survival outcomes. We identified 66 patients, 57 glioblastoma and 9 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant grade 4; 38 were treated with CPI, 22 with virus therapy, and 6 with CMV-specific T- cell therapy. PIK3CA mutation was associated with shorter PFS and OS (p=0.022, 0.073, respectively) among all patients and a shorter OS among CPI-treated patients (p=0.004). PIK3CA wild-type tumors had less PD-1 expression in CD3+/CD8+ T cells. In CPI-treated patients, IDH1/2 mutation was associated with a shorter OS (p=0.002), and mutations in RB1 and TERT promoter were associated with a shorter PFS (p-value=0.00056, 0.022, respectively). Length of CPI therapy of more than 6 months was associated with increased PFS and OS (p=0.048, 0.062, respectively), while steroid use at baseline was associated with a shorter OS (p=0.00023). Multifocal disease was associated with shorter PFS and OS durations (p=0.0017, 0.0013, respectively) among all patients. In HGG, PIK3CA, IDH1/2, RB1, and TERT promoter mutations may be associated with a poor response to immunotherapy. These results need to be validated in larger studies. Our results may provide the rationale for clinical trials combining PI3K and IDH inhibitors with CPI in HGG.

Abstract Purpose While immunotherapy has transformed treatment in multiple solid tumors, its efficacy in high-grade glioma remains limited. Understanding the molecular and clinical factors that influence glioma’s response to immunotherapy is essential to improving outcomes. Methods We identified patients with recurrent glioblastoma or astrocytoma, IDH-mutant grade 4, who had been treated with checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), virus therapy, or cell therapy and determined the association between their molecular, clinical, and demographic characteristics and survival outcomes. Results We identified 66 patients, 57 glioblastoma and 9 astrocytoma, IDH-mutant grade 4; 38 were treated with CPI, 22 with virus therapy, and 6 with cell therapy. PIK3CA mutation was associated with shorter PFS and OS (p = 0.022, 0.073, respectively) among all patients and a shorter OS among CPI-treated patients (p = 0.004). Tumor tissue without the mutation had less PD-1 expression in CD3+/CD8 + T cells. In CPI-treated patients, IDH1/2 mutation was associated with a shorter OS (p = 0.002), and mutations in RB1 and TERT promoter were associated with a shorter PFS (p-value = 0.00056, 0.022, respectively). Length of CPI therapy of more than 6 months was associated with increased PFS and OS (p = 0.048, 0.062, respectively), while steroid use at baseline was associated with a shorter OS (p = 0.00023). Multifocal disease was associated with shorter PFS and OS durations (p = 0.0017, 0.0013, respectively) among all patients. Conclusions In high-grade glioma, PIK3CA, IDH1/2, RB1, and TERT promoter mutations may be associated with a poor response to immunotherapy. Our results may provide the rationale for clinical trials combining PI3K and IDH inhibitors with CPI in high-grade glioma.

Abstract Pediatric brain tumors are the most common solid tumors in children. Even to date, with the advances in multimodality therapeutic management, survival outcomes remain dismal in some types of tumors, such as pediatric-type diffuse high-grade gliomas or central nervous system embryonal tumors. Failure to understand the complex molecular heterogeneity and the elusive tumor and microenvironment interplay continues to undermine therapeutic efficacy. Developing a strategy that would improve survival for these fatal tumors remains unmet in pediatric neuro-oncology. Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging as a feasible, safe, and promising therapy for brain tumors. The new paradigm in virotherapy implies that the direct cytopathic effect is followed, under certain circumstances, by an antitumor immune response responsible for the partial or complete debulking of the tumor mass. OVs alone or combined with other therapeutic modalities have been primarily used in adult neuro-oncology. A surge in encouraging preclinical studies in pediatric brain tumor models recently led to the clinical translation of OVs with encouraging results in these tumors. In this review, we summarize the different virotherapy tested in preclinical and clinical studies in pediatric brain tumors, and we discuss the limitations and future avenues necessary to improve the response of these tumors to this type of therapy.

The AANS/CNS Section on Tumors was founded 40 years ago in 1984 to assist in the education of neurosurgeons interested in neuro-oncology, and serves as a resource for other national organizations regarding the clinical treatment of nervous system tumors. The Section on Tumors was the first national physicians’ professional organization dedicated to the study and treatment of patients with brain and spine tumors. Over the past 40 years, the Section on Tumors has built solid foundations, including establishing the tumor section satellite meetings, founding the Journal of Neuro-Oncology (the first medical journal dedicated to brain and spine surgical oncology), advancing surgical neuro-oncology education and research, promoting neurosurgical involvement in neuro-oncology clinical trials, and advocating for patients with brain and spine tumors. This review provides a synopsis of the Section on Tumors’ history, its challenges, and its opportunities, drawing on the section’s archives and input from the 17 section chairs who led it during its first 40 years.

Abstract Brain metastases are a challenging manifestation of renal cell carcinoma. We have a limited understanding of brain metastasis tumor and immune biology, drivers of resistance to systemic treatment, and their overall poor prognosis. Current data support a multimodal treatment strategy with radiation treatment and/or surgery. Nonetheless, the optimal approach for the management of brain metastases from renal cell carcinoma remains unclear. To improve patient care, the authors sought to standardize practical management strategies. They performed an unstructured literature review and elaborated on the current management strategies through an international group of experts from different disciplines assembled via the network of the International Kidney Cancer Coalition. Experts from different disciplines were administered a survey to answer questions related to current challenges and unmet patient needs. On the basis of the integrated approach of literature review and survey study results, the authors built algorithms for the management of single and multiple brain metastases in patients with renal cell carcinoma. The literature review, consensus statements, and algorithms presented in this report can serve as a framework guiding treatment decisions for patients. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:454‐489.

Abstract Background There is recognition that breast cancer is a collection of heterogeneous diseases divided in subtypes based on combined molecular features such as hormonal receptors (HR) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) status. We aimed to study clinical differences among biological subtypes in brain metastasis from breast cancer after targeted therapy introduction. Methods This was a retrospective study with 406 consecutive patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer treated at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 1998 to 2013. Overall, 315 of these patients met the study criteria and were analyzed. Subtypes were classified as HER2-/HR+ (96 patients), HER2+/HR+ (57 patients), HER2+/HR- (63 patients), and triple negative (HER2-/HR-) (99 patients). End points were time to development of brain metastasis (TDBM), brain metastasis-free survival (BMFS), and overall survival from start of treatment of brain metastasis (OSBM). Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to analyze the data. Results TDBM was 41 months for HER2-/HR+; 58 months for HER2+/HR+; 30 months for HER2+/HR-; and 27 months for triple negative (P < .001). BMFS was 9 months for HER2-/HR+; 24 months for HER2+/HR+; 9 months for HER2+/HR-; and 7 months for triple negative (P = .06). OSBM was 20 months for HER2-/HR+; 22 months for HER2+/HR+; 24 months for HER2+/HR-; and 9 months for triple negative (P < .001). On multivariate analyses, triple negative showed lower OSBM compared with other subtypes, with a hazard ratio of 1.9 (P < .001). Conclusion Comparing all breast cancer subgroups we noticed that HR and HER2 are the most significant biomarkers in brain metastasis behavior. Patients who received targeted therapy had better outcomes, but not in the triple negative group. Prospective studies with different treatment modalities for each subgroup are recommended.