Abstract Neurosurgical oncology is a rapidly advancing field, driven by interdisciplinary collaboration, technological innovation, and a growing understanding of tumor biology. As we celebrate the 40th anniversary of the AANS/CNS Section on Tumors, this editorial highlights the collaborative spirit that defines the Section and explores the many ways it intersects with other neurosurgical subspecialties and AANS/CNS Sections to optimize patient care. This special edition features a series of articles showcasing these intersections across functional, cerebrovascular, spine, trauma, pain, and pediatric neurosurgery. For example, insights into neuron–glioma interactions—enhanced by tools such as optogenetics and advanced brain mapping—are opening doors to more personalized treatment strategies. Innovations in preoperative embolization for skull base meningiomas are improving surgical precision and outcomes. Similarly, advances in managing vertebral metastatic disease with surgical techniques and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are reshaping standards of care. Neuro-intensive care has evolved to support personalized postoperative recovery, with a focus on neurological function and cognitive rehabilitation. In pain management, neuromodulation, including intrathecal drug delivery and spinal cord stimulation, is offering new relief to tumor patients. Adolescents and young adults (AYA) with gliomas remain an underserved population, requiring age-specific treatment frameworks and better integration into clinical trials. This edition celebrates the diverse and collaborative workforce propelling neurosurgical oncology forward.
Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines for the Role of Radiosurgery for Patients With Functioning Pituitary Adenomas
BACKGROUND: Patients with functioning pituitary adenomas (FPA) require a multidisciplinary team-based approach to select best medical, surgical, and radiation treatments, including stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide evidence-based recommendations on the use of SRS for adult patients with FPA. METHODS: PubMed and Embase were searched from data base inception to June 8, 2021. Full-text articles were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria. Evidence tables were developing based on data extraction from the full-text reviews, and evidence-based recommendations were finalized. RESULTS: Of the total 1842 abstracts pertinent to this topic, 343 full articles met eligibility. Of these, 21 met entry criteria and were included in the evidence tables. The provided Class III evidence supported 2 Level III recommendations: 1. SRS, hypofractionated SRS, fractionated (>5 fractions) radiotherapy, and conventional radiation therapy provide excellent radiographic control with variable hormonal reduction and endocrine remission rates. For SRS and fractionated radiotherapy hormonal reduction may continue for up to 10 years after treatment. 2. Clinicians may continue to administer endocrine suppressive medical treatment before SRS as this may not affect radiographic control. CONCLUSION: This systematic review provides evidence-based recommendations to guide providers caring for adult patients with FPA when making decisions pertinent to radiosurgery. The CNS Guidelines Committee will continue to pursue timely updates to further improve the care of patients with this diagnosis.
Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guideline on the Role of Radiosurgery (Stereotactic Radiosurgery) and Radiation Therapy in the Management of Patients With Vestibular Schwannomas: Updates
BACKGROUND: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established modality for treatment of adult patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS). The aim of this work was to provide an updated literature review on this topic. OBJECTIVE: To review the literature published since the last guideline on this topic. METHODS: OVID MEDLINE and Embase were searched for the period January 1, 2015, to May 20, 2022, using search terms and search strategies to identify pertinent abstracts. These were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify full-text review articles. Evidence tables were constructed using data derived from full-text reviews and recommendations made from the evidence derived. RESULTS: From the total 1035 abstracts identified, 26 full-text articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this update. Four new level III recommendations stemmed from this work. In adult patients with sporadic intracanalicular or <2 cm VS, SRS should not be recommended as superior to observation alone for hearing preservation. In adult patients with sporadic VS treated with SRS, cochlear dose constraint should be considered because it provides better hearing preservation than no constraint. In the same population, single fraction SRS should be recommended rather than hypofractionated SRS (>1 and ≤5 fractions) because it results in decreased cranial nerve dysfunction. Finally, adult patients with sporadic VS undergoing SRS should be informed that SRS does not result in an increased number of secondary malignancies compared with the rate expected in the overall population. CONCLUSION: Recent published literature provides new recommendations for the treatment of adult patients with VS with SRS. The full guideline can be seen online at https://www.cns.org/guidelines/treatment-adults-vestibular-schwannoma/6-role-of-radiosurgery-srs-radiation-therapy-in-ma
Introduction. Innovations in cortical and subcortical stimulation mapping
The AANS/CNS Section on Tumors was founded 40 years ago in 1984 to assist in the education of neurosurgeons interested in neuro-oncology, and serves as a resource for other national organizations regarding the clinical treatment of nervous system tumors. The Section on Tumors was the first national physicians’ professional organization dedicated to the study and treatment of patients with brain and spine tumors. Over the past 40 years, the Section on Tumors has built solid foundations, including establishing the tumor section satellite meetings, founding the Journal of Neuro-Oncology (the first medical journal dedicated to brain and spine surgical oncology), advancing surgical neuro-oncology education and research, promoting neurosurgical involvement in neuro-oncology clinical trials, and advocating for patients with brain and spine tumors. This review provides a synopsis of the Section on Tumors’ history, its challenges, and its opportunities, drawing on the section’s archives and input from the 17 section chairs who led it during its first 40 years.
Congress of Neurological Surgeons Systematic Review and Evidence-Based Guidelines on the Management of Progressive Glioblastoma in Adults: Update of the 2014 Guidelines
BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine best practice recommendation to review guidelines every 5 years is followed by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines Committee. The aim of this work was to provide an updated literature review and evidence-based recommendations on the topic of diagnosis and treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM). OBJECTIVE: To review the literature published since the last guidelines on pGBM dated 2014, with literature search ending in June 2012. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for the period July 1, 2012, to March 31, 2019, using search terms and search strategies to identify pertinent abstracts. These were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify full-text review articles. Evidence tables were constructed using data derived from full-text reviews and recommendations made from the evidence derived. RESULTS: From the total 8786 abstracts identified by the search, 237 full-text articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this update. Two new level II recommendations derived from this work. For the diagnosis of patients with GBM, the use of diffusion-weighted images is recommended to be included in the magnetic resonance images with and without contrast used for surveillance to detect pGBM. For the treatment of patients with pGBM, repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended to improve overall survival. An additional 21 level III recommendations were provided. CONCLUSION: Recent published literature provides new recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of pGBM. The Central Nervous System Guidelines Committee will continue to pursue timely updates to further improve the care of patients with diagnosis. https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/guidelines-management-of-progressive-glioblastoma
ACR Appropriateness Criteria
®
Pre-Irradiation Evaluation and Management of Brain Metastases
Abstract Pretreatment evaluation is performed to determine the number, location, and size of the brain metastases and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the recommended imaging technique, particularly in patients being considered for surgery or stereotactic radiosurgery. A contiguous thin-cut volumetric MRI with gadolinium with newer gadolinium-based agents can improve detection of small brain metastases. A systemic workup and medical evaluation are important, given that subsequent treatment for the brain metastases will also depend on the extent of the extracranial disease and on the age and performance status of the patient. Patients with hydrocephalus or impending brain herniation should be started on high doses of corticosteroids and evaluated for possible neurosurgical intervention. Patients with moderate symptoms should receive approximately 4–8 mg/d of dexamethasone in divided doses. The routine use of corticosteroids in patients without neurologic symptoms is not necessary. There is no proven benefit of anticonvulsants in patient without seizures. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 3 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances where evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.