Patrick, Hayes H.

OBJECTIVE The principal tenet of minimally invasive neurosurgery is to limit approach-related tissue trauma, and a major assumption is that shorter incisions and smaller openings, in addition to protecting the brain, also have some perceptible benefits for the patient. This study tests the assumption of patient benefit and tries to define its significance. METHODS Procedures that fit the inclusion criteria of minimally invasive transcranial "keyhole" surgery were sought in the principal investigator’s archives. Each case was then paired with a classic procedure performed within the study time frame by the two senior authors, matched for pathology, size, location, and complexity. These pairs were then compared using a statistical tool (i.e., the Wilcoxon signed-rank test) designed for matched samples. Differences in estimated blood loss, duration of surgery, and length of hospital stay were examined. The narcotic needs during hospitalization were also examined as morphine milligram equivalent (MME). RESULTS Ninety patients were included in this study, evenly split between the minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and classic cohorts. Comparison of the 45 pairs showed no significant difference in estimated blood loss, though the operative times favored the MIS cohort significantly (mean ± SEM 310 ± 17 minutes vs 383 ± 24 minutes, p = 0.02). The length of stay was shorter for MIS, but the difference reached statistical significance only when cases with complications were excluded. The most important finding was that significantly less narcotic was needed during hospitalization in the MIS cohort (83 ± 15 MME vs 257 ± 47 MME). CONCLUSIONS The large difference in narcotic needs points to enhanced recovery from MIS techniques. While the difference in operative time did not lead to significantly shorter hospital stays, data suggest that minimally invasive technique may benefit the patient during recovery. This inspires further investigations to define the potentially positive impact on hospital and healthcare systems.

BACKGROUND: The Institute of Medicine best practice recommendation to review guidelines every 5 years is followed by the Congress of Neurological Surgeons Guidelines Committee. The aim of this work was to provide an updated literature review and evidence-based recommendations on the topic of diagnosis and treatment of patients with progressive glioblastoma (pGBM). OBJECTIVE: To review the literature published since the last guidelines on pGBM dated 2014, with literature search ending in June 2012. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for the period July 1, 2012, to March 31, 2019, using search terms and search strategies to identify pertinent abstracts. These were then screened using published exclusion/inclusion criteria to identify full-text review articles. Evidence tables were constructed using data derived from full-text reviews and recommendations made from the evidence derived. RESULTS: From the total 8786 abstracts identified by the search, 237 full-text articles met inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this update. Two new level II recommendations derived from this work. For the diagnosis of patients with GBM, the use of diffusion-weighted images is recommended to be included in the magnetic resonance images with and without contrast used for surveillance to detect pGBM. For the treatment of patients with pGBM, repeat cytoreductive surgery is recommended to improve overall survival. An additional 21 level III recommendations were provided. CONCLUSION: Recent published literature provides new recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of pGBM. The Central Nervous System Guidelines Committee will continue to pursue timely updates to further improve the care of patients with diagnosis. https://www.cns.org/guidelines/browse-guidelines-detail/guidelines-management-of-progressive-glioblastoma