Back to Authors

Yang, Jinzhong

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9254-4501

Mayo Clinic

The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Citations 3

Advanced External Beam Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Skull Base Reirradiation
Wang, He , Alsanea, Fahed , Zhang, X , Liu, Wei , Yang, Jinzhong , Williamson, Tyler D. , Hunter, Rachel , Balter, Peter , Briere, Tina M. , Zhu, Ronald X., Moreno, Amy C. , Reddy, Jay P. , Rosenthal, D.I., Gunn, Gary B., Phan, Jack , Liu, Wei , Yang, Jinzhong , Williamson, Tyler D , Hunter, Rachel A , Briere, Tina M , Moreno, Amy C , Reddy, Jay P , Phan, Jack , Rhee, Dong Joo , Wen, Zhifei , Zhao, Yao Jiang , Lee, Anna , Garden, Adam S. , Gunn, Gary B.

Cancers | February 6, 2025 | Volume: 17 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 540

10.3390/cancers17030540 Get It

Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for skull base reirradiation is particularly challenging, as patients have already received substantial radiation doses to the region, and nearby normal organs may have approached their tolerance limit from prior treatments. In this study, we reviewed the characteristics and capabilities of four advanced external beam radiation delivery systems and four modern treatment planning systems and evaluated the treatment plan quality of each technique using skull base reirradiation patient cases. Methods: SBRT plans were generated for sixteen skull base reirradiation patients using four modalities: the GK plan for the Elekta Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion/ICON, the CyberKnife (CK) plan for the Accuray CyberKnife, the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan for the Hitachi ProBeat-FR proton therapy machine, and the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for the Varian TrueBeam STx. These plans were evaluated and compared using two novel gradient indices in addition to traditional dosimetry metrics for targets and organs at risk (OARs). The steepest border gradient quantified the percent prescription dose fall-off per millimeter at the boundary between the target and adjacent critical structures. This gradient index highlighted the system’s ability to spare nearby critical OARs. The volume gradient assessed the extent of dose spread outside the target toward the patient’s body. Results: All plans achieved comparable target coverage and conformity, while IMPT and VMAT demonstrated significantly better uniformity. The GK plans exhibited the highest border gradient, up to 20.9%/mm, followed by small-spot-size IMPT plans and CK plans. Additionally, IMPT plans showed the benefit of reduced dose spread in low-dose regions and the lowest maximum and mean doses to the brainstem and carotid artery. Conclusions: The advanced external beam radiotherapy modalities evaluated in this study are well-suited for SBRT in skull base reirradiation, which demands precise targeting of tumors with highly conformal doses and steep dose gradients to protect nearby normal structures.
Promotion and tenure for medical physicists should be based on article specific measures and not on journal impact factor
Hedrick, Samantha , Yang, Jinzhong , Rong, Yi , Rong, Yi , Yang, Jinzhong

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | October 10, 2024 | Volume: 25 | Issue: 12 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/acm2.14537 Get It

Submillimeter alignment of more than three contiguous vertebrae in spinal SRS/SBRT with 6‐degree couch
Luo, Dershan , Yang, James N., Yang, Jinzhong , Chang, Eric L. , Brown, Paul D. , McAleer, Mary Frances , Ghia, Amol J. , Wang, Xin , Zhao, Zhongxiang , Li, Jing , Yang, Jinzhong

Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics | August 8, 2017 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 225-236

10.1002/acm2.12153 Get It

AbstractThe purpose of this study is to identify regions of spinal column in which more than three contiguous vertebrae can be reliably and quickly aligned within 1 mm using a 6‐degree (6D) couch and full body immobilization device. We analyzed 45 cases treated over a 3‐month period. Each case was aligned using ExacTrac x‐ray positioning system with integrated 6D couch to be within 1° and 1 mm in all six dimensions. Cone‐Beam computed tomography (CBCT) with at least 17.5 cm field of view (FOV) in the superior–inferior direction was taken immediately after ExacTrac positioning. It was used to examine the residual error of five to nine contiguous vertebrae visible in the FOV. The residual error of each vertebra was determined by expanding/contracting the vertebrae contour with a margin in millimeter integrals on the planning CT such that the new contours would enclose the corresponding vertebrae contour on CBCT. Submillimeter initial setup accuracy was consistently achieved in 98% (40/41) cases for a span of five or more vertebrae starting from T2 vertebra and extending caudally to S5. The curvature of spinal column along the cervical region and cervicothoracic junction was not easily reproducible between treatment and simulation. Fifty‐seven percent (8/14) of cases in this region had residual setup error of more than 1 mm in nearby vertebrae after alignment using 6D couch with image guidance. In conclusion, 6D couch integrated with image guidance is convenient and accurately corrects small rotational shifts. Consequently, more than three contiguous vertebrae can be aligned within 1 mm with immobilization that reliably reproduces the curvature of the thoracic and lumbar spinal column. Ability of accurate setup is becoming less a concern in limiting the use of stereotactic radiosurgery or stereotactic body radiation therapy to treat multilevel spinal target.