Sears, Thomas

Abstract Background: Glioblastoma recurrence is inevitable despite aggressive surgical resection of contrast enhancing (CE) tumor. Unlike the deep molecular characterization of CE glioblastoma, unresected infiltrating tumor, representing minimal residual disease (MRD) has not been well profiled. Increasingly, clinical trials are being conducted in the MRD setting for glioblastoma patients, necessitating understanding of unresected infiltrating tumor for targeted therapeutic development. Methods: Visium HD spatial transcriptomics was used to profile a cohort of newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve glioblastoma patients that underwent supramaximal resection, with both core and infiltrating in situ components. Spatial profiles generated expression signatures of infiltrative and CE tumor. For in silico prediction of therapeutics targeting the MRD, expression signatures of infiltrative and CE tumor were compared with drug perturbation signatures from the NIH L1000 database using the sRGES method to predict reversal of disease expression patterns. IC50 data from human cell lines were aggregated from the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer or individual study data while blood-brain barrier (BBB) penetrance was predicted using the CNS-MPO approach. Findings: Infiltrative tumor expression profiles were enriched for genes corresponding to neural and oligodendrocyte progenitor like cells. In contrast CE glioblastoma displayed mesenchymal and astrocytic programs, suggesting spatial concentration of glioblastoma states within MRD and CE tumor. For CE glioblastoma, proteasome inhibitors and glucocorticoid receptor agonists were predicted to have the highest antitumor activity. In contrast, histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) were highly ranked for MRD while exhibiting low predicted efficacy in CE tumor. Synergy analysis of drug candidates provided multiple dual treatment options for both the CE and MRD contexts. Conclusions: Cumulatively, these data indicate that the resected tumor does not reflect the MRD state, providing clarity on why targeted therapeutics for glioblastoma have not been particularly successful. Spatial profiling of the MRD demonstrates vulnerability to unique drug targets, which if utilized in the correct setting could confer greater survival benefit. Citation Format: Harrshavasan Congivaram, Shashwat Tripathi, Mateo Gomez, Katy McCortney, Ching Man Wai, Ruochen Du, Thomas K. Sears, Jianzhong Zhang, Daniel J. Brat, Craig M. Horbinski, Mark W. Youngblood, Jared T. Ahrendsen, Adam M. Sonabend, Stephen T. Magill, Matthew C. Tate, Maciej S. Lesniak, Sean Sachdev, Timothy Sita, Priya Kumthekar, Karan Dixit, Robin Buerki, Ditte Primdahl, Mustafa Khasraw, John de Groot, David A. Reardon, Rimas V. Lukas, Roger Stupp, Amy B. Heimberger. In silico screening of therapeutics candidates targeting minimal residual disease in glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2026; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2026 Apr 17-22; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(7 Suppl):Abstract nr 2496.

IDH1/2 mutations (IDH mut ) increase methylation of DNA and histones in gliomas. IDH mut inhibitors are effective against low-grade IDH mut gliomas, but new strategies against high-grade IDH mut gliomas are needed. Although histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACi) are ineffective against IDH wt glioblastoma (GBM), their potential in IDH mut gliomas has not been extensively studied. We previously established that IDH mut gliomas are more sensitive to HDACi than IDH wt GBM. Here we show that IDH mut is associated with greater sensitivity to HDACi only in glioma, not in IDH mut chondrosarcoma or cholangiocarcinoma. While HDACi induced more histone acetylation and gene regulation in IDH mut glioma than in IDH wt GBM, such acetylation was mostly within gene deserts, whereas IDH mut glioma promoters paradoxically lost histone acetylation. Two mediators of HDACi resistance, YAP and TAZ, were methylated and suppressed in IDH mut gliomas but not in other IDH mut cancers. Inducing YAP or TAZ expression in IDH mut gliomas conferred resistance to HDACi. Finally, belinostat extended in vivo survival only in IDH mut glioma models, not in IDH mut GBM models. Our findings provide a mechanistic rationale for further studies of HDACi in patients with IDH mut glioma, as well as the potential use of YAP/TAZ as a biomarker of HDACi sensitivity in cancers.

Abstract Background Acquired resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy due to DNA mismatch repair (MMR) enzyme deficiency is a barrier to improving outcomes for isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma (GBM) patients. KL-50 is a new imidazotetrazine-based therapeutic designed to induce DNA interstrand cross-links, and subsequent double-stranded breaks, in an MMR-independent manner in cells with O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) deficiency. Previous research showed its efficacy against LN229 glioma cells with MMR and MGMT knockdown. Its activity against patient-derived GBM that model post-TMZ recurrent tumors is unclear. Methods We created MMR-deficient GBM patient-derived xenografts through exposure to TMZ, followed by treatment with additional TMZ or KL-50. We also generated isogenic, MSH6 knockout (KO) patient-derived GBM and tested them for sensitivity to TMZ and KL-50. Results KL-50 extended the median survival of mice intracranially engrafted with either patient-derived TMZ-naïve GBM6 or TMZ-naïve GBM12 by 1.75-fold and 2.15-fold, respectively (P < 0.0001). A low dose (4 Gy) of fractionated RT further extended the survival of KL-50-treated GBM12 mice (median survival = 80 days for RT + KL-50 vs. 71 days KL-50 alone, P = 0.018). KL-50 also extended the median survival of mice engrafted with post-TMZ, MMR-deficient GBM6R-m185 (140 days for KL-50 vs. 37 days for vehicle, P < 0.0001). MSH6 KO increased TMZ IC50 for GBM6 and GBM12 cultures by >5-fold and >12-fold for cell death and live cell count outputs, respectively. In contrast, MSH6-KO actually decreased KL-50 IC50 by 10–80%. Conclusion KL-50-based compounds are a promising new strategy for the treatment of MGMT-deficient, MMR-deficient GBM that recurs after frontline TMZ.

Adult-type diffusely infiltrating gliomas, of which glioblastoma is the most common and aggressive, almost always recur after treatment and are fatal. Improved understanding of therapy-driven tumor evolution and acquired therapy resistance in gliomas is essential for improving patient outcomes, yet the majority of the models currently used in preclinical research are of therapy-naïve tumors. Here, we describe the development of therapy-resistant IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patient-derived xenografts (PDX) through orthotopic engraftment of therapy naïve PDX in athymic nude mice, and repeated in vivo exposure to the therapeutic modalities most often used in treating glioblastoma patients: radiotherapy and temozolomide chemotherapy. Post-temozolomide PDX became enriched for C>T transition mutations, acquired inactivating mutations in DNA mismatch repair genes (especially MSH6), and developed hypermutation. Such post-temozolomide PDX were resistant to additional temozolomide (median survival decrease from 80 days in parental PDX to 42 days in a temozolomide-resistant derivative). However, temozolomide-resistant PDX were sensitive to lomustine (also known as CCNU), a nitrosourea which induces tumor cell apoptosis by a different mechanism than temozolomide. These PDX models mimic changes observed in recurrent GBM in patients, including critical features of therapy-driven tumor evolution. These models can therefore serve as valuable tools for improving our understanding and treatment of recurrent glioma.