Robinson, Giles

Abstract Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) is an international working group dedicated to developing standardized recommendations for response assessment in children with central nervous system tumors enrolled on clinical trials. This standardization facilitates easier and more reliable comparison of responses across trials. Since the first RAPNO publication in 2013, response guidelines have been issued for medulloblastoma (MB), low-grade glioma (LGG), high-grade glioma (HGG), diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, ependymoma, and craniopharyngioma. Many of these guidelines have already been incorporated into clinical trials to evaluate their effectiveness and accuracy. RAPNO has always been predicated on the idea that these consensus recommendations will require updates over time as they are applied in practice given technological advancements, evolving treatment approaches, and growing knowledge of disease pathology. A half-day RAPNO symposium sponsored by the Society of Neuro-Oncology was held in San Diego, California, United States, on May 15, 2025. This event coincided with the 8th Biennial Pediatric Society of Neuro-Oncology meeting. The main objectives were to identify ongoing RAPNO challenges, discuss potential updates, and plan future initiatives across 3 specific groups: (1) LGG/Craniopharyngioma, (2) HGG/diffuse midline glioma (DMG)/Ependymoma, and (3) MB and other seeding tumors. This manuscript reviews the symposium proceedings and highlights key topics and challenges discussed, as well as outlining future RAPNO initiatives.

Abstract BACKGROUND Medulloblastoma (MB) is a highly malignant childhood cerebellar tumor comprising a collection of molecularly and clinically distinct entities. Group 3 and Group 4-MB subgroups originate from overlapping progenitor pools of the developing rhombic lip when neuronal differentiation hierarchies are subverted through somatic alterations. Mutations suspected to deregulate the activity of chromatin-modifying genes are pervasive in Group 3 and Group 4-MB. However, the molecular consequences of these alterations remain largely undefined. METHODS We characterized the chromatin landscape of fifty-two primary MBs using chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) for six histone modifications and performed multi-modal integration with sample-matched somatic lesions, genome-wide DNA methylation, and transcriptomic profiles. RESULTS Analysis of differential chromatin states across MB subgroups using a Hidden Markov Model revealed a significant enrichment of the bivalent enhancer state (EnhBiv; marked by coincident H3K4me1 and H3K27me3) in Group 4-MB which localized to promoters of neurodevelopmental genes and transcription factors. To functionally dissect the pathogenetic significance of the enriched EnhBiv state in Group 4-MB, we sought to identify key regulators that confer this state. Integrative bioinformatics coupled with CUT&RUN analysis revealed significant enrichment of KDM2B, a histone lysine demethylase overexpressed in Group 4-MB, in gene promoters marked by the EnhBiv state. CRISPR gene targeting or targeted protein degradation of KDM2B selectively suppressed growth of Group 3 and Group 4-MB models in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, inhibition of KDM2B disrupted chromatin bivalency by blocking PRC2 complex recruitment and reducing H3K27me3 deposition, profoundly derepressing PRC2 targets involved in neuronal differentiation. CONCLUSIONS Our comprehensive characterization of the MB chromatin landscape in a large cohort of primary tumors provides unprecedented insights into the epigenetic basis of MB subgroups, implicating novel mechanisms of tumorigenesis, and nominating KDM2B as a selective dependency in Group 3/4-MB that should be prioritized as an attractive therapeutic target.

PURPOSE SJMB03 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00085202 ) was a phase III risk-adapted trial that aimed to determine the frequency and clinical significance of biological variants and genetic alterations in medulloblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients 3-21 years old were stratified into average-risk and high-risk treatment groups based on metastatic status and extent of resection. Medulloblastomas were molecularly classified into subgroups (Wingless [WNT], Sonic Hedgehog [SHH], group 3, and group 4) and subtypes based on DNA methylation profiles and overlaid with gene mutations from next-generation sequencing. Coprimary study end points were (1) to assess the relationship between ERBB2 protein expression in tumors and progression-free survival (PFS), and (2) to estimate the frequency of mutations associated with WNT and SHH tumors. Clinical and molecular risk factors were evaluated, and the most robust were used to model new risk-classification categories. RESULTS Three hundred thirty eligible patients with medulloblastoma were enrolled. Five-year PFS was 83.2% (95% CI, 78.4 to 88.2) for average-risk patients (n = 227) and 58.7% (95% CI, 49.8 to 69.1) for high-risk patients (n = 103). No association was found between ERBB2 status and PFS in the overall cohort ( P = .74) or when patients were stratified by clinical risk ( P = .71). Mutations in CTNNB1 (96%), DDX3X (37%), and SMARCA4 (24%) were most common in WNT tumors and PTCH1 (38%), TP53 (21%), and DDX3X (19%) in SHH tumors. Methylome profiling classified 53 WNT (17.4%), 48 SHH (15.7%), 65 group 3 (21.3%), and 139 group 4 (45.6%) tumors. A comprehensive clinicomolecular risk factor analysis identified three low-risk groups (WNT, low-risk SHH, and low-risk combined groups 3 and 4) with excellent (5-year PFS > 90%) and two very high-risk groups (high-risk SHH and high-risk combined groups 3 and 4) with poor survival (5-year PFS < 60%). CONCLUSION These results establish a new risk stratification for future medulloblastoma trials.

AbstractBackgroundMedulloblastoma (MB) is a rare brain tumor occurring more frequently in children in whom research has been primarily focused. Treatment recommendations in adults are mainly based on retrospective data and pediatric experience; however, molecular features and treatment tolerance differ between the 2 age groups. In adults, prognostic tools are suboptimal, late recurrences are typical, and long-term sequelae remain understudied. Treatment has not adapted to molecular classification advances; thus, the survival rate of adult MB has not improved.MethodsIn 2017, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) received support from the Cancer Moonshot℠ to address the challenges and unmet needs of adults with rare central nervous system tumors through NCI-CONNECT, a program that creates partnerships among patients, health care professionals, researchers, and advocacy organizations. On November 25, 2019, NCI-CONNECT convened leading clinicians and scientists in a workshop to review advances in research, share scientific insights, and discuss clinical challenges in adult MB.ResultsWorking groups identified unmet needs in clinical trial design, tissue acquisition and testing, tumor modeling, and measurement of clinical outcomes.ConclusionsParticipants identified opportunities for collaboration; discussed plans to create a working group of clinicians, researchers, and patient advocates; and developed specific action items to expedite progress in adult MB.