Foreman, Nicholas K.

Abstract Response Assessment in Pediatric Neuro-Oncology (RAPNO) is an international working group dedicated to developing standardized recommendations for response assessment in children with central nervous system tumors enrolled on clinical trials. This standardization facilitates easier and more reliable comparison of responses across trials. Since the first RAPNO publication in 2013, response guidelines have been issued for medulloblastoma (MB), low-grade glioma (LGG), high-grade glioma (HGG), diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma, ependymoma, and craniopharyngioma. Many of these guidelines have already been incorporated into clinical trials to evaluate their effectiveness and accuracy. RAPNO has always been predicated on the idea that these consensus recommendations will require updates over time as they are applied in practice given technological advancements, evolving treatment approaches, and growing knowledge of disease pathology. A half-day RAPNO symposium sponsored by the Society of Neuro-Oncology was held in San Diego, California, United States, on May 15, 2025. This event coincided with the 8th Biennial Pediatric Society of Neuro-Oncology meeting. The main objectives were to identify ongoing RAPNO challenges, discuss potential updates, and plan future initiatives across 3 specific groups: (1) LGG/Craniopharyngioma, (2) HGG/diffuse midline glioma (DMG)/Ependymoma, and (3) MB and other seeding tumors. This manuscript reviews the symposium proceedings and highlights key topics and challenges discussed, as well as outlining future RAPNO initiatives.

PURPOSE Pharmacologic therapies for neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibromas (NF1-PNs) are limited; currently, none are US Food and Drug Administration–approved for adults. METHODS ReNeu is an open-label, multicenter, pivotal, phase IIb trial of mirdametinib in 58 adults (≥18 years of age) and 56 children (2 to 17 years of age) with NF1-PN causing significant morbidities. Patients received mirdametinib capsules or tablets for oral suspension (2 mg/m 2 twice daily, maximum 4 mg twice daily), regardless of food intake, in 3 weeks on/1 week off 28-day cycles. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; proportion of patients with a ≥20% reduction of target PN volume from baseline on consecutive scans during the 24-cycle treatment phase) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS Twenty-four of 58 adults (41%) and 29 of 56 children (52%) had a BICR-confirmed objective response during the 24-cycle treatment phase; in addition, two adults and one child had confirmed responses during long-term follow-up. Median (range) target PN volumetric best response was –41% (−90 to 13) in adults and –42% (−91 to 48) in children. Both cohorts reported significant and clinically meaningful improvement in patient- or parent proxy-reported outcome measures of worst tumor pain severity, pain interference, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that began early and were sustained during treatment. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and nausea in adults and dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and paronychia in children. CONCLUSION In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1-PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib treatment demonstrated significant confirmed ORRs by BICR, deep and durable PN volume reductions, and early, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvement in pain and HRQOL. Mirdametinib was well-tolerated in adults and children.

Abstract BACKGROUND PN in patients (pts) with NF1 can cause pain, disfigurement, impaired quality of life (QoL), and it can undergo malignant transformation. ReNeu (NCT03962543), a multicenter, open-label, phase 2b study, evaluated efficacy and safety of the highly selective, oral, investigational MEK1/2 inhibitor mirdametinib in adults (≥18 y) and children (2-17 y) with inoperable NF1 PN causing significant morbidities. MATERIAL AND METHODS Mirdametinib was administered as a capsule or dispersible tablet (2 mg/m2 BID, max 4 mg BID) without regard to food in 3 wk on/1 wk off 28-d cycles. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; percentage of pts with confirmed MRI-assessed ≥20% reduction of target PN volume by blinded independent central review [BICR] within the 24-cycle treatment phase). The minimum clinically relevant ORR (null) was defined as 23% for adults and 20% for children. Pts could continue treatment in an optional long-term follow-up (LTFU) phase. Additional key endpoints were duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), change from baseline in target PN volume, worst pain severity (Numerical Rating Scale-11 [NRS-11]), pain interference (Pain Interference Index [PII]), health-related (HR) QoL (PedsQL), and safety. RESULTS All 114 pts (58 adult, 56 children) received mirdametinib. As of the 20 Sept 2023 data cutoff (DCO), BICR-confirmed ORR during the treatment phase was 41% (95% CI, 29-55; P<.001 vs null) in adults and 52% (95% CI, 38-65; P<.001 vs null) in children. Two adults and 1 child had a confirmed response in the ongoing LTFU. Median (range) target PN volumetric best response from baseline was -41% (-90, 13) and -42% (-91, 48) in adult and children, respectively. As of the DCO, median treatment duration was 22 mo for each cohort, and median DoR was not reached. Median (range) TTR was 7.8 (4-19) mo in adults and 7.9 (4-19) mo in children. Adults and children had statistically significant improvements from baseline to Cycle 13 in NRS-11, PII, and key PedsQL measures. Most frequent (≥35% pts) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in adults and diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and vomiting in children. 16% and 25% of adults and children, respectively, had grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, and 22% and 9%, respectively, discontinued due to TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1 PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib demonstrated a statistically significant ORR by BICR, with deep and durable PN volume reductions, significant improvements in pain severity, pain interference, and HRQoL, and a manageable safety profile in both adults and children. Together with a dispersible tablet formulation, these results underscore the potential of mirdametinib to become an important new treatment option for NF1 PN pts across all ages.

3016 Background: PN in patients (pts) with NF1 can cause pain, disfigurement, impaired quality of life (QoL), and can undergo malignant transformation. ReNeu (NCT03962543), a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2b study, evaluated efficacy and safety of the highly selective, oral, investigational MEK1/2 inhibitor mirdametinib in adult (≥18 y) and pediatric (2-17 y) pts with inoperable NF1 PN causing significant morbidities. Methods: Mirdametinib was administered as a capsule or dispersible tablet (2 mg/m 2 BID, max 4 mg BID) without regard to food in 3 wk on/1 wk off 28-d cycles. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; percentage of pts with MRI-assessed ≥20% reduction of target PN volume by blinded independent central review [BICR] within the 24-cycle treatment phase). The minimum clinically relevant ORR (null) was defined as 23% for adults and 20% for pediatrics. Ptscould continue treatment in an optional long-term follow-up (LTFU) phase. Additional key endpoints were duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), change from baseline (BL) in target PN volume, pain severity (Numerical Rating Scale-11 [NRS-11]), pain interference (Pain Interference Index [PII]), health-related (HR) QoL (PedsQL), and safety. Results: All114 pts (58 adult, 56 pediatric) received mirdametinib. As of the 20 Sept 2023 data cutoff (DCO), BICR-confirmed ORR during the treatment phase was 41% (95% CI, 29-55; P<.001 vs null) in adults and 52% (95% CI, 38-65; P<.001 vs null) in pediatric pts. Two adult pts and 1 pediatric pt also had a confirmed response in the ongoing LTFU. Median (min, max) target PN volumetric best response from BL was -41% (-90, 13) and -42% (-91, 48) in adult and pediatric pts, respectively. As of the DCO, median treatment duration was 22 mo for each cohort and median DoR was not reached. Median (range) TTR was 7.8 (4-19) mo in adult pts and 7.9 (4-19) mo in pediatric pts. Adult and pediatric pts had statistically significant improvements from BL to cycle 13 in NRS-11, PII, and key PedsQL measures. Most frequent (≥35% pts) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in adults and diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and vomiting in pediatric pts. 16% and 25% of adult and pediatric pts, respectively, had grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, and 22% and 9%, respectively, discontinued due to TEAEs. Conclusions: In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1 PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib demonstrated a statistically significant ORR by BICR, with deep and durable PN volume reductions, significant improvements in pain severity, pain interference, and HRQoL, and a manageable safety profile in both adults and children. Together with a dispersible tablet formulation, these results underscore mirdametinib’s potential to become an important new treatment option for NF1 PN pts across all ages. Clinical trial information: NCT03962543 .

Abstract BACKGROUND Treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPGs remain challenging as most existing data are retrospective and have not included standardized visual outcomes. In this study, we prospectively enrolled newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs and performed standardized neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for monitoring and treatment. METHODS Children with NF1-OPG on MRI who were evaluated by both a study ophthalmologist and neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert within 1 month of radiologic diagnosis were eligible for enrollment. All subjects attempted quantitative visual acuity using Teller acuity cards (TAC) as well as ATS-HOTV testing. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert provided reasons for obtaining the MRI as well as initiating treatment, if applicable. Descriptive statistics calculated the success rate of acquiring TAC and reasons to obtain the MRI. RESULTS Two-hundred fifty subjects from 22 institutions were enrolled and had at least one visit beyond baseline (Median age 3.1 years, range 0.1–16.8; 53% female). TAC was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=195, 78%) and at least one eye in (N=206, 82%). ATS-HOTV was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=97, 39%) and at least one eye in (N=98, 39%). The two most common reasons to obtain an MRI were screening due to a diagnosis of NF1 (N=99, 39%) and ophthalmologic concern (N=81, 32%). At enrollment, continued observation occurred in a majority of subjects (N=221, 88%) while treatment with chemotherapy was initiated in only 11% (N=29). Twenty-nine (11%) subjects initially observed transitioned to treatment after enrollment (range: 2.5–25 months) thus far. DISCUSSION We present a prospective multicenter study of children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. The ability to acquire quantitative visual acuity was higher than anticipated. The frequency of NF1-OPGs requiring treatment is lower than previously reported. Regression models of clinical and MRI features that prompted immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation will be discussed.

Abstract BACKGROUND NF1-OPGs are amorphous tumors involving either single or multiple locations (optic nerve, chiasm, tract) along the anterior visual pathway (AVP). In this prospective study, we investigated how volumetric MRI measures of the AVP as well as other clinical variables are associated with treatment decisions in children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. METHODS Children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPG whose MRI included a T1-weighted volumetric sequence without significant artifact at their enrollment visit were eligible for inclusion. All subjects underwent a quantitative ophthalmic exam to determine if visual acuity (VA) was normal. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert determined whether the subject would be observed or undergo treatment at that baseline visit. Volumetric MRI analysis was automatically performed using a deep learning network that measured AVP volume (mm3). Non-parametric group comparisons and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the impact of age at enrollment, sex, NF1 inheritance type, AVP volume, and VA on the decision for immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation. RESULTS One-hundred twenty-three subjects met inclusion criteria. Subjects assigned to observation (N=112, 44% female) and subjects immediately treated with chemotherapy (N=11, 80% female) at enrollment were of similar age (2.7 and 2.8 years, respectively) and inheritance (p &gt; 0.05). Abnormal VA was present more often in the treatment group (46%) compared to the observation group (17%, p &lt;0.001). AVP volume was significantly greater in the treatment group (4,181.1mm3) compared to the observation group (1,819.8mm3, p &lt;0.001). AVP volume, sex, and VA reached significance in univariable regression, however, in the multivariable regression model only the AVP volume (p &lt; 0.001) was significantly associated with treatment initiation. DISCUSSION Children with greater NF1-OPG AVP volumes are treated more often compared with those with lower volumes. Volumetric measures of NF1-OPGs are a valuable metric in understanding treatment patterns and are positioned to help inform clinical decision making.