Stapleton, Stacie L.

ABSTRACT Background Radiotherapy is a cornerstone of treatment for pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors, but dose selection remains uniform despite interpatient variability in tumor radiosensitivity. This is consequential in children, for whom toxicity can have lifelong effects. Genomic-adjusted radiation dose (GARD) integrates tumor genomics with delivered radiation dose to quantify the biological effect of radiotherapy and has been validated across adult malignancies. Its relevance in pediatric CNS tumors is unknown. Methods We performed a cohort study using gene expression and data from 246 pediatric patients with high-grade glioma, medulloblastoma, or ependymoma from the Children’s Brain Tumor Network. GARD was calculated using a sequencing-adapted radiosensitivity index integrated with radiation dose through the linear–quadratic model. Associations of GARD and physical radiation dose with event-free and overall survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models stratified by tumor type and anatomic location. Patients who did not receive radiotherapy comprised a negative control cohort (sham-GARD). Results Among patients receiving radiotherapy, physical dose was uniform, whereas GARD showed substantial interpatient variability in biological effect. Higher GARD was associated with improved event-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·83–0·97; p=0·004) and overall survival (HR 0·90, 95% CI 0·83–0·99; p=0·018). Physical dose was not associated with either endpoint. Among patients who did not receive radiotherapy, sham-GARD was not associated with outcomes, supporting GARD as a treatment-specific predictor rather than a prognostic biomarker. Conclusions In pediatric CNS tumors, the biological effect of radiotherapy quantified by GARD was associated with outcomes, whereas physical dose was not. These findings challenge uniform radiotherapy dosing and support genomically informed dose individualization. Prospective evaluation of GARD-guided radiotherapy is warranted to optimize tumor control while minimizing long-term toxicity in children.

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib is the first FDA-approved MEK1/2 inhibitor for both adults and children (≥2y) with symptomatic NF1-PN. In ReNeu, symptomatic improvement and PN volume reductions were observed at the earliest assessments (~91 and ~152 days, respectively) and were sustained. This analysis evaluated time to first onset and resolution of commonly reported TRAEs in the ReNeu trial. METHODS Data cutoff (DCO) was September 20, 2023. Median time to first onset and resolution (days) for common TRAEs (≥15%) were evaluated for prepubescents (≥2 to <12y, n=32), postpubescents (≥12 to <18y, n=24), younger adults (≥18 to ≤50y, n=48), and older adults (>50y, n=10). RESULTS Common TRAEs were mostly grades 1 to 2 (83%). In prepubescents, median day (range) of onset was 32 (14, 263) for vomiting, 71 (19, 386) for dermatitis acneiform, 123 (1, 663) for diarrhea, 124 (52, 775) for paronychia, and 127 (2, 663) for nausea. For postpubescents, median day (range) of onset was 8 (1, 438) for diarrhea, 8 (2, 574) for nausea, 12 (1, 252) for dermatitis acneiform, 28 (2, 354) for vomiting, and 110 (43, 245) for paronychia. In younger adults, median day (range) of onset was 5 (1, 352) for nausea, 8 (2, 15) for dermatitis acneiform, 9 (2, 73) for diarrhea, and 29 (1, 264) for vomiting. For older adults, median day (range) of onset was 4 (1, 286) for diarrhea, 9 (2, 15) for nausea, and 13 (2, 38) for dermatitis acneiform. Time to resolution was variable between TRAEs and among patients in all age groups; 90% resolved completely by DCO. Among all patients, 18 had a TRAE of asymptomatic ejection fraction decrease, with all but one resolving by DCO. CONCLUSIONS Overall, common TRAEs arose before treatment benefits and were generally resoluble by DCO. Proactively managing TRAEs may improve treatment experience and adherence.

PURPOSE Pharmacologic therapies for neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibromas (NF1-PNs) are limited; currently, none are US Food and Drug Administration–approved for adults. METHODS ReNeu is an open-label, multicenter, pivotal, phase IIb trial of mirdametinib in 58 adults (≥18 years of age) and 56 children (2 to 17 years of age) with NF1-PN causing significant morbidities. Patients received mirdametinib capsules or tablets for oral suspension (2 mg/m 2 twice daily, maximum 4 mg twice daily), regardless of food intake, in 3 weeks on/1 week off 28-day cycles. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; proportion of patients with a ≥20% reduction of target PN volume from baseline on consecutive scans during the 24-cycle treatment phase) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS Twenty-four of 58 adults (41%) and 29 of 56 children (52%) had a BICR-confirmed objective response during the 24-cycle treatment phase; in addition, two adults and one child had confirmed responses during long-term follow-up. Median (range) target PN volumetric best response was –41% (−90 to 13) in adults and –42% (−91 to 48) in children. Both cohorts reported significant and clinically meaningful improvement in patient- or parent proxy-reported outcome measures of worst tumor pain severity, pain interference, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that began early and were sustained during treatment. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and nausea in adults and dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and paronychia in children. CONCLUSION In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1-PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib treatment demonstrated significant confirmed ORRs by BICR, deep and durable PN volume reductions, and early, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvement in pain and HRQOL. Mirdametinib was well-tolerated in adults and children.

Abstract Background Facial angiofibromas (FAs) are a major feature of tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Topical rapamycin can successfully treat FAs. A new stabilized cream formulation that protects rapamycin from oxidation has been developed in 0.5% and 1% concentrations. Objectives To assess the efficacy and safety of a novel, stabilized topical rapamycin cream formulation. Methods This multicentre double-blind randomized placebo-controlled dose–response phase II/III study with a parallel design included participants aged 6–65 years with FAs of mild or moderate severity according to the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) scale. Participants were randomized to one of three treatment arms: topical rapamycin 0.5%, topical rapamycin 1% or placebo. Treatment was applied once daily for 26 weeks. Safety and efficacy measures were assessed at days 14, 56, 98, 140 and 182. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants achieving IGA scores of ‘clear’ or ‘almost clear’ after 26 weeks of treatment. Secondary measures included Facial Angiofibroma Severity Index (FASI) and participant- and clinician-reported percentage-based improvement. Safety measures included the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and blood rapamycin concentration changes over time. Results Participants (n = 107) were randomized to receive either rapamycin 1% (n = 33), rapamycin 0.5% (n = 36) or placebo (n = 38). All treated participants were included in the final analysis. The percentage of participants with a two-grade IGA improvement was greater in the rapamycin 0.5% treatment group (11%) and rapamycin 1% group (9%) than in the placebo group (5%). However, this was not statistically significant [rapamycin 0.5%: odds ratio (OR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36–8.18 (P = 0.50); rapamycin 1%: OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.33–8.40 (P = 0.53)]. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of participants treated with rapamycin cream that achieved at least a one-grade improvement in IGA [rapamycin 0.5%: 56% (OR 4.73, 95% CI 1.59–14.10; P = 0.005); rapamycin 1%: 61% (OR 5.14, 95% CI 1.70–15.57; P = 0.004); placebo: 24%]. Skin adverse reactions were more common in patients following rapamycin application (64%) vs. placebo (29%). Conclusions Both rapamycin cream formulations (0.5% and 1%) were well tolerated, and either strength could lead to clinical benefit in the treatment of FA.