Bielamowicz, Kevin

Abstract BACKGROUND Mirdametinib, a MEK1/2 inhibitor, is the first FDA-approved medicine for both adults and children (≥2y) with NF1-PN not amenable to complete resection. In the phase 2b ReNeu trial (NCT03962543), confirmed objective response rate (ORR) was 41% in adults and 52% in children. This analysis explored relationships between baseline characteristics and mirdametinib responses in ReNeu. METHODS Confirmed ORR was the proportion of patients with ≥20% reduction from baseline in target PN volume by magnetic resonance imaging on consecutive scans during the 24-cycle treatment phase (“responders”) as assessed by blinded independent central review. Characteristics included age, body surface area (BSA), sex, race, ethnicity, target PN location, PN type (typical, nodular, or solitary nodular), target PN volume, and progression status. Rates of dose reductions and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated. These factors were descriptively analyzed for potential relationships with confirmed objective response (data cutoff: 20September2023). RESULTS With mirdametinib, there was no clear difference between responders (n=53) and non-responders (n=61) in age (mean, 22.89 and 22.67y), BSA (mean, 1.42 and 1.51 m2), sex (60.4% and 57.4% female), race (83.0% and 68.9% White), or ethnicity (83.0% and 85.2% non-Hispanic/Latino). The majority of responders and non-responders had head/neck for target PN location (50.9% and 47.5%), typical PN type (81.1% and 63.9%), and baseline progression status (60.4% and 55.7%). Mean (95% CI) target PN volume was 283.43 (155.19, 411.66) and 415.74 (211.71, 619.77) mL, respectively. Dose reduction (11.3%; 18.0%) and TRAE rates (96.2%; 96.7%) were comparable. CONCLUSIONS This analysis suggests mirdametinib provides clinical benefit across a broad range of patient and NF1-PN tumor characteristics; a relationship between analyzed baseline characteristics and confirmed objective response was not established. Mean PN volume was higher in non-responders, though CIs overlapped. Dose reductions and emergence of TRAEs did not appear to impact response to mirdametinib. SUPPORT SpringWorks Therapeutics, Inc.

Abstract Patients with NF1-PN experience pain and other symptoms that negatively impact functioning and quality-of-life. We present patient- and parent proxy-reported HRQoL outcomes from ReNeu (NCT03962543), a pivotal, phase 2b trial of mirdametinib, an investigational MEK1/2 inhibitor, in adults and children (≥2 y) with NF1-PN causing morbidities. Fifty-eight adults and 56 children received mirdametinib (2 mg/m2 BID; 3-weeks-on/1-week-off, 28-d cycles). Change in HRQoL was assessed by Pediatric QoL Inventory (PedsQL) 4.0 Generic Core Scales from baseline across the 24-cycle treatment phase; change from baseline at Cycle 13 (C13) was a prespecified secondary endpoint. PedsQL is a HRQoL measure for adults and children with a Total Score (TS) and 4 subscales: physical, emotional, social, and school/work. Items are reported on a 0-100 scale (higher scores=better HRQoL). Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as change from baseline >9.7 points for adults, >8.5 points for child self-report, and >9.0 points for parent proxy-report. PedsQL-TS improvement (least-squares mean, LSM [SE] change) from baseline at C13 was 3.9 (1.6; P=.018; n=34) for adults, 4.0 (2.4; P=.096; n=38) for children by self-report, and 5.6 (1.9; P=.005; n=43) by parent proxy-report. PedsQL-TS improvements for adults and children by parent proxy-report (not by children self-report) were observed early (at C5 and C3, respectively) and sustained through C24. Clinically meaningful improvement in PedsQL-TS from baseline at C13 was achieved by 37% (10/27) adults, 45% (13/29) children by self-report, and 47% (15/32) children by parent proxy-report (among patients who could have achieved a clinically meaningful change from baseline). Significant (P<.05) improvement from baseline to C13 was reported for physical (adults, children, and parent proxy-report), school/work (adults), and emotional and social (parent proxy-report) subscales. Adults and children (by parent proxy-report) with NF1-PN had clinically meaningful, early, and sustained improvement in HRQoL over the course of mirdametinib treatment.

PURPOSE Pharmacologic therapies for neurofibromatosis type 1-associated plexiform neurofibromas (NF1-PNs) are limited; currently, none are US Food and Drug Administration–approved for adults. METHODS ReNeu is an open-label, multicenter, pivotal, phase IIb trial of mirdametinib in 58 adults (≥18 years of age) and 56 children (2 to 17 years of age) with NF1-PN causing significant morbidities. Patients received mirdametinib capsules or tablets for oral suspension (2 mg/m 2 twice daily, maximum 4 mg twice daily), regardless of food intake, in 3 weeks on/1 week off 28-day cycles. The primary end point was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; proportion of patients with a ≥20% reduction of target PN volume from baseline on consecutive scans during the 24-cycle treatment phase) assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) of volumetric magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS Twenty-four of 58 adults (41%) and 29 of 56 children (52%) had a BICR-confirmed objective response during the 24-cycle treatment phase; in addition, two adults and one child had confirmed responses during long-term follow-up. Median (range) target PN volumetric best response was –41% (−90 to 13) in adults and –42% (−91 to 48) in children. Both cohorts reported significant and clinically meaningful improvement in patient- or parent proxy-reported outcome measures of worst tumor pain severity, pain interference, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) that began early and were sustained during treatment. The most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and nausea in adults and dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, and paronychia in children. CONCLUSION In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1-PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib treatment demonstrated significant confirmed ORRs by BICR, deep and durable PN volume reductions, and early, sustained, and clinically meaningful improvement in pain and HRQOL. Mirdametinib was well-tolerated in adults and children.

Abstract BACKGROUND PN in patients (pts) with NF1 can cause pain, disfigurement, impaired quality of life (QoL), and it can undergo malignant transformation. ReNeu (NCT03962543), a multicenter, open-label, phase 2b study, evaluated efficacy and safety of the highly selective, oral, investigational MEK1/2 inhibitor mirdametinib in adults (≥18 y) and children (2-17 y) with inoperable NF1 PN causing significant morbidities. MATERIAL AND METHODS Mirdametinib was administered as a capsule or dispersible tablet (2 mg/m2 BID, max 4 mg BID) without regard to food in 3 wk on/1 wk off 28-d cycles. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; percentage of pts with confirmed MRI-assessed ≥20% reduction of target PN volume by blinded independent central review [BICR] within the 24-cycle treatment phase). The minimum clinically relevant ORR (null) was defined as 23% for adults and 20% for children. Pts could continue treatment in an optional long-term follow-up (LTFU) phase. Additional key endpoints were duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), change from baseline in target PN volume, worst pain severity (Numerical Rating Scale-11 [NRS-11]), pain interference (Pain Interference Index [PII]), health-related (HR) QoL (PedsQL), and safety. RESULTS All 114 pts (58 adult, 56 children) received mirdametinib. As of the 20 Sept 2023 data cutoff (DCO), BICR-confirmed ORR during the treatment phase was 41% (95% CI, 29-55; P<.001 vs null) in adults and 52% (95% CI, 38-65; P<.001 vs null) in children. Two adults and 1 child had a confirmed response in the ongoing LTFU. Median (range) target PN volumetric best response from baseline was -41% (-90, 13) and -42% (-91, 48) in adult and children, respectively. As of the DCO, median treatment duration was 22 mo for each cohort, and median DoR was not reached. Median (range) TTR was 7.8 (4-19) mo in adults and 7.9 (4-19) mo in children. Adults and children had statistically significant improvements from baseline to Cycle 13 in NRS-11, PII, and key PedsQL measures. Most frequent (≥35% pts) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in adults and diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and vomiting in children. 16% and 25% of adults and children, respectively, had grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, and 22% and 9%, respectively, discontinued due to TEAEs. CONCLUSIONS In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1 PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib demonstrated a statistically significant ORR by BICR, with deep and durable PN volume reductions, significant improvements in pain severity, pain interference, and HRQoL, and a manageable safety profile in both adults and children. Together with a dispersible tablet formulation, these results underscore the potential of mirdametinib to become an important new treatment option for NF1 PN pts across all ages.

3016 Background: PN in patients (pts) with NF1 can cause pain, disfigurement, impaired quality of life (QoL), and can undergo malignant transformation. ReNeu (NCT03962543), a multicenter, open-label, Phase 2b study, evaluated efficacy and safety of the highly selective, oral, investigational MEK1/2 inhibitor mirdametinib in adult (≥18 y) and pediatric (2-17 y) pts with inoperable NF1 PN causing significant morbidities. Methods: Mirdametinib was administered as a capsule or dispersible tablet (2 mg/m 2 BID, max 4 mg BID) without regard to food in 3 wk on/1 wk off 28-d cycles. The primary endpoint was confirmed objective response rate (ORR; percentage of pts with MRI-assessed ≥20% reduction of target PN volume by blinded independent central review [BICR] within the 24-cycle treatment phase). The minimum clinically relevant ORR (null) was defined as 23% for adults and 20% for pediatrics. Ptscould continue treatment in an optional long-term follow-up (LTFU) phase. Additional key endpoints were duration of response (DoR), time to response (TTR), change from baseline (BL) in target PN volume, pain severity (Numerical Rating Scale-11 [NRS-11]), pain interference (Pain Interference Index [PII]), health-related (HR) QoL (PedsQL), and safety. Results: All114 pts (58 adult, 56 pediatric) received mirdametinib. As of the 20 Sept 2023 data cutoff (DCO), BICR-confirmed ORR during the treatment phase was 41% (95% CI, 29-55; P<.001 vs null) in adults and 52% (95% CI, 38-65; P<.001 vs null) in pediatric pts. Two adult pts and 1 pediatric pt also had a confirmed response in the ongoing LTFU. Median (min, max) target PN volumetric best response from BL was -41% (-90, 13) and -42% (-91, 48) in adult and pediatric pts, respectively. As of the DCO, median treatment duration was 22 mo for each cohort and median DoR was not reached. Median (range) TTR was 7.8 (4-19) mo in adult pts and 7.9 (4-19) mo in pediatric pts. Adult and pediatric pts had statistically significant improvements from BL to cycle 13 in NRS-11, PII, and key PedsQL measures. Most frequent (≥35% pts) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were dermatitis acneiform, diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting in adults and diarrhea, dermatitis acneiform, and vomiting in pediatric pts. 16% and 25% of adult and pediatric pts, respectively, had grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs, and 22% and 9%, respectively, discontinued due to TEAEs. Conclusions: In ReNeu, the largest multicenter NF1 PN trial reported to date, mirdametinib demonstrated a statistically significant ORR by BICR, with deep and durable PN volume reductions, significant improvements in pain severity, pain interference, and HRQoL, and a manageable safety profile in both adults and children. Together with a dispersible tablet formulation, these results underscore mirdametinib’s potential to become an important new treatment option for NF1 PN pts across all ages. Clinical trial information: NCT03962543 .

Abstract BACKGROUND Treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPGs remain challenging as most existing data are retrospective and have not included standardized visual outcomes. In this study, we prospectively enrolled newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs and performed standardized neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for monitoring and treatment. METHODS Children with NF1-OPG on MRI who were evaluated by both a study ophthalmologist and neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert within 1 month of radiologic diagnosis were eligible for enrollment. All subjects attempted quantitative visual acuity using Teller acuity cards (TAC) as well as ATS-HOTV testing. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert provided reasons for obtaining the MRI as well as initiating treatment, if applicable. Descriptive statistics calculated the success rate of acquiring TAC and reasons to obtain the MRI. RESULTS Two-hundred fifty subjects from 22 institutions were enrolled and had at least one visit beyond baseline (Median age 3.1 years, range 0.1–16.8; 53% female). TAC was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=195, 78%) and at least one eye in (N=206, 82%). ATS-HOTV was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=97, 39%) and at least one eye in (N=98, 39%). The two most common reasons to obtain an MRI were screening due to a diagnosis of NF1 (N=99, 39%) and ophthalmologic concern (N=81, 32%). At enrollment, continued observation occurred in a majority of subjects (N=221, 88%) while treatment with chemotherapy was initiated in only 11% (N=29). Twenty-nine (11%) subjects initially observed transitioned to treatment after enrollment (range: 2.5–25 months) thus far. DISCUSSION We present a prospective multicenter study of children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. The ability to acquire quantitative visual acuity was higher than anticipated. The frequency of NF1-OPGs requiring treatment is lower than previously reported. Regression models of clinical and MRI features that prompted immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation will be discussed.

Abstract BACKGROUND NF1-OPGs are amorphous tumors involving either single or multiple locations (optic nerve, chiasm, tract) along the anterior visual pathway (AVP). In this prospective study, we investigated how volumetric MRI measures of the AVP as well as other clinical variables are associated with treatment decisions in children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. METHODS Children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPG whose MRI included a T1-weighted volumetric sequence without significant artifact at their enrollment visit were eligible for inclusion. All subjects underwent a quantitative ophthalmic exam to determine if visual acuity (VA) was normal. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert determined whether the subject would be observed or undergo treatment at that baseline visit. Volumetric MRI analysis was automatically performed using a deep learning network that measured AVP volume (mm3). Non-parametric group comparisons and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the impact of age at enrollment, sex, NF1 inheritance type, AVP volume, and VA on the decision for immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation. RESULTS One-hundred twenty-three subjects met inclusion criteria. Subjects assigned to observation (N=112, 44% female) and subjects immediately treated with chemotherapy (N=11, 80% female) at enrollment were of similar age (2.7 and 2.8 years, respectively) and inheritance (p &gt; 0.05). Abnormal VA was present more often in the treatment group (46%) compared to the observation group (17%, p &lt;0.001). AVP volume was significantly greater in the treatment group (4,181.1mm3) compared to the observation group (1,819.8mm3, p &lt;0.001). AVP volume, sex, and VA reached significance in univariable regression, however, in the multivariable regression model only the AVP volume (p &lt; 0.001) was significantly associated with treatment initiation. DISCUSSION Children with greater NF1-OPG AVP volumes are treated more often compared with those with lower volumes. Volumetric measures of NF1-OPGs are a valuable metric in understanding treatment patterns and are positioned to help inform clinical decision making.

Abstract Background: Endocrine deficiencies are common following craniospinal irradiation (CSI) in children with brain tumors, but empirical data comparing outcomes following proton (PRT) and photon radiation therapy (XRT) are limited. Methods: This retrospective chart review compared the incidence of hypothyroidism, growth hormone deficiency (GHD), and adrenal insufficiency (AI) in patients with medulloblastoma treated with XRT and PRT between 1997 and 2016. All patients received CSI and had routine endocrine screening labs to evaluate for thyroid dysfunction, GHD, and AI. We used proportional hazards regression to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) comparing the development of hypothyroidism, AI, and GHD between radiation modalities, adjusting for age at diagnosis, sex, race/ethnicity, and CSI dose.Results: We identified 118 patients with medulloblastoma who were followed for a median of 5.6 years from the end of radiotherapy. Thirty-five (31%) patients developed hypothyroidism, 71 (66%) GHD, and 20 (18%) AI. Compared to PRT, XRT was associated with a higher incidence of primary (28% vs. 6%; HR=4.61, 95% CI 1.2-17.7, p=0.03) and central hypothyroidism (33% vs. 9%; HR 2.35 (0.8-6.8, p=0.12). GHD and AI incidence rates were similar between the groups. Conclusions: Primary and central hypothyroidism occur less often after PRT CSI, compared to XRT CSI. This suggests that the thyroid and pituitary glands receive less radiation after spine and posterior fossa boost RT, respectively, using PRT.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Because treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPG remain challenging, we sought to establish evidence-based guidelines. We prospectively enrolled children with newly-diagnosed NF1-OPGs, and gathered standardized clinical neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments. METHODS Only children with NF1 and newly diagnosed OPGs, confirmed by central review, were eligible. Indications for obtaining the initial MRI, as well as factors associated with the decision to treat with chemotherapy or observe without treatment, were obtained. Quantitative visual acuity (VA), other ophthalmic features, and imaging were captured at standard time points. Goal enrollment is 250 subjects. RESULTS One-hundred thirty-three children (52% female) from 20 institutions met inclusion criteria, and were included in this preliminary analysis. Eighty-six percent of subjects were able to perform quantitative VA testing at enrollment. The most common reasons for the diagnostic MRI included screening related to NF1 diagnosis (36.8%), ophthalmologic concerns (29.3%), and non-ophthalmologic concerns (24.8%), such as headache. To date, twenty subjects have initiated treatment with chemotherapy, twelve (9%) at the time of the initial OPG diagnosis. Median age at OPG diagnosis was 3.1 years. Age and sex distribution were similar in subjects immediately entering the observation and treatment arms (median age 3.0 versus 3.5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION Most children with NF1-OPGs are observed at time of their initial OPG diagnosis, rather than treated. Importantly, a large proportion of children are able to complete quantitative VA testing at enrollment. Once enrollment is complete, these data will help to establish evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of NF1-OPGs.