Phillips, Paul H.

Abstract BACKGROUND Treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPGs remain challenging as most existing data are retrospective and have not included standardized visual outcomes. In this study, we prospectively enrolled newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs and performed standardized neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for monitoring and treatment. METHODS Children with NF1-OPG on MRI who were evaluated by both a study ophthalmologist and neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert within 1 month of radiologic diagnosis were eligible for enrollment. All subjects attempted quantitative visual acuity using Teller acuity cards (TAC) as well as ATS-HOTV testing. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert provided reasons for obtaining the MRI as well as initiating treatment, if applicable. Descriptive statistics calculated the success rate of acquiring TAC and reasons to obtain the MRI. RESULTS Two-hundred fifty subjects from 22 institutions were enrolled and had at least one visit beyond baseline (Median age 3.1 years, range 0.1–16.8; 53% female). TAC was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=195, 78%) and at least one eye in (N=206, 82%). ATS-HOTV was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=97, 39%) and at least one eye in (N=98, 39%). The two most common reasons to obtain an MRI were screening due to a diagnosis of NF1 (N=99, 39%) and ophthalmologic concern (N=81, 32%). At enrollment, continued observation occurred in a majority of subjects (N=221, 88%) while treatment with chemotherapy was initiated in only 11% (N=29). Twenty-nine (11%) subjects initially observed transitioned to treatment after enrollment (range: 2.5–25 months) thus far. DISCUSSION We present a prospective multicenter study of children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. The ability to acquire quantitative visual acuity was higher than anticipated. The frequency of NF1-OPGs requiring treatment is lower than previously reported. Regression models of clinical and MRI features that prompted immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation will be discussed.

Abstract BACKGROUND NF1-OPGs are amorphous tumors involving either single or multiple locations (optic nerve, chiasm, tract) along the anterior visual pathway (AVP). In this prospective study, we investigated how volumetric MRI measures of the AVP as well as other clinical variables are associated with treatment decisions in children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. METHODS Children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPG whose MRI included a T1-weighted volumetric sequence without significant artifact at their enrollment visit were eligible for inclusion. All subjects underwent a quantitative ophthalmic exam to determine if visual acuity (VA) was normal. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert determined whether the subject would be observed or undergo treatment at that baseline visit. Volumetric MRI analysis was automatically performed using a deep learning network that measured AVP volume (mm3). Non-parametric group comparisons and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the impact of age at enrollment, sex, NF1 inheritance type, AVP volume, and VA on the decision for immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation. RESULTS One-hundred twenty-three subjects met inclusion criteria. Subjects assigned to observation (N=112, 44% female) and subjects immediately treated with chemotherapy (N=11, 80% female) at enrollment were of similar age (2.7 and 2.8 years, respectively) and inheritance (p > 0.05). Abnormal VA was present more often in the treatment group (46%) compared to the observation group (17%, p <0.001). AVP volume was significantly greater in the treatment group (4,181.1mm3) compared to the observation group (1,819.8mm3, p <0.001). AVP volume, sex, and VA reached significance in univariable regression, however, in the multivariable regression model only the AVP volume (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with treatment initiation. DISCUSSION Children with greater NF1-OPG AVP volumes are treated more often compared with those with lower volumes. Volumetric measures of NF1-OPGs are a valuable metric in understanding treatment patterns and are positioned to help inform clinical decision making.

SIGNIFICANCE This pilot randomized trial, the first to evaluate a specific base‐in relieving prism treatment strategy for childhood intermittent exotropia, did not support proceeding to a full‐scale clinical trial. Defining and measuring prism adaptation in children with intermittent exotropia are challenging and need further study. PURPOSE This study aimed to determine whether to proceed to a full‐scale trial of relieving base‐in prism spectacles versus refractive correction alone for children with intermittent exotropia. METHODS Children 3 years old to those younger than 13 years with distance intermittent exotropia control score of ≥2 points on the Intermittent Exotropia Office Control Scale (Strabismus 2006;14:147–150; 0 [phoria] to 5 [constant]), ≥1 episode of spontaneous exotropia, and 16 to 35∆ by prism‐and‐alternate‐cover test, who did not fully prism adapt on a 30‐minute in‐office prism‐adaptation test were randomized to base‐in relieving prism (40% of the larger of distance and near exodeviations) or nonprism spectacles for 8 weeks. A priori criteria to conduct a full‐scale trial were defined for the adjusted treatment group difference in mean distance control: “proceed” (≥0.75 points favoring prism), “uncertain” (>0 to <0.75 points favoring prism), or “do not proceed” (≥0 points favoring nonprism). RESULTS Fifty‐seven children (mean age, 6.6 ± 2.2 years; mean baseline distance control, 3.5 points) received prism (n = 28) or nonprism (n = 29) spectacles. At 8 weeks, mean control values were 3.6 and 3.3 points in prism (n = 25) and nonprism (n = 25) groups, respectively, with an adjusted difference of 0.3 points (95% confidence interval, −0.5 to 1.1 points) favoring nonprism (meeting our a priori “do not proceed” criterion). CONCLUSIONS Base‐in prism spectacles, equal to 40% of the larger of the exodeviations at distance or near, worn for 8 weeks by 3‐ to 12‐year‐old children with intermittent exotropia did not yield better distance control than refractive correction alone, with the confidence interval indicating that a favorable effect of 0.75 points or larger is unlikely. There was insufficient evidence to warrant a full‐scale randomized trial.

Abstract INTRODUCTION Because treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPG remain challenging, we sought to establish evidence-based guidelines. We prospectively enrolled children with newly-diagnosed NF1-OPGs, and gathered standardized clinical neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments. METHODS Only children with NF1 and newly diagnosed OPGs, confirmed by central review, were eligible. Indications for obtaining the initial MRI, as well as factors associated with the decision to treat with chemotherapy or observe without treatment, were obtained. Quantitative visual acuity (VA), other ophthalmic features, and imaging were captured at standard time points. Goal enrollment is 250 subjects. RESULTS One-hundred thirty-three children (52% female) from 20 institutions met inclusion criteria, and were included in this preliminary analysis. Eighty-six percent of subjects were able to perform quantitative VA testing at enrollment. The most common reasons for the diagnostic MRI included screening related to NF1 diagnosis (36.8%), ophthalmologic concerns (29.3%), and non-ophthalmologic concerns (24.8%), such as headache. To date, twenty subjects have initiated treatment with chemotherapy, twelve (9%) at the time of the initial OPG diagnosis. Median age at OPG diagnosis was 3.1 years. Age and sex distribution were similar in subjects immediately entering the observation and treatment arms (median age 3.0 versus 3.5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION Most children with NF1-OPGs are observed at time of their initial OPG diagnosis, rather than treated. Importantly, a large proportion of children are able to complete quantitative VA testing at enrollment. Once enrollment is complete, these data will help to establish evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of NF1-OPGs.