Back to Authors

Areaux, Raymond G.

https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5884-5557

Mayo Clinic

University of Minnesota

Citations 8

Semaglutide and diabetic retinopathy: an OHDSI network study
Cai, Cindy X. , Hribar, Michelle R. , Wang, Sophia Y. , Swaminathan, Swarup S. , Flowers, Alexis , Brown, Eric N. , Chen, John J. , Chen, Aiyin , Alshammari, Thamir , Falconer, Thomas , Martin, Benjamin , Westlund, Erik , Mathioudakis, Nestoras , Fan, Ruochong, Stocking, Jacqueline C. , Humes, Izabelle, McCoy, David , Adibuzzaman, Mohammad, Areaux, Raymond G. , Brash, James T., Morgan‐Cooper, Hannah, Desai, Priya , Rustam, Zainab, Zhu, Gu , Swerdel, Joel N. , Suchard, Marc A. , Ryan, Patrick , Cai, Cindy Xinji , Barkmeier, Andrew, Stocking, Jacqueline C , Chen, John J , Mathioudakis, Nestoras N , Nishimura, Akihiko, Baxter, Sally L. , Goetz, Kerry , Toy, Brian C. , Barkmeier, Andrew J. , Xu, Benjamin Yixing , Leng, Theodore , Boland, Michael V. , Bu, Fan , Martin, Benjamin, Zhang, Linying , Fan, Ruochong, Wilcox, Adam B , Lai, Albert M. , Xie, Yangyiran , Lee, Lok Hin , Dorr, David A , Weiskopf, Nicole G. , Desai, Priya, Tran, Diep D. , Rustam, Zainab, Sena, Anthony G. , Nagy, Paul G. , Schuemie, Martijn J. , Hripcsak, George

BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care | November 5, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 6 | Pages: e005424

10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005424 Get It

Introduction Semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), has potential associations with higher rates of diabetic retinopathy (DR) complications including proliferative DR (PDR) and diabetic macular edema (DME). The purpose of this study was to determine whether an association exists between semaglutide and PDR and treatment-requiring DR/DME. Research design and methods This was a retrospective cohort study of 14 databases (six administrative claims and eight electronic health records) in the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics Evidence Network. Adults with T2D on semaglutide, other GLP-1RA (dulaglutide, exenatide), or non-GLP-1RA medications (empagliflozin, sitagliptin, glipizide) from 1 December 2017 to 31 December 2023 were included. The association between semaglutide and PDR or treatment-requiring DR/DME was assessed using an active-comparator cohort design comparing new users of semaglutide as second-line T2D treatment to those on other GLP-1RAs and non-GLP-1RAs. Propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). Network-wide HR estimates were generated using a random-effects meta-analysis. Results The study included 810 390 new semaglutide users for T2D. PDR risk for semaglutide was similar to dulaglutide (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.54, p=0.51), empagliflozin (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.30, p=0.41) and sitagliptin (HR 0.83, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.55, p=0.57) but was lower than glipizide (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.88, p=0.01). The risk for treatment-requiring DR/DME for semaglutide was similar to empagliflozin (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.02, p=0.06) but lower than dulaglutide (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.91, p=0.02), sitagliptin (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.81, p=0.008) and glipizide (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33 to 0.91, p=0.02). Conclusions and relevance We did not identify increased risk for either PDR or treatment-requiring DR/DME comparing semaglutide with other GLP-1RAs or non-GLP-1RAs. Patients with T2D should still undergo close eye care follow-up, particularly when initiating new antihyperglycemic medications.
Semaglutide and Nonarteritic Anterior Ischemic Optic Neuropathy
Cai, Cindy X. , Hribar, Michelle R. , Swaminathan, Swarup S. , Flowers, Alexis , Brown, Eric N. , Chen, John J. , Chen, Aiyin , Wang, Sophia Y. , Ehrlich, Joshua R. , Armbrust, Karen R. , Alshammari, Thamir , Swerdel, Joel N. , Suchard, Marc A. , Falconer, Thomas , DuVall, Scott L. , Viernes, Benjamin , O’Brien, William J. , Martin, Benjamin , Westlund, Erik , Mathioudakis, Nestoras , Fan, Ruochong, Stocking, Jacqueline C. , Takkouche, Sahar , Humes, Izabelle, McCoy, David , Adibuzzaman, Mohammad, Areaux, Raymond G. , Rojas‐Carabali, William , Brash, James T., Lee, David A. , Mawn, Louise A. , Agrawal, Rupesh, Morgan‐Cooper, Hannah, Desai, Priya , Ryan, Patrick , Barkmeier, Andrew, Chen, John J , Mathioudakis, Nestoras N , Stocking, Jacqueline C , Lee, Cecilia S , Baxter, Sally L. , Goetz, Kerry , Toy, Brian C. , Xu, Benjamin Yixing , Leng, Theodore , Barkmeier, Andrew J. , Boland, Michael V. , Dorr, David A , Boyce, Danielle M. , Schuemie, Martijn J. , Bu, Fan , Sena, Anthony G. , Hripcsak, George , Nishimura, Akihiko, Nagy, Paul G. , Matheny, Michael E. , Zhang, Linying , Martin, Benjamin, Fan, Ruochong, Wilcox, Adam B , Lai, Albert M. , Lee, Lok Hin , Xie, Yangyiran , Weiskopf, Nicole G. , Desai, Priya

JAMA Ophthalmology | February 20, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 304

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2024.6555 Get It

Importance Semaglutide, a glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA), has recently been implicated in cases of nonarteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy (NAION), raising safety concerns in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Objective To investigate the potential association between semaglutide and NAION in the Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) network. Design, Setting, and Participants This was a retrospective study across 14 databases (6 administrative claims and 8 electronic health records). Included were adults with T2D taking semaglutide, other GLP-1RA (dulaglutide, exenatide), or non–GLP-1RA medications (empagliflozin, sitagliptin, glipizide) from December 1, 2017, to December 31, 2023. The incidence proportion and rate of NAION were calculated. Association between semaglutide and NAION was assessed using 2 approaches: an active-comparator cohort design comparing new users of semaglutide with those taking other GLP-1RAs and non–GLP-1RA drugs, and a self-controlled case-series (SCCS) analysis to compare individuals’ risks during exposure and nonexposure periods for each drug. The cohort design used propensity score–adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs). The SCCS used conditional Poisson regression models to estimate incidence rate ratios (IRRs). Network-wide HR and IRR estimates were generated using a random-effects meta-analysis model. Exposures GLP-1RA and non–GLP-1RAs. Main Outcomes and Measures NAION under 2 alternative definitions based on diagnosis codes: one more inclusive and sensitive, the other more restrictive and specific. Results The study included 37.1 million individuals with T2D, including 810 390 new semaglutide users. Of the 43 620 new users of semaglutide in the Optum’s deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database, 24 473 (56%) were aged 50 to 69 years, and 26 699 (61%) were female. The incidence rate of NAION was 14.5 per 100 000 person-years among semaglutide users. The HR for NAION among new users of semaglutide was not different compared with that of the non–GLP-1RAs using the sensitive NAION definition—empagliflozin (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 0.78-2.68; P = .12), sitagliptin (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.56-3.01; P = .27), and glipizide (HR, 1.23; 95% CI, 0.66-2.28; P = .25). The risk was higher only compared with patients taking empagliflozin (HR, 2.27; 95% CI, 1.16-4.46; P = .02) using the specific definition. SCCS analysis of semaglutide exposure showed an increased risk of NAION (meta-analysis IRR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-1.54; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this study suggest a modest increase in the risk of NAION among individuals with T2D associated with semaglutide use, smaller than that previously reported, and warranting further investigation into the clinical implications of this association.
NFS-21. DEMOGRAPHIC, CLINICAL AND IMAGING CHARACTERISTICS OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED OPTIC PATHWAY GLIOMAS ASSOCIATED WITH NF1: RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTER NF1-OPG NATURAL HISTORY STUDY
Fisher, Michael J. , Listernick, Robert , Liu, Grant, Ferner, Rosalie E. , Lasky-Zeid, Janice, Ullrich, Nicole J. , Stasheff, Steven F., Rosser, T.H.L., Borcher, March, Arden-Holmes, Simone, Flaherty, Maree , Hummel, Trent R. , Motley, Walker, Bielamowicz, Kevin , Phillips, Paul H. , Reginald, Arun, Peragallo, Jason H. , Sato, Aimee , Hogan, Nick, McCourt, Emily A. , Ranka, Milan P., Campen, Cynthia , Beres, Shannon , Stearns, Duncan , Örge, Faruk , O’Halloran, Henry S., Oattes, Julius, Reddy, Alyssa , Brodsky, Michael A., Donahue, Sean P., Blank, Peter M K de , Gutmann, David H. , Heidary, Gena , Bornhorst, Miriam , Rosser, Teena, Bouffet, Éric , Wolf, David S. , El-Dairi, Mays , Mater, David Van , Tarczy‐Hornoch, Kristina , Klesse, Laura J. , Foreman, Nicholas K. , Allen, Jeffrey C. , Moertel, Christopher L. , Areaux, Raymond G. , Crawford, John Ross , Brodsky, Michael, Esbenshade, Adam J. , Cutter, Gary , Avery, Robert A.

Neuro-Oncology | June 18, 2024 | Volume: 26 | Issue: Supplement_4 | Pages: 0-0

10.1093/neuonc/noae064.579 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND Treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPGs remain challenging as most existing data are retrospective and have not included standardized visual outcomes. In this study, we prospectively enrolled newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs and performed standardized neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments in order to develop evidence-based guidelines for monitoring and treatment. METHODS Children with NF1-OPG on MRI who were evaluated by both a study ophthalmologist and neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert within 1 month of radiologic diagnosis were eligible for enrollment. All subjects attempted quantitative visual acuity using Teller acuity cards (TAC) as well as ATS-HOTV testing. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert provided reasons for obtaining the MRI as well as initiating treatment, if applicable. Descriptive statistics calculated the success rate of acquiring TAC and reasons to obtain the MRI. RESULTS Two-hundred fifty subjects from 22 institutions were enrolled and had at least one visit beyond baseline (Median age 3.1 years, range 0.1–16.8; 53% female). TAC was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=195, 78%) and at least one eye in (N=206, 82%). ATS-HOTV was successfully acquired in both eyes (N=97, 39%) and at least one eye in (N=98, 39%). The two most common reasons to obtain an MRI were screening due to a diagnosis of NF1 (N=99, 39%) and ophthalmologic concern (N=81, 32%). At enrollment, continued observation occurred in a majority of subjects (N=221, 88%) while treatment with chemotherapy was initiated in only 11% (N=29). Twenty-nine (11%) subjects initially observed transitioned to treatment after enrollment (range: 2.5–25 months) thus far. DISCUSSION We present a prospective multicenter study of children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. The ability to acquire quantitative visual acuity was higher than anticipated. The frequency of NF1-OPGs requiring treatment is lower than previously reported. Regression models of clinical and MRI features that prompted immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation will be discussed.
NFS-24. TUMOR VOLUME IN NEWLY DIAGNOSED OPTIC PATHWAY GLIOMAS ASSOCIATED WITH NF1 (NF1-OPG): PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM THE INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTER NF1-OPG NATURAL HISTORY STUDY
Jiang, Zhifan , Parida, Abhijeet , Listernick, Robert , Liu, Grant, Ferner, Rosalie E. , Lasky-Zeid, Janice, Ullrich, Nicole J. , Stasheff, Steven F., Rosser, T.H.L., Arden-Holmes, Simone, Flaherty, Maree , Hummel, Trent R. , Motley, Walker, Bielamowicz, Kevin , Phillips, Paul H. , Reginald, Arun, Peragallo, Jason H. , El-Diari, Mays, Sato, Aimee , Hogan, Nick, McCourt, Emily A. , Ranka, Milan P., Campen, Cynthia , Beres, Shannon , Stearns, Duncan , Örge, Faruk , O’Halloran, Henry S., Brodsky, Michael A., Donahue, Sean P., Oattes, Julius, Reddy, Alyssa , Linguraru, Marius George , Fisher, Michael J. , Avery, Robert A. , Gutmann, David H. , Blank, Peter M K de , Heidary, Gena , Bornhorst, Miriam , Rosser, Teena, Borchert, Mark , Bouffet, Éric , Wolf, David S. , Mater, David Van , Tarczy‐Hornoch, Kristina , Klesse, Laura J. , Foreman, Nicholas K. , Allen, Jeffrey C. , Moertel, Christopher L. , Areaux, Raymond G. , Crawford, John Ross , Brodsky, Michael, Esbenshade, Adam J. , Cutter, Gary

Neuro-Oncology | June 18, 2024 | Volume: 26 | Issue: Supplement_4 | Pages: 0-0

10.1093/neuonc/noae064.582 Get It

Abstract BACKGROUND NF1-OPGs are amorphous tumors involving either single or multiple locations (optic nerve, chiasm, tract) along the anterior visual pathway (AVP). In this prospective study, we investigated how volumetric MRI measures of the AVP as well as other clinical variables are associated with treatment decisions in children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPGs. METHODS Children with newly diagnosed NF1-OPG whose MRI included a T1-weighted volumetric sequence without significant artifact at their enrollment visit were eligible for inclusion. All subjects underwent a quantitative ophthalmic exam to determine if visual acuity (VA) was normal. The neuro-oncologist/NF1 expert determined whether the subject would be observed or undergo treatment at that baseline visit. Volumetric MRI analysis was automatically performed using a deep learning network that measured AVP volume (mm3). Non-parametric group comparisons and multivariable logistic regression models evaluated the impact of age at enrollment, sex, NF1 inheritance type, AVP volume, and VA on the decision for immediate treatment with chemotherapy versus observation. RESULTS One-hundred twenty-three subjects met inclusion criteria. Subjects assigned to observation (N=112, 44% female) and subjects immediately treated with chemotherapy (N=11, 80% female) at enrollment were of similar age (2.7 and 2.8 years, respectively) and inheritance (p > 0.05). Abnormal VA was present more often in the treatment group (46%) compared to the observation group (17%, p <0.001). AVP volume was significantly greater in the treatment group (4,181.1mm3) compared to the observation group (1,819.8mm3, p <0.001). AVP volume, sex, and VA reached significance in univariable regression, however, in the multivariable regression model only the AVP volume (p < 0.001) was significantly associated with treatment initiation. DISCUSSION Children with greater NF1-OPG AVP volumes are treated more often compared with those with lower volumes. Volumetric measures of NF1-OPGs are a valuable metric in understanding treatment patterns and are positioned to help inform clinical decision making.
Complications Occurring Through 5 Years Following Primary Intraocular Lens Implantation for Pediatric Cataract
Yen, Kimberly G., Repka, Michael X. , Sutherland, Desirae R. , Haider, Kathryn M. , Kraker, Raymond T. , Galvin, Jennifer, Li, Zhuokai , Holmes, Jonathan M. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Wallace, David K. , Enyedi, Laura B. , Jones, Sarah K., Hug, Denise, Stahl, Erin D., Dent, Rebecca J., Kong, Lingkun , Wang, Serena , Gallerson, Bryan K., Hutchinson, Amy K., Lenhart, Phoebe D. , Brower, Judy, Morrison, David G., Ruark, Scott T., Mets-Halgrimson, Rebecca, Yoon, Hawke , Hamidullah, Aaliyah, Anderson, Jill S., Holleschau, Ann M., Superstein, Rosanne , Bélanger, Caroline, Fallaha, Nicole, Hamel, Patrick , Thibeault, Maryse, Tamkins, Susanna M. , Park, Hee-Jung S., Trumler, Anya A., Liu, Xiaonong, Astle, William F., Sanders, Emi , McOwen, Diana C., Gray, Michael E. , Yang, Michael B. , Bowman, Corey S., Therriault, Margaret, Smith, Heather , Whitaker, Michele E., Örge, Faruk , Grigorian, A. Paula, Baird, Alicia M., Strominger, Mitchell B. , Klein, Shelley, Kemmer, Jacquelyn D., Neiman, Alexandra E., Mendoza, Myra N., Frohwein, Jill J., Bremer, Don L., Cassady, Cybil, Golden, Richard P., Jordan, Catherine O., Oravec, Sara A., Yanovitch, Tammy L. , Lunsford, Keven, Nye, Christina, Shea, Caroline, Stillman, SueAnn M., Iderstine, Stephen C. Van, Robertson, Elisa, Cruz, Oscar A., Ghadban, Rafif, Govreau, Dawn, Longmuir, Susannah Q. , Shan, Xiaoyan, Taylor, Kate , Powell, Christine, Hammond, Benjamin P., Gearinger, Matthew D., Czubinski, Andrea, Salvin, Jonathan, Fisher, Alicia, Lee, Katherine A., Brooks, Daniel , Schweinler, Bonita R., Sala, Nicholas A., Sala, Allyson M., Summers, Allison I. , Karr, Daniel J. , Wilson, Lorri B., Rauch, Paula K., O’Hara, Mary, Gandhi, Nandini, Hashmi, Tania, Colburn, Jeffrey, Dittman, Eileen, Whitfill, Charles R., Wheeler, Amy M., McCourt, Emily A. , Singh, Jasleen , Welnick, Nanastasia, Azar, Nathalie F., Baker, Joseph, Droste, Patrick J. , Peters, Robert J., Hilbrands, Jan, Pineles, Stacy L., Bernardo, Marianne J., Peterson, Edward, Peterson, Charla H., Kumar, Kartik , Melese, Ephrem, Lingua, Robert W., Grijalva, Jeff, Crouch, Earl R., Crouch, Earl R., Ventura, Gaylord, Anninger, William, Benson, Shawn L., Karp, Karen A. , Smith, Jordana M., Brickman-Kelleher, Jill, Ticho, Benjamin H., Khammar, Alexander J., Clausius, Deborah A., Guo, Suquin, Chamberlain, Carolyn, Schloff, Susan, Madigan, William P., Burkman, Donna, Ramsey, Jean E., McConnell, Kate H. , Friedman, Ilana, Rosado, José , Sauberan, Donald P., Hemberger, Jody C., Davis, Patricia L., Rudaitis, Indre, Lowery, Robert S., Cupit, Shawn, Bothun, Erick D. , Wernimont, Suzanne M., Neilsen, Rebecca A., Baran, Francine, Gladstone, Amy, Smith, Justin , Mellott, Mei, Kieser, Troy, Erzurum, S. Ayse , Colon, Beth, Shah, Birva, Quebbemann, Micaela, Austin, Darrell S., Boyle, Nicole M., Conner, Courtney L., Chandler, Danielle L. , Donahue, Quayleen, Fimbel, Brooke P., Robinson, Julianne L., Hercinovic, Amra, Hoepner, James E., Kaplon, Joseph D., Melia, Michele , Ortiz, Gillaine, Woodard, Victoria C., Stutz, Kathleen M., Everett, Donald F., Diener‐West, Marie , Baker, John D., Davis, Barry R. , Phelps, Dale L. , Poff, Stephen W., Tychsen, Lawrence , Bradfield, Yasmin S., Foster, Nicole C. , Plager, David A. , Silver, Jayne L., Weise, Katherine K., Verderber, Lisa C. , Dean, Trevano W., Campomanes, Alejandra G. de Alba , Young, Marielle P. , Rahmani, Bahram , Whitehead, George F., Lambert, Scott R. , Kurup, Sudhi P. , Kraus, Courtney L. , Hatt, Sarah R. , Cotter, Susan A. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Freedman, Sharon F. , Prakalapakorn, Sasapin Grace , Ranaivo, Hantamalala Ralay , Areaux, Raymond G. , Chang, Ta Chen , Traboulsi, Elias I. , Ghasia, Fatema F. , Chen, Vicki, Rogers, David L. , LaRoche, G. Robert, Larson, Scott A. , Clarke, Michael W. , Hendricks, Dorothy H. , Jin, Jing , Brooks, Daniel, Rauch, Paula K., Baker, Joseph, Peterson, Edward, Crouch, Earl R., Suh, Donny Won , Christiansen, Stephen P. , Herlihy, Erin P. , Beck, Roy W. , Henderson, Robert J. , Wu, Rui , Saunders, Richard Anthony , Salchow, Daniel J. , Birch, Eileen E. , Manny, Ruth E. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

JAMA Ophthalmology | June 23, 2023 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 705

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2335 Get It

Importance Lensectomy with primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is often used in the management of nontraumatic pediatric cataract, but long-term data evaluating the association of age and IOL location with the incidence of complications are limited. Objective To describe the incidence of complications and additional eye surgeries through 5 years following pediatric lensectomy with primary IOL implantation and association with age at surgery and IOL location. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study used Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group cataract registry data from 61 institution- and community-based practices over 3 years (June 2012 to July 2015). Participants were children younger than 13 years without baseline glaucoma who had primary IOL implantation (345 bilateral and 264 unilateral) for nontraumatic cataract. Data analysis was performed between September 2021 and January 2023. Exposures Lensectomy with primary IOL implantation. Main Outcome and Measures Five-year cumulative incidence of complications by age at surgery (<2 years, 2 to <4 years, 4 to <7 years, and 7 to <13 years) and by IOL location (sulcus vs capsular bag) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results The cohort included 609 eyes from 491 children (mean [SD] age, 5.6 [3.3] years; 261 [53%] male and 230 [47%] female). Following cataract extraction with primary IOL implantation, a frequent complication was surgery for visual axis opacification (VAO) (cumulative incidence, 32%; 95% CI, 27%-36%). Cumulative incidence was lower with anterior vitrectomy at the time of IOL placement (12%; 95% CI, 8%-16%) vs without (58%; 95% CI, 50%-65%), and the risk of undergoing surgery for VAO was associated with not performing anterior vitrectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 6.19; 95% CI, 3.70-10.34; P < .001). After adjusting for anterior vitrectomy at lens surgery, there were no differences in incidence of surgery for VAO by age at surgery (<2 years, HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.63-2.87], 2 to <4 years, HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.44-1.68], 4 to <7 years, HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.72-1.56]; P = .74) or by capsular bag vs sulcus IOL fixation (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.36-4.17; P = .75). Cumulative incidence of glaucoma plus glaucoma suspect by 5 years was 7% (95% CI, 4%-9%), which did not differ by age after controlling for IOL location and laterality. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, a frequent complication following pediatric lensectomy with primary IOL was surgery for VAO, which was associated with primary anterior vitrectomy not being performed but was not associated with age at surgery or IOL location. The risk of glaucoma development across all ages at surgery suggests a need for long-term monitoring.
Incidence of Glaucoma-Related Adverse Events in the First 5 Years After Pediatric Lensectomy
Bothun, Erick D. , Repka, Michael X. , Kraker, Raymond T. , Leske, David A. , Li, Zhuokai , Astle, William F., Holmes, Jonathan M. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Wallace, David K. , Enyedi, Laura B. , Jones, Sarah K., Hug, Denise, Stahl, Erin D., Dent, Rebecca J., Kong, Lingkun , Wang, Serena , Gallerson, Bryan K., Hutchinson, Amy K., Lenhart, Phoebe D. , Brower, Judy, Morrison, David G., Ruark, Scott T., Mets-Halgrimson, Rebecca, Yoon, Hawke , Hamidullah, Aaliyah, Anderson, Jill S., Holleschau, Ann M., Superstein, Rosanne , Bélanger, Caroline, Fallaha, Nicole, Hamel, Patrick , Thibeault, Maryse, Tamkins, Susanna M. , Park, Hee-Jung S., Trumler, Anya A., Liu, Xiaonong, Sanders, Emi , McOwen, Diana C., Gray, Michael E. , Yang, Michael B. , Bowman, Corey S., Galvin, Jennifer, Therriault, Margaret, Smith, Heather , Whitaker, Michele E., Örge, Faruk , Grigorian, A. Paula, Baird, Alicia M., Strominger, Mitchell B. , Klein, Shelley, Kemmer, Jacquelyn D., Neiman, Alexandra E., Mendoza, Myra N., Frohwein, Jill J., Bremer, Don L., Cassady, Cybil, Golden, Richard P., Jordan, Catherine O., Oravec, Sara A., Yanovitch, Tammy L. , Lunsford, Keven, Nye, Christina, Shea, Caroline, Stillman, SueAnn M., Iderstine, Stephen C. Van, Robertson, Elisa, Cruz, Oscar A., Ghadban, Rafif, Govreau, Dawn, Longmuir, Susannah Q. , Shan, Xiaoyan, Taylor, Kate , Powell, Christine, Hammond, Benjamin P., Gearinger, Matthew D., Czubinski, Andrea, Salvin, Jonathan, Fisher, Alicia, Lee, Katherine A., Brooks, Daniel , Schweinler, Bonita R., Sala, Nicholas A., Sala, Allyson M., Summers, Allison I. , Karr, Daniel J. , Wilson, Lorri B., Rauch, Paula K., O’Hara, Mary, Gandhi, Nandini, Hashmi, Tania, Colburn, Jeffrey, Dittman, Eileen, Whitfill, Charles R., Wheeler, Amy M., McCourt, Emily A. , Singh, Jasleen , Welnick, Nanastasia, Azar, Nathalie F., Baker, Joseph, Droste, Patrick J. , Peters, Robert J., Hilbrands, Jan, Pineles, Stacy L., Bernardo, Marianne J., Peterson, Edward, Peterson, Charla H., Kumar, Kartik , Melese, Ephrem, Lingua, Robert W., Grijalva, Jeff, Crouch, Earl R., Crouch, Earl R., Ventura, Gaylord, Anninger, William, Benson, Shawn L., Karp, Karen A. , Smith, Jordana M., Brickman-Kelleher, Jill, Ticho, Benjamin H., Khammar, Alexander J., Clausius, Deborah A., Guo, Suquin, Chamberlain, Carolyn, Schloff, Susan, Madigan, William P., Burkman, Donna, Ramsey, Jean E., McConnell, Kate H. , Friedman, Ilana, Rosado, José , Sauberan, Donald P., Hemberger, Jody C., Davis, Patricia L., Rudaitis, Indre, Lowery, Robert S., Cupit, Shawn, Mohney, Brian G., Wernimont, Suzanne M., Neilsen, Rebecca A., Baran, Francine, Gladstone, Amy, Smith, Justin , Mellott, Mei, Kieser, Troy, Erzurum, S. Ayse , Colon, Beth, Shah, Birva, Quebbemann, Micaela, Austin, Darrell S., Boyle, Nicole M., Conner, Courtney L., Chandler, Danielle L. , Donahue, Quayleen, Fimbel, Brooke P., Robinson, Julianne L., Hercinovic, Amra, Hoepner, James E., Kaplon, Joseph D., Melia, Michele , Ortiz, Gillaine, Woodard, Victoria C., Stutz, Kathleen M., Sutherland, Desirae R. , Everett, Donald F., Diener‐West, Marie , Baker, John D., Davis, Barry R. , Phelps, Dale L. , Poff, Stephen W., Tychsen, Lawrence , Bradfield, Yasmin S., Foster, Nicole C. , Plager, David A. , Salchow, Daniel J. , Silver, Jayne L., Weise, Katherine K., Verderber, Lisa C. , Dean, Trevano W., Yen, Kimberly G., Campomanes, Alejandra G. de Alba , Young, Marielle P. , Rahmani, Bahram , Haider, Kathryn M. , Whitehead, George F., Lambert, Scott R. , Kurup, Sudhi P. , Kraus, Courtney L. , Wu, Rui, Hatt, Sarah R. , Freedman, Sharon F. , Cotter, Susan A. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Prakalapakorn, Sasapin Grace , Ranaivo, Hantamalala Ralay , Areaux, Raymond G. , Chang, Ta Chen , Traboulsi, Elias I. , Ghasia, Fatema F. , Chen, Vicki, Rogers, David L. , LaRoche, G. Robert, Larson, Scott A. , Clarke, Michael W. , Hendricks, Dorothy H. , Jin, Jing , Brooks, Daniel, Rauch, Paula K., Baker, Joseph, Peterson, Edward, Crouch, Earl R., Suh, Donny Won , Christiansen, Stephen P. , Herlihy, Erin P. , Beck, Roy W. , Henderson, Robert J. , Saunders, Richard Anthony , Birch, Eileen E. , Manny, Ruth E. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

JAMA Ophthalmology | February 16, 2023 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 324

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.6413 Get It

ImportanceGlaucoma can develop following cataract removal in children.ObjectiveTo assess the cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events (defined as glaucoma or glaucoma suspect) and factors associated with risk of these adverse events in the first 5 years after lensectomy prior to 13 years of age.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used longitudinal registry data collected at enrollment and annually for 5 years from 45 institutional and 16 community sites. Participants were children aged 12 years or younger with at least 1 office visit after lensectomy from June 2012 to July 2015. Data were analyzed from February through December 2022.ExposuresUsual clinical care after lensectomy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events and baseline factors associated with risk of these adverse events.ResultsThe study included 810 children (1049 eyes); 443 eyes of 321 children (55% female; mean [SD] age, 0.89 [1.97] years) were aphakic after lensectomy, and 606 eyes of 489 children (53% male; mean [SD] age, 5.65 [3.32] years) were pseudophakic. The 5-year cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events was 29% (95% CI, 25%-34%) in 443 eyes with aphakia and 7% (95% CI, 5%-9%) in 606 eyes with pseudophakia; 7% (95% CI, 5%-10%) of aphakic eyes and 3% (95% CI, 2%-5%) of pseudophakic eyes were diagnosed as glaucoma suspect. Among aphakic eyes, a higher risk for glaucoma-related adverse events was associated with 4 of 8 factors, including age less than 3 months (vs ≥3 months: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.88; 99% CI, 1.57-5.23), abnormal anterior segment (vs normal: aHR, 2.88; 99% CI, 1.56-5.30), intraoperative complications at time of lensectomy (vs none; aHR, 2.25; 99% CI, 1.04-4.87), and bilaterality (vs unilaterality: aHR, 1.88; 99% CI, 1.02-3.48). Neither of the 2 factors evaluated for pseudophakic eyes, laterality and anterior vitrectomy, were associated with risk of glaucoma-related adverse events.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, glaucoma-related adverse events were common after cataract surgery in children; age less than 3 months at surgery was associated with elevated risk of the adverse events in aphakic eyes. Children with pseudophakia, who were older at surgery, less frequently developed a glaucoma-related adverse event within 5 years of lensectomy. The findings suggest that ongoing monitoring for the development of glaucoma is needed after lensectomy at any age.
Visual Outcomes and Complications After Lensectomy for Traumatic Cataract in Children
Enyedi, Laura B. , Jones, Sarah K., Hug, Denise, Stahl, Erin D., Dent, Rebecca J., Yen, Kimberly G., Kong, Lingkun , Wang, Serena , Gallerson, Bryan K., Lambert, Scott R. , Hutchinson, Amy K., Brower, Judy, Ruark, Scott T., Rahmani, Bahram , Kurup, Sudhi P. , Mets-Halgrimson, Rebecca, Yoon, Hawke , Hamidullah, Aaliyah, Anderson, Jill S., Holleschau, Ann M., Superstein, Rosanne , Bélanger, Caroline, Fallaha, Nicole, Hamel, Patrick , Thibeault, Maryse, Tamkins, Susanna M. , Kraus, Courtney L. , Park, Hee-Jung S., Trumler, Anya A., Liu, Xiaonong, Astle, William F., Sanders, Emi , McOwen, Diana C., Yang, Michael B. , Bowman, Corey S., Galvin, Jennifer, Therriault, Margaret, Haider, Kathryn M. , Smith, Heather , Whitaker, Michele E., Örge, Faruk , Grigorian, A. Paula, Baird, Alicia M., Strominger, Mitchell B. , Klein, Shelley, Campomanes, Alejandra de Alba, Kemmer, Jacquelyn D., Neiman, Alexandra E., Mendoza, Myra N., Frohwein, Jill J., Bremer, Don L., Cassady, Cybil, Golden, Richard P., Jordan, Catherine O., Oravec, Sara A., Yanovitch, Tammy L. , Lunsford, Keven, Whitehead, George F., Nye, Christina, Shea, Caroline, Stillman, SueAnn M., Iderstine, Stephen C. Van, Young, Marielle P. , Robertson, Elisa, Cruz, Oscar A., Ghadban, Rafif, Govreau, Dawn, Longmuir, Susannah Q. , Shan, Xiaoyan, Taylor, Kate , Powell, Christine, Hammond, Benjamin P., Gearinger, Matthew D., Czubinski, Andrea, Salvin, Jonathan, Fisher, Alicia, Lee, Katherine A., Brooks, Daniel , Schweinler, Bonita R., Sala, Nicholas A., Sala, Allyson M., Summers, Allison I. , Karr, Daniel J. , Wilson, Lorri B., Rauch, Paula K., O’Hara, Mary, Gandhi, Nandini, Hashmi, Tania, Colburn, Jeffrey, Dittman, Eileen, Whitfill, Charles R., Wheeler, Amy M., McCourt, Emily A. , Singh, Jasleen , Welnick, Nanastasia, Azar, Nathalie F., Baker, Joseph, Droste, Patrick J. , Peters, Robert J., Hilbrands, Jan, Pineles, Stacy L., Bernardo, Marianne J., Peterson, Edward, Peterson, Charla H., Kumar, Kartik , Melese, Ephrem, Lingua, Robert W., Grijalva, Jeff, Crouch, Earl R., Ventura, Gaylord, Anninger, William, Benson, Shawn L., Karp, Karen A. , Smith, Jordana M., Brickman-Kelleher, Jill, Ticho, Benjamin H., Khammar, Alexander J., Clausius, Deborah A., Guo, Suquin, Chamberlain, Carolyn, Schloff, Susan, Madigan, William P., Burkman, Donna, Ramsey, Jean E., McConnell, Kate H. , Friedman, Ilana, Rosado, José , Sauberan, Donald P., Hemberger, Jody C., Davis, Patricia L., Rudaitis, Indre, Lowery, Robert S., Cupit, Shawn, Mohney, Brian G., Wernimont, Suzanne M., Neilsen, Rebecca A., Herlihy, Erin P. , Baran, Francine, Gladstone, Amy, Smith, Justin , Mellott, Mei, Kieser, Troy, Erzurum, S. Ayse , Colon, Beth, Shah, Birva, Quebbemann, Micaela, Austin, Darrell S., Boyle, Nicole M., Conner, Courtney L., Chandler, Danielle L. , Donahue, Quayleen, Fimbel, Brooke P., Hardt, Graham M., Hoepner, James E., Kaplon, Joseph D., Lazar, Elizabeth L., Melia, Michele , Ortiz, Gillaine, Rojas, Diana E., Shah, Jennifer A., Everett, Donald F., Diener‐West, Marie , Baker, John D., Davis, Barry R. , Phelps, Dale L. , Poff, Stephen W., Tychsen, Lawrence , Bradfield, Yasmin S., Foster, Nicole C. , Plager, David A. , Silver, Jayne L., Weise, Katherine K., Verderber, Lisa C. , Bothun, Erick D. , Repka, Michael X. , Dean, Trevano W., Gray, Michael E. , Lenhart, Phoebe D. , Li, Zhuokai , Morrison, David G., Wallace, David K. , Kraker, Raymond T. , Holmes, Jonathan M. , Freedman, Sharon F. , Prakalapakorn, Sasapin Grace , Ranaivo, Hantamalala Ralay , Areaux, Raymond G. , Chang, Ta Chen , Traboulsi, Elias I. , Ghasia, Fatema F. , Chen, Vicki, Campomanes, Alejandra G. de Alba , Rogers, David L. , LaRoche, G. Robert, Larson, Scott A. , Clarke, Michael W. , Hendricks, Dorothy H. , Jin, Jing , Brooks, Daniel, Rauch, Paula K., Baker, Joseph, Peterson, Edward, Suh, Donny Won , Christiansen, Stephen P. , Beck, Roy W. , Wu, Rui , Saunders, Richard Anthony , Salchow, Daniel J. , Birch, Eileen E. , Manny, Ruth E. , Cotter, Susan A. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

JAMA Ophthalmology | May 7, 2021 | Volume: 139 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 647

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2021.0980 Get It

NFB-09. ENROLLMENT AND CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF NEWLY DIAGNOSED, NEUROFIBROMATOSIS TYPE 1 ASSOCIATED OPTIC PATHWAY GLIOMA (NF1-OPG): PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM AN INTERNATIONAL MULTI-CENTER NATURAL HISTORY STUDY
Fisher, Michael J. , Liu, Grant T. , Ferner, Rosalie E. , Listernick, Robert , Zeid, Janice Lasky, Ullrich, Nicole J. , Stasheff, Steven F., Rosser, Tena, Ardern‐Holmes, Simone , Flaherty, Maree , Hummel, Trent R. , Motley, William W., Bielamowicz, Kevin , Phillips, Paul H. , Reginald, Arun, Peragallo, Jason H. , Sato, Aimee , Hogan, Nick, Foreman, Nick, McCourt, Emily A. , Ranka, Milan P., Campen, Cynthia , Beres, Shannon , Stearns, Duncan , Örge, Faruk , O’Halloran, Henry S., Brodsky, Michael A., Donahue, Sean P., Gutmann, David H. , Blank, Peter M K de , Heidary, Gena , Bornhorst, Miriam , Borchert, Mark , Bouffet, Éric , Wolf, David S. , Mater, David Van , El-Dairi, Mays , Tarczy‐Hornoch, Kristina , Klesse, Laura J. , Foreman, Nick, Allen, Jeffrey C. , Moertel, Christopher L. , Areaux, Raymond G. , Crawford, John Ross , Esbenshade, Adam J. , Cutter, Gary , Avery, Robert A.

Neuro-Oncology | December 4, 2020 | Volume: 22 | Issue: Supplement_3 | Pages: iii419-iii419

10.1093/neuonc/noaa222.613 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Because treatment and clinical management decisions for children with NF1-OPG remain challenging, we sought to establish evidence-based guidelines. We prospectively enrolled children with newly-diagnosed NF1-OPGs, and gathered standardized clinical neuro-oncology and ophthalmology assessments. METHODS Only children with NF1 and newly diagnosed OPGs, confirmed by central review, were eligible. Indications for obtaining the initial MRI, as well as factors associated with the decision to treat with chemotherapy or observe without treatment, were obtained. Quantitative visual acuity (VA), other ophthalmic features, and imaging were captured at standard time points. Goal enrollment is 250 subjects. RESULTS One-hundred thirty-three children (52% female) from 20 institutions met inclusion criteria, and were included in this preliminary analysis. Eighty-six percent of subjects were able to perform quantitative VA testing at enrollment. The most common reasons for the diagnostic MRI included screening related to NF1 diagnosis (36.8%), ophthalmologic concerns (29.3%), and non-ophthalmologic concerns (24.8%), such as headache. To date, twenty subjects have initiated treatment with chemotherapy, twelve (9%) at the time of the initial OPG diagnosis. Median age at OPG diagnosis was 3.1 years. Age and sex distribution were similar in subjects immediately entering the observation and treatment arms (median age 3.0 versus 3.5 years, respectively). CONCLUSION Most children with NF1-OPGs are observed at time of their initial OPG diagnosis, rather than treated. Importantly, a large proportion of children are able to complete quantitative VA testing at enrollment. Once enrollment is complete, these data will help to establish evidence-based guidelines for clinical management of NF1-OPGs.