Back to Authors

Bothun, Erick D.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6749-4768

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 13

At‐home visual acuity in children using a custom iPhone application compared with standardized in‐office visual acuity testing
Roberts, Tawna L. , Bothun, Erick D. , Zhu, Yufeng, Henderson, Robert J. , Boyle, Nicole M, Leske, David A. , Wernimont, Suzanne M., Marino, Carrie E, Manh, Vivian M. , Youngerman, Jillian M, Qayum, Jennifer N, Srinivasan, Gayathri , Titelbaum, Jenna R. , Crouch, Eric R. , Colburn, Jeffrey, Esposito, Christina , Zeto, V Lori, Connolly, Katie, Bhakta, Rita M, Lorenzana, Ingryd J., McDowell, Paula, Beaulieu, Wesley T, Kraker, Raymond T, Holmes, Jonathan M, Pineles, Stacy L., Weise, Katherine K., Cotter, Susan A, Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Beaulieu, Wesley T , Kraker, Raymond T , Hatt, Sarah R. , Raghuram, Aparna , McDowell, Paula S., Kraker, Raymond T. , Holmes, Jonathan M. , Cotter, Susan A.

Optometry and Vision Science | May 1, 2026 | Volume: 103 | Issue: 4 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ovs2.70040 Get It

ABSTRACT Purpose To validate a custom smartphone application for at‐home visual acuity (VA) measurement in children. Methods A total of 452 children aged 3–17.5 years participated. Certified examiners measured in‐office test–retest VA (logMAR) using gold‐standard Amblyopia Treatment Study HOTV (3‐to‐6‐year‐olds, younger cohort) or electronic Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (7‐to‐17.5‐year‐olds, older cohort) protocols at 3–4.5 m and app‐based VA at 1.5 m. Caregivers measured at‐home app‐based VA at 1.5 m. Results Comparing at‐home app‐based with gold‐standard VA, in eyes 20/40 or better, 95% (143/151) and 93% (91/98) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = −0.03, older = −0.04; 95% limits‐of‐agreement half‐width (LOA): younger = ±0.26, older = ±0.22). In eyes 20/50 or worse, 66% (42/64) and 75% (76/101) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.11, older = 0.13, LOA: younger = ±0.50, older = ±0.51). Comparing in‐office app‐based VA with gold‐standard VA, in eyes 20/40 or better, 98% (160/164) and 94% (99/105) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = −0.03, older = −0.03; LOA: younger = ±0.22; older = ±0.24). In eyes 20/50 or worse, 85% (60/71) and 91% (101/111) of the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.04; older = 0.04; LOA: younger = ±0.39; older = ±0.24). For gold‐standard test–retest, in eyes 20/40 or better, 99% (163/164) and 99% (104/105) of the younger and older cohorts had retest within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.00; older = 0.01; LOA: younger = ±0.17; older = ±0.11). For 20/50 or worse, 92% (66/72) and 100% (111/111) in the younger and older cohorts were within 2 lines, respectively (mean differences: younger = 0.01; older = 0.02; LOA: younger = ±0.35; older = ±0.15). Conclusions Our app demonstrated good concordance with the gold standard at home and in the office for eyes with VA of 20/40 or better. However, concordance decreased considerably for eyes with VA 20/50 or worse, particularly at home.
Evaluation of AI Summaries on Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ophthalmology Notes
Becerra, Clara M. Castillejo , Dahl, Heidi M., Patel, Neil R. , Kaplan, Tyler M., Kohli, Darrell, Bothun, Erick D. , Mohney, Brian G., Tooley, Andrea A. , Baratz, Keith H. , Iezzi, Raymond , Bakri, Sophie J. , Roddy, Gavin W. , Hodge, David O. , Sit, Arthur J. , Chen, John J. , D'Souza, Haley S, Barkmeier, Andrew J. , Hodge, David, Chen, John J , Castillejo Becerra, Clara M , Sit, Arthur J , Tailor, Prashant D. , D’Souza, Haley S. , Patel, Neil R., Starr, Matthew R.

JAMA Ophthalmology | April 4, 2025 | Volume: 143 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 410

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2025.0351 Get It

ImportanceSpecialized ophthalmology terminology limits comprehension for nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals, hindering interdisciplinary communication and patient care. The clinical implementation of large language models (LLMs) into practice has to date been relatively unexplored.ObjectiveTo evaluate LLM–generated plain language summaries (PLSs) integrated into standard ophthalmology notes (SONs) in improving diagnostic understanding, satisfaction, and clarity.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsRandomized quality improvement study conducted from February 1, 2024, to May 31, 2024, including data from inpatient and outpatient encounters in a single tertiary academic center. Participants were nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals and ophthalmologists. The single inclusion criterion was any encounter note generated by an ophthalmologist during the study dates. Exclusion criteria were (1) lack of established nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals for outpatient encounters and (2) procedure-only patient encounters.InterventionAddition of LLM-generated plain language summaries to ophthalmology notes.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary outcome was survey responses from nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals assessing understanding, satisfaction, and clarity of ophthalmology notes. Secondary outcomes were survey responses from ophthalmologists evaluating PLS in terms of clinical workflow and accuracy, objective measures of semantic quality, and safety analysis.ResultsA total of 362 (85%) nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals (33.0% response rate) preferred the PLS to SON. Demographic data on age, race and ethnicity, and sex were not collected. Nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals reported enhanced diagnostic understanding (percentage point increase, 9.0; 95% CI, 0.3-18.2; P = .01), increased note detail satisfaction (percentage point increase, 21.5; 95% CI, 11.4-31.5; P < .001), and improved explanation clarity (percentage point increase, 23.0; 95% CI, 12.0-33.1; P < .001) for notes containing a PLS. The addition of a PLS was associated with reduced comprehension gaps between clinicians who were comfortable and uncomfortable with ophthalmology terminology (from 26.1% [95% CI, 13.7%-38.6%; P < .001] to 14.4% [95% CI, 4.3%-24.6%; P > .06]). PLS semantic analysis found high meaning preservation (bidirectional encoder representations from transformers score mean F1 score: 0.85) with greater readability than SONs (Flesch Reading Ease: 51.8 vs 43.6; Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level: 10.7 vs 11.9). Ophthalmologists (n = 489; 84% response rate) reported high PLS accuracy (90% [320 of 355] a great deal) with minimal review time burden (94.9% [464 of 489] ≤1 minute). PLS error rate on ophthalmologist review was 26% (126 of 489). A total of 83.9% (104 of 126) of errors were deemed low risk for harm and none had a risk of severe harm or death.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this study, use of LLM-generated PLSs was associated with enhanced comprehension and satisfaction among nonophthalmology clinicians and professionals, which might aid interdisciplinary communication. Careful implementation and safety monitoring are recommended for clinical integration given the persistence of errors despite physician review.
Role of Intraocular Lens Implantation in Children
Bothun, Erick D.

Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility | May 10, 2024 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 93-96

10.1080/2576117x.2023.2221908 Get It

Applying Normal PedEyeQ Thresholds to Assess Eye-related Quality of Life among Children with Strabismus
Leske, David A. , Wernimont, Suzanne M., Bothun, Erick D. , Holmes, Jonathan M. , Hatt, Sarah R. , Birch, Eileen E. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

Journal of Binocular Vision and Ocular Motility | May 10, 2024 | Volume: 72 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 92-96

10.1080/2576117x.2022.2026733 Get It

Complex balanced intrachromosomal rearrangement involving PITX2 identified as a cause of Axenfeld‐Rieger Syndrome
Farris, Joseph , Khanna, Cheryl L. , Smadbeck, James B. , Johnson, Sarah H. , Bothun, Erick D. , Kaplan, Tyler, Hoffman, Francis, Polonis, Katarzyna , Reis, Linda M. , Rust, Laura, Hoppman, Nicole L., Vasmatzis, George , Marcou, Cherisse A. , Schimmenti, Lisa A. , Klee, Eric W. , Khanna, Cheryl, Bothun, Erick, Oliver, Gavin, Schimmenti, Lisa A , Farris, Joseph D , Hoffman, Francis, Oliver, Gavin R. , Semina, Elena V.

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | January 18, 2024 | Volume: 194 | Issue: 5 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/ajmg.a.63542 Get It

AbstractAxenfeld‐Rieger Syndrome (ARS) type 1 is a rare autosomal dominant condition characterized by anterior chamber anomalies, umbilical defects, dental hypoplasia, and craniofacial anomalies, with Meckel's diverticulum in some individuals. Here, we describe a clinically ascertained female of childbearing age with ARS for whom clinical targeted sequencing and deletion/duplication analysis followed by clinical exome and genome sequencing resulted in no pathogenic variants or variants of unknown significance in PITX2 or FOXC1. Advanced bioinformatic analysis of the genome data identified a complex, balanced rearrangement disrupting PITX2. This case is the first reported intrachromosomal rearrangement leading to ARS, illustrating that for patients with compelling clinical phenotypes but negative genomic testing, additional bioinformatic analysis are essential to identify subtle genomic abnormalities in target genes.
Complications Occurring Through 5 Years Following Primary Intraocular Lens Implantation for Pediatric Cataract
Yen, Kimberly G., Repka, Michael X. , Sutherland, Desirae R. , Haider, Kathryn M. , Kraker, Raymond T. , Galvin, Jennifer, Li, Zhuokai , Holmes, Jonathan M. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Wallace, David K. , Enyedi, Laura B. , Jones, Sarah K., Hug, Denise, Stahl, Erin D., Dent, Rebecca J., Kong, Lingkun , Wang, Serena , Gallerson, Bryan K., Hutchinson, Amy K., Lenhart, Phoebe D. , Brower, Judy, Morrison, David G., Ruark, Scott T., Mets-Halgrimson, Rebecca, Yoon, Hawke , Hamidullah, Aaliyah, Anderson, Jill S., Holleschau, Ann M., Superstein, Rosanne , Bélanger, Caroline, Fallaha, Nicole, Hamel, Patrick , Thibeault, Maryse, Tamkins, Susanna M. , Park, Hee-Jung S., Trumler, Anya A., Liu, Xiaonong, Astle, William F., Sanders, Emi , McOwen, Diana C., Gray, Michael E. , Yang, Michael B. , Bowman, Corey S., Therriault, Margaret, Smith, Heather , Whitaker, Michele E., Örge, Faruk , Grigorian, A. Paula, Baird, Alicia M., Strominger, Mitchell B. , Klein, Shelley, Kemmer, Jacquelyn D., Neiman, Alexandra E., Mendoza, Myra N., Frohwein, Jill J., Bremer, Don L., Cassady, Cybil, Golden, Richard P., Jordan, Catherine O., Oravec, Sara A., Yanovitch, Tammy L. , Lunsford, Keven, Nye, Christina, Shea, Caroline, Stillman, SueAnn M., Iderstine, Stephen C. Van, Robertson, Elisa, Cruz, Oscar A., Ghadban, Rafif, Govreau, Dawn, Longmuir, Susannah Q. , Shan, Xiaoyan, Taylor, Kate , Powell, Christine, Hammond, Benjamin P., Gearinger, Matthew D., Czubinski, Andrea, Salvin, Jonathan, Fisher, Alicia, Lee, Katherine A., Brooks, Daniel , Schweinler, Bonita R., Sala, Nicholas A., Sala, Allyson M., Summers, Allison I. , Karr, Daniel J. , Wilson, Lorri B., Rauch, Paula K., O’Hara, Mary, Gandhi, Nandini, Hashmi, Tania, Colburn, Jeffrey, Dittman, Eileen, Whitfill, Charles R., Wheeler, Amy M., McCourt, Emily A. , Singh, Jasleen , Welnick, Nanastasia, Azar, Nathalie F., Baker, Joseph, Droste, Patrick J. , Peters, Robert J., Hilbrands, Jan, Pineles, Stacy L., Bernardo, Marianne J., Peterson, Edward, Peterson, Charla H., Kumar, Kartik , Melese, Ephrem, Lingua, Robert W., Grijalva, Jeff, Crouch, Earl R., Crouch, Earl R., Ventura, Gaylord, Anninger, William, Benson, Shawn L., Karp, Karen A. , Smith, Jordana M., Brickman-Kelleher, Jill, Ticho, Benjamin H., Khammar, Alexander J., Clausius, Deborah A., Guo, Suquin, Chamberlain, Carolyn, Schloff, Susan, Madigan, William P., Burkman, Donna, Ramsey, Jean E., McConnell, Kate H. , Friedman, Ilana, Rosado, José , Sauberan, Donald P., Hemberger, Jody C., Davis, Patricia L., Rudaitis, Indre, Lowery, Robert S., Cupit, Shawn, Bothun, Erick D. , Wernimont, Suzanne M., Neilsen, Rebecca A., Baran, Francine, Gladstone, Amy, Smith, Justin , Mellott, Mei, Kieser, Troy, Erzurum, S. Ayse , Colon, Beth, Shah, Birva, Quebbemann, Micaela, Austin, Darrell S., Boyle, Nicole M., Conner, Courtney L., Chandler, Danielle L. , Donahue, Quayleen, Fimbel, Brooke P., Robinson, Julianne L., Hercinovic, Amra, Hoepner, James E., Kaplon, Joseph D., Melia, Michele , Ortiz, Gillaine, Woodard, Victoria C., Stutz, Kathleen M., Everett, Donald F., Diener‐West, Marie , Baker, John D., Davis, Barry R. , Phelps, Dale L. , Poff, Stephen W., Tychsen, Lawrence , Bradfield, Yasmin S., Foster, Nicole C. , Plager, David A. , Silver, Jayne L., Weise, Katherine K., Verderber, Lisa C. , Dean, Trevano W., Campomanes, Alejandra G. de Alba , Young, Marielle P. , Rahmani, Bahram , Whitehead, George F., Lambert, Scott R. , Kurup, Sudhi P. , Kraus, Courtney L. , Hatt, Sarah R. , Cotter, Susan A. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Freedman, Sharon F. , Prakalapakorn, Sasapin Grace , Ranaivo, Hantamalala Ralay , Areaux, Raymond G. , Chang, Ta Chen , Traboulsi, Elias I. , Ghasia, Fatema F. , Chen, Vicki, Rogers, David L. , LaRoche, G. Robert, Larson, Scott A. , Clarke, Michael W. , Hendricks, Dorothy H. , Jin, Jing , Brooks, Daniel, Rauch, Paula K., Baker, Joseph, Peterson, Edward, Crouch, Earl R., Suh, Donny Won , Christiansen, Stephen P. , Herlihy, Erin P. , Beck, Roy W. , Henderson, Robert J. , Wu, Rui , Saunders, Richard Anthony , Salchow, Daniel J. , Birch, Eileen E. , Manny, Ruth E. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

JAMA Ophthalmology | June 23, 2023 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 705

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.2335 Get It

Importance Lensectomy with primary intraocular lens (IOL) implantation is often used in the management of nontraumatic pediatric cataract, but long-term data evaluating the association of age and IOL location with the incidence of complications are limited. Objective To describe the incidence of complications and additional eye surgeries through 5 years following pediatric lensectomy with primary IOL implantation and association with age at surgery and IOL location. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective cohort study used Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group cataract registry data from 61 institution- and community-based practices over 3 years (June 2012 to July 2015). Participants were children younger than 13 years without baseline glaucoma who had primary IOL implantation (345 bilateral and 264 unilateral) for nontraumatic cataract. Data analysis was performed between September 2021 and January 2023. Exposures Lensectomy with primary IOL implantation. Main Outcome and Measures Five-year cumulative incidence of complications by age at surgery (<2 years, 2 to <4 years, 4 to <7 years, and 7 to <13 years) and by IOL location (sulcus vs capsular bag) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models. Results The cohort included 609 eyes from 491 children (mean [SD] age, 5.6 [3.3] years; 261 [53%] male and 230 [47%] female). Following cataract extraction with primary IOL implantation, a frequent complication was surgery for visual axis opacification (VAO) (cumulative incidence, 32%; 95% CI, 27%-36%). Cumulative incidence was lower with anterior vitrectomy at the time of IOL placement (12%; 95% CI, 8%-16%) vs without (58%; 95% CI, 50%-65%), and the risk of undergoing surgery for VAO was associated with not performing anterior vitrectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 6.19; 95% CI, 3.70-10.34; P < .001). After adjusting for anterior vitrectomy at lens surgery, there were no differences in incidence of surgery for VAO by age at surgery (<2 years, HR, 1.35 [95% CI, 0.63-2.87], 2 to <4 years, HR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.44-1.68], 4 to <7 years, HR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.72-1.56]; P = .74) or by capsular bag vs sulcus IOL fixation (HR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.36-4.17; P = .75). Cumulative incidence of glaucoma plus glaucoma suspect by 5 years was 7% (95% CI, 4%-9%), which did not differ by age after controlling for IOL location and laterality. Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study, a frequent complication following pediatric lensectomy with primary IOL was surgery for VAO, which was associated with primary anterior vitrectomy not being performed but was not associated with age at surgery or IOL location. The risk of glaucoma development across all ages at surgery suggests a need for long-term monitoring.
Incidence of Glaucoma-Related Adverse Events in the First 5 Years After Pediatric Lensectomy
Bothun, Erick D. , Repka, Michael X. , Kraker, Raymond T. , Leske, David A. , Li, Zhuokai , Astle, William F., Holmes, Jonathan M. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Wallace, David K. , Enyedi, Laura B. , Jones, Sarah K., Hug, Denise, Stahl, Erin D., Dent, Rebecca J., Kong, Lingkun , Wang, Serena , Gallerson, Bryan K., Hutchinson, Amy K., Lenhart, Phoebe D. , Brower, Judy, Morrison, David G., Ruark, Scott T., Mets-Halgrimson, Rebecca, Yoon, Hawke , Hamidullah, Aaliyah, Anderson, Jill S., Holleschau, Ann M., Superstein, Rosanne , Bélanger, Caroline, Fallaha, Nicole, Hamel, Patrick , Thibeault, Maryse, Tamkins, Susanna M. , Park, Hee-Jung S., Trumler, Anya A., Liu, Xiaonong, Sanders, Emi , McOwen, Diana C., Gray, Michael E. , Yang, Michael B. , Bowman, Corey S., Galvin, Jennifer, Therriault, Margaret, Smith, Heather , Whitaker, Michele E., Örge, Faruk , Grigorian, A. Paula, Baird, Alicia M., Strominger, Mitchell B. , Klein, Shelley, Kemmer, Jacquelyn D., Neiman, Alexandra E., Mendoza, Myra N., Frohwein, Jill J., Bremer, Don L., Cassady, Cybil, Golden, Richard P., Jordan, Catherine O., Oravec, Sara A., Yanovitch, Tammy L. , Lunsford, Keven, Nye, Christina, Shea, Caroline, Stillman, SueAnn M., Iderstine, Stephen C. Van, Robertson, Elisa, Cruz, Oscar A., Ghadban, Rafif, Govreau, Dawn, Longmuir, Susannah Q. , Shan, Xiaoyan, Taylor, Kate , Powell, Christine, Hammond, Benjamin P., Gearinger, Matthew D., Czubinski, Andrea, Salvin, Jonathan, Fisher, Alicia, Lee, Katherine A., Brooks, Daniel , Schweinler, Bonita R., Sala, Nicholas A., Sala, Allyson M., Summers, Allison I. , Karr, Daniel J. , Wilson, Lorri B., Rauch, Paula K., O’Hara, Mary, Gandhi, Nandini, Hashmi, Tania, Colburn, Jeffrey, Dittman, Eileen, Whitfill, Charles R., Wheeler, Amy M., McCourt, Emily A. , Singh, Jasleen , Welnick, Nanastasia, Azar, Nathalie F., Baker, Joseph, Droste, Patrick J. , Peters, Robert J., Hilbrands, Jan, Pineles, Stacy L., Bernardo, Marianne J., Peterson, Edward, Peterson, Charla H., Kumar, Kartik , Melese, Ephrem, Lingua, Robert W., Grijalva, Jeff, Crouch, Earl R., Crouch, Earl R., Ventura, Gaylord, Anninger, William, Benson, Shawn L., Karp, Karen A. , Smith, Jordana M., Brickman-Kelleher, Jill, Ticho, Benjamin H., Khammar, Alexander J., Clausius, Deborah A., Guo, Suquin, Chamberlain, Carolyn, Schloff, Susan, Madigan, William P., Burkman, Donna, Ramsey, Jean E., McConnell, Kate H. , Friedman, Ilana, Rosado, José , Sauberan, Donald P., Hemberger, Jody C., Davis, Patricia L., Rudaitis, Indre, Lowery, Robert S., Cupit, Shawn, Mohney, Brian G., Wernimont, Suzanne M., Neilsen, Rebecca A., Baran, Francine, Gladstone, Amy, Smith, Justin , Mellott, Mei, Kieser, Troy, Erzurum, S. Ayse , Colon, Beth, Shah, Birva, Quebbemann, Micaela, Austin, Darrell S., Boyle, Nicole M., Conner, Courtney L., Chandler, Danielle L. , Donahue, Quayleen, Fimbel, Brooke P., Robinson, Julianne L., Hercinovic, Amra, Hoepner, James E., Kaplon, Joseph D., Melia, Michele , Ortiz, Gillaine, Woodard, Victoria C., Stutz, Kathleen M., Sutherland, Desirae R. , Everett, Donald F., Diener‐West, Marie , Baker, John D., Davis, Barry R. , Phelps, Dale L. , Poff, Stephen W., Tychsen, Lawrence , Bradfield, Yasmin S., Foster, Nicole C. , Plager, David A. , Salchow, Daniel J. , Silver, Jayne L., Weise, Katherine K., Verderber, Lisa C. , Dean, Trevano W., Yen, Kimberly G., Campomanes, Alejandra G. de Alba , Young, Marielle P. , Rahmani, Bahram , Haider, Kathryn M. , Whitehead, George F., Lambert, Scott R. , Kurup, Sudhi P. , Kraus, Courtney L. , Wu, Rui, Hatt, Sarah R. , Freedman, Sharon F. , Cotter, Susan A. , Group, Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator, Prakalapakorn, Sasapin Grace , Ranaivo, Hantamalala Ralay , Areaux, Raymond G. , Chang, Ta Chen , Traboulsi, Elias I. , Ghasia, Fatema F. , Chen, Vicki, Rogers, David L. , LaRoche, G. Robert, Larson, Scott A. , Clarke, Michael W. , Hendricks, Dorothy H. , Jin, Jing , Brooks, Daniel, Rauch, Paula K., Baker, Joseph, Peterson, Edward, Crouch, Earl R., Suh, Donny Won , Christiansen, Stephen P. , Herlihy, Erin P. , Beck, Roy W. , Henderson, Robert J. , Saunders, Richard Anthony , Birch, Eileen E. , Manny, Ruth E. , Holmes, Jonathan M.

JAMA Ophthalmology | February 16, 2023 | Volume: 141 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 324

10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.6413 Get It

ImportanceGlaucoma can develop following cataract removal in children.ObjectiveTo assess the cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events (defined as glaucoma or glaucoma suspect) and factors associated with risk of these adverse events in the first 5 years after lensectomy prior to 13 years of age.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used longitudinal registry data collected at enrollment and annually for 5 years from 45 institutional and 16 community sites. Participants were children aged 12 years or younger with at least 1 office visit after lensectomy from June 2012 to July 2015. Data were analyzed from February through December 2022.ExposuresUsual clinical care after lensectomy.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe main outcomes were cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events and baseline factors associated with risk of these adverse events.ResultsThe study included 810 children (1049 eyes); 443 eyes of 321 children (55% female; mean [SD] age, 0.89 [1.97] years) were aphakic after lensectomy, and 606 eyes of 489 children (53% male; mean [SD] age, 5.65 [3.32] years) were pseudophakic. The 5-year cumulative incidence of glaucoma-related adverse events was 29% (95% CI, 25%-34%) in 443 eyes with aphakia and 7% (95% CI, 5%-9%) in 606 eyes with pseudophakia; 7% (95% CI, 5%-10%) of aphakic eyes and 3% (95% CI, 2%-5%) of pseudophakic eyes were diagnosed as glaucoma suspect. Among aphakic eyes, a higher risk for glaucoma-related adverse events was associated with 4 of 8 factors, including age less than 3 months (vs ≥3 months: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 2.88; 99% CI, 1.57-5.23), abnormal anterior segment (vs normal: aHR, 2.88; 99% CI, 1.56-5.30), intraoperative complications at time of lensectomy (vs none; aHR, 2.25; 99% CI, 1.04-4.87), and bilaterality (vs unilaterality: aHR, 1.88; 99% CI, 1.02-3.48). Neither of the 2 factors evaluated for pseudophakic eyes, laterality and anterior vitrectomy, were associated with risk of glaucoma-related adverse events.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study, glaucoma-related adverse events were common after cataract surgery in children; age less than 3 months at surgery was associated with elevated risk of the adverse events in aphakic eyes. Children with pseudophakia, who were older at surgery, less frequently developed a glaucoma-related adverse event within 5 years of lensectomy. The findings suggest that ongoing monitoring for the development of glaucoma is needed after lensectomy at any age.
Accuracy of the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision for Identifying Infantile Eye Disease
Xu, Timothy T. , Bothun, Cole E. , Hendricks, Tina M., Mansukhani, Sasha A. , Bothun, Erick D. , White, Launia J. , Mohney, Brian G.

Ophthalmic Epidemiology | November 25, 2021 | Volume: 29 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 649-655

10.1080/09286586.2021.2009520 Get It

De novo PBX1 variant in a patient with glaucoma, kidney anomalies, and developmental delay: An expansion of the CAKUTHED phenotype
Safgren, Stephanie L. , Olson, Rory J. , Bothun, Erick D. , Hanna, Christian , Klee, Eric W. , Schimmenti, Lisa A. , Vairo, Filippo , Bothun, Erick D , Hanna, Christian , Klee, Eric W , Schimmenti, Lisa A , Safgren, Stephanie L , Olson, Rory , Vairo, Filippo Pinto e

American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A | November 19, 2021 | Volume: 188 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 919-925

10.1002/ajmg.a.62576 Get It

AbstractAn infant was referred for evaluation of congenital glaucoma and corneal clouding. In addition, he had a pelvic kidney, hypotonia, patent ductus arteriosus, abnormal pinnae, and developmental delay. Exome sequencing identified a previously unpublished de novo single nucleotide insertion in PBX1 c.400dupG (NM_002585.3), predicted to cause a frameshift resulting in a truncated protein with loss of function (p.Ala134Glyfs*65). Identification of this loss of function variant supports the diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract syndrome with or without hearing loss, abnormal ears, or developmental delay (CAKUTHED). Here, we propose glaucoma as an extra‐renal manifestation associated with PBX1‐related disease due to the relationship of PBX1 with MEIS1, MEIS2, and FOXC1 transcription factors associated with eye development.
Orbital anatomy magnetic resonance imaging in diplopic versus non-diplopic patients after glaucoma drainage device placement
Shah, Saumya M. , Kilgore, Khin P. , Bothun, Erick D. , Khanna, Cheryl L. , Khanna, Cheryl L , Hunt, Christopher H.

European Journal of Ophthalmology | June 1, 2021 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 341-346

10.1177/11206721211020206 Get It

Purpose: New-onset persistent diplopia has become a common complication after glaucoma drainage device (GDD) placement. Understanding the orbital anatomy of such patients may provide information regarding risk of diplopia, GDD selection, and post-operative management. The purpose of this study was to examine the orbital anatomic differences in diplopic and non-diplopic patients after GDD implantation using high-resolution MRI. Methods: Seven eyes ( N = 4 with diplopia and N = 3 without diplopia after GDD placement) of seven patients that had undergone placement of Baerveldt 250 (B250), Baerveldt 350 (B350), or Ahmed FP7 (FP7) GDD were prospectively enrolled at a single institution. All patients underwent a 3.0T orbital MRI with 3D volumetric T1 and T2 weighted sequence. Images were analyzed for orbital volume, axial length, orbital distances, presence of superior rectus-lateral rectus (SR-LR) band, position of GDD, and SR-LR angles. Results: Patients with diplopia had smaller mean ± SD orbital axial (911.5 ± 111.8 mm 3 vs 931.7 ± 79.7 mm 3 ) and coronal volumes (1162.5 ± 145.5 mm 3 vs 1180 ± 34.6 mm 3 ) compared to non-diplopic patients. Average orbital rim distances were larger for the diplopic group. The SR-LR displacement angle for diplopic patients was larger (101.6° ± 8.1 vs 94.7° ± 17.6) while the SR-LR quadrantic angle (86.6° ± 4.2 vs 89.1° ± 4.3) was smaller. SR-LR band was present and intact in all patients. GDD malpositioning was not evident in any patient. Conclusion: The decreased orbital axial and coronal volumes as well as increased orbital rim distances in diplopic patients suggests the need for further studies to understand the role of orbital anatomy in occurrence of diplopia. Dynamic MRI imaging may be helpful in identifying differences in extraocular muscle function that reveal an etiology of diplopia in patients with GDD implantation.