Kilgore, Khin P.

Précis: Surgical and clinical success rates were similar among Ahmed FP7, and Baerveldt 250 and 350 glaucoma drainage devices at three years. Purpose: To compare rates of surgical and clinical success in patients with Ahmed FP7 (FP7), Baerveldt 250 (B250), or Baerveldt 350 (B350) glaucoma drainage devices (GDDs). Design: A retrospective cohort study. Methods: A total of 157 eyes of 129 adult patients with FP7, B250, B350 GDDs, and 190 eyes of 99 medically controlled glaucoma patients were enrolled at a tertiary care institution from August 2017 through July 2019. They were followed through April 2020. The main outcome measures included surgical and clinical failure. Surgical failure was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) outside 5–21 mm Hg, IOP reduced <20% below baseline, additional glaucoma surgery, GDD removal, or no light perception. Eyes that did not meet their goal IOP ranges or required secondary glaucoma interventions were deemed clinical failures. Results: A total of 43 (12.4%) FP7, 36 (10.4%) B250, 78 (22.5%) B350, and 190 (54.8%) medically treated control eyes were enrolled. By the postoperative year 3 visit, 10 (23.2%) FP7, 11 (30.6%) B250, and 32 (41.0%) B350 eyes had met a surgical failure criterion (P=0.127). There were no significant differences in the numbers of eyes meeting their IOP target ranges (P=0.510), and rates of secondary glaucoma surgeries (P=0.270). Overall clinical success was attained among 83.3% FP7, 81.8% B250, and 68.0% B350 eyes (P=0.447). Conclusions: The GDD groups were similar in their rates of success, based on both the surgical and clinical success definitions.

Purpose: New-onset persistent diplopia has become a common complication after glaucoma drainage device (GDD) placement. Understanding the orbital anatomy of such patients may provide information regarding risk of diplopia, GDD selection, and post-operative management. The purpose of this study was to examine the orbital anatomic differences in diplopic and non-diplopic patients after GDD implantation using high-resolution MRI. Methods: Seven eyes ( N = 4 with diplopia and N = 3 without diplopia after GDD placement) of seven patients that had undergone placement of Baerveldt 250 (B250), Baerveldt 350 (B350), or Ahmed FP7 (FP7) GDD were prospectively enrolled at a single institution. All patients underwent a 3.0T orbital MRI with 3D volumetric T1 and T2 weighted sequence. Images were analyzed for orbital volume, axial length, orbital distances, presence of superior rectus-lateral rectus (SR-LR) band, position of GDD, and SR-LR angles. Results: Patients with diplopia had smaller mean ± SD orbital axial (911.5 ± 111.8 mm 3 vs 931.7 ± 79.7 mm 3 ) and coronal volumes (1162.5 ± 145.5 mm 3 vs 1180 ± 34.6 mm 3 ) compared to non-diplopic patients. Average orbital rim distances were larger for the diplopic group. The SR-LR displacement angle for diplopic patients was larger (101.6° ± 8.1 vs 94.7° ± 17.6) while the SR-LR quadrantic angle (86.6° ± 4.2 vs 89.1° ± 4.3) was smaller. SR-LR band was present and intact in all patients. GDD malpositioning was not evident in any patient. Conclusion: The decreased orbital axial and coronal volumes as well as increased orbital rim distances in diplopic patients suggests the need for further studies to understand the role of orbital anatomy in occurrence of diplopia. Dynamic MRI imaging may be helpful in identifying differences in extraocular muscle function that reveal an etiology of diplopia in patients with GDD implantation.

Precis: Diplopia was present in ~20% of patients with Ahmed FP7 (FP7) or Baerveldt 350 (B350), compared with 5% to 6% in those with Baerveldt 250 (B250) or controls, suggesting risk of diplopia should be included in preoperative counseling. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of diplopia and strabismus in patients with B250, B350, or FP7 glaucoma drainage devices (GDD). Materials and Methods: In this cohort study, glaucoma patients 18 years and above who had received, or would be receiving, a B250, B350, or FP7 GDD, and medically treated controls were consecutively enrolled from August 8, 2017, through July 31, 2019. The Diplopia Questionnaire was administered ≥30 days postoperatively, and upon enrollment to the controls. All diplopic patients underwent orthoptic measurements, which were reviewed by a strabismus specialist. Patients with GDDs in quadrants other than superotemporal, multiple GDDs, or scleral buckles were excluded. Bonferroni correction was applied for pairwise comparisons. Results: Diplopia was reported in 23/129 (17.8%) GDD patients and 5/99 (5.1%) control patients (P=0.003): 8/35 (22.9%) FP7, 2/32 (6.3%) B250, and 13/62 (21.0%) B350, with significant differences between FP7 versus controls (P=0.014) and B350 versus controls (P=0.011). Diplopia was attributable to GDD in 2 FP7 (5.9%, 95% confidence interval: 0.7-19.2), 0 B250, and 4 B350 (6.5%, 95% confidence interval: 1.7-15.2) patients, without significant differences between the GDDs. Conclusions: Patients with the larger (B350) or the higher profile plate (FP7) GDDs were more likely to experience diplopia than controls, and diplopia was attributable to the GDD in ~6% of patients with either a FP7 or a B350 GDD. Since diplopia can affect patients’ quality of life, preoperative counseling for GDD surgery, particularly B350 and FP7, should include a discussion of the risk of diplopia.