Spiegel, Matthew R.

AbstractBackgroundHistologic acute graft pyelonephritis (HAGPN) after kidney transplantation (KT) has been assessed less frequently than urinary tract infections (UTIs) or clinical acute graft pyelonephritis. Risk factors for HAGPN, its association with graft loss, and measures that might prevent it are not known.MethodsWe performed a retrospective review of HAGPN cases identified from KT occurring between January 2008 and December 2017 at our institution. We compared the HAGPN cases to a randomly selected control group of KTs to identify risk factors using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. The association between HAGPN and graft loss was also assessed, similarly.ResultsHAGPN was identified in 46 of 1391 patients (cumulative incidence, 5% [95% CI, 3%–7%]) undergoing KT at a single center from January 2008 through December 2017 (median time to diagnosis, 241 days after KT; interquartile range, 122–755 days). Indications for biopsy were follow‐up of treated rejection (n = 20 [43%]), KT protocol biopsy (n = 19 [41%]), and acute kidney injury (n = 7 [15%]). Histologic rejection, UTI, and asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) were present in 23 (50%), 9 (20%), and 16 (35%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models comparing KT recipients with or without HAGPN (n = 46 and n = 138, respectively) showed that HAGPN was associated with urologic complication by day 30, delayed graft function, previous UTI or ASB, and a history of rejection. In the univariate and multivariate analyses, HAGPN was associated with an increased risk of graft loss.ConclusionHAGPN is an infrequent, unanticipated, and clinically significant complication of KT.

Abstract Background Histologic acute graft pyelonephritis (HAGPN) is a complication of kidney transplantation (KT) diagnosed serendipitously by renal biopsy. A retrospective review of 1391 patients who underwent KT at our institution between 2008 and 2017 identified 46 cases (cumulative incidence 5%). Rejection was present in 50% of biopsies demonstrating HAGPN, complicating management. The aims of this study were to identify risk factors and outcomes of HAGPN. Methods Recipient, donor, operative and post-transplant characteristics of 46 cases of HAGPN and 138 controls randomly selected from the 1345 patients who underwent KT between 2008 and 2017 were assessed in univariable and multivariable Cox regression models. Associations of HAGPN with death or graft failure were assessed in univariable models. Results In univariable analysis, characteristics associated with increased risk of HAGPN in order of decreasing hazard ratio (HR) were rejection (HR 10.82, 5.66-20.72), urinary tract infections (UTI) or asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) (HR 6.28, 3.43-11.50), urologic malfunction (UM) within 30 days of KT, (HR 5.34, 2.85-10.02), less than 4 matches at HLA A/B/DR loci (HR 3.74, 1.19-11.76), delayed graft function (DGF) (HR 2.1, 1.47-3.00), basiliximab induction (HR 1.59, 1.05-2.42), diabetes mellitus (DM) at KT (HR 1.52, 1.07-2.16), operative time (HR 1.11, 1.03-1.19) and cold ischemic time (CIT) (HR 1.05, 1.02-1.06). UM, rejection and UTI or ASB were the most significant risk factors based on clinical and statistical importance, and after adjusting for them, DM, transplant type, CIT, ureteral stent placement and DGF remained significant risk factors. In univariable analysis, ureteral stent placement at transplant (HR 0.60, 0.43-0.88) and living-related donor (HR 0.18, 0.04-0.78) were each associated with reduced risk of HAGPN which persisted after multivariable analysis. In univariable analysis, HAGPN was associated with death (HR 17.04, 7.93-39.31) and graft failure (HR 3.77, 1.73, 8.20). Conclusion HAGPN is an infrequent, unanticipated, clinically significant complication of renal transplantation. Post-transplant dysfunction of the allograft collection system may be a modifiable risk factor. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Precis: In this population-based study of 509 open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients over a 36-year period, we identified a decreased rate of developing dementia compared with the rate in the general population. Purpose: The aim was to determine the incidence of dementia and Alzheimer disease (AD) among patients with OAG. Patients and Methods: Retrospective, population-based cohort study. All residents of Olmsted County, Minnesota (≥40 y) who were diagnosed with OAG between January 1, 1965 and December 31, 2000, were eligible for inclusion in this study. A total of 509 patients were included over the 36-year period. The cumulative probability of developing dementia was calculated and compared with the population risk of dementia. Results: Of the 509 patients included, 300 (58.9%) were female, the median age was 67.5 years, and 278 patients (54.6%) had primary OAG. Other subgroups were pseudoexfoliation in 15.1%, treated ocular hypertension in 14.1%, normal tension glaucoma in 10.6%, and pigmentary glaucoma in 5.5% of the patients. Respectively, 118 (23.0%) and 99 (19.4%) patients developed dementia and AD. The 10-year cumulative probability of developing dementia and AD was 12.0% and 9.9%, with a 95% confidence interval of 9.3%-15.3% and 7.5%-13%, respectively. The observed 10-year incidence of dementia and AD were significantly lower than the expected population incidence (19.0% and 19.0%; P<0.001). Older age at diagnosis of glaucoma was a strong predictor for the development of dementia by multivariate analysis (hazard ratio: 3.31, 95% confidence interval: 2.61-4.20, P<0.001). Conclusion: The risk of developing dementia or AD was decreased in OAG patients compared with the general population. OAG with onset at a later age may present as a different etiopathogenetic entity compared with onset at a younger age, and represent the optic nerve findings of generalized neurodegenerative processes.

PolyQ ATXN3 is a pharmacodynamic marker for SCA3, and a SNP associated with the expanded allele may serve to specifically target mutant ATXN3 .

Background The impact of proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy on subsequent hemorrhage and mortality after variceal hemorrhage is unclear. Aim Evaluate the associations of PPI use with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and death within 30 days of undergoing esophageal variceal band ligation (EBL) separately in inpatient and outpatient settings. Methods Retrospective review of cirrhotic patients with variceal hemorrhage who underwent EBL between 2005 and 2018. Endoscopic findings, PPI use at admission (inpatients only), PPI use at discharge (inpatients and outpatients), and adverse outcomes data (liver transplant, UGIB, transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt, and death within 30 days of discharge or death during hospitalization) were reviewed. Results A total of 446 patients (164 inpatients, 282 outpatients) were included. The most commonly observed outcomes were death within 30 days of discharge in inpatients (12.8%), UGIB within 30 days of discharge in inpatients (21.3%), and UGIB within 30 days of discharge in outpatients (8.5%). For inpatients, prescription of PPI at discharge was associated with a lower risk of bleeding within 30 days (odds ratio: 0.30, P = 0.025) and death within 30 days (odds ratio = 0.16, P = 0.002). No other significant associations of PPI with death or UGIB were reported. Conclusion Post-EBL PPI therapy is associated with reduced risk of bleeding and death within 30 days after variceal hemorrhage in hospitalized patients.

7523 Background: tALL is a recently appreciated but poorly defined clinical entity. We define tALL as any prior exposure to cytotoxic chemotherapy and/or radiation for another malignancy, and we report a comparative analysis of characteristics, cytogenetics and outcomes for this subset among a modern unselected ALL cohort from the Mayo Clinic Cancer Center (MCCC). Methods: We performed a systematic search in the 3-site MCCC registry and included all patients (pts) diagnosed and received at least 1 cycle of ALL-directed therapy and/or underwent allogeneic transplantation (AlloHCT) between 2008-2018. Comparisons of characteristics between tALL and dnALL were made using a Wilcoxon rank sum test (continuous variables) and Fisher’s exact test (categorical variables). Time-to-event variables were compared using unadjusted Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results: 431 ALL pts were identified during the study period, including n = 69 (16%) classified as tALL. Median follow-up from diagnosis was 2.3 years (range 0-18 years). The most common prior malignancies among tALL pts were Breast (24.6%), Lymphoma (15.9%), Myeloid (15.9%), GU/GYN (14.5%) and Myeloma (11.6%). In comparison to dnALL, pts with tALL were significantly older (63.2 vs 45.2 years, P < 0.001), more often female (65.2% vs 39.8%, P < 0.001), less frequently Hispanic (3.5% vs 13.1%, P = 0.042); more often of B-lineage (92.8% vs 81.8%, P = 0.022). On review of cytogenetics, tALL pts more often had hypodiploidy/near triploidy (Ho/Tr) (21.7% vs 4.1%, P < 0.001), more often had monosomal (MDS-like) (33.3% vs 12.4%, P = 0.0047) and complex karyotype (38% vs 17.3%, P = 0.0069). Importantly, incidence of BCR/ABL-positive (Ph+) ALL was not significantly different. Latency period between exposure to prior cancer therapy and development of tALL was significantly longer for Ph+ compared to Ph-negative ALL (median 9 vs. 4 years, P = 0.007). Patients with tALL had a 3-year OS after diagnosis of 37% [vs 59.7% for dnALL (HR death 1.86, 95% CI 1.31-2.65, P < 0.001)]. However, the two groups did not differ significantly regarding occurrence of AlloHCT (HR = 0.91, 95% CI 0.63-1.31, P = 0.61) or post-AlloHCT survival (HR = 1.29, 95% CI 0.75-2.23, P = 0.35). Conclusions: Therapy-related ALL represents an important & unique clinical entity with poor prognosis & adverse cytogenetic features. Ph+ tALL has a longer latency and similar frequency in both tALL and dnALL. AlloHCT appears to be an appropriate treatment strategy, possibly abrogating the poor prognosis of tALL.

Background Patients with Eisenmenger syndrome are known to have a high incidence of sudden cardiac death ( SCD ), yet the underlying causes are not well understood. We sought to define the predictors of SCD in this population. Methods and Results A retrospective analysis of all patients with Eisenmenger syndrome from 2 large tertiary referral centers was performed. ECGs, prolonged ambulatory recordings, echocardiograms, and clinical histories were reviewed; and the cause of death was identified. A total of 246 patients (85 [34.6%] men) with a mean age of 37.3 (±14.2) years were followed up for a median of 7 years. Over the study period, 136 patients died, with 40 experiencing SCD and 74 experiencing cardiac death (sudden and nonsudden). Age, atrial fibrillation, prolonged QRS duration, complete heart block, right atrial enlargement, right bundle branch block, increased right atrial pressure, impaired biventricular function, and the presence of a pacemaker were associated with increased risk of SCD , whereas advanced pulmonary hypertension therapies were protective. Atrial fibrillation (11.45‐fold increased risk; P <0.001) and QRS duration ≥120 ms (2.06‐fold increased risk; P =0.034) remained significant predictors of SCD in the multivariate analysis, whereas advanced pulmonary hypertension therapies were strongly protective against SCD ( P <0.001). Conclusions Atrial arrhythmias, impaired ventricular function, and conduction system disease were associated with increased risk of SCD in this cohort of patients with Eisenmenger syndrome, providing an opportunity for early risk stratification and potential intervention. Clinical heart failure symptoms (New York Heart Association class ≥ II ) were predictive of increased mortality but not of SCD , suggesting a potential arrhythmic cause behind SCD .

Introduction Novel high-risk groups have been identified in adult ALL, including secondary (sALL) and Philadelphia-like ALL (Ph-like, based on CRLF2, IgH, ABL2, JAK2 and other tyrosine kinase translocations), and those with minimal residual disease >0.1% (MRD+) after induction therapy. Novel targeted therapies are now routinely incorporated into 1st line regimens, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BCR-ABL1-pos), rituximab (CD20+) and blinatumomab (Blina) for MRD+. The impact of these novel high risk groups and therapies after alloHCT is unknown; therefore, we evaluated their impact on overall survival (OS), relapse rate (REL), non-relapse mortality (NRM) and acute and chronic GVHD. Methods We evaluated pts receiving 1st Allo-HCT for ALL at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Phoenix, and Jacksonville) from 2008-2018 for outcomes of interest, specifically the impact of novel therapies and risk groups. Associations of patient factors with outcomes were examined using univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox proportional hazards regression models, where the cause-specific hazard of the given outcome was modeled to account for the competing risk of death. Results We identified 261 consecutive AlloHCT recipients during the study period. Median age at transplant was 48 years (18-72) and 147 (56.3%) were male. The median comorbidity (HCT-CI) score was 2 (0-8). 213 pts (81.6%) had B-lineage ALL, of which 85 (32.6%) were BCR-ABL-pos, 17 (6.5%) Ph-like (identified by FISH), 16 (6.1%) hypoploidy/near triploidy (Hy/Tri), and 67 (25.7%) pre-B ALL NOS. The remaining 48 (18.4%) had T-ALL. 30 pts (11.5%) had sALL (i.e. prior chemo/radiotherapy for another malignancy). HyperCVAD was the most common 1st line regimen (68.2%). 243 (93.1%) pts achieved Complete Remission (CR1) after induction therapy, and 203 (77.8%) were in CR1 at the time of alloHCT. Blina was administered for MRD+ in 14 pts (5.4%), and for relapsed/refractory ALL (R/R) in 13 (27% of R/R pts), 7 of whom received Blina as initial therapy for R/R. Donors were matched unrelated in 149 (57.1%), matched related in 98 (37.5%), and haploidentical in 14 (5.4%). Peripheral blood (PB) grafts were used in 233 (89.3%). 103 (54.5%) were donor:recipient (D:R) sex-matched, and 86 D:R mismatched [47 (24.9%) M:F; and 39 (20.6%) F:M]. Myeloablative conditioning was used for the majority (78.5%) mostly with Cy/TBI (60.5%). Standard GVHD prophylaxis regimens were used. Outcomes Median follow-up after transplant was 22.4 months (0.5-135), and 51 (19.5%) had REL. The 1, 2 and 5-year survival rates were 71.9%, 64.9%, and 54.1%, respectively (Figure 1). Acute GVHD developed in 144 (55.2%) and chronic GVHD in 100 (38.3%). Ph-like ALL, Blina for MRD+, Blina for R/R, sALL and CD20-pos had no independent impact on OS. In contrast, age>60, Hy/Tri, and >CR1 at alloHCT were associated with worse OS in UVA, however, in MVA only pre-B ALL NOS was associated with better OS. Female:male D:R status was associated with inferior OS. Blina for R/R disease was associated with increased risk of REL in UVA [HR 5.26 95% CI (1.33, 20.00), p=0.017], whereas other novel high risk groups had no impact on REL. In contrast, T-ALL, Hy/Tri and >CR1 at AlloHCT were associated with increased REL in UVA, but only T-ALL and Hy/Tri continued to predict for increased REL in MVA. Secondary ALL was associated with increased NRM in UVA [HR 1.96 95% CI (1.07, 3.57), p=0.028], whereas other novel high risk groups had no impact on NRM. In contrast, age>60, >CR1 at AlloHCT and D:R sex mismatch were associated with higher NRM in UVA, but only sex mismatch and >CR1 at AlloHCT were associated with higher NRM in MVA. TBI use was associated with higher risk of acute GvHD (p=0.008) and ATG use with lower risk chronic GVHD (p<0.001). Similarly non-PB grafts were associated with a lower risk of chronic GVHD (p=0.005). Results for OS, REL, NRM, acute and chronic GVHD analysis are shown in Table 1. Conclusion Novel high risk groups (CD20+, Ph-like and sALL) do not appear to adversely impact OS after alloHCT, although sALL was associated with increased risk of NRM. Interestingly, pre-B-ALL NOS appear to be associated with favorable OS. Novel targeted therapies also do not independently predict outcome, with the exception of Blina for R/R ALL which may be associated with REL after subsequent alloHCT (a subgroup for whom novel maintenance strategies should be explored). Our analysis highlights the importance of allo-HCT for novel high risk ALL subgroups. Disclosures Patnaik: Stem Line Pharmaceuticals.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kharfan-Dabaja:Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy. Foran:Agios: Honoraria, Research Funding.